There is the spring-boot application that uses spring-aop. proxy-target-class is true.
I'm trying to create a test for a service class. This service depends on a component class. I want to inject a mock into the service instead of the real component.
I found some similar questions:
Mocking a property of a CGLIB proxied service not working
Injecting Mockito mocks into a Spring bean
I choose this answer to the last question, and I have tried to implement this approach. I chose it because it is not tied to the implementation details of the proxy classes and I can easily use a config class in other tests.
Below there is the example which simulates the real problem.
#org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect
#org.springframework.stereotype.Component
public class Aspect {
#Before("within(demo.Service)")
public void someAdvice() {
System.out.println("advice");
}
}
#org.springframework.stereotype.Service
public class Service {
#Autowired
private Component component;
public void action() {
System.out.println(component.action());
}
}
#org.springframework.stereotype.Component
public class Component {
public String action() {
return "real action";
}
}
#SpringApplicationConfiguration
public class ServiceTest extends BaseTest {
#Autowired
Service service;
#Test
public void testAction() {
service.action();
}
#Configuration
public static class Config {
#Mock Component mock;
public Config() {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
}
#Bean
public Component component() {
Mockito.when(mock.action()).thenReturn("mock action");
return mock;
}
}
}
Complete example: https://github.com/eds0404/spring-inject-mock-into-proxy
The above code is not working as I expect, the service does not use mock ("real action" will be printed if you run test). But the above code works fine if the Component class is not marked with #Component annotation, and its objects are created by the method with #Been annotation.
How to solve this issue? If this is wrong approach, what is best practice?
Related
I'm using JUnit5 to test a Spring Boot application. I want to test a #Service object, which uses #Autowired fields. I would like to mock another #Service object which is indirectly used by my test object. Concretely, I have the following (highly simplified) setup:
Object being tested:
#Service
public class MainService {
private #Autowired SubService subService;
public String test() {
return subService.test();
}
}
SubService:
#Service
public class SubService {
private #Autowired StringService stringService;
public String test() {
return stringService.test();
}
}
StringService:
#Service
public class StringService {
public String test() {
return "Real service";
}
}
Test class used:
#SpringBootTest
public class MainServiceTest {
private #Autowired MainService mainService;
private #MockBean StringService stringService;
#BeforeEach
public void mock() {
Mockito.when(stringService.test()).thenReturn("Mocked service");
}
#Test
public void test() {
assertEquals("Mocked service", mainService.test());
}
}
The above works if I run the test class as a #SpringBootTest, but this loads the full application and is very slow. I also want to avoid #WebMvcTest since I don't need the web server, or #DataJpaTest since I don't need persistence. I don't want to mock SubService, as it contains functionality I want to test together with the MainService.
I tried the following:
#ExtendWith(SpringExtension.class) => throws NoSuchBeanDefinitionException, it seems the autowiring does not work in this case
#ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class) and using #InjectMocks and #Mock instead of the Spring annotations => as the StringService is not a direct field of the MainService being tested, this does not work.
Is there a way to use the spring dependency injection system without loading the web server or persistence layer, or alternatively not use Spring tests but allow for 'nested' dependency injection?
You can use profiling (i.e Spring #Profile) to avoid loading the whole application. It will look something like below:
#Profile("test")
#Configuration
public class TestConfiguration {
#Bean
public MainService mainService() {
return new MainService();
}
#Bean
public SubService subService() {
return new SubService();
}
// mock the StringService
#Bean
public StringService stringService() {
return Mockito.mock(StringService.class);
}
}
then use that profile with `#SpringBootTest(classes = TestConfiguration.class), it will look something like below:
#ActiveProfiles("test")
#SpringBootTest(classes = TestConfiguration.class)
class MainServiceTest {
#Autowired
private MainService mainService;
#Test
public void test() {
// configure behavior using apis like when(), basically however you
// want your mock to behave
}
}
This will load only the beans defined in the class TestConfiguration.
NOTE: Since your question is more about how to avoid loading the whole application, I've answered focusing on that. The above approach will get the job done, but I'd prefer constructor wiring over any other mode of dependency injection on any given day, it's easier to maintain and test(like cases where you want to mock).
There have been several arguments around not using ApplicationContext.getBean() to get a bean reference, of which most are based on logic that it violates the principles of Inversion of control.
Is there a way to get reference to prototype scoped bean without calling context.getBean() ?
Consider to use Spring Boot!
Than you can do something like this...
Runner:
#SpringBootApplication
public class Runner{
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(Runner.class, args);
}
}
Some Controller:
#Controller
public class MyController {
// Spring Boot injecting beans through #Autowired annotation
#Autowired
#Qualifier("CoolFeature") // Use Qualifier annotation to mark a class, if for example
// you have more than one concreate class with differant implementations of some interface.
private CoolFeature myFeature;
public void testFeature(){
myFeature.doStuff();
}
}
Some cool feature:
#Component("CoolFeature") // To identify with Qualifier
public class CoolFeature{
#Autowired
private SomeOtherBean utilityBean;
public void doStuff(){
// use utilityBean in some way
}
}
No XML files to handle.
We can still access context for manual configurations if needed.
Suggested reading:
Spring Boot Reference
Pro Spring Boot
This type of problem can be solved using method injection, which is described in more detail here: https://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/html/beans.html#beans-factory-method-injection
This is the most common approach to create prototype bean:
abstract class MyService {
void doSome() {
OtherService otherService = getOtherService();
}
abstract OtherService getOtherService();
}
#Configuration
class Config {
#Bean
public MyService myService() {
return new MyService() {
OtherService getOtherService() {
return otherService();
}
}
}
#Bean
#Scope("prototype")
public OtherService otherService() {
return new OtherService();
}
}
Java 8 added a new feature by which we can provide method implementation in interfaces.
Is there any way in Spring 4 by which we can inject beans in the interface which can be used inside the method body?
Below is the sample code
public interface TestWiring{
#Autowired
public Service service;// this is not possible as it would be static.
//Is there any way I can inject any service bean which can be used inside testWiringMethod.
default void testWiringMethod(){
// Call method of service
service.testService();
}
}
This is a bit tricky but it works if you need the dependency inside the interface for whatever requirement.
The idea would be to declare a method that will force the implemented class to provide that dependency you want to autowire.
The bad side of this approach is that if you want to provide too many dependencies the code won't be pretty since you will need one getter for each dependency.
public interface TestWiring {
public Service getService();
default void testWiringMethod(){
getService().testService();
}
}
public class TestClass implements TestWiring {
#Autowire private Service service;
#Override
public Service getService() {
return service;
}
}
You can created Class utils of application context and use it everywhere even not bean class .
you can have code somethins this :
public class ApplicationContextUtil implements ApplicationContextAware {
private static ApplicationContext applicationContext;
#Override
public void setApplicationContext(ApplicationContext context) {
ApplicationContextUtil.applicationContext = context;
}
public static ApplicationContext getApplicationContext() {
return applicationContext;
}
}
and add this to your spring configuration
<bean class="com.example.ApplicationContextUtil" id="applicationContextUtil"/>
now simple to use when you need :
ApplicationContextUtil.getApplicationContext().getBean(SampleBean.class)
this word in web and simple spring app.
I have the following service:
#Service
public class PlayerValidationService {
#Autowire
private EmailService emailService;
public boolean validatePlayerEmail(Player player) {
return this.emailService.validateEmail(player.getEmail());
}
Now in my junit test class i'm using a different 3rd service that uses PlayerValidationService :
public class junit {
#autowire PlayerAccountService playerAccountService ;
#Test
public test() {
this.playerAccountService .createAccount();
assertAllSortsOfThings();
}
Is it possible to mock the EmailService within the PlayerAccountService when using annotation based autowiring? (for example make the mock not checking the validation of the email via the regular email provider we work with)
thanks.
There are a couple of ways in which you could do this. First the simplest option is to ensure that your service provides a setEmailService(EmailService) method. In which case you just replace the Spring-injected implementation with your own.
#Autowired
private PlayerValidationService playerValidationService;
#Mock
private EmailService emailService;
#Before
public void setup() {
initMocks(this);
playerValidationService.setEmailService(emailService);
}
A shortcoming of that approach is that an instance of the full-blown EmailService is likely to be created by Spring. Assuming that you don't want that to happen, you can use 'profiles'.
In your test packages, create a configuration class which is only active in a particular profile:
#Configuration
#Profile("mockemail")
public class MockEmailConfig {
#Bean(name = "emailService")
public EmailService emailService() {
return new MyDummyEmailService();
}
}
And add an annotation to your test to activate that profile:
#ActiveProfiles({ "mockemail" })
public class PlayerValidationServiceTest {
//...
}
Spring is failing to autowire my object? Is it possible to autowire an object within an abstract class. Assume all schemas are supplied in application-context.xml
Question: What annotation should be on the base and extending classes (if any) #Service #Component?
Example
abstract class SuperMan {
#Autowire
private DatabaseService databaseService;
abstract void Fly();
protected void doSuperPowerAction(Thing thing) {
//busy code
databaseService.save(thing);
}
}
Extending class
public class SuperGirl extends SuperMan {
#Override
public void Fly() {
//busy code
}
public doSomethingSuperGirlDoes() {
//busy code
doSuperPowerAction(thing)
}
application-context.xml
<context:component-scan base-package="com.baseLocation" />
<context:annotation-config/>
I have that kind of spring setup working
an abstract class with an autowired field
public abstract class AbstractJobRoute extends RouteBuilder {
#Autowired
private GlobalSettingsService settingsService;
and several children defined with #Component annotation.
Normally, Spring should do the autowiring, as long as your abstract class is in the base-package provided for component scan.
See this and this for further reference.
#Service and #Component are both stereotypes that creates beans of the annotated type inside the Spring container. As Spring Docs state,
This annotation serves as a specialization of #Component, allowing for
implementation classes to be autodetected through classpath scanning.
What if you need any database operation in SuperGirl you would inject it again into SuperGirl.
I think the main idea is using the same object reference in different classes.
So what about this:
//There is no annotation about Spring in the abstract part.
abstract class SuperMan {
private final DatabaseService databaseService;
public SuperMan(DatabaseService databaseService) {
this.databaseService = databaseService;
}
abstract void Fly();
protected void doSuperPowerAction(Thing thing) {
//busy code
databaseService.save(thing);
}
}
#Component
public class SuperGirl extends SuperMan {
private final DatabaseService databaseService;
#Autowired
public SuperGirl (DatabaseService databaseService) {
super(databaseService);
this.databaseService = databaseService;
}
#Override
public void Fly() {
//busy code
}
public doSomethingSuperGirlDoes() {
//busy code
doSuperPowerAction(thing)
}
In my opinion, inject once run everywhere :)
In my case, inside a Spring4 Application, i had to use a classic Abstract Factory Pattern(for which i took the idea from - http://java-design-patterns.com/patterns/abstract-factory/) to create instances each and every time there was a operation to be done.So my code was to be designed like:
public abstract class EO {
#Autowired
protected SmsNotificationService smsNotificationService;
#Autowired
protected SendEmailService sendEmailService;
...
protected abstract void executeOperation(GenericMessage gMessage);
}
public final class OperationsExecutor {
public enum OperationsType {
ENROLL, CAMPAIGN
}
private OperationsExecutor() {
}
public static Object delegateOperation(OperationsType type, Object obj)
{
switch(type) {
case ENROLL:
if (obj == null) {
return new EnrollOperation();
}
return EnrollOperation.validateRequestParams(obj);
case CAMPAIGN:
if (obj == null) {
return new CampaignOperation();
}
return CampaignOperation.validateRequestParams(obj);
default:
throw new IllegalArgumentException("OperationsType not supported.");
}
}
}
#Configurable(dependencyCheck = true)
public class CampaignOperation extends EO {
#Override
public void executeOperation(GenericMessage genericMessage) {
LOGGER.info("This is CAMPAIGN Operation: " + genericMessage);
}
}
Initially to inject the dependencies in the abstract class I tried all stereotype annotations like #Component, #Service etc but even though Spring context file had ComponentScanning for the entire package, but somehow while creating instances of Subclasses like CampaignOperation, the Super Abstract class EO was having null for its properties as spring was unable to recognize and inject its dependencies.After much trial and error I used this **#Configurable(dependencyCheck = true)** annotation and finally Spring was able to inject the dependencies and I was able to use the properties in the subclass without cluttering them with too many properties.
<context:annotation-config />
<context:component-scan base-package="com.xyz" />
I also tried these other references to find a solution:
http://www.captaindebug.com/2011/06/implementing-springs-factorybean.html#.WqF5pJPwaAN
http://forum.spring.io/forum/spring-projects/container/46815-problem-with-autowired-in-abstract-class
https://github.com/cavallefano/Abstract-Factory-Pattern-Spring-Annotation
http://www.jcombat.com/spring/factory-implementation-using-servicelocatorfactorybean-in-spring
https://www.madbit.org/blog/programming/1074/1074/#sthash.XEJXdIR5.dpbs
Using abstract factory with Spring framework
Spring Autowiring not working for Abstract classes
Inject spring dependency in abstract super class
Spring and Abstract class - injecting properties in abstract classes
Spring autowire dependency defined in an abstract class
Please try using **#Configurable(dependencyCheck = true)** and update this post, I might try helping you if you face any problems.