I'm implementing a login authentication and the backend developer wants me to pass along the key value pairs in the header when i make a GET request. I'm new to AngularJS and I think my problem is the format of my header. I'm able to get a status 200 in Advanced Rest client (chrome extension for testing apis) with this format below. That is the raw format of the key value pairs if i put curly brackets around them or quotes or even a comma it throws an error so i'm very certain that should be the correct format.
identity: foo
password: bar
I've done every format possible to try to replicate it in the above example. So in my Code it goes like this, and i always get an error.
var config = {headers:{'identity': 'foo', 'password':'bar'}};
this.GetUser = function (config) {
return $http.get($rootScope.endPoint + '/user/email_token)', config);
};
you can do it like this:
$http.defaults.headers.common['identity'] = 'foo';
$http.defaults.headers.common['password'] = 'bar';
and call the api without additional properties
this.GetUser = function () {
return $http.get($rootScope.endPoint + '/user/email_token)');
};
Related
I have a url:
https://cn.company.com/appv2/search
and want to have a different map local depending on the request coming with a different parameter in the body (i.e. it is NOT attached to the url like https://cn.company.com/appv2/search?cursor=abc. Instead it is in the body of the request { cursor: abc }.
Any idea on if this can be done in proxyman?
I basically want to be able to stub pagination through the proxy without waiting on a server implementation. So I'd have no cursor on the first request, server would return a cursor and then use that on the next request and get a different response from server on the request so that I can test out the full pagination flow.
Yes, it can be solved with the Scripting from Proxyman app.
Use Scripting to get the value of the request body
If it's matched, use Scripting to mimic the Map Local (Mock API also supports)
Here is the sample code and how to do it:
Firstly, call your request and make sure you can see the HTTPS Response
Right-Click on the request -> Tools -> Scripting
Select the Mock API checkbox if you'd like a Mock API
Use this code
/// This func is called if the Response Checkbox is Enabled. You can modify the Response Data here before it goes to the client
/// e.g. Add/Update/Remove: headers, statusCode, comment, color and body (json, plain-text, base64 encoded string)
///
async function onResponse(context, url, request, response) {
// get the value from the body request
var cursorValue = request.body["cursor"];
// Use if to provide a map local file
if (cursorValue === "abc") {
// Set Content Type as a JSON
response.headers["Content-Type"] = "application/json";
// Set a Map Local File
response.bodyFilePath = "~/Desktop/my_response_A.json";
} else if (cursorValue === "def") {
// Set Content Type as a JSON
response.headers["Content-Type"] = "application/json";
// Set a Map Local File
response.bodyFilePath = "~/Desktop/my_response_B.json";
}
// Done
return response;
}
Reference
Map Local with Scripting: https://docs.proxyman.io/scripting/snippet-code#map-a-local-file-to-responses-body-like-map-local-tool-proxyman-2.25.0+
I have a question regarding a small issue that I'm having. I've created a widget that will live on the Service Portal to allow an admin to Accept or Reject requests.
The data for the widget is pulling from the Approvals (approval_approver) table. Under my GlideRecord, I have a query that checks for the state as requested. (Ex. addQuery('state', 'requested'))
To narrow down the search, I tried entering addQuery('sys_id', current.sys_id). When I use this query, my script breaks and I get an error on the Service Portal end.
Here's a sample of the GlideRecord script I've written to Accept.
[//Accept Request
if(input && input.action=="acceptApproval") {
var inRec1 = new GlideRecord('sysapproval_approver');
inRec1.addQuery('state', 'requested');
//inRec1.get('sys_id', current.sys_id);
inRec1.query();
if(inRec1.next()) {
inRec1.setValue('state', 'Approved');
inRec1.setValue('approver', gs.getUserID());
gs.addInfoMessage("Accept Approval Processed");
inRec1.update();
}
}][1]
I've research the web, tried using $sp.getParameter() as a work-around and no change.
I would really appreciate any help or insight on what I can do different to get script to work and filter the right records.
If I understand your question correctly, you are asking how to get the sysId of the sysapproval_approver record from the client-side in a widget.
Unless you have defined current elsewhere in your server script, current is undefined. Secondly, $sp.getParameter() is used to retrieve URL parameters. So unless you've included the sysId as a URL parameter, that will not get you what you are looking for.
One pattern that I've used is to pass an object to the client after the initial query that gets the list of requests.
When you're ready to send input to the server from the client, you can add relevant information to the input object. See the simplified example below. For the sake of brevity, the code below does not include error handling.
// Client-side function
approveRequest = function(sysId) {
$scope.server.get({
action: "requestApproval",
sysId: sysId
})
.then(function(response) {
console.log("Request approved");
});
};
// Server-side
var requestGr = new GlideRecord();
requestGr.addQuery("SOME_QUERY");
requestGr.query(); // Retrieve initial list of requests to display in the template
data.requests = []; // Add array of requests to data object to be passed to the client via the controller
while(requestsGr.next()) {
data.requests.push({
"number": requestsGr.getValue("number");
"state" : requestsGr.getValue("state");
"sysId" : requestsGr.getValue("sys_id");
});
}
if(input && input.action=="acceptApproval") {
var sysapprovalGr = new GlideRecord('sysapproval_approver');
if(sysapprovalGr.get(input.sysId)) {
sysapprovalGr.setValue('state', 'Approved');
sysapprovalGr.setValue('approver', gs.getUserID());
sysapprovalGr.update();
gs.addInfoMessage("Accept Approval Processed");
}
...
I am trying to create a Zapier app to create a new invoice in Zoho.
Has the requirements: Content-Type: application: x-www-form-urlencoded and input JSON string should be passed using JSONString parameter
The following URI is working for me in REST console when I set the Content Type to "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" and method POST.
https://invoice.zoho.com/api/v3/invoices?authtoken=xxxxxx&organization_id=xxxxxx&JSONString={"customer_id":"xxxxxx","line_items":[{"item_id":"xxxxxx"}]}
However my problem is trying to implement this into Zapier. I think I need to use a function like below to convert the JSON into the right format, but I have no idea how to turn this into a query paramater called JSONString.
create_invoice_pre_write: function(bundle) {
var data = JSON.parse(bundle.request.data);
bundle.request.data = $.param(data);
bundle.request.headers['Content-Type'] = 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded';
return bundle.request;
}
Just need a point in the right direction. I'm not sure what to try next.
You can create an Invoice in Zoho Invoice through Zapier using the below snippet of code.
You can set the query params in bundle.request.params which you want to send it to ZI for the creation of Invoice.
create_invoice_pre_write: function(bundle)
{
var data = JSON.parse(bundle.request.data);
bundle.request.method = "POST",
bundle.request.url = "https://invoice.zoho.com/api/v3/invoices",
bundle.request.params.authtoken = {authtoken},
bundle.request.params.organization_id = {organization_id},
bundle.request.params.JSONString = data
bundle.request.headers= "'Content-Type':'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'";
return bundle.request;
}
This should be working for you. If you have any doubts do let me know.
I have searched in this forum for quiet a bit and here's my problem -
I have a ng-repeat in my html which takes in a list of messages(Json object).
Each message JSON has a sender email address - e.g. abc#gmail.com
Now, I have to get the email address from the message and form another REST API request to fetch their images for e.g. - http://<>:8080/getImage/abc#gmail.com (email address dynamic)
So in my code, I'll have a ng-repeat and a ng-src pointing to the image REST URL
If there's no image in server, it returns a 404 and displays a broken image on the UI. How do I handle it? On the other hand, if I make a http request to determine if there's a success message and on failure return a default image, then the whole thing goes through an endless loop. I'll try to create a fiddle and include it for better explanation.
Use the error block to handle such behavior:
function($http) {
var restUrl = 'getImage/abc';
return {
fetchImage: function(imageId) {
var self = this;
return $http.get(restUrl + '/' + imageId).
success(function(data) {
return self.imageUrl = data;
}).
error(function(data) {
return self.imageUrl = "pathToDefaultImage";
});
},
...
I have a servicestack service which when called via the browser (restful) Url ex:http://localhost:1616/myproducts, it works fine.
The service method has RedisCaching enabled. So first time it hits the data repository and caches it for subsequent use.
My problem is when I try calling it from a c# client via Soap12ServiceClient. It returns the below error:
Error in line 1 position 183. Expecting element '<target response>'
from namespace 'http://schemas.datacontract.org/2004/07/<target namespace>'..
Encountered 'Element' with name 'base64Binary',
namespace 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/'.
Below is my Client code:
var endpointURI = "http://mydevelopmentapi.serverhostingservices.com:1616/";
using (IServiceClient client = new Soap12ServiceClient(endpointURI))
{
var request = new ProductRequest { Param1 = "xy23432"};
client.Send<ProductResponse>(request);
}
It seems that the soapwsdl used is giving the problem, but I appear to have used the defaults as generated by servicestack..
Any help will be much appreciated.
Update
I was able over come this error by changing the cache code at the service end:
Code that returned error at client end:
return RequestContext.ToOptimizedResultUsingCache(this.CacheClient, cacheKey,
() =>
new ProductResponse(){CreateDate = DateTime.UtcNow,
products = new productRepository().Getproducts(request)
});
Code that works now:
var result = this.CacheClient.Get<ProductResponse>(cacheKey);
if (result == null)
{
this.CacheClient.Set<ProductResponse>(cacheKey, productResult);
result = productResult;
}
return result;
But I am still curious to know why the first method (RequestContext.ToOptimizedResultUsingCache) returned error at c# client?
But I am still curious to know why the first method (RequestContext.ToOptimizedResultUsingCache) returned error at c# client?
From what I can tell, the ToOptimizedResultUsingCache is trying to pull a specific format (xml, html, json, etc) out of the cache based on the RequestContext's ResponseContentType (see code here and here). When using the Soap12ServiceClient the ResponseContentType is text/html (not sure if this is correct/intentional within ServiceStack). So what ToOptimizedResultUsingCache is pulling out of the cache is a string of html. The html string is being returned to the Soap12ServiceClient and causing an exception.
By pulling directly out of the cache you are bypassing ToOptimizedResultUsingCache's 'format check' and returning something the Soap12ServiceClient can handle.
** If you are using Redis and creating your key with UrnId.Create method you should see a key like urn:ProductResponse:{yourkey}.html
Thanks for your response paaschpa.
I revisited the code and I was able to fix it. Since your response gave me the direction, I have accepted your answer. Below is my fix.
I moved the return statement from RequestContext to the response DTO.
Code which throws error when used via c# client (code was returning entire requestcontext):
return RequestContext.ToOptimizedResultUsingCache(this.CacheClient, cacheKey,
() =>
new ProductResponse(){CreateDate = DateTime.UtcNow,
products = new productRepository().Getproducts(request)
});
Fixed Code (return moved to response DTO):
RequestContext.ToOptimizedResultUsingCache(this.CacheClient, cacheKey,
() => {
return new ProductResponse(){CreateDate = DateTime.UtcNow,
products = new productRepository().Getproducts(request)
}
});