This is our first steps using big data stuff like apache spark and hadoop.
We have a installed Cloudera CDH 5.3. From the cloudera manager we choose to install spark. Spark is up and running very well in one of the nodes in the cluster.
From my machine I made a little application that connects to read a text file stored on hadoop HDFS.
I am trying to run the application from Eclipse and it displays these messages
15/02/11 14:44:01 INFO client.AppClient$ClientActor: Connecting to master spark://10.62.82.21:7077...
15/02/11 14:44:02 WARN client.AppClient$ClientActor: Could not connect to akka.tcp://sparkMaster#10.62.82.21:7077: akka.remote.InvalidAssociation: Invalid address: akka.tcp://sparkMaster#10.62.82.21:7077
15/02/11 14:44:02 WARN Remoting: Tried to associate with unreachable remote address [akka.tcp://sparkMaster#10.62.82.21:7077]. Address is now gated for 5000 ms, all messages to this address will be delivered to dead letters. Reason: Connection refused: no further information: /10.62.82.21:7077
The application is has one class the create a context using the following line
JavaSparkContext sc = new JavaSparkContext(new SparkConf().setAppName("Spark Count").setMaster("spark://10.62.82.21:7077"));
where this IP is the IP of the machine spark working on.
Then I try to read a file from HDFS using the following line
sc.textFile("hdfs://10.62.82.21/tmp/words.txt")
When I run the application I got the
Check your Spark master logs, you should see something like:
15/02/11 13:37:14 INFO Remoting: Remoting started; listening on addresses :[akka.tcp://sparkMaster#mymaster:7077]
15/02/11 13:37:14 INFO Remoting: Remoting now listens on addresses: [akka.tcp://sparkMaster#mymaster:7077]
15/02/11 13:37:14 INFO Master: Starting Spark master at spark://mymaster:7077
Then when your connecting to the master, be sure to use exactly the same hostname as found in the logs above (do not use the IP address):
.setMaster("spark://mymaster:7077"));
Spark standalone is a bit picky with this hostname/IP stuff.
When you create your Spark master using the shell command "sbin/start-master.sh". go the the address http://localhost:8080 and check the "URL" row.
I notice no accepted answer, just for info I thought I'd mention a couple things.
First, in the spark-env.sh file in the conf directory, the SPARK_MASTER_IP and SPARK_LOCAL_IP settings can be hostnames. You don't want them to be, but they can be.
As noted in another answer, Spark can be a little picky about hostname vs. IP address, because of this resolved bug/feature: See bug here. The problem is, it's not clear if they "resolved" is simply by telling us to use IP instead of hostname?
Well I am having this same problem right now, and the first thing you do is check the basics.
Can you ping the box where the Spark master is running? Can you ping the worker from the master? More importantly, can you password-less ssh to the worker from the master box? Per 1.5.2 docs you need to be able to do that with a private key AND have the worker entered in the conf/slaves file. I copied the relevant paragraph at the end.
You can get a situation where the worker can contact the master but the master can't get back to the worker so it looks like no connection is being made. Check both directions.
Finally of all the combinations of settings, in a limited experiment just now I only found one that mattered: On the master, in spark-env.sh, set the SPARK_MASTER_IP to the IP address, not hostname. Then connect from the worker with spark://192.168.0.10:7077 and voila it connects! Seemingly none of the other config parameters are needed here.
Here's the paragraph from the docs about ssh and slaves file in conf:
To launch a Spark standalone cluster with the launch scripts, you
should create a file called conf/slaves in your Spark directory, which
must contain the hostnames of all the machines where you intend to
start Spark workers, one per line. If conf/slaves does not exist, the
launch scripts defaults to a single machine (localhost), which is
useful for testing. Note, the master machine accesses each of the
worker machines via ssh. By default, ssh is run in parallel and
requires password-less (using a private key) access to be setup. If
you do not have a password-less setup, you can set the environment
variable SPARK_SSH_FOREGROUND and serially provide a password for each
worker.
Once you have done that, using the IP address should work in your code. Let us know! This can be an annoying problem, and learning that most of the config params don't matter was nice.
Related
I am using WebHDFSSensor and for that we need to provide namenode. However, active namenode and standBy namenode change. I can't just provide current namenode host to webhdfs_conn_id. I have to create connection from both host. I tried to provide host as an array but it didn't work.
So my question here is , Lets consider I need connection with name webhdfs_default and I need it for 2 host w.x.y.z and a.b.c.d. How do I create that?
I have two Macs (both OS X EI Caption) at home, both are connected to same wifi. I want to install an spark cluster (with two workers) on this two computers.
Mac1 (192.168.1.2) is my master, with Spark 1.5.2, it is up and working well, and I can see the Spark UI at http://localhost:8080/ (also I see spark://Mac1:7077)
I also have run one slave on this machine (Mac1), and I see it under workers in the Spark UI.
Then, I have copied the Spark on the second machine (Mac2), and I am trying to run another Slave on Mac2 (192.168.2.9) by this command:
./sbin/start-slave.sh spark://Mac1:7077
But, it does not work: Looking at log it shows:
Failed to connect to master Mac1:7077
Actor not found for: ActorSelection[Anchor(akka.tcp://sparkMaster#Mac1:7077/),Path(/User/Master)]
Networking-wise, at Mac1, I can SSH to Mac2, and vice versa, but I cannot telnet to Mac1:7077.
I will appreciate it if you help me to solve this problem.
tl;dr Use -h option for ./sbin/start-master.sh, i.e. ./sbin/start-master.sh -h Mac1
Optionally, you could do ./sbin/start-slave.sh spark://192.168.1.2:7077 instead.
The reason is that binding to ports in Spark is very sensitive to what names and IPs are used. So, in your case, 192.168.1.2 != Mac1. They're different "names" in Spark, and that's why you can use ssh successfully as it uses name resolver on OS while it does not work at Spark level where the above condition holds, i.e. the "names" are not equal.
Likely a networking/firewall issue on the mac.
Also, your error message you copy/pasted reference port 7070. is this the issue?
using IP addresses in conf/slaves works somehow, but I have to use IP everywhere to address the cluster instead of host name.
SPARK + Standalone Cluster: Cannot start worker from another machine
I have installed a single node haodoop cluster on using Hortonworks/Ambari on Amazon's ec2 host.
Since I don't want this cluster running 24/7, I stop the instance when done. When I reboot the instance later, I get a new IP address and then ambari no longer is able to start the Hadoop related services.
Is there a way other than completely redeploying to reconfigure the cluster so the services will start?
It looks like the IP address lives in various xml files under /etc, in the postgres database table ambari, and possibly other places I haven't found yet.
I tried updating the xml files and postgres database with updated versions of the ip address, internal and external dns names as I could find them, but to no avail. I have not been able to restart the services.
The reason I am doing this is to possibly save the deployment time and data configuration on hdfs and other project specific setup each time I restart the host.
Any suggestions?
Thanks!
Elastic IP can be used. Also, since you mentioned it being a single node cluster - you can use localhost or private IP.
If you use elastic IP, your UIs will always be on the same public IP. However, if you use private IP or localhost and do not associate your instance with an elastic IP you will have to look for public IP everytime you start the instance and then connect to the web UI using the IP.
Thanks for the help, both Harman and TJ are correct. I haven't used an elastic IP because I might have more than one of these running and a time, and for now at least, I don't mind looking up the public ip address.
Harman's suggestion of using "localhost" as the fqdn when setting up ambari in the first place is a really good idea in retrospect. Unless I go through the whole setup again, that's water under the bridge for me, but I recommend this to others who might read this post.
In my case, I figured this out on my own before coming back to the page. The specific step I took was insanely simple after all, thanks to Occam's Razor.
I added the following line in /etc/hosts:
<new internal IP> <old internal dns name>
and then did
ambari-server restart. from the command line. Then I am able to restart all services after logging into ambari.
I am new to Spark and I am trying to run it on EC2. I follow the tutorial on spark webpage by using spark-ec2 to launch a Spark cluster. Then, I try to use spark-submit to submit the application to the cluster. The command looks like this:
./bin/spark-submit --class org.apache.spark.examples.SparkPi --master spark://ec2-54-88-9-74.compute-1.amazonaws.com:7077 --executor-memory 2G --total-executor-cores 1 ./examples/target/scala-2.10/spark-examples_2.10-1.0.0.jar 100
However, I got the following error:
ERROR SparkDeploySchedulerBackend: Application has been killed. Reason: All masters are unresponsive! Giving up.
Please let me know how to fix it. Thanks.
You're seeing this issue because the master node of your spark-standalone cluster cant open a TCP connection back to the drive (on your machine). The default mode of spark-submit is client which runs the driver on the machine that submitted it.
A new cluster mode was added to spark-deploy that submits the job to the master where it is then run on a client, removing the need for a direct connection. Unfortunately this mode is not supported in standalone mode.
You can vote for the JIRA issue here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2260
Tunneling your connection via SSH is possible but latency would be a big issue since the driver would be running locally on your machine.
I'm curious if you still having this issue ... But in case anyone is asking here is a brief answer. As clarified by jhappoldt, the master node of your spark-standalone cluster cant open a TCP connection back to the drive (on your local machine). Two workarounds are possible, tested and succeeded.
(1) From EC2 Management Console, create a new security group and add rules to enable TCP back and forth from your PC (public IP). (what I did was adding TCP rules inbound and outbound) ... Then add this security group to your master instance. (right click --> Networking --> Change security groups). Note: add it and don't remove the already established security groups.
This solution work well, but in your specific scenario, deploying your application from local machine to EC2 cluster, you will face further problems (resource related) so the next option is the best one
(2) Having your .jar file (or .egg) copy it to the master node using scp. You can check this link http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/AccessingInstancesLinux.html for information about how to do that; and deploy your application from the master node. Note: spark is already pre-insalled so you will do nothing but write the same exact command you write on your local machine from ~/spark/bin. This shall work perfect.
Are you executing the command on your local machine, or on the created EC2 node? If you're doing it locally, make sure port 7077 is open in the security settings, as its closed to the outside by default.
I'm trying to use the Dedoop application that runs using Hadoop and HDFS on Amazon EC2. The Hadoop cluster is set up and the Namenode JobTracker and all other Daemons are running without error.
But the war Dedoop.war application is not able to connect to the Hadoop Namenode after deploying it on tomcat.
I have also checked to see if the ports are open in EC2.
Any help is appreciated.
If you're using Amazon AWS, I highly recommend using Amazon Elastic Map Reduce. Amazon takes care of setting up and provisioning the Hadoop cluster for you, including things like setting up IP addresses, NameNode, etc.
If you're setting up your own cluster on EC2, you have to be careful with public/private IP addresses. Most likely, you are pointing to the external IP addresses - can you replace them with the internal IP addresses and see if that works?
Can you post some lines of the Stacktrace from Tomcat's log files?
Dedoop must etablish an SOCKS proxy server (similar to ssh -D port username#host) to pass connections to Hadoop nodes on EC2. This is mainly because Hadoop resolves puplic IPS to EC2-internal IPs which breaks MR Jobs submission and HDFS management.
To this end Tomcat must be configured to to etablish ssh connections. The setup procedure is described here.