Is there a unique document value for each groups inside a names.nsf?
I would like to add and remove members inside a group over TDI Notes Connector.
I realize when I choose the ListName as link criteria, there are sometimes multiple lookup results.
Please note that we do have multiple domino servers. The names.nsf and the groups are replicating, so I'm looking for a document (unique ID) for a group which is not changing on different domino servers.
Thank you.
Every document in Notes/Domino has a UniversalID that is a unique identifier. Unfortunately this identifier is NOT saved in any field. But I googled a bit about TDI Notes Connector and found this page
And it seems that TDI adds the universalid as field to every document it retrieves as $$UNID:
The following Entry Attributes are added by the Connector itself (their values are not available as document items):
$$UNID - the Universal ID of the document (see "The $$UNID and
$$NoteID Attributes")
...
The $$UNID and $$NoteID Attributes
The Universal ID (UnID) is the value that uniquely identifies a Domino document. All replicas of the document have the same UnID and the UnID is not changed when the document is modified. This value should be used for tracking objects during synchronization. The Universal ID value is mapped to the $$UNID Attribute of Entry objects delivered by the Connector. The value of the $$UNID Attribute is a string of 32 characters, each one representing a hexadecimal digit (0-9, A-F).
Related
I am trying to allow the user to search on any of 4 criteria and have the rest of the 3 remaining field data validate based on the first search for selection.
I have four fields that I am trying to make dependent drop downs for the remaining 3 based on what you search for 1st. For example:
Scenario 1 - I search the data range validation for NAME and select a name in Cell L2.
I want the Phone, Email and Address to become dependent on the name was chosen (as there may be multiple records with the name of the person chosen).
I have accomplished this by using a secondary filter formula to filter address based on the name chosen and then applied data validation from the filter.
My problem is that I can't seem to figure out how to do the same thing if they pick the address first. Because my data validation is set on the filtered values and not the entire database. If they picked the address first, I want to validate based on ALL addresses and then filter-validate the NAME, PHONE and EMAIL.
I really just want them to be able to search whatever of the 4 criteria and then validate the other 3 on that result.
Any thoughts would help.
You can see my formula for filtering Addresses based on the Name selection in Cell S2 of the Customer Record Tab.
=if(L6="Address",filter('Sample Data'!$C:$C,'Sample Data'!$E:$E=L6),IF(L6="Phone",filter('Sample Data'!$C:$C,'Sample Data'!$D:$D=L3),IF(L6="Email",filter('Sample Data'!$C:$C,'Sample Data'!$J:$J=L4),L2)))
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1E7adi88aEgvdV4ao8unbMHgZLEyu5CCRdTOjv8thjtc/edit#gid=1427488050
Select Name and only the Phones, Emails and Addresses for that selected name can be selected.
Select the Address and only the Names, Phones and Emails for that Address can be selected.
Same for Phone and for Email
Is there any common URL to navigate to serviceNow portal with number (INC/REQ/CHG)?
I have an common URL (INC/REQ/CHG) which can be navigated to ServiceNow portal by sys_id:
https://XXXXdev.service-now.com/nav_to.do?uri=task.do?sys_id=XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
I have tried below URLs for incident but it is creating a new record
XXXXdev.service-now.com/nav_to.do?uri=incident.do?sysparm_order=INC0XXX
OR
XXXXdev.service-now.com/nav_to.do?uri=incident.do?number=INC00XXXX
No problem if there are different URLs for INC, REQ or CHG, I want a URL to see record by giving a number but not with sys_id.
From what you have described I believe you want:
https://[instance].service-now.com/incident.do?sysparm_query=number=INC1234567
https://[instance].service-now.com/sc_request.do?sysparm_query=number=REQ1234567
https://[instance].service-now.com/change_request.do?sysparm_query=number=CHG1234567
Or the catch all
https://[instance].service-now.com/task.do?sysparm_query=number=INC1234567
https://[instance].service-now.com/task.do?sysparm_query=number=REQ1234567
https://[instance].service-now.com/task.do?sysparm_query=number=CHG1234567
(see https://docs.servicenow.com/bundle/helsinki-servicenow-platform/page/use/navigation/concept/c_NavigatingByURL.html)
If you want to keep the outer frames of SN then use the nav_to.do?uri= version e.g.
https://[instance].service-now.com/nav_to.do?uri=sc_request.do?sysparm_query=number=REQ1234567
which is what #kirk has described.
You have a couple of options depending on what you're trying to do exactly.
Email
If you're trying to send this link in an email notification, you can use ${URI_REF} for the table that the notification is generated on.
This will automatically generate a link to the record.
You can also dot walk to another table, for example
Catalog Task up to the Requested Item ${request_item.URI_REF}
Current task up top the parent record ${parent.URI_REF}
Calculated
If you are looking to generate this based on some calculated method you can do this with the table name and the record number.
https://instance.service-now.com/nav_to.do?uri=/table_name.do?sysparm_query=number=RECORD_NUMBER
For instance for a Change record with record number CHG0000123
https://instance.service-now.com/nav_to.do?uri=/change.do?sysparm_query=number=CHG0000123
You may also reference a record by using a parent table, though this is more for an interesting note rather than a good practice. INC, REQ, and CHG all inherit from the Task table so you could do this.
https://instance.service-now.com/nav_to.do?uri=/task.do?sysparm_query=number=CHG0000123
The drawback to using the parent table is that it won't have all fields and won't have the proper form layout. Mostly just an interesting exercise.
You may also leverage the text search and the system will pull up a record that matches the record number.
https://instance.service-now.com/nav_to.do?uri=/textsearch.do?sysparm_query=number=CHG0000123
Note that this works out of the box and you could have configured search to not behave that way.
Business Rule
Another method inside of a Business Rule is to use the current.getLink() method. This will return a URL to the record. If you would like to add to a journal entry, you could use this
var currentLink = "[code]<a href='" + current.getLink() + "'>" + current.number + "</a>[/code]";
var journal = gs.getMessage("The new record is {0}", [currentLink]);
gr.work_notes = journalEntry;
Your initial URI will actually work with a NUMBER (like INC000001), assuming that number is actually the display field for the table (as it is by default):
https://XXXX.service-now.com/incident.do?sys_id=NUMBER
When you do a sys_id= lookup, we first lookup by the sys_id column. If it's not found there, we try a lookup on the display value (number), which will load the form exactly as you expect.
{yourinstance}.service-now.com/nav_to.do?uri=incident.do?sys_id={incidentNumber}
Replace incidentNumber with your incident number .
I have a list of ListingKeys that are updated since 2015-01-01
Then Id like to fetch all the metadata and values based on that field (listingKey). I'm expecting to search by arrays of listingKeys.
So my DMQL2 query is
(Listingkey=10026515129,10026515170,10039422998,10039789519,10039789557,10039789596,10262631304,10383785355,10383787516,10389025847)
And the response from MRIS is
[PHRETS\Exceptions\RETSException]
'Listingkey' is not a valid search item for SearchType = 'Property' and Class = 'MRIS Residential'.
I'm surprised that 'Listingkey' is not searchable, its unlikely because its unique and a primary key, if we want to sync our database we could easily do this by ListingKey.
I'd suggest using www.retsmd.com to verify that the 2nd parameter in your Search request is a valid class name under the Property resource. Unless the server is misreporting something, I'd doubt that "MRIS Residential" is the value you want for the 2nd parameter.
If you could paste the Search line you're using completely, that would help. I regularly pull listings by primary key from that server so I know the software is capable of it.
I am creating a database for software product keys at work which means having to document every product key in notes. I want to be able to say in a column how many of these product keys are assigned and how many are not. I have assigned a basic binary value to every form which can either make it assigned or not and leads to give the form a structure such as this ( the keys are false obviously)
I want to add a line next to Office 2013 that says XX Assigned, XX Unassigned for instance and I want this to work across every possible product I add to the database. Any ideas?
I am not sure that it is possible exactly as you wanted.
After "Assigned" column add a column, with 1 set as the column value (look at the picture below).
Open the second tab of the created column and set "Totals" to "Total" and check "Hide detail rows".
In this case just after "Assigned" column there will be a column with number of entries, which belong to this category.
I need to identify unique emails from an inbox by storing the EntryId. I would like to save space on my unique index by only storing the portion of EntryId that applies to the message (rather than containing folders).
Can anyone confirm that it is possible to parse out the EntryId and retrieve sections that apply to only the email item? If so, which characters am I looking for (looks like the last 47, but I would like to validate that assumption)?
I am using Outlook 2007 with Exchange 2003.
Exchange entry id contains 4 bytes prefix, muid (16 bytes), source key of the parent folder, source key of the message itself.
If you are in online mode, you can retrieve the PR_SOURCE_KEY property of the message.