Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm a Web Developer and Backend Architect. As a Developer I need Web Hosting to run and deploy my code. Normal Web hosting plans don't offer flexibility, they're focused on simplicity and ease of use for normal/non-tech people. However, I need full stack hosting, a server where I have full control. Where I can install my necessary and preferred software, run my own programs like I do in my own PC. I have seen dedicated hosting, VPS hosting, cloud servers and I don't know which one actually fits my needs.I'll be happy if someone gives me some guidance.
Thank you,
Abraar
I suggest you to use http://aws.amazon.com/pt/ bcz:
Price - have free plans that help you in development process and paid plans are not expensive
Structure - You can configure everything, machine, server configuration, OS, DNS and more.
Technologies - Most Hosts have limitations and you cant configure permissions in server. AWS use a separated structure that let you set your configurations without limitations.
Well, this is my point. I tested and worked with so many hosts and i realize that AWS is the best.
Dedicated hosting is not necessary because it cost is very high.
If you need a fixed server eg:4gp ram, 2 core processor and centos.
you can go for VPS Hosting you can get help in this link VPS
Help.
If you want to pay for what you use you should go for cloud servers.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Closed 8 years ago.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Improve this question
Currently I have a dedicated server with WHM and Joomla running.
I want to transfer it to new server. This new server has high speed bandwidth.
I only have remote access to the new server which has Win 2008 R2 installed and it shows it was installed on a VM.
I need to configure this server to run a domain name with Joomla which will be access by 10k visitors/month.
I have knowledge on WHM and CPanel only. How I can started with any ready made packages?
The reason my management changed the server is for better performance as current dedicated server is slower.
However, I guess the new server is installed on a VM..
Please guide.
The first thing you need to do is not move your Joomla site to a Windows server. The configuration of the server is critical to the performance of Joomla and you will have nagging issues until the end of time trying to run Joomla on Windows. It can be done, but it's a massive headache and there is absolutely no advantage to doing so. There are dozens of reputable hosting companies that have servers configured specifically to run Joomla optimally. Take a look at Rochen (I have over 50 sites on Rochen) or CloudAccess, both have official relationships with the Joomla project and both have very reasonable pricing.
Also, 10k visitors per month does not require a dedicated server unless all of those users are on simultaneously running SQL query heavy apps. You could easily run a site that size on a managed virtual server and have no performance issues at all. I've got sites with hundreds of thousands of monthly visitors running on a single MVS with no issues at all.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking to set up a TeamCity server for continuously building a .NET web application. I already have hosting, so I don't want to get a whole new hosting account such as AppHarbor.
I don't maintain my own physical server, nor do I want to.
I also don't want to have to pay $50 or more per month for an entire dedicated Windows machine, just to host TeamCity.
I really don't care if it's slow and on a shared machine, as it's just continuous build which will be running in the background.
I'll want to have the outputs automatically deployed to a server of my choice through FTP.
Is there anyone on the market providing hosted TeamCity environments?
AppVeyor CI provides hosted continuous integration for .NET developers.
Disclaimer: I'm the developer of this service.
If your open source project you can get a free account at Code Better http://codebetter.com/jameskovacs/2009/02/24/announcing-teamcity-codebetter-com/ I don't know of any for non open source.
OnCheckin.com offers Cloud Powered Continuous Deployment for.Net websites and services.
Disclosure: I am the developer and founder of this service.
Just came across BuildBox (now Buildkite) from a tweet from someone I follow. Seems like a suitable solution to this.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I am currently using Pivotal Tracker and I like it for its features. The project I am working on though is basically just a hobby game project on the side (even though I plan to sell it when I am done). So while I do want to advance and work on it in a timely matter, I really don't feel like being "timed" with iterations like Pivotal Tracker does.
I really like Trac, but I don't want to host it on my home server because I don't run that server 24/7 and I have another person working on the project that doesn't have access to my server. So I want that person to be able to access the tracker at all times. So are there any project trackers like Trac that are hosted?
Thanks
It looks like SourceForge can do what you want. Free hosting with issue tracking, etc.
Check out something like Assembla. For a relatively low price, they'll have issue tracking, SVN hosting, and even a simple wiki.
I was able to find a good tracker called Acunote (http://www.acunote.com). It is really good, and free for my project requirements.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking for a web application to manage tasks (not necessary programming-oriented) for a small team. It must be easy to setup and maintain, and I don't look for an SaaS solution. It must offer file upload and mail users in case of a change. There is hundred of solutions available but most are too complex for what we want or are not "stable" (not updated since a long time, not very well programmed). i was wondering if stack overflow's folks have some recommendations...
Try:
lighthouse - http://lighthouseapp.com/
-or-
gemini - http://www.countersoft.com/home.aspx
We had a very similar requirement and after much searching we eventually decided on Redmine.
Does all that you require and more. Setup couldn't be easier if you use one of the Bitnami stacks. We went down the virtual image route as we had a VMWare server - but installers for existing platforms are also available.
I tried Basecamp some time ago but I don't need a web based solution. But it was pretty good.
http://basecamphq.com/
Redmine is a great project management, used by many open source projects. It is also quite actively maintained and really stable.
It's worth mentioning that even though Redmine is software oriented, it can easily be used as a project management software. All you have to do is ignore all the parts about repositories and you have a full-fledged project management software.
http://www.redmine.org/
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I've come to love Amazon's EC2 service and I'm looking for something similar that supports the ability to save a running Windows server image and start new instances from it.
I contacted GoGrid (the feature is planned in future) and Mosso (no joy)
Anyone know of any hosting/cloud providers that can dothis?
I have just received a message from Amazon to the effect that that they will be supporting Windows Server on EC2 this fall.
Wahaay!!
Seems like dealing with licensing issues would be nightmarish for the host.
I can't see how licensing would be any different than for a co-lo provider.
GoGrid as announced to offer the feature this fall. Look at http://www.flexihost.co.uk and http://www.elastichosts.com (both in the UK) as well as http://www.appnexus.com.
I have heard that www.rightscale.com (it's kind of a nice interface to EC2 hosting) will support Windows sometime in the future.
With a lot of manual tweaking you can already run Windows on EC2 using virtualization inside a Linux virtual machine:
http://www.howtoforge.com/amazon_elastic_compute_cloud_qemu
I have a short list of cloud hosting companies on my website:
http://hotware.wordpress.com/2008/07/25/a-short-cloud-hosting-link-list/
AT&T's Synaptic Hosting allows this, though I'm sure you'll pay through the nose, as it's "enterprise".