I want to build a full version of Ubuntu 14 desktop as the base image for gui applications, I know how to build on the Ubuntu desktop version by the debootstrap, as described in https://docs.docker.com/articles/baseimages/, but that is a minimal Linux version and some GUI application cannot run perfectly, because there are some basic components missing, such as a font family, so I want the full control of a basic image, thanks!
fcwu/docker-ubuntu-vnc-desktop
https://github.com/fcwu/docker-ubuntu-vnc-desktop provides a convenient setup:
docker run --name ubvnc -p 6080:80 -p 5900:5900 dorowu/ubuntu-desktop-lxde-vnc:bionic
Then either:
visit: http://127.0.0.1:6080/#/ which runs a noVNC more limited JavaScript VNC client
run:
sudo apt-get install tigervnc-viewer
xtigervncviewer :5900
Then inside vinagre, you might want to go into full screen mode to be able to see the full desktop
I also tried vinagre, but it was much laggier when scrolling Firefox on YouTube.
To quit just kill docker on the terminal. And to restart the machine
docker start ubvnc
and then reconnect with VNC. Then to quit the machine:
docker stop ubvnc
You have to wait a few seconds for the VNC server on the guest to start before you can connect.
Chromium won't start from the menu. If you try to launch it from the command line it explains why:
Running as root without --no-sandbox is not supported. See https://crbug.com/638180.
Firefox does not care however.
TODO: no audio. --device /dev/snd did not help:
How to play sound in a docker container
https://forums.docker.com/t/how-to-get-sound/36527
https://github.com/fcwu/docker-ubuntu-vnc-desktop/issues/49
See also:
Can you run GUI applications in a Docker container?
How to open Ubuntu GUI inside a Docker image
Tested on Ubuntu 19.04 host, fcwu/docker-ubuntu-vnc-desktop, dorowu/ubuntu-desktop-lxde-vnc image id: 70516b87e92d.
I don't see the benefits of it, but impossible n'est pas français (impossible isn't French).
Docker Desktop is a way that will give you an X11 server to connect on using SSH.
This Dockerfile creates a docker image and once it's executed it creates a container that runs X11 and SSH services. The ssh is used to forward X11 and provide you encrypted data communication between the docker container and your local machine.
Related
I am on a corporate Windows laptop and I want to start experimenting with Docker. Being a corporate machine, everything needs to go through the corporate proxy.
I installed Debian on WSL and then the Docker Desktop, which installed its components on the Debian WSL VM. My first priority however was to test docker on WSL directly and not through Docker Desktop. So I set to read the Docker docs and download the docker/getting-started image through the Debian terminal. That, however, failed due to not using the network proxy.
Desktop Docker docs state that setting the proxy settings on Docker Desktop will propagate the proxy settings to Docker itself. Indeed, I set the proxy settings on Docker Desktop, and I was now able to properly download my image from inside Debian.
Since I want to have full control of Docker through the Debian terminal and not Docker Desktop, I want to understand in which way the proxy settings propagate to Docker inside WSL. I imagined that Docker Desktop altered some configuration file inside Debian, but a grep on the whole system of the proxy ip got me nothing. So my question is, in what way does the Docker Desktop let Docker know which proxy to use?
As much as I know, And am not 100% sure as I have not worked with docker in a while.
When you start docker service in WSL, this will trigger the init.d/docker script, And when you set the Company proxy manually in docker desktop, The loading time is :
Stopping Docker service
Updating configuration Script at /etc/init.d/docker
Starting the service again, and with it the new script
And to make sure that this is valid, You can try to check the /etc/init.d/docker script contents.
and as an alternative way of not adding the scripts manually. you can export the proxy configuration in WSL, and check if it will work without adding the proxy configuration to Docker Desktop.
my goal is to run Windows container with a desktop app (EXE) installed inside, having its own GUI (CAD).
It's not a problem to build the container, installing silently the app, however I cannot realize how its output (GUI) would be redirect/catch up in Windows docker host to interact with it.
Digging web I found DISPLAY envvar setting for Linux container, but nothing for Windows' one.
I cannot believe it's impossible to get graphic output from Windows Container.
Please help,
Thanks in advance!
Yes, unfortunately docker containers are not designed for GUI using. It possible if only your app is accessible through web browser
you need XServer, running on windows host machine
for example, install VcSrv https://sourceforge.net/projects/vcxsrv/
run it, then see ipconfig in console
find vEthernet ipv4
my ipconfig
use it when run docker container, for example try
docker run --rm -it --net=host -e DISPLAY=172.22.96.1:0 stefanscherer/xeyes
in env DISPLAY set your ipv4 from vEthernet in ipconfig
I try to run docker in bash ubuntu on windows. But every time I get this message
"Cannot connect to the Docker daemon at unix:///var/run/docker.sock. Is the docker daemon running?". If i run it in powershell - it work. Can somebody help?
Connecting to the docker deamon requires some privilidges that you don't have when starting the bash terminal.
You can however use the docker command terminal which will allow you to interact with the docker deamon.
Found the solution on this post: https://blog.jayway.com/2017/04/19/running-docker-on-bash-on-windows/
Connect Docker on WSL to Docker on Windows
Running docker against an engine on a different machine is actually quite easy, as Docker can expose a TCP endpoint which the CLI can attach to.
This TCP endpoint is turned off by default; to activate it, right-click the Docker icon in your taskbar and choose Settings, and tick the box next to “Expose daemon on tcp://localhost:2375 without TLS”.
With that done, all we need to do is instruct the CLI under Bash to connect to the engine running under Windows instead of to the non-existing engine running under Bash, like this:
$ docker -H tcp://0.0.0.0:2375 images
REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE
There are two ways to make this permanent – either add an alias for the above command, or better yet, export an environment variable which instructs Docker where to find the host engine:
$ echo "export DOCKER_HOST='tcp://0.0.0.0:2375'" >> ~/.bashrc
$ source ~/.bashrc
Now, running docker commands from Bash works just like they’re supposed to.
$ docker run hello-world
Hello from Docker!This message shows that your installation appears to be working correctly.
I have been experimenting with docker the aim is
Install docker on windows 16
for which I am following instructions from https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/windowscontainers/quick_start/quick_start_windows_server
everything looks fine till installation of the docker , after that when I try to test the docker it give
below error.
failed to register layer: re-exec error: exit status 1: output: ProcessBaseLayer C:\ProgramData\docker\windowsfilter\0c9
effd422805350acb1f051eb171399678aff003192c41be274acc4762b786c: The system cannot find the path specified.
here I am just trying to pull "hello-world" from docker hub
My ultimate aim is to run IIS on docker container and deploy the application running on IIS.
Had anyone faced such issue or could come up with any suggestions
its VM machine with
OS :- Win2016
HDD :- 50GB
RAM :- 4GB
You can't pull the hello-world image from docker hub because it's linux image. I used to see it before while playing with Docker Container on windows when trying to do the same thing.
If you want to get different image like IIS, just run command follow the instructions:
First:
Install-PackageProvider ContainerImage -Force
Then
Install-ContainerImage -Name WindowsServerCore
After that, restart your docker container with
Restart-Service docker
And you'll have the images of IIS on your machine.
I've tried to get the images of windows as the way we do in Linux but it always throw error as you have, I guess that all images we have on hub now are for Linux only, so if you want to have particular things, you must build it by yourselves or using existed images for Windows on Docker hub (about 9 or 10 images as I remember).
This is probably because there's no hello-world image for Windows. You can try running docker run windowsservercore cmd /C hello world.
I wanted to start the docker daemon with an open TCP address like this: docker daemon -H tcp://0.0.0.0:2375, but the terminal suggested that I use dockerd instead, which is apparently not a program that comes with the Docker Client for mac. Is there a way I can either
A - get some form of dockerd on my mac machine.
B - get around the use of dockerd by some other method.
?
Install socat command: brew install socat
Choose a port: (in the example 8099)
Run: socat -d -d TCP-L:8099,fork UNIX:/var/run/docker.sock
and then use tcp://localhost:8099 as API URL
works for me, hope this helps
Finally I found the config of mac docker like dockerd.
Click the docker icon in the menu bar, preferences, advanced
get around the use of dockerd by some other method. (2016)
Note that in 2022, you can go without dockerd/Docker Desktop entirely.
See Batuhan Apaydin's article "A modern toolkit to start working with container images on macOS that meets your needs without requiring a Docker Daemon or even Docker Desktop".
It uses lima+nerdctl
The nerdctl tool is designed as a drop-in replacement for the Docker client
And Lima is a hypervisor that launches Linux virtual machines with automatic file sharing, port forwarding, and containerd.
The name of lima comes from an abbreviation of the first two capital letters of LInux MAchines.
The design of Lima is similar to WSL2, but Lima focuses on macOS as the primary target host.
Lima uses QEMU, which is a generic and open source machine emulator and virtualizer, as a hypervisor under the hood to achieve the virtualization thing.
Lima can also work with other container engines such as Podman and even for non-container applications.
By default, when lima launches a VM, it runs buildkitd and containerd in a rootless way and also downloads necessary client tooling around them such as buildctl, nerdctl.
Everything will be set up for us. So, all that’s left is building, pulling, and running containers
For buildkit, Batuhan proposes developer-guy/buildkit-machine
buildkit-machine allows you to make buildkitd daemon accessible in your macOS environment.
To do so, it uses lima, which is a Linux subsystem for macOS, under the hood.
lima spins up a VM that runs buildkitd daemon in a rootless way which means that sock file of the buildkitd daemon is now be able to accessible from /run/user/<USERID>/buildkit/buildkitd.
So: no more Docker Desktop / dockerd, and use container in a rootless mode!
For more, see Bret Fisher's video "Free Docker Desktop Alternatives: DevOps and Docker Live Show (Ep 156)" (Jan. 2022)
I have found a workaround for this in the official forum
https://forums.docker.com/t/using-pycharm-docker-plugin-with-docker-beta/8617/9
$socat TCP-LISTEN:2376,reuseaddr,fork UNIX-CLIENT:/var/run/docker.sock
That workaround opens port 2376 to the world... as TLS isn't enabled, this is a bad idea as anyone on the same network can hijack your docker daemon
It is not supported to run dockerd on Mac. From this issue:
I think on Darwin it should never suggest to run dockerd. The daemon runs in a Linux virtual machine, so you do not need to (and cannot) run it manually.
If you want to do any specific configuration on mac, you might have already installed Docker Desktop. Docker desktop supports configuration using UserInterface shown below in the screenshot.