I have a multi-module project looks like this:
module-A
--POM.xml
--sourceDirectory
--SourceA.java
--testSourceDirectory
--testSourceA.java
module-B
--POM.xml
--sourceDirectory
--SourceB.java
--testSourceDirectory
--testSourceB.java
...many similar modules
ParentModule
--POM.xml
--dependency
--module-A
--module-B
...
--module-x
I have ParentModule in order to access the source files (SourceA.java) in A,B, etc. in Netbeans using "Go to type" without opening all the modules as projects. But it seems with the simple dependency I cannot access the testsourcedirectory sources (testSourceA.java).
Is there any tags that would allow my ParentModule to see and index all the testSourceDirectories in the modules?
I think you got something fundamentally wrong. Maven is a build tool ‐ see Maven's Introduction. It's not a tool for supporting the handling of your sources in the IDE of your choice.
Furthermore, a dependency, as declared in Maven, is a module/artifact/library your code relies on at runtime. So, there's no point declaring your test sources, which are used as part of the development cycle only, as (runtime) dependencies.
Related
I have maven multi-modules project. At the parent level, i have some java files. And in the parent pom.xml, at the package phase i do some stuff.
Usually, when i run mvn package at parent level, the package phase of parent pom will be run and all the modules will be packaged as well.
I am looking for a way that allow me to do these (when i run mvn package):
allow me to run only paren pom.xml (the script at the package phase), not the modules. This is the 1st priority.
allow me to run paren pom.xml and some particular modules (like module 1, module 2 BUT not module 3 , module 4).
Can i use profile for those issue?
Thanks.
While I agree with the fact that you may not have optimal project structure, the answer is that Maven 2.2.1 has an option "--non-recursive" which satisfies your first requirement:
-N,--non-recursive Do not recurse into sub-projects
So something like this:
mvn --non-recursive clean compile
Why do you want to have java code on the top level? In my opinion this is not a very good idea. Have your code in the subprojects and let the top-level project be responsible for holding the general information and configuration of the entire project.
If you have some base-library code in the top-level project now, you can put it in a sub-project and set up dependencies between the projects.
Take a look at Maven parent pom vs modules pom
The nature of your question indicates that your project structure may not be optimal.
I have a parent project(has its own pom.xml) in which I import the child project as a jar with its own pom.xml.
In the parent pom.xml I have specified my child jar as a dependency - this gets resolved, but i want maven to resolve the dependencies required by my child jar.
My Use case to replicate :
When I include spring-web-mvc.jar the transitive dependencies are resolved automatically.
I have a similar requirement where I include my child.jar into a main framework project and expect the transitive dependencies to get resolved (Notw: the child.jar is not hosted it is packaged as jar and present on the local file system)
Current Structure:
Child Project:
|----/src/main/java
|----/src/main/resources
|----child-pom.xml
>This child project will be a jar as dependency in the parent project
Parent Project
|----/src/main/java
|----/src/main/resources
|----/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/lib/child.jar
|---- parent-pom.xml
The problem:
When i create a war from parent project i want all the dependecy including transitive ones to show in WEB-INF lib.
Currently this is not happening.
First when talking of parent/ child Maven projects normaly you have your"childs" specified as modules in a common parent project which itself is beeing packed with the packaging type pom rather than make them a dependency of the parent project.
When it comes to the dependencies of your "childs" or generally "dependencies of your dependencies" those are called transitive dependencies and are pretty well explained in the official documentation found here: http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html
The resolving of those transitive dependencies is one of Mavens core strenghts and guaranteed by default unless they lead to conflicts that make the build fail.
Two things to help here are having a closer look into the enforcer plugin (http://maven.apache.org/enforcer/maven-enforcer-plugin/) and the shader plugin (http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/) .... well and the official documentation of corse (reading the whole thing takes less than a day - then supports you further for specific topics whereas we gladly further support you too if you already have pom.xml files and you are stuck somewhere.
While the enforcer-plugin covers certain conflicts regarding different versions of the same artefacts the shader plugin will just pack everything you specified to a single jar for reverseengineering (its not the normal use case but i sometimes use it that way if i am not absolutly sure what ends in my final archives).
Also worth a look at is the dependency-plugin already available in the maven distributions - mvn dependency:tree -Dverbose will give you pretty detailed information on the resolved dependencies (and probably version conflicts).
I have a multi module maven project. One of the modules is a reusable part which is packaged into a jar, and the other is a war web-app which depends on the first module. When I use jetty:run-exploded on the second module, the packaged jar is taken from local maven repository whereas I want the first module to be rebuild and packaged into the resulting war. Is there any way to force such behavior instead of the default one?
From everything I can tell from reading documents about Maven's design and using Maven myself this cannot be done in the projects own directory.
Maven will not follow module paths UP a hierarchy. Using -amd (also make dependencies) will only work at the top level module that ties all the other multi-module pom's together. So what you can do is this:
At the TOP level directory
mvn -amd -pl jetty_module jetty:run-exploded
I think you can use maven Advanced Reactor Options to archive this.
http://www.sonatype.com/people/2009/10/maven-tips-and-tricks-advanced-reactor-options/
The -pl or –projects option allows you to select a list of projects from a multimodule project. This option can be useful if you are working on a specific set of projects, and you’d rather not wait through a full build of a multi-module project during a development cycle.
Maven -amd(also-make-dependents ) also help to build multi module project once. Using that you can build a project and any project that depends on that project.
I have a multi project in maven like this:
paren-project
-> plugin-project
-> testbed-project
The plugin project generates a JAR, which is manually copied to a specific subdirectory of testbed (using whatever embedded script like groovy or ant). The important point: I don't want the plugin JAR to be in the classpath of testbed.
But I cannot found the solution to force the plugin project to be build BEFORE the testbed project. If I set the plugin project as dependency of the testbed project, it is added in the classpath.
Any solution, or do I have to switch to a build system like gradle, ivy or ant ?
As it is mentioned at the http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-multiple-modules.html
Reactor Sorting
Because modules within a multi-module build can depend on each other,
it is important that The reactor sorts all the projects in a way that
guarantees any project is built before it is required.
The following relationships are honoured when sorting projects:
project dependency on another module in the build
plugin declaration where the plugin is another modules in the build
plugin dependency on another module in the build
build extension declaration on another module in the build
the order declared in the modules element (if no other rule applies)
Note that only "instantiated" references are used - dependencyManagement
and pluginManagement elements will not cause a change to the reactor sort order
Maven is a versatile system. No need to switch.
You can add the dependency like this:
<dependency>
<groupId>group</groupId>
<artifactId>artifact</artifactId>
<optional>true</optional>
</dependency>
This way, the dependency will not be included in the classpath.
Read more about Optional Dependency
I've got a project with Maven in which one subproject (A) wants to depend on another subproject (B) which uses "pom" packaging.
If I do this the straightforward way, where A specifies a dependency on B with <type>pom</type>, things work perfectly if I do "mvn install", but if I run any phase earlier than install, such as mvn compile or mvn package, then it fails while trying to build A: it goes looking for B's pom in the repository, and doesn't find it.
I don't really want this pom in the repository, because it's part of our active source code and changes frequently.
For all the jar-packaged projects we build, it seems to work fine to keep them out of the repository, build with mvn package, and Maven knows how to find all the dependencies in the source and build trees it manages without resorting to the repository; however for the pom-packaged project it always wants to go to the repository.
A couple things I learned while trying to understand this:
Maven best practices encourage you to use pom-packaged projects to group dependencies, but with the added step of "mvn install" on the POM project
Maven lifecycle documentation says "a project that is purely metadata (packaging value is pom) only binds goals to the install and deploy phases"; maybe this is why the POM project is invisible as a dependency target unless I invoke the install phase? I tried binding the compiler plugin to the compile phase and this didn't seem to help.
Is there a way that I can specify the POM subproject as a dependency of another subproject in the same parent project, without installing the POM project to the repository?
It isn't purely a question of which goals are bound to which lifecycle phases for POM projects. If it were, then binding the "package" goal would solve the problem.
When building a multi-module project, Maven reads the POMs of all modules to determine dependencies between modules, so that it can build the depended-upon modules before the depending modules. It's able to achieve this even when running the "package" goal (such that the depended-upon modules are not yet in the local repository).
Therefore, the code that constructs the classpath for builds must be managing several cases, notably:
extra-project jar dependency, where it looks for the POM in the local repository, handles its dependencies, and adds the POM's jar to the classpath
extra-project pom dependency, where it looks for the POM in the local repository and handles its dependencies
intra-project jar dependency, where it looks for the POM within the project tree, handles its dependencies, and adds that module's target/classes folder to the classpath
intra-project pom dependency, where for some reason it doesn't look for the POM within the project tree, and therefore doesn't handle it's dependencies.
Notice the asymmetry in the last two cases, as compared to the first two.
I can see two solutions to your problem. One is to file a bug report, or rather a request to change the behaviour (since it's obviously intentional), perhaps only for the case of intra-project dependencies on multi-module projects. Or indeed propose a patch. But since the behaviour is intentional, you might meet a refusal. In the best of cases, you're in for a long wait. (I'd vote for your bug report though - I've been stung by that same behaviour, in a different context.)
The other solution is simply to run an install on your project. I don't really understand why you don't want the POM project in your repository: if needs be, you can use a snapshot repository, where it doesn't matter if things change frequently, to avoid polluting your main repository.
Configuring maven-install-plugin to run during the compile phase, and copy the relevant pom.xml to the repository, seems to accomplish what I wanted as far as Maven itself is concerned, though m2eclipse still is not happy (it throws "failed to read artifact descriptor" errors with no additional description for the pom.xml that has a dependency on the other POM project).