Java 8 added a new feature by which we can provide method implementation in interfaces.
Is there any way in Spring 4 by which we can inject beans in the interface which can be used inside the method body?
Below is the sample code
public interface TestWiring{
#Autowired
public Service service;// this is not possible as it would be static.
//Is there any way I can inject any service bean which can be used inside testWiringMethod.
default void testWiringMethod(){
// Call method of service
service.testService();
}
}
This is a bit tricky but it works if you need the dependency inside the interface for whatever requirement.
The idea would be to declare a method that will force the implemented class to provide that dependency you want to autowire.
The bad side of this approach is that if you want to provide too many dependencies the code won't be pretty since you will need one getter for each dependency.
public interface TestWiring {
public Service getService();
default void testWiringMethod(){
getService().testService();
}
}
public class TestClass implements TestWiring {
#Autowire private Service service;
#Override
public Service getService() {
return service;
}
}
You can created Class utils of application context and use it everywhere even not bean class .
you can have code somethins this :
public class ApplicationContextUtil implements ApplicationContextAware {
private static ApplicationContext applicationContext;
#Override
public void setApplicationContext(ApplicationContext context) {
ApplicationContextUtil.applicationContext = context;
}
public static ApplicationContext getApplicationContext() {
return applicationContext;
}
}
and add this to your spring configuration
<bean class="com.example.ApplicationContextUtil" id="applicationContextUtil"/>
now simple to use when you need :
ApplicationContextUtil.getApplicationContext().getBean(SampleBean.class)
this word in web and simple spring app.
Related
I am using Alfresco Process Services and have created a created a spring boot project for custom logic like TaskListeners and Delegations. I am creating the jar file from this maven project and copying it into webapps/activiti-app/WEB-INF/lib folder.
I have a simple TaskListener as below which is getting called on Task start. But the #Autowired variables are always null.
package com.activiti.extension.bean;
#Component("myTaskListener")
public class MyTaskListener implements TaskListener {
#Autowired
UserService userService;
#Override
public void notify(DelegateTask task) {
logger.info("userService: " +userService); // Always prints null
}
Finally I was able to make it work. I was putting the task listener in the class field of the Task properties with full package name. Now I am putting Delegate expression like ${myTaskListener} and it worked...
Thank you all for your time and help
This is because your your MyTaskListener is annotated as #Component or at least being ignored by spring during init. for auto-wiring capabilities spring requires this annotation (or similar to this) under the provided #ComponentScan packages to consider the class as a bean otherwise it will take as a normal java class and hence the #autowired is of no use in your case.
This below code is worked for me
#Component
public class MyTaskListener implements TaskListener {
public static UserService getUserServiceObject() {
return SpringApplicationContextHolder.getApplicationContext().getBean(UserService.class);
}
#Override
public void notify(DelegateTask delegateTask) {
//UserService Object, It is not null now
getUserServiceObject();
}
}
#Component
public class SpringApplicationContextHolder implements ApplicationContextAware {
private static ApplicationContext applicationContext = null;
public static ApplicationContext getApplicationContext() {
return applicationContext;
}
#Override
public void setApplicationContext(ApplicationContext applicationContext) throws BeansException {
this.applicationContext = applicationContext;
}
}
There is also one more way to get to your custom service "UserService" using Alfresco Spring Application context.
First access ServiceRegistry (registry used for accessing Alfresco Services but also any other custom service):
ServiceRegistry serviceRegistry = (ServiceRegistry) Context.getProcessEngineConfiguration().getBeans().get(ActivitiConstants.SERVICE_REGISTRY_BEAN_KEY);
Then get custom service UserService:
QName qname = QName.createQName("UserService");
UserService userService = (UserService) serviceRegistry.getService(qname);
There have been several arguments around not using ApplicationContext.getBean() to get a bean reference, of which most are based on logic that it violates the principles of Inversion of control.
Is there a way to get reference to prototype scoped bean without calling context.getBean() ?
Consider to use Spring Boot!
Than you can do something like this...
Runner:
#SpringBootApplication
public class Runner{
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(Runner.class, args);
}
}
Some Controller:
#Controller
public class MyController {
// Spring Boot injecting beans through #Autowired annotation
#Autowired
#Qualifier("CoolFeature") // Use Qualifier annotation to mark a class, if for example
// you have more than one concreate class with differant implementations of some interface.
private CoolFeature myFeature;
public void testFeature(){
myFeature.doStuff();
}
}
Some cool feature:
#Component("CoolFeature") // To identify with Qualifier
public class CoolFeature{
#Autowired
private SomeOtherBean utilityBean;
public void doStuff(){
// use utilityBean in some way
}
}
No XML files to handle.
We can still access context for manual configurations if needed.
Suggested reading:
Spring Boot Reference
Pro Spring Boot
This type of problem can be solved using method injection, which is described in more detail here: https://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/html/beans.html#beans-factory-method-injection
This is the most common approach to create prototype bean:
abstract class MyService {
void doSome() {
OtherService otherService = getOtherService();
}
abstract OtherService getOtherService();
}
#Configuration
class Config {
#Bean
public MyService myService() {
return new MyService() {
OtherService getOtherService() {
return otherService();
}
}
}
#Bean
#Scope("prototype")
public OtherService otherService() {
return new OtherService();
}
}
There is the spring-boot application that uses spring-aop. proxy-target-class is true.
I'm trying to create a test for a service class. This service depends on a component class. I want to inject a mock into the service instead of the real component.
I found some similar questions:
Mocking a property of a CGLIB proxied service not working
Injecting Mockito mocks into a Spring bean
I choose this answer to the last question, and I have tried to implement this approach. I chose it because it is not tied to the implementation details of the proxy classes and I can easily use a config class in other tests.
Below there is the example which simulates the real problem.
#org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect
#org.springframework.stereotype.Component
public class Aspect {
#Before("within(demo.Service)")
public void someAdvice() {
System.out.println("advice");
}
}
#org.springframework.stereotype.Service
public class Service {
#Autowired
private Component component;
public void action() {
System.out.println(component.action());
}
}
#org.springframework.stereotype.Component
public class Component {
public String action() {
return "real action";
}
}
#SpringApplicationConfiguration
public class ServiceTest extends BaseTest {
#Autowired
Service service;
#Test
public void testAction() {
service.action();
}
#Configuration
public static class Config {
#Mock Component mock;
public Config() {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
}
#Bean
public Component component() {
Mockito.when(mock.action()).thenReturn("mock action");
return mock;
}
}
}
Complete example: https://github.com/eds0404/spring-inject-mock-into-proxy
The above code is not working as I expect, the service does not use mock ("real action" will be printed if you run test). But the above code works fine if the Component class is not marked with #Component annotation, and its objects are created by the method with #Been annotation.
How to solve this issue? If this is wrong approach, what is best practice?
I'm using Jersey 2 and Spring, and I'm trying to initialize my Jersey application (i.e. the class derived from ResourceConfig) with parameters from the Spring context.
Background: I have a single Jersey application that I build (i.e. a single WAR) and I deploy it across a server cluster with different Spring configurations on different servers to enable or disable different parts of the server, e.g. some of the servers have /search resources turned on, etc. This was really easy in Jersey 1.0: I just put,
<context:component-scan base-package="com.mycompany.resources.search"/>
in a Spring config to have Jersey scan that particular package and enable the JAX-RS resource providers in it.
Now in Jersey 2.0 the Spring <context:component-scan ... /> doesn't work, so resources have to be programmatically registered in a startup class derived from ResourceConfig:
public class MyApplication extends ResourceConfig {
public MyApplication() {
packages("com.mycompany.resources.search");
}
}
So far so good, but I need to conditionally scan that package, and I can't figure out how to get any Spring configuration into the MyApplication class. I thought that constructor injection might work:
public class MyApplication extends ResourceConfig {
#Autowired
public MyApplication(#Qualifier("my-config") MyConfiguration myConfiguration) {
if (myConfiguration.isEnabled()) {
packages("com.mycompany.resources.search");
}
}
}
However HK2 complains that it can't find a default constructor to use... so this indicates to me that DI is in play in the construction of this class, but that the DI isn't using Spring.
Similarly, using the the Spring bean lifecycle doesn't work:
public class MyApplication extends ResourceConfig implements InitializingBean {
#Autowired
private MyConfiguration myConfiguration;
public MyApplication() {
}
#Override
public void afterPropertiesSet() throws Exception {
if (myConfiguration.isEnabled()) {
packages("com.mycompany.resources.search");
}
}
}
(The afterPropertiesSet method isn't called.)
So now I'm stuck: is there any way to configure a Jersey ResourceConfig application object using Spring?
UPDATE:
I accepted #JohnR's answer below but I'll also include my eventual solution which I think is a bit cleaner. #JohnR's answer was to have the object initialized twice: first by Spring and then by Jersey/HK2. When Spring initializes the object you cache the dependencies in a static member, and then when Jersey/HK2 initializes it later you can retrieve the dependencies.
I ended up doing this:
public class MyApplication extends ResourceConfig {
public MyApplication() {
ApplicationContext rootCtx = ContextLoader.getCurrentWebApplicationContext();
MyConfiguration myConfiguration = rootCtx.getBean(MyConfiguration.class);
if (myConfiguration.isEnabled()) {
packages("com.mycompany.resources.whatever");
}
}
}
Rather than having the object initialized twice, we let Jersey/HK2 initialize it but then we retrieve the dependencies from Spring.
Both solutions are vulnerable to timing: they both assume that Spring is initialized before Jersey/HK2.
Expanding on my previous comment:
Trying to extend ResourceConfig is dangerous if you don't know what you're doing. Jersey becomes unpredictable, and if you try to subclass it into an Abstract class, Jersey crashes.
Instead, the JAX-RS specification provides us with a very useful interface called Feature: It allows you to register any classes you want as if you were configuring your own application. Furthermore, you don't need to use the awkward AbstractBinder, you just specify what contracts you register your classes with.
import org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext;
import org.springframework.web.context.support.WebApplicationContextUtils;
import javax.ws.rs.container.DynamicFeature;
import javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerRequestFilter;
import javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerResponseFilter;
import javax.ws.rs.core.Context;
import javax.ws.rs.core.Feature;
import javax.ws.rs.core.FeatureContext;
// Don't use #Component here, we need to inject the Spring context manually.
public class MySpringFeature implements Feature {
#Context
private ServletContext servletContext;
private ApplicationContext applicationContext;
#Autowired
private MySecurityDAO mySecurityDAO;
#Autowired
private MySpringResponseFilter myResponseFilter;
#Override
public boolean configure(FeatureContext context) {
if(this.servletContext == null) {
return false; // ERROR!
}
this.applicationContext = WebApplicationContextUtils.getWebApplicationContext(servletContext);
if(this.applicationContext == null) {
return false; // ERROR!
}
// This is where the magic happens!
AutowireCapableBeanFactory bf = applicationContext.getAutowireCapableBeanFactory();
bf.autowireBean(this);
// From here you can get all the beans you need
// Now we take a Spring bean instance,
// and register it with its appropriate JAX-RS contract
context.register(myResponseFilter, ContainerResponseFilter.class);
// Or, we could do this instead:
SomeSecurityFilter mySecurityFilter = new SomeSecurityFilter();
mySecurityFilter.setSecurityDAO(mySecurityDAO);
context.register(mySegurityFilter, ContainerRequestFilter.class);
// Or even this:
SomeOtherSpringBean someOtherBean = applicationContext.getBean(SomeOtherSpringBean.class);
context.register(someOtherBean, SomeOtherJerseyContract.class);
// Success!
return true;
}
}
And in your ResourceConfig:
public class MyApplication extends ResourceConfig() {
public MyApplication() {
register(MySpringFeature.class);
}
}
Ta-da!
So now I'm stuck: is there any way to configure a Jersey
ResourceConfig application object using Spring?
I don't think you can configure Jersey to obtain your ResourceConfig from Spring as a Spring managed bean. It's a bit hackish, but you could do something like this. Note that you'll end up with two instance of your ResourceConfig: one managed by Spring and another by Jersey:
public class MyApplication extends ResourceConfig {
// static, available to all instances
private static MyConfiguration myConfiguration;
public MyApplication() {
// when Spring creates the first instance of MyApplication, myConfiguration
// will be null because the setter wasn't called yet
if (myConfiguration != null)
{
// second instance created by jersey... Spring will have autowired
// the first instance, and myConfiguration is static
if (myConfiguration.isEnabled())
packages("com.mycompany.resources.search");
}
}
#Autowired
public void setMyConfiguration(MyConfiguration config)
{
// instance level setter saves to a static variable to make it available for
// future instances (i.e. the one created by jersey)
MyApplication.myConfiguration = config;
}
}
Again, this is fairly hackish. You'll want to make sure Spring is initialized before Jersey and look closely at any threading issues that could occur during initialization.
Spring is failing to autowire my object? Is it possible to autowire an object within an abstract class. Assume all schemas are supplied in application-context.xml
Question: What annotation should be on the base and extending classes (if any) #Service #Component?
Example
abstract class SuperMan {
#Autowire
private DatabaseService databaseService;
abstract void Fly();
protected void doSuperPowerAction(Thing thing) {
//busy code
databaseService.save(thing);
}
}
Extending class
public class SuperGirl extends SuperMan {
#Override
public void Fly() {
//busy code
}
public doSomethingSuperGirlDoes() {
//busy code
doSuperPowerAction(thing)
}
application-context.xml
<context:component-scan base-package="com.baseLocation" />
<context:annotation-config/>
I have that kind of spring setup working
an abstract class with an autowired field
public abstract class AbstractJobRoute extends RouteBuilder {
#Autowired
private GlobalSettingsService settingsService;
and several children defined with #Component annotation.
Normally, Spring should do the autowiring, as long as your abstract class is in the base-package provided for component scan.
See this and this for further reference.
#Service and #Component are both stereotypes that creates beans of the annotated type inside the Spring container. As Spring Docs state,
This annotation serves as a specialization of #Component, allowing for
implementation classes to be autodetected through classpath scanning.
What if you need any database operation in SuperGirl you would inject it again into SuperGirl.
I think the main idea is using the same object reference in different classes.
So what about this:
//There is no annotation about Spring in the abstract part.
abstract class SuperMan {
private final DatabaseService databaseService;
public SuperMan(DatabaseService databaseService) {
this.databaseService = databaseService;
}
abstract void Fly();
protected void doSuperPowerAction(Thing thing) {
//busy code
databaseService.save(thing);
}
}
#Component
public class SuperGirl extends SuperMan {
private final DatabaseService databaseService;
#Autowired
public SuperGirl (DatabaseService databaseService) {
super(databaseService);
this.databaseService = databaseService;
}
#Override
public void Fly() {
//busy code
}
public doSomethingSuperGirlDoes() {
//busy code
doSuperPowerAction(thing)
}
In my opinion, inject once run everywhere :)
In my case, inside a Spring4 Application, i had to use a classic Abstract Factory Pattern(for which i took the idea from - http://java-design-patterns.com/patterns/abstract-factory/) to create instances each and every time there was a operation to be done.So my code was to be designed like:
public abstract class EO {
#Autowired
protected SmsNotificationService smsNotificationService;
#Autowired
protected SendEmailService sendEmailService;
...
protected abstract void executeOperation(GenericMessage gMessage);
}
public final class OperationsExecutor {
public enum OperationsType {
ENROLL, CAMPAIGN
}
private OperationsExecutor() {
}
public static Object delegateOperation(OperationsType type, Object obj)
{
switch(type) {
case ENROLL:
if (obj == null) {
return new EnrollOperation();
}
return EnrollOperation.validateRequestParams(obj);
case CAMPAIGN:
if (obj == null) {
return new CampaignOperation();
}
return CampaignOperation.validateRequestParams(obj);
default:
throw new IllegalArgumentException("OperationsType not supported.");
}
}
}
#Configurable(dependencyCheck = true)
public class CampaignOperation extends EO {
#Override
public void executeOperation(GenericMessage genericMessage) {
LOGGER.info("This is CAMPAIGN Operation: " + genericMessage);
}
}
Initially to inject the dependencies in the abstract class I tried all stereotype annotations like #Component, #Service etc but even though Spring context file had ComponentScanning for the entire package, but somehow while creating instances of Subclasses like CampaignOperation, the Super Abstract class EO was having null for its properties as spring was unable to recognize and inject its dependencies.After much trial and error I used this **#Configurable(dependencyCheck = true)** annotation and finally Spring was able to inject the dependencies and I was able to use the properties in the subclass without cluttering them with too many properties.
<context:annotation-config />
<context:component-scan base-package="com.xyz" />
I also tried these other references to find a solution:
http://www.captaindebug.com/2011/06/implementing-springs-factorybean.html#.WqF5pJPwaAN
http://forum.spring.io/forum/spring-projects/container/46815-problem-with-autowired-in-abstract-class
https://github.com/cavallefano/Abstract-Factory-Pattern-Spring-Annotation
http://www.jcombat.com/spring/factory-implementation-using-servicelocatorfactorybean-in-spring
https://www.madbit.org/blog/programming/1074/1074/#sthash.XEJXdIR5.dpbs
Using abstract factory with Spring framework
Spring Autowiring not working for Abstract classes
Inject spring dependency in abstract super class
Spring and Abstract class - injecting properties in abstract classes
Spring autowire dependency defined in an abstract class
Please try using **#Configurable(dependencyCheck = true)** and update this post, I might try helping you if you face any problems.