What happens when we decommission a datanode while write is happening to HDFS on that node?
Will it stop writing the data to HDFS on that node and decommision that node or will it finish writing and then decommision it.
I found a solution for this in cloudera.
Decommissioning applies to only to HDFS DataNode, MapReduce TaskTracker, YARN NodeManager, and HBase RegionServer roles. If the host has other roles running on it, those roles are stopped/killed.
http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera/en/documentation/core/latest/topics/cm_mc_decomm_host.html
As staded at the Hadoop wiki:
Hadoop offers the decommission feature to retire a set of existing data-nodes. The nodes to be retired should be included into the exclude file, and the exclude file name should be specified as a configuration parameter dfs.hosts.exclude. This file should have been specified during namenode startup.
The exclude file property names a file that contains a list of hosts that are not permitted to connect to the namenode.
When that occurs, I think an IOException is gotten by the process writting to the decommissioned node.
After you add the entries for the nodes that you want to decommission. You need to execute namenode -refreshnodes command to start actual process of decommission. Actual process of decomission is very slow. All the current tasks either read/write will continue as per usual. But all future writes are not allowed but reads are allowed with least priority. Meanwhile all the blocks are replicated to other nodes.
Related
I couldn't understand the difference between secondary name node and standby name node and backup name node. I am looking for in depth understanding of these terms. Kindly help me out with this.
Secondary namenode is just a helper for Namenode.
It gets the edit logs from the namenode in regular intervals and applies to fsimage.
Once it has new fsimage, it copies back to namenode.
Namenode will use this fsimage for the next restart, which will reduce the startup time.
Secondary Namenode's whole purpose is to have a checkpoint in HDFS. Its just a helper node for namenode. That’s why it also known as checkpoint node.
But, It cant replace namenode on namenode's failure.
So, Namenode still is Single-Point-of-Failure.
To overcome this issue; STANDBY-NAMENODE comes into picture.
It does three things:
merging fsimage and edits-log files. (Secondary-namenode's work)
receive online updates of the file system meta-data, apply them to its memory state and persist them on disks just like the name-node does.
Thus at any time the Backup node contains an up-to-date image of the namespace both in memory and on local disk(s).
Cluster will switch over to the new name-node (this standby-node) if the active namenode dies.
However, the answer explained above is satisfactory but I want to add some points to it.
About Standby-Namenode
Both active and standby Namenode use a shared directory and standby Namenode sync through that directory from time to time so there must be no delay in activating it if the active Namenode goes down.
But the main factor is about the block reports, Block reports are not written in edit-logs, they are stored in local disk space. So syncing with a shared directory is not enough.
To avoid this conflict, data-nodes has the addresses of both the name-nodes,
and they send the block reports to both of them but they only follow the block commands coming from the active Namenode.
Hope this is helpful
Standby Node : In the case of an unplanned event such as a machine crash, the cluster would be unavailable until an operator restarted the NameNode.Planned maintenance events such as software or hardware upgrades on the NameNode machine could result in whole cluster downtime. So a Standby Node comes in action which is nothing but a backup for the Name Node .
Secondary NameNode : It is one of the poorest named part of the hadoop ecosystem usually beginners get confused thinking of it as a backup.Secondary NameNode in hadoop is a specially dedicated node in HDFS cluster whose main function is to take checkpoints of the file system metadata present on namenode. It is not a backup namenode. It just checkpoints namenode’s file system namespace. The Secondary NameNode is a helper to the primary NameNode but not replace for primary namenode.
The Secondary namenode maps the fsimage and the edit log transactions periodically stores them in a shared storage location in case of HA enabled HDFS Cluster.
In other hand, Standby node has the ability to transfer the latest built fsimage to the Active NameNode via HTTP Get call .
So the main difference between Secondary and standby namenode is secondary namenode does not upload the merged Fsimage with editlogs to active namenode
where as the standby node uplods the merged new image back to active Namenode.
So the NameNode need to fetch the state from the Secondary NameNode
I want to delete datanode from my hadoop cluster, but don't want to lose my data. Is there any technique so that data which are there on the node which I am going to delete may get replicated to the reaming datanodes?
What is the replication factor of your hadoop cluster?
If it is default which is generally 3, you can delete the datanode directly since the data automatically gets replicated. this process is generally controlled by name node.
If you changed the replication factor of the cluster to 1, then if you delete the node, the data in it will be lost. You cannot replicate it further.
Check all the current data nodes are healthy, for these you can go to the Hadoop master admin console under the Data nodes tab, the address is normally something link http://server-hadoop-master:50070
Add the server you want to delete to the files /opt/hadoop/etc/hadoop/dfs.exclude using the full domain name in the Hadoop master and all the current datanodes (your config directory installation can be different, please double check this)
Refresh the cluster nodes configuration running the command hdfs dfsadmin -refreshNodes from the Hadoop name node master
Check the Hadoop master admin home page to check the state of the server to remove at the "Decommissioning" section, this may take from couple of minutes to several hours and even days depending of the volume of data you have.
Once the server is shown as decommissioned complete, you may delete the server.
NOTE: if you have other services like Yarn running on the same server, the process is relative similar but with the file /opt/hadoop/etc/hadoop/yarn.exclude and then running yarn rmadmin -refreshNodes from the Yarn master node
I have installed a hadoop cluster with total 3 machines, with 2 nodes acting as datanodes and 1 node acting as Namenode and as well as a Datanode.
I wanted to clear certain doubts regarding hadoop cluster installation and architecture.
Here is a list of questions I am looking answers for----
I uploaded a data file around 500mb size in the cluster and then checked the hdfs report.
I noticed that the namenode I made is also occupying 500mb size in the hdfs, along with datanodes with a replication factor of 2.
The problem here is that I want the namenode not to store any data on it, in short i dont want it to work as a datanode as it is also storing the file I am uploading. So what is the way of making it only act as a Master Node and not like a datanode?
I tried running the command hadoop -daemon.sh stop on the Namenode to stop the datanode services on it but it wasnt of any help.
How much metadata does a Namenode generate for a filesize typically of 1 GB? Any approximations?
Go to conf directory inside your $HADOOP_HOME directory on your master. Edit the file named slaves and remove the entry corresponding to your name node from it. This way you are only asking the other two nodes to act as slaves and name node as only the master.
I'm curious if you could essentially separate the HDFS filesystem from the MapReduce framework. I know that the main point of Hadoop is to run the maps and reduces on the machines with the data in question, but I was wondering if you could just change the *.xml files to change the configuration of what machine the jobtracker, namenode and datanodes are running on.
Currently, my configuration is a 2 VMs setup: one (the master) with Namenode, Datanode, JobTracker, Tasktracker (and the SecondaryNameNode), the other (the slave) with DataNode, Tasktraker. Essentially, what I want to change is have the master with NameNode DataNode(s), JobTracker, and have the slave with only the TaskTracker to perform the computations (and later on, have more slaves with only TaskTrackers on them; one on each). The bottleneck will be the data transfer between the two VMs for the computations of maps and reduces, but since the data at this stage is so small I'm not primarily concerned with it. I would just like to know if this configuration is possible, and how to do it. Any tips?
Thanks!
You don't specify this kind of options in the configuration files.
What you have to do is to take care of what kind of deamons you start on each machine(you call them VMs but I think you mean machines).
I suppose you usually start everything using the start-all.sh script which you can find in the bin directory under the hadoop installation dir.
If you take a look at this script you will see that what it does is to call a number of sub-scripts corresponding to starting the datanodes, tasktrackers and namenode, jobtracker.
In order to achive what you've said, I would do like this:
Modify the masters and slaves files as this:
Master file should contain the name of machine1
Slaves should contain the name of machine2
Run start-mapred.sh
Modify the masters and slaves files as this:
Master file should contain the machine1
Slaves file should contain machine1
Run start-dfs.sh
I have to tell you that I've never tried such a configuration so I'm not sure this is going to work but you can give it a try. Anyway the solution is in this direction!
Essentially, what I want to change is have the master with NameNode DataNode(s), JobTracker, and have the slave with only the TaskTracker to perform the computations (and later on, have more slaves with only TaskTrackers on them; one on each).
First, I am not sure why to separate the computation from the storage. The whole purpose of MR locality is lost, thought you might be able to run the job successfully.
Use the dfs.hosts, dfs.hosts.exclude parameters to control which datanodes can connect to the namenode and the mapreduce.jobtracker.hosts.filename, mapreduce.jobtracker.hosts.exclude.filename parameters to control which tasktrackers can connect to the jobtracker. One disadvantage of this approach is that the datanodes and tasktrackers are started on the nodes which are excluded and aren't part of the Hadoop cluster.
Another approach is to modify the code to have a separate slave file for the tasktracker and the datanode. Currently, this is not supported in Hadoop and would require a code change.
Please explain what's dfs.include file purpose and how to define it.
I've added a new node to the Hadoop cluster but it's not identified by the namenode. In one of the posts I found that dfs.include can resolve this issue.
Thank you in advance,
Vladi
Just including the node name in the dfs.include and mapred.include is not sufficient. The slave file has to be updated on the namenode/jobtracker. The tasktracker and the datanode have to be started on the new node and the refreshNodes command has to be run on the NameNode and the JobTracker to make them aware of the new node.
Here are the instructions on how to do this.
According to the 'Hadoop : The Definitive Guide'
The file (or files) specified by the dfs.hosts and mapred.hosts properties is different from the slaves file. The former is used by the namenode and jobtracker to determine which worker nodes may connect. The slaves file is used by the Hadoop control scripts to perform cluster-wide operations, such as cluster restarts. It is never used by the Hadoop
daemons.