I use YouTrack online by Jetbrains for issue tracking, but have found that it appears to not support sorting by multiple fields. For example, if I enter this search phrase: order by: Priority asc, created desc then it will only sort by the Priority of the issue ascending.
Within each priority, the dates are not sorted (I want the most recently filed ones at the top of each priority grouping).
Also, if I change the search to: order by: created desc then it sorts the entire list by created date descending, but of course lose the priority groupings.
My conclusion is that it is only supporting a single level sort - Anyone know if there is a way to achieve the functionality I desire?
YouTrack does support sorting by multiple fields, here's an example: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issues?q=order+by%3A+Priority+asc%2C+created+desc .
So I suggest that you contact YouTrack support on this issue.
Related
For my requirement, I've got a specific layout for a report. To simplify, the series of Categories should present the Areas in a particular order (financial information).
Every Category will be present on a different Page on Power BI. However, as you can see, some areas belong to multiple Categories. Because of this, I'm getting an error message if I try to order this column by an index, and I can't modify the name of the area.
Is it possible to specify on a cross table that I do not need it to perform any alphabetic order?
I've looked for a possible answer, but so far I have not found any solution to this.
Regards.
I'm bit confused with Algolia settings releated to sorting, specifically in the dashboard I created new replicas, products_price_asc & products_price_desc. Then I come to the ranking formula and added a "price" attribute to the sorting.
However, it allows me to pick up the price attribute only once, so as to specify the sorting order of the price.
So the result is, that I have a dropdown menu with 2 options (price order ASC and DESC), but only one of them works correctly.
It's my first day with Algolia, so maybe I've missed something, but if anyone can explain me, how to implement this, I'll be happy.
Thanks in advance.
Creating replicas for sorting is the right first step: you need one replica per sorting order (in your case, one for sorting by price DESC, and one for sorting by price ASC).
But you need to update the Ranking Formula on the replicas themselves, not on the main index.
So, on products_asc, you should set this:
And on products_desc, you should set this:
Now, when you need to order results by ascending price, you should target the products_asc index for your search. When ordering by price descending, it will be products_desc.
On a number of reports I have noticed that setting sort options through the tablix properties does not work. I choose the data I'd like to sort by (date) and set the option (Z to A), but the report still shows unsorted. Has anyone else seen this issue? I have read that updating the report xml to include the sort may be what needs to be done because the report builder does not preserve the changes made. Haven't gone down that road yet as I'm looking to see if there's a fix already identified.
Date Type Lead Name State distance Consultant ZIP State 1 Level Reason url
Those are the columns from the export with data filling each column. Can't give too much info because it shows phone numbers and addresses.
One option is to sort the data in your dataset. Then you can leave it and SSRS will honor that.
As the others mentioned, make sure you check the datatype so it's not trying to sort the dates as a string.
Set the sort priorities at the group level, not on the table or dataset properties.
You should never have to edit the XML to get this to work. This is a basic built-in feature that most reports use.
Do you have groups on your tablix? if yes, did you try sorting it with the Row Groups or Column Groups at bottom instead of the sorting properties of the tablix?
SSRS 2008
I've defined Interactive sort on a column that has also null values.
I want the nulls to always appear at the end of the report regardless of whether the
direction is Ascending or Descending.
Report is displayed by Reportviewer in VS2010
User clicks on column header to activate interactive sort
All help/suggestions are welcome.
I can think of one workaround here, which may or may not help, but at worst might give you more ideas.
What you can try doing is actually use two tables, and apply the sort to only one, but make it look like one table in the report.
Create two tables:
Apply filters to the tables to show non-null values in the first and null values in the second.
I used the expression:
=IIf(IsNothing(Fields!val2.Value), "NULL", "NOTNULL")
Apply Interactive Sorting to the first table.
This gives the results:
So in this simple case it's achieving what you're after.
Since it's actually two objects, you might get breaks in places users don't expect; this could be mitigated by keeping the objects together with a Rectangle.
If you're looking for multiple columns this might not be suitable, but hopefully it helps.
I have several Qlikview charts that have interactive sorting enabled but the odd part is some columns can be sorted ascending or descending and others can only be sorted one way. Nothing happens if you click on the column again.
Each field has a proper sort defined, it looks like a bug - anyone else experience this?
Thanks
Dan
It happens often when on the sort tab of the properties it has selected more than one way of sorting for example you have a field that has sort as text and numeric value