how can i add #somelink to laravel route - laravel

I want to create a laravel route that links to a named anchor in a page. Could someone help with how to achieve that. Example: return Redirect::route('admin.articles.edit#somelink', $article->id);
In this case the route is in a controller which is redirecting back to the pages' comments section

I was looking for this and stumbled upon this older question.
The "possible duplicate" has an answer for the case where the link is created in a view (i.e. in html). It may not be immediately clear that this can also be used in returning a redirect route from a controller, as OP seemed to require (some years ago :).
At least in Laravel 5.5, it is possible to use this in the redirect()->to() function, e.g.:
return redirect()->to(
route('admin.articles.edit', [$article->id]) . "#somelink"
);
Based on this answer.

Related

How to return to another page after finishing process in Laravel?

This is a little bit hard to understand even the title I put. Sorry about that I just do not know how to clearly explain this, but I will try...
So for example I have a controller and inside that controller I have a function which return the data in the table of my database. then in the last column of every row, I make view,add,edit,delete options as links. When a user clicks on the add for example, they will redirect to an add page. After they submit the form of the add page. they should be redirected to the first page that return the data from the table. but the problem is, the variables of foreach loop in the first page do not got recognized by laravel anymore. because they do not got processed since the route does not goes to the controller and to the function that return the data instead it goes to add function.
So I want to know is there anyway to solve this? If you could provide sample code, I would appreciate a lot thanks
From your explanation, I believe the code to go back to the original page after adding, editing etc is simply return redirect()->back(). This will take the user back to the previous page. As for data continuity, one approach would be considering using sessions. They save data globally and can be accessed from any controller once saved. To do this, simply save the data with session(['session_name' => $data]) and to retrieve the data use session('session_name'). Let me know if this helps!
If you want ti redirect after something like a login or an activation process you can do it with something like this:
return redirect()->to('login')
You can specify the path from your web.php file as you can see in my example in 'myPath'
As #DerickMasai correctly pointed out it is better to use named routes instead of hard coding the path itself.
Naming a route can work like so:
Route::get('/login', [LoginController::class, 'index'])->name('login');

Laravel 5.7 Passing a value to a route in a controller

My controller posts a form to create a new page. After posting the form I need to redirect the user to the new page that will have the contents for that page that were entered in the previous form. If I simply do return view('mynewpageview', compact('mycontent')); where my mycontent is the object used to execute the $mycontent->save(); command, I carry the risk for someone refreshing the url thus posting the same content twice by creating a new page.
Instead I would like to redirect the user to the actual page url.
My route is
Route::get('/newpage/{id}', 'PageController#pagebyid'); and if I use return redirect()->route('/newpage/$pageid'); where $pageid = $mycontent->id; I get Route not defined error.
What would be the solution either to stop someone from resubmitting the content or a correct syntax for passing the parameter?
The correct answer that works for me is -
Give your route a name in the routes file
Then pass the parameters with an array as shown below in the controller.
return redirect()->route('newpageid', ['id' => $pageid]);
With basic (unnamed) routes, the correct syntax was return redirect('/newpage/'.$pageid);
You have already found out you can alternatively use named routes.
Last but not least, thanks for having considered the "double submit" issue! You have actually implemented the PRG pattern :)

Laravel return from controller and continue routing

I haven't found an answer whether it is possible to return from a Laravel controller back to routers and continue searching for another route. Or maybe, another approach would be useful to solve this:
The goal is to have blog articles with url following the domain name like this:
domain.com/url-of-blog-article
so, my route looks like this:
Route::get ('{articleUrl}', 'WEB\BlogController#showArticle');
However, if the article with the requested url doesn't exists, I would like to return back to the router and continue with searching another page. One solution might be to put this route to the end of the router. But, is there a way to return from the controller without a view?
I don't believe that's possible. Moreover, even if it were, I wouldn't recommend it -- your application would waste time searching the database for an article that doesn't exist, and it would go against the router's convention of matching a single route for a given URL.

MVC Routing Engine routes same formatted route to different controller actions

Okay, I did my homework and search SO, and indeed I found similar questions but not reporting the behavior I'm getting.
Here is the deal, I have defined a route:
routes.MapRoute("CategoryName", "Category/Name/{text}",
new { controller = "Category", action = "Name", text = "" });
The twist here is the following:
This url: http://www.url.com/Category/Name/existingCategoryName
And this url: http://www.url.com/Category/Name/anotherExistingCategoryName
Both url's should go to the same controller method which is public ActionResult Name(string text) but sadly the first url is going to the default Index method, the second is being routed correctly.
I wonder why this happens, as I've been with .net mvc for several years and never experienced this behavior.
As a side note here are some facts:
As it's being route to different methods, I doubt the code inside them has something to do with it.
When manually write the category to something it doesn't exists in the DB as a category name it goes through the Name method.
The routes are placed correctly, as I'm aware the first route that matches the pattern will win.
Even I tried place the CategoryName route first, the behavior is the same.
When writing each link in the Category/Index I use the same #Html.RouteLink() helper, so all the links are formatted the same way.
Thanks in advance!
Are you using the - sign in the failing route?
Maybe you can find more information with the Routing debugger
And maybe you can look at this question: Failing ASP.NET MVC route. Is this a bug or corner case?
Phil Haack also give an possible answer to your problem in: ASP.NET routing: Literal sub-segment between tokens, and route values with a character from the literal sub-segment

Redirect CI problem

I'm kind of new with CodeIgniter and I'm still learning (a lot).
So I have a view and when I submit a form I 'call' the controller by surfing to the right URL dynamically e.g. site/delete
class Site extends Controller {
function index(){$this->load->view('...')}
function delete() {
$this->site_model->delete_row();
$this->index();
}
}
Now when that action is done (deleted the row) I'm calling $this->index(); to redirect to my initial page (which is good) but my url stays: site/delete . I want my URL to be ../site/index (or without the /index)
Any help would be appreciated :-) .
So far I found something to solve this:
instead of:
$this->index();
I'm using:
redirect('site');
Does anyone know this is a good practice?
Redirect is what you should use.
In the user guide:
http://codeigniter.com/user_guide/helpers/url_helper.html
they use it after checking if a user is logged in. Depending on if they are or not, they redirect to a different place.
Also, note that any code after the redirect won't run. Make sure and redirect after you've done everything you need to.
My preferred method is to have actions like that handled by the same method that will be seen by the user afterwards.
What if you go to /site/delete afterwards, as a user? It will either have to detect and throw a error (show a message) or redirect to an appropriate page. /site/delete has no meaning.
For example, if a user would normally see an overview after deleting, then my form will be posted to /site/index; with index quickly checking for the condition and calling _delete() in the same controller, before doing its normal work.
That way, if the user refreshes the page, or presses 'back', things should look consistent to them.
Another example would be that /settings/edit would post to itself - this means that it can act on the post and show any output (e.g. validation errors). It means there's no /settings/do_edit location on my site, and also means that the user can go back to /settings/edit safely, and see a form for editing their settings.
I suppose this is a subjective take on a perhaps objective question, and I would encourage feedback on my view, but it's my way of avoiding the problem you have asked about.
$this->index();
Call of function in a function simply execute the functionality within that function.
And url never changed.
for changing the url you should use.
redirect ( base_url().'site');
but you should load url helper in constructor.

Resources