I am trying to make a XBAP application communicating with a webservice with login.
But I want the user to skip the login step if they already logged in the last seven days.
I got it to work using html/aspx.
But it fails continuously with XBAP.
While debugging, the application is given full trust.
This is the code I have so far to write the cookie:
protected static void WriteToCookie(
string pName,
Dictionary<string, string> pData,
int pExiresInDays)
{
// Set the cookie value.
string data = "";
foreach (string key in pData.Keys)
{
data += String.Format("{0}={1};", key, pData[key]);
}
string expires = "expires=" + DateTime.Now.AddDays(pExiresInDays).ToUniversalTime().ToString("r");
data += expires;
try
{
Application.SetCookie(new Uri(pName), data);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
}
}
And this is what I have to read the cookie:
protected static Dictionary<string, string> ReadFromCookie(
string pName)
{
Dictionary<string, string> data = new Dictionary<string, string>();
try
{
string myCookie = Application.GetCookie(new Uri(pName));
// Returns the cookie information.
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(myCookie) == false)
{
string[] splitted = myCookie.Split(new char[] { ';' }, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries);
string[] sub;
foreach(string split in splitted)
{
sub = split.Split(new char[] { ':' }, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries);
if (sub[0] == "expires")
{
continue;
}
data.Add(sub[0], sub[1]);
}
}
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
}
return data;
}
The pName is set with:
string uri = "http://MyWebSiteName.com";
When the user authenticate the first time, I call the WriteToCookie function and set it with 7 days to expire.
It looks like everything is fine as I get no exception of error messages. (I have a break point in the catch)
After that, I close the session and start it again.
The first thing I do is a ReadFromCookie.
Then I get an exception with the following message: No more data is available
So my application is sending the user automatically back to the login screen.
I also tried to do a ReadFromCookie right after the WriteToCookie in the same session, and I get the same error.
Application.SetCookie(new Uri("http://MyWebSiteName.com/WpfBrowserApplication1.xbap"), "Hellllo");
string myCookie2 = Application.GetCookie(new Uri("http://MyWebSiteName.com/WpfBrowserApplication1.xbap"));
It seems to me that the cookie is not even written in the first place.
So I am guessing I am doing something wrong.
Maybe the uri I am using is wrong. Is there a specific format needed for it?
Just like you need a very specific format for the expire date.
I have been searching quite a lot of internet for a good sample/tutorial about using cookies with XBAP, and I could not find anything really well documented or tested.
A lot of people say that it works, but no real sample to try.
A lot of people also handle the authentication in html, then go to the XBAP after successfully reading/writing the cookies.
I would prefer a full XBAP solution if possible.
To answer some questions before they are asked, here are the project settings:
Debug:
Command line arguments: -debug -debugSecurityZoneURL http://MyWebSiteName.com "C:\Work\MyWebSiteName\MyWebSiteNameXBAP\bin\Debug\MyWebSiteNameXBAP.xbap"
Security:
Enable ClickOnce security settings (Checked)
This is a full trust application (selected)
I also created a certificate, and added it the 3 stores like explained in "publisher cannot be verified" message displayed
So I do not have the warning popup anymore. I just wanted to make sure that it was not a permission issue.
Finally found the answer to this problem.
Thanks for this CodeProject I was finally able to write/read cookies from the XBAP code.
As I had guessed, the URI needs to be very specific and you cannot pass everything you want in it.
What did the trick was using: BrowserInteropHelper.Source
In the end the read/write code looks like:
Application.SetCookie(BrowserInteropHelper.Source, data);
string myCookie = Application.GetCookie(BrowserInteropHelper.Source);
It looks like you cannot use ';' to separate your own data.
If you do so, you will only get the first entry in your data.
Use a different separator (ex: ':') and then you can get everything back
The data look like this:
n=something:k=somethingElse;expires=Tue, 12 May 2015 14:18:56 GMT ;
The only thing I do not get back from Application.GetCookie is the expire date.
Not sure if it is normal or not. Maybe it is flushed out automatically for some reason. If someone knows why, I would appreciate a comment to enlighten me.
At least now I can read/write data to the cookie in XBAP. Yeah!
Related
I wrote an add-in for Outlook years ago that adds entries to a database based on the Item's ConversationIndex/ConversationId properties. This works great and remains uniform across all clients interacting with the messages (e.g. "Bob" can see that "Mary" already processed this message because an entry with the ConversationIndex already exists).
I'm now trying to move this piece to a service (and connect via the EWS API) but I'm not having good luck matching these properties with the values coming from Outlook. For example:
The Outlook Add-In will give me the following values for a specific email I'm targeting:
ConversationID: 6B6369F5023EA646AA7BC161274BDAE8
ConversationIndex: 0101CF3C7EEC6B6369F5023EA646AA7BC161274BDAE8
However, from the EWS API I get the following:
ConversationID: AAQkADFhZThkNmJmLTlkODItNDQyZS1hM2YxLTQ2NWNkMTllYjhjOQAQAGtjafUCPqZGqnvBYSdL2ug=
ConversationIndex: new byte[]{1,1,207,60,126,236,107,99,105,245,2,62,166,70,170,123,193,97,39,75,218,232}
I recognize the first as a Base64 encoded string, however what I get decoded doesn't look like anything I recognize (or can decipher). Is there anyone familiar with this, or who can help to get these two values to align? I can only imagine these properties come from the exchange server is some fashion, but the Client probably performs some cleansing whereas the EWS API just gives me the raw value (less the Base64 for what I presume transport purposes given the XML medium).
If anyone is familiar with this or has done it before I would greatly appreciate any guidance.
Side Note:
There are probably better ways to identify emails but for now I'm stuck with trying to keep these two synonymous. Modifying the outlook add-in isn't really an option, and once I migrate a 1:1 translation to the server (and drop the add-in) I'll have flexibility changing how it work. But for now I need them to run side-by-side. I need to be able to see processes made within Outlook from the web server and vise-versa.
Just found out (I think).
Breakdown
With more Googling and a bit more effort I believe I was able to make them align 1:1 using the following:
ConversationId
This is apparently an assembled value made up of several properties. Luckily I was able to find a method Woodman posted re-implementing the original algorithm used by Outlook here. With some minor modifications (to work with EWS instead of Outlook) I was able to get it to work.
ConversationIndex
This turned out to simply be a matter of using the BitConverter (and removing the hyphens). Easy peasy.
Final Result:
public static class EwsEmailMessageExtensions
{
private const int c_ulConvIndexIDOffset = 6;
private const int c_ulConvIndexIDLength = 16;
private static ExtendedPropertyDefinition PidTagConversationIndexTracking = new ExtendedPropertyDefinition(0x3016, MapiPropertyType.Boolean);
// HUGE props to Woodman
// https://stackoverflow.com/a/21625224/298053
public static string GetOutlookConversationId(this EmailMessage emailMessage)
{
Boolean convTracking;
if (!emailMessage.TryGetProperty(PidTagConversationIndexTracking, out convTracking))
{
convTracking = true;
}
var convIndex = emailMessage.ConversationIndex;
byte[] idBytes;
if (convTracking && convIndex != null && convIndex.Length > 0)
{
// get Id from Conversation index
idBytes = new byte[c_ulConvIndexIDLength];
Array.Copy(convIndex, c_ulConvIndexIDOffset, idBytes, 0, c_ulConvIndexIDLength);
}
else
{
// get Id from Conversation topic
var topic = emailMessage.ConversationTopic;
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(topic))
{
return string.Empty;
}
if (topic.Length >= 265)
{
topic = topic.Substring(0, 256);
}
topic = topic.ToUpper();
using (var md5 = new System.Security.Cryptography.MD5CryptoServiceProvider())
{
idBytes = md5.ComputeHash(Encoding.Unicode.GetBytes(topic));
}
}
return BitConverter.ToString(idBytes).Replace("-", string.Empty);
}
public static String GetOutlookConversationIndex(this EmailMessage emailMessage)
{
var convIndex = emailMessage.ConversationIndex;
return BitConverter.ToString(convIndex).Replace("-", String.Empty);
}
}
Usage:
// Prep
ExchangeService service = new ExchangeService(...);
Folder inbox = Folder.bind(service, WellKnownFolderName.Inbox);
Item item = /* inbox.FindItems(...).First() */
// Implmentation
EmailMessage emailMessage = item as EmailMessage;
if (emailMessage != null)
{
String conversationId = emailMessage.GetOutlookConversationId();
String conversationIndex = emailMessage.GetOutlookConversationIndex();
/* ... */
}
I am trying to write an activity in Google+ using the dotnet-client. The issue is that I can't seem to get the configuration of my client app correctly. According to the Google+ Sign-In configuration and this SO question we need to add the requestvisibleactions parameter. I did that but it did not work. I am using the scope https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login and I even added the scope https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.moments.write but the insert still did not work.
This is what my request url looks like:
https://accounts.google.com/ServiceLogin?service=lso&passive=1209600&continue=https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth?scope%3Dhttps://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login%2Bhttps://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.moments.write%26response_type%3Dcode%26redirect_uri%3Dhttp://localhost/%26state%3D%26requestvisibleactions%3Dhttp://schemas.google.com/AddActivity%26client_id%3D000.apps.googleusercontent.com%26request_visible_actions%3Dhttp://schemas.google.com/AddActivity%26hl%3Den%26from_login%3D1%26as%3D-1fbe06f1c6120f4d<mpl=popup&shdf=Cm4LEhF0aGlyZFBhcnR5TG9nb1VybBoADAsSFXRoaXJkUGFydHlEaXNwbGF5TmFtZRoHQ2hpa3V0bwwLEgZkb21haW4aB0NoaWt1dG8MCxIVdGhpcmRQYXJ0eURpc3BsYXlUeXBlGgdERUZBVUxUDBIDbHNvIhTeWybcoJ9pXSeN2t-k8A4SUbfhsygBMhQivAmfNSs_LkjXXZ7bPxilXgjMsQ&scc=1
As you can see from there that there is a request_visible_actions and I even added one that has no underscore in case I got the parameter wrong (requestvisibleactions).
Let me say that my app is being authenticated successfully by the API. I can get the user's profile after being authenticated and it is on the "insert moment" part that my app fails. My insert code:
var body = new Moment();
var target = new ItemScope();
target.Id = referenceId;
target.Image = image;
target.Type = "http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity";
target.Description = description;
target.Name = caption;
body.Target = target;
body.Type = "http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity";
var insert =
new MomentsResource.InsertRequest(
// this is a valid service instance as I am using this to query the user's profile
_plusService,
body,
id,
MomentsResource.Collection.Vault);
Moment result = null;
try
{
result = insert.Fetch();
}
catch (ThreadAbortException)
{
// User was not yet authenticated and is being forwarded to the authorization page.
throw;
}
catch (Google.GoogleApiRequestException requestEx)
{
// here I get a 401 Unauthorized error
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
} `
For the OAuth flow, there are two issues with your request:
request_visible_actions is what is passed to the OAuth v2 server (don't pass requestvisibleactions)
plus.moments.write is a deprecated scope, you only need to pass in plus.login
Make sure your project references the latest version of the Google+ .NET client library from here:
https://developers.google.com/resources/api-libraries/download/stable/plus/v1/csharp
I have created a project on GitHub showing a full server-side flow here:
https://github.com/gguuss/gplus_csharp_ssflow
As Brettj said, you should be using the Google+ Sign-in Button as demonstrated in the latest Google+ samples from here:
https://github.com/googleplus/gplus-quickstart-csharp
First, ensure you are requesting all of the activity types you're writing. You will know this is working because the authorization dialog will show "Make your app activity available via Google, visible to you and: [...]" below the text that starts with "This app would like to". I know you checked this but I'm 90% sure this is why you are getting the 401 error code. The following markup shows how to render the Google+ Sign-In button requesting access to Add activities.
<div id="gConnect">
<button class="g-signin"
data-scope="https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login"
data-requestvisibleactions="http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity"
data-clientId="YOUR_CLIENT_ID"
data-accesstype="offline"
data-callback="onSignInCallback"
data-theme="dark"
data-cookiepolicy="single_host_origin">
</button>
Assuming you have a PlusService object with the correct activity type set in data-requestvisibleactions, the following code, which you should be able to copy/paste to see it work, concisely demonstrates writing moments using the .NET client and has been tested to work:
Moment body = new Moment();
ItemScope target = new ItemScope();
target.Id = "replacewithuniqueforaddtarget";
target.Image = "http://www.google.com/s2/static/images/GoogleyEyes.png";
target.Type = "";
target.Description = "The description for the activity";
target.Name = "An example of add activity";
body.Target = target;
body.Type = "http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity";
MomentsResource.InsertRequest insert =
new MomentsResource.InsertRequest(
_plusService,
body,
"me",
MomentsResource.Collection.Vault);
Moment wrote = insert.Fetch();
Note, I'm including Google.Apis.Plus.v1.Data for convenience.
Ah it's that simple! Maybe not? I am answering my own question and consequently accept it as the answer (after a few days of course) so others having the same issue may be guided. But I will definitely up-vote Gus' answer for it led me to the fix for my code.
So according to #class answer written above and as explained on his blog the key to successfully creating a moment is adding the request_visible_actions parameter. I did that but my request still failed and it is because I was missing an important thing. You need to add one more parameter and that is the access_type and it should be set to offline. The OAuth request, at a minimum, should look like: https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth?scope=https://www.googleapis.com/auth/plus.login&response_type=code&redirect_uri=http://localhost/&request_visible_actions=http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity&access_type=offline.
For the complete and correct client code you can get Gus' example here or download the entire dotnet client library including the source and sample and add what I added below. The most important thing that you should remember is modifying your AuthorizationServerDescription for the Google API. Here's my version of the authenticator:
public static OAuth2Authenticator<WebServerClient> CreateAuthenticator(
string clientId, string clientSecret)
{
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(clientId))
throw new ArgumentException("clientId cannot be empty");
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(clientSecret))
throw new ArgumentException("clientSecret cannot be empty");
var description = GoogleAuthenticationServer.Description;
var uri = description.AuthorizationEndpoint.AbsoluteUri;
// This is the one that has been documented on Gus' blog site
// and over at Google's (https://developers.google.com/+/web/signin/)
// This is not in the dotnetclient sample by the way
// and you need to understand how OAuth and DNOA works.
// I had this already, see my original post,
// I thought it will make my day.
if (uri.IndexOf("request_visible_actions") < 1)
{
var param = (uri.IndexOf('?') > 0) ? "&" : "?";
description.AuthorizationEndpoint = new Uri(
uri + param +
"request_visible_actions=http://schemas.google.com/AddActivity");
}
// This is what I have been missing!
// They forgot to tell us about this or did I just miss this somewhere?
uri = description.AuthorizationEndpoint.AbsoluteUri;
if (uri.IndexOf("offline") < 1)
{
var param = (uri.IndexOf('?') > 0) ? "&" : "?";
description.AuthorizationEndpoint =
new Uri(uri + param + "access_type=offline");
}
// Register the authenticator.
var provider = new WebServerClient(description)
{
ClientIdentifier = clientId,
ClientSecret = clientSecret,
};
var authenticator =
new OAuth2Authenticator<WebServerClient>(provider, GetAuthorization)
{ NoCaching = true };
return authenticator;
}
Without the access_type=offline my code never worked and it will never work. Now I wonder why? It would be good to have some explanation.
i know there is a lot of questions on this already but I still didn't seem to find a definitive answer. What i'm looking to do is have users be remembered after they login for say 2 weeks or until they log out. Below is what I think should be happening and I was wondering if anyone with a bit more experience could tell me if i'm right or wrong.
User logs in for the first time. An RPC call to the server returns a 'UserInfo' object which includes with it a new sessionID. Aka on the server this happens and user is returned:
user.setSessionId(getThreadLocalRequest().getSession().getId());
Now after user is returned we must create Cookies to store the client side data. Am i correct in saying we need a Cookie to identify the current user and another for the sessionID:
final long DURATION = 1000 * 60 * 60 * 24 * 14; //duration remembering login - 2 weeks
Date expires = new Date(System.currentTimeMillis() + DURATION);
String sessionID = user.getSessionId();
String username = user.getUsername();
Cookies.setCookie("sessionID", sessionID, expires, null, "/", false);
Cookies.setCookie("username", username, expires, null, "/", false);
Now when the user comes back to the app at a later date we check the cookies and (provided they exists and have not been deleted for some reason such as an explicit log out from the user) use their values to check session validity via RPC to the server:
String sessionID = Cookies.getCookie("sessionID");
String username = Cookies.getCookie("username");
if ( sessionID != null && username != null){
AsyncCallback<UserInfo> callBack = new AsyncCallback<UserInfo>(){
#Override
public void onFailure(Throwable caught) {
Window.alert("Error connecting to server.");
}
#Override
public void onSuccess(Boolean sessionValid) {
if (sessionValid)
loadInitialInterfaceForUser("username");
else
loadLoginInterface();
}
};
loginSvc.checkSessionValidity(sessionID,username, callBack);
}
else
loadLoginInterface();
Now, assuming what I have done so far is correct (which is a bit of a long shot :P) my real question is what exactly should I check at the server side checkSessionValidity(sessionID,username)?
Is it simply a case of fetching the user that I have stored serverside and comparing sessionID with the sessionID I have associated with user? Do I also check it hasn't expired?
I know this is a longwinded and perhaps not very well worded question... I'm struggling to get my head round it so any and all help is very welcome!
Cheers, Steve
Yes,that is a key thing to do.
Here is some interesting point discussed on that (Storing session id and username in DB)
Have a look on this (ofcourse you can check them in impl class instead of servlet)
how to check if a sessionId is valid in a servlet (java).
And here is an excellent example of Session Management in GWT
http://varuntayur.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/session-management-in-gwt
Read this also
question on GWT, Cookies and webpage directing
Take a look at the following link.
Cannot use same cookie for multiple GWT applications
This might solve your problem.
I have a requirement to download a file from the server, but open inline if possible. I'm currently doing;
Response.AddHeader("Content-Disposition", string.Format("inline; filename={0}", documentFileName));
result = new FileStreamResult(new FileStream(documentFilePath, FileMode.Open), "application/msword");
I've put application/msword in there right now, because that's what I'm having a problem with. When I click Open on the word document, it's as if the document makes multiple calls back to the action, but there is no session and no database so it crashes. When the user is running this, they see a long hang, the "Downloading" dialog finally appears in word and they have to cancel it. The document is there and is valid but this is not desirable.
Pdfs, pngs etc. download fine. Can anybody explain this behavior, and give me some hints as to how I fix it?
Update:
The action basically looks like;
[HttpPost]
public FileResult View(int id, int source)
{
var document = GetDocumentFromDatabase(id, source);
documentFilePath = Path.Combine( documentsDirectory, document.Name);
documentName = document.Name;
Response.AddHeader("Content-Disposition", string.Format("inline; filename={0}", documentFileName));
result = new FileStreamResult(new FileStream(documentFilePath, FileMode.Open), "application/msword");
return result;
}
I've trimmed it down, as I can't share the specifics, but the full idea is there.
Answer:
I have a lookup of available content-types, in there I have defined whether the file is inline or attachment, and when I detect a word document, I set it to attachment. No more error. PDF opens in the browser still because I set it to inline.
I use:
public ActionResult GetAttachment(int id)
{
var attachment = _repository.GetAttachByID(id);
if (attachment != null)
{
Response.AppendHeader("Content-Disposition",string.Format("inline; filename={0}",attachment.FileName));
return File(attachment.File, attachment.MimeType, attachment.FileName);
}
else
{
return null;
}
}
Regards
I am using the Background Transfer to upload Photographs to my Web Service. As the Photograph uploads can consume significant time and memory, I thought it might be a nice idea to use the background transfer request to accomplish this. After the photo is uploaded, I want to obtain the Id of the uploaded photo and then use it for post-processing. However, it turns out I can't do that in a background transfer request.
Per my understanding, Background Transfer works using the following logic ONLY:
You have to obtain the file you want to upload and then save/copy it to your app's Isolated Storage under the folder: shared/transfers. This is extremely important. Apparently, using file in a different location didn't work for me. Maybe it isn't the shared/transfers as much as it is a 'relative' path. But I would stick to the same conventions.
After you have saved the file in that location, your background request can be created based on that. It doesn't look like you can pass POST CONTENT other than the file contents, so any other parameters like file name, mime type etc. will need to be passed as QUERY String parameters only. I can understand this, but it would've been nice if I could pass both as POST Content. I don't think HTTP has a limitation on how this works.
Here is some code for creating a request using Hammock:
string url = App.ZineServiceAuthority + "articles/save-blob?ContainerName={0}&MimeType={1}&ZineId={2}&Notes={3}&IsPrivate={4}&FileName={5}";
url = String.Format(url, userId, "image/jpg", ZineId, txtStatus.Text, true, UploadFileName);
var btr = new BackgroundTransferRequest(new Uri(url, UriKind.Absolute));
btr.TransferPreferences = TransferPreferences.AllowCellularAndBattery;
btr.Method = "POST";
btr.Headers.Add("token", IsolatedStorageHelper.GetTravzineToken());
btr.UploadLocation = new Uri(#"/shared\transfers/" + UploadFileName, UriKind.Relative);
btr.TransferStatusChanged += new EventHandler<BackgroundTransferEventArgs>(btr_TransferStatusChanged);
btr.TransferProgressChanged += new EventHandler<BackgroundTransferEventArgs>(btr_TransferProgressChanged);
BackgroundTransferService.Add(btr);
In my case, I am literally passing all the necessary parameters using the query string. On a successful save, my Web Service returns back the Id of the Photo I just uploaded. However:
There is NO way (or at least I know of) to obtain and evaluate the RESPONSE. The Background Transfer Request Event handlers do not expose a RESPONSE.
Here are my event handlers:
void btr_TransferProgressChanged(object sender, BackgroundTransferEventArgs e)
{
bool isUploading = e.Request.TotalBytesToSend > 0 ? true : false;
lblStatus.Text = isUploading ? "Uploading" + e.Request.BytesSent.ToString() + " sent" : "Done";
}
void btr_TransferStatusChanged(object sender, BackgroundTransferEventArgs e)
{
if (e.Request.TransferStatus == TransferStatus.Completed)
{
using (IsolatedStorageFile iso =
IsolatedStorageFile.GetUserStoreForApplication())
{
if (iso.FileExists(e.Request.UploadLocation.OriginalString))
iso.DeleteFile(e.Request.UploadLocation.OriginalString);
}
BackgroundTransferService.Remove(e.Request);
if (null != e.Request.TransferError)
{
MessageBox.Show(e.Request.TransferError.Message);
}
else
{
lblStatus.Text = "Done baby done";
}
}
}
So now my question is, how does anyone do any sort of POST Processing in such scenarios?
Can anyone please tell me the line of thought behind designing such an inflexible class?
Any thoughts on how I could get around this issue would be appreciated.
Also, does anyone have any working examples of a homegrown BackgroundTransfer?
Haven't tried it but why not set a download location like this:
btr.DownloadLocation = "myDownloadFile.html";
btr.UploadLocation = "myUploadFile.jpg";
...
If the request is completed read the file "myDownloadFile.html" where your response has been stored and delete it afterwards.