I have a parent project(has its own pom.xml) in which I import the child project as a jar with its own pom.xml.
In the parent pom.xml I have specified my child jar as a dependency - this gets resolved, but i want maven to resolve the dependencies required by my child jar.
My Use case to replicate :
When I include spring-web-mvc.jar the transitive dependencies are resolved automatically.
I have a similar requirement where I include my child.jar into a main framework project and expect the transitive dependencies to get resolved (Notw: the child.jar is not hosted it is packaged as jar and present on the local file system)
Current Structure:
Child Project:
|----/src/main/java
|----/src/main/resources
|----child-pom.xml
>This child project will be a jar as dependency in the parent project
Parent Project
|----/src/main/java
|----/src/main/resources
|----/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/lib/child.jar
|---- parent-pom.xml
The problem:
When i create a war from parent project i want all the dependecy including transitive ones to show in WEB-INF lib.
Currently this is not happening.
First when talking of parent/ child Maven projects normaly you have your"childs" specified as modules in a common parent project which itself is beeing packed with the packaging type pom rather than make them a dependency of the parent project.
When it comes to the dependencies of your "childs" or generally "dependencies of your dependencies" those are called transitive dependencies and are pretty well explained in the official documentation found here: http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html
The resolving of those transitive dependencies is one of Mavens core strenghts and guaranteed by default unless they lead to conflicts that make the build fail.
Two things to help here are having a closer look into the enforcer plugin (http://maven.apache.org/enforcer/maven-enforcer-plugin/) and the shader plugin (http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-shade-plugin/) .... well and the official documentation of corse (reading the whole thing takes less than a day - then supports you further for specific topics whereas we gladly further support you too if you already have pom.xml files and you are stuck somewhere.
While the enforcer-plugin covers certain conflicts regarding different versions of the same artefacts the shader plugin will just pack everything you specified to a single jar for reverseengineering (its not the normal use case but i sometimes use it that way if i am not absolutly sure what ends in my final archives).
Also worth a look at is the dependency-plugin already available in the maven distributions - mvn dependency:tree -Dverbose will give you pretty detailed information on the resolved dependencies (and probably version conflicts).
Related
I would like to distribute the main artifact sources (main Java and tests) of a multi module project as a simple - standalone - Maven project.
The easy parts of this can be implemented using the maven-source-plugin. This also is able to include the POM in the generated source code jar. However, this is the artefact POM, which refers to the parent POM which is not included in the jar.
Other than creating the POM manually, is there a way to generate a minimal POM which contains the dependencies (extracted from the artifact POM and its parent)?
If you create the POM with the flatten-maven-plugin, all parent relations are resolved and you get an equivalent POM without the unnecessary parts.
https://www.mojohaus.org/flatten-maven-plugin/
Could somebody explain to me, what are are differences between the file pom.xml and the file effective pom.xml in an apache maven project?
The Super POM
All Maven project POMs extend the Super POM, which defines a set of defaults shared by all projects.
The Simplest POM
All Maven POMs inherit defaults from the Super POM. If you are just writing a simple project that produces a JAR from some source in src/main/java, want to run your JUnit tests in src/test/java, and want to build a project site using mvn site, you don’t have to customize anything. All you would need, in this case, is the simplest possible POM shown in The Simplest POM. This POM defines a groupId, artifactId, and version: the three required coordinates for every project.
The Effective POM
It is the merge between The Super POM and the POM from The Simplest POM.
NOTE: This info was extracted from the following link (in the link the explanation is very complete)
Maven: The Complete Reference - 3.2. The POM
You can see the difference of a pom.xml and the effective pom.xml using
mvn help:effective-pom
which is describe here.
In a multi module project you'll use a parent pom.xml for defining general settings for all modules and then in each module there will only be specific settings.
The above goal will help you analyze the resulting pom that you could of course actually use instead of the parent reference.
The whole idea is by using the generalization (super-pom) / specialization (module pom) approach there is a central place where you can specify the general configuration. This is much more efficient then having to cut&paste the general parts.
Please also note that the effective pom will add the default behavior e.g. for the jar plugin so that you can debug issues like
Maven JAR Plugin 3.0.2 Error: You have to use a classifier to attach supplemental artifacts to the project instead of replacing them
with this approach. See also Maven `help:effective-pom` only generating for a single project, not all projects
In build section of my effective pom there is a Maven plugin that I don't want to use (it was used before, but now I want to remove it).
I removed this plugin from every parent of my project, but is is still applied.
How do I find out where this plugin declaration come from?
UPDATE:
It turns out this plugin was an implicit dependency of another one. It was not declared as such, but referenced from plugin's components.XML leading to runtime dependency injection. The problem was found by pure luck. I think the question is still relevant - it should be possible to find implicit plugin dependencies without wasting a day or two.
Have you run
mvn install
on the parent pom when you deleted the plugin from there?
When you run mvn from submodule it actually looks into your local repository for parent/siblings modules (jars, poms), not to filesystem (compared to maven using the result of the build when you run whole parent project build with submodules).
If it doesn't help, have a look if it's not coming from super pom. You can see super pom on maven website:
http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.0.5/maven-model-builder/super-pom.html
On mvnrepositry, when you search for a certain module, there's a link to download the binary. For some versions it has a pom.xml file available for download instead of the jar. What are you supposed to do with that pom.xml? It seems like if I specify a version that does not have a downloadable jar, but instead downloadable pom.xml, my maven build will fail. Is what I'm seeing correct?
Modules that only have pom files are maven modules with pom packaging. They are used to aggregate multiple modules into one unit. You can use such a module as a dependency for your maven project. Maven will download the pom file, analyze the dependencies included in that pom file and download those & add it to your automatically.
Even modules that have jars (jar packaging) have a pom file associated with them. This pom file defines the other dependencies that are required for using it. Maven will automatically process and fetch those dependencies (transitive dependencies).
This makes specifying and managing dependency for any project. You will specify the top level modules that your projects directly depends on and other things required will automatically figured out and downloaded. It also makes it easier when you have upgrade to a new version - all the transitive dependencies will get upgraded automatically.
One of the reason that cause this is because of licensing issue.
License for such JARs prohibit public redistribution in such approach. So someone provide only the POM so that you can get the JAR yourself and install it to your local maven repo/ internal repo, together with the POM provided.
I've got a project with Maven in which one subproject (A) wants to depend on another subproject (B) which uses "pom" packaging.
If I do this the straightforward way, where A specifies a dependency on B with <type>pom</type>, things work perfectly if I do "mvn install", but if I run any phase earlier than install, such as mvn compile or mvn package, then it fails while trying to build A: it goes looking for B's pom in the repository, and doesn't find it.
I don't really want this pom in the repository, because it's part of our active source code and changes frequently.
For all the jar-packaged projects we build, it seems to work fine to keep them out of the repository, build with mvn package, and Maven knows how to find all the dependencies in the source and build trees it manages without resorting to the repository; however for the pom-packaged project it always wants to go to the repository.
A couple things I learned while trying to understand this:
Maven best practices encourage you to use pom-packaged projects to group dependencies, but with the added step of "mvn install" on the POM project
Maven lifecycle documentation says "a project that is purely metadata (packaging value is pom) only binds goals to the install and deploy phases"; maybe this is why the POM project is invisible as a dependency target unless I invoke the install phase? I tried binding the compiler plugin to the compile phase and this didn't seem to help.
Is there a way that I can specify the POM subproject as a dependency of another subproject in the same parent project, without installing the POM project to the repository?
It isn't purely a question of which goals are bound to which lifecycle phases for POM projects. If it were, then binding the "package" goal would solve the problem.
When building a multi-module project, Maven reads the POMs of all modules to determine dependencies between modules, so that it can build the depended-upon modules before the depending modules. It's able to achieve this even when running the "package" goal (such that the depended-upon modules are not yet in the local repository).
Therefore, the code that constructs the classpath for builds must be managing several cases, notably:
extra-project jar dependency, where it looks for the POM in the local repository, handles its dependencies, and adds the POM's jar to the classpath
extra-project pom dependency, where it looks for the POM in the local repository and handles its dependencies
intra-project jar dependency, where it looks for the POM within the project tree, handles its dependencies, and adds that module's target/classes folder to the classpath
intra-project pom dependency, where for some reason it doesn't look for the POM within the project tree, and therefore doesn't handle it's dependencies.
Notice the asymmetry in the last two cases, as compared to the first two.
I can see two solutions to your problem. One is to file a bug report, or rather a request to change the behaviour (since it's obviously intentional), perhaps only for the case of intra-project dependencies on multi-module projects. Or indeed propose a patch. But since the behaviour is intentional, you might meet a refusal. In the best of cases, you're in for a long wait. (I'd vote for your bug report though - I've been stung by that same behaviour, in a different context.)
The other solution is simply to run an install on your project. I don't really understand why you don't want the POM project in your repository: if needs be, you can use a snapshot repository, where it doesn't matter if things change frequently, to avoid polluting your main repository.
Configuring maven-install-plugin to run during the compile phase, and copy the relevant pom.xml to the repository, seems to accomplish what I wanted as far as Maven itself is concerned, though m2eclipse still is not happy (it throws "failed to read artifact descriptor" errors with no additional description for the pom.xml that has a dependency on the other POM project).