I'd like to retrieve the unique enterprise number of a switch from an snmpget query
Is there any global OID to query?
I've tried with 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0 that is nearly ok but I'd like to retrieve the unique number for the enterprise for example HP ---> 11
Thanks a lot
SysobjectID (or the OID 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.2.0 ) is the way to get the unique enterprise OID. It is the number following the 1.3.6.1.4.1
Here is description from the MIB documentation
"The vendor's authoritative identification of the
network management subsystem contained in the entity.
This value is allocated within the SMI enterprises
subtree (1.3.6.1.4.1) and provides an easy and
unambiguous means for determining what kind of box' is
being managed. For example, if vendorFlintstones,
Inc.' was assigned the subtree 1.3.6.1.4.1.424242,
it could assign the identifier 1.3.6.1.4.1.424242.1.1
to its `Fred Router'."
Related
Is there a unique document value for each groups inside a names.nsf?
I would like to add and remove members inside a group over TDI Notes Connector.
I realize when I choose the ListName as link criteria, there are sometimes multiple lookup results.
Please note that we do have multiple domino servers. The names.nsf and the groups are replicating, so I'm looking for a document (unique ID) for a group which is not changing on different domino servers.
Thank you.
Every document in Notes/Domino has a UniversalID that is a unique identifier. Unfortunately this identifier is NOT saved in any field. But I googled a bit about TDI Notes Connector and found this page
And it seems that TDI adds the universalid as field to every document it retrieves as $$UNID:
The following Entry Attributes are added by the Connector itself (their values are not available as document items):
$$UNID - the Universal ID of the document (see "The $$UNID and
$$NoteID Attributes")
...
The $$UNID and $$NoteID Attributes
The Universal ID (UnID) is the value that uniquely identifies a Domino document. All replicas of the document have the same UnID and the UnID is not changed when the document is modified. This value should be used for tracking objects during synchronization. The Universal ID value is mapped to the $$UNID Attribute of Entry objects delivered by the Connector. The value of the $$UNID Attribute is a string of 32 characters, each one representing a hexadecimal digit (0-9, A-F).
So, a company I work at has an older ERP system that uses FoxPro 4 or 5. There is no support for the system, so I am trying to use skills that I don't possess. I'm good with Servers and even networks, but not coding. I have attached links to two similar errors that are occuring to two different users in different departments using different computers. Your help would be appreciated.
FoxPro Error 1
FoxPro Error 2
Well, the problem is exactly what it says on the tin. It looks like the issue is with the field BODY.COST. The field will have a maximum capacity, for example N(12, 2) would allow numbers up to 999999999.99 to be stored in it.
The system is attempting to put a number that is bigger than the defined capacity into this field. You can see it is a GATHER MEMVAR statement in both cases. This statement takes memory variables and updates a database table using them. One of the memory variables has ended up with a bigger number in it than the database field (looks like BODY.COST) that is intended to store it has capacity for.
Beyond that, with no support and no source code you are really limited to looking at what the user is trying to post and seeing if that gives you any clues. Is that the extent of the error dumps or are those just snippets?
The messages are saying that you are trying to store a larger value than the field would accept. This happens with numeric and float fields in Foxpro. In both of the messages, the table was indirectly aliased as "BODY" and the problematic field is "COST".
As a solution, using VFP5 (do not use a later version - there weren't VFP4), you can make all the numeric and float fields to either Currency or Double data type.
Currency has a high certainity and suggested for monetary values (need not be monetary). It is in the range of –922337203685477.5808 to 922337203685477.5807. That range is actually above what a numeric/float field can support.
If you think that is not enough range, than you can use double (something like -10^327 to 10^304 - VFP has a precision of 15 digits, you lose precision beyond that).
I would go with Currency.
I am using makemsi's command 'Mergemodule' to include Microsoft's redistribuitable 'policy_8_0_Microsoft_VC80_DebugCRT_x86_x64.msm' to my msi.
The ppwizard preprocessor gives me error 'The underlying OLE container used to store binary data has has a key limit of 62 characters.This was exceeded by 2 character(s), the key '_MAKEMSI_Cabs.policy_8_0_Microsoft_VC80_DebugCRT_x86_x64.msm.cab'
I believe this happens because binary data is stored inside msi as OLE Stream with key created by concatenating the table name and the values of the record's primary keys using a period delimiter.The Limit for this key is 62 characters which exceeds here with '_MAKEMSI_Cabs.policy_8_0_Microsoft_VC80_DebugCRT_x86_x64.msm.cab' where '_MAKEMSI_Cabs' is the table Name and 'policy_8_0_Microsoft_VC80_DebugCRT_x86_x64.msm.cab' is value.
Can anyone please suggest a work around for this. Thanks in advance.
I am trying to create an application for work. The app will be used internally and should allow us to assign some barcode numbers to our product SKUs. I am using Visual Studio / Basic 2010 Express to build this as my very limited and beginners experience is with VS 2010 Express.
I'll give a bit of information about how I see this application working and then I'll get on with my actual question:
I see the app allowing us to create a new Product in the database by a user entering the SKU and description of the product and then the app will assign this product the next available base number for the barcode and from there the app will (if required) generate the correct EAN13 and GTIN14 barcodes and store them against that SKU.
As a company we have a large range of barcode numbers we can use and we have split this large range up so that the first 50,000 (for example) are for our EAN13 codes, the next 50K are for our GTIN14 codes for Inner Cartons and the remaining 50K are for Master Cartons.
So in order to achieve this I have my Product table which contains the fields 'SKU', 'Description' and 'BarcodeBase'. I have managed to set the BarcodeBase field as unique and I am attempting to use AutoIncrement(Seed & Step) to make sure that this assigns the product a base barcode (before I calculate the check digit) that falls within the EAN13 range as described above...
So finally my question is: Is there a way I can put an upper limit on AutoIncrement so that on the off chance, way way in the future, the base barcode number will not overflow into the next range?
I've been googling unsuccessfully for an answer and I am only coming across things which talk about the data type of the field having a limit. For example the upper limit of an Int32 type. Through my searches I have become vaguely aware of the 'Expression' property of the field and also the possibility of coding a partial class - but I don't know if that is the right direction to go in or if there is something much simpler that I am overlooking / have not found.
I would really appreciate any help!
Edit: As per GrandMasterFlush's comment - I have added a local database to my VS project. So I think I am using a SQL Server Compact 3.5 db.
Use a CHECK constraint, e.g.:
ALTER TABLE dbo.Product ADD CONSTRAINT ...
CHECK (BarcodeBase BETWEEN 1 AND 50000);
I suggest you do not make BarcodeBase an IDENTITY column in the Product table (IDENTITY is the feature that you are referring to as "autoincrement"). IDENTITY is really designed for surrogate key use only and isn't ideal for meaningful business data. You can't update an IDENTITY column, it isn't necessarily sequential, may have gaps in the number sequence and you also only get to use one IDENTITY column per table. Instead of using IDENTITY in the Product table you can generate the sequence elsewhere, for example by incrementing a single value stored in a single row table.
I am trying to build a client to get values from an snmp enabled device using snmp4j. Using the OID and index number i can fetch the name and serial number of the device. But i heard that index number is not constant and it keeps changing.
Thou i may find the required index number (for example, of a network interface) among the SNMP OIDs, sometimes we may not completely rely on the index number always staying the same.
Index numbers may be dynamic - they may change over time and your item may stop working as a consequence.
SO i need to find a way as to how to fetch the index number dynamically. Or is there any way that i can get the serial number without hard coding the serial number.
One OID might have 150 index numbers each having an different value. i need to get a particular info from that table.
It's (unfortunately) not unusual that index numbers change. For example, some equipment will re-order some tables on reboot.
You probably already realized that if the index values are volatile, you won't be able to fetch the data in one request. But you could do it by "walking" the table.
Using the GetNextRequest, you can start at the column headers, and then proceed through the table, fetching all the data or just individual columns. For a more detailed example, see section 4.2.2.1 of RFC 1905:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1905
Assuming that there is some column in the table which will identify the correct card, you could either:
Walk only the identifying column, and from the values find the index of the card you want, then issue a single GetRequest for the serial number of that card
(More efficient) Walk both columns (identifier and serial number) by requesting those two column headers in the first request, etc. In the resulting data set, find the data for you card.