What is the correct way to use backgroundCompletionHandler in Alamofire? - nsurlsession

I'm not clear on how to use this properly but had seen other people doing this type of thing:
func application(application: UIApplication, handleEventsForBackgroundURLSession identifier: String, completionHandler: () -> Void) {
manager.sharedInstance.backgroundCompletionHandler = completionHandler
}
In our similar implementation, at this point completionHandler is partial apply forwarder for reabstraction thunk helper...
Where manager is (despite being a singleton) essentially:
let configuration = NSURLSessionConfiguration.backgroundSessionConfigurationWithIdentifier("com.ourcompany.app")
let manager = Alamofire.Manager(configuration: configuration)
However this causes the following warning to be printed in the console:
Warning: Application delegate received call to -application:handleEventsForBackgroundURLSession:completionHandler: but the completion handler was never called.
I set a breakpoint here and at this point the message is already visible in the console and backgroundCompletionHandler is nil.
We're building against the iOS 9 SDK with Xcode 7.0 and currently using Alamofire 2.0.2
I originally thought this was introduced when we merged our Swift 2.0 branch but I'm also seeing the message with an earlier commit using Xcode 6.4 against the iOS 8 SDK.
Update 1
To address #cnoon's suggestions:
The identifier matches - the configuration and manager are set inside a singleton so there's no way for it to be wrong.
When adding and printing inside of didSet on backgroundCompletionHandler in the Manager class, the message is logged before the warning.
When printing inside of the closure set to sessionDidFinishEventsForBackgroundURLSession on the delegate inside the Manager class, the message is printed after the warning.
When overriding sessionDidFinishEventsForBackgroundURLSession and printing inside of it before calling backgroundCompletionHandler, the message is printed after the warning.
As for verifying I have my Xcode project set up correctly for background sessions, I'm not sure how to do that and couldn't find any documentation on how to do so.
I should note that when trying to upload some screenshots from my phone I was initially unable to reproduce this issue in order to try these suggestions.
It was only after trying to share some photos that I was able to reproduce this again. I'm not sure or the correlation (if any) but it may be related to the photos taking longer to upload.
Update 2
The UIBackgroundModes are set exactly as #Nick described, and calling completionHandler() directly inside of application:handleEventsForBackgroundURLSession:completionHandler: does not display the warning.
Update 3
So, it appears I overlooked an small but important detail. There's a wrapper around Alamofire.Manager that doesn't expose it directly. The relevant part of its implementation looks like this:
private var manager: Manager
public var backgroundCompletionHandler: (() -> Void)? {
get {
return manager.backgroundCompletionHandler
}
set {
manager.backgroundCompletionHandler = backgroundCompletionHandler
}
}
and setting the completion handler in the AppDelegate executes that code path.
func application(application: UIApplication, handleEventsForBackgroundURLSession identifier: String, completionHandler: () -> Void) {
myManager.sharedInstance.backgroundCompletionHandler = completionHandler
}
I've confirmed that the following change to expose the instance of Alamofire.Manager and access it directly does not produce the warning:
public var manager: Manager
// public var backgroundCompletionHandler: (() -> Void)? {
// get {
// return manager.backgroundCompletionHandler
// }
// set {
// manager.backgroundCompletionHandler = backgroundCompletionHandler
// }
// }
and in the AppDelegate:
func application(application: UIApplication, handleEventsForBackgroundURLSession identifier: String, completionHandler: () -> Void) {
myManager.sharedInstance.manager.backgroundCompletionHandler = completionHandler
}
Based on this it appears that using a computed property to proxy the completion handler is the cause of the issue.
I'd really prefer not to expose this property and would love to know of any workarounds or alternatives.

It appears as though everything you are doing is correct. I have an example app that does exactly what you've described that works correctly and does not throw the warning you are seeing. I'm guessing you still have some small error somewhere. Here are a few ideas to try out:
Verify the identifier matches the identifier of your background session
Add a didSet log statement on the backgroundSessionHandler in the Manager class temporarily to verify it is getting set
Add a log statement into the sessionDidFinishEventsForBackgroundURLSession to verify it is getting called as expected
Override the sessionDidFinishEventsForBackgroundURLSession on the delegate and manually call the backgroundSessionHandler
Verify you have your Xcode project set up correctly for background sessions
Update 2
Your computed property is wrong. Instead it needs to set the backgroundCompletionHandler to newValue. Otherwise you are never setting it to the new value correctly. See this thread for more info.

Related

Unable to connect WKExtensionDelegate in Xcode 14 watch app

In the Apple developer docs chapter "There and Back Again" the watch app's App is written like this:
#main
struct MyWatchApp: App {
#WKExtensionDelegateAdaptor(ExtensionDelegate.self) var extensionDelegate
#SceneBuilder var body: some Scene {
WindowGroup {
NavigationView {
ContentView()
}
}
}
}
Unfortunately I get a purple runtime warning on my var declaration that says
#WKExtensionDelegateAdaptor should only be used within an extension based process
There must be something in Xcode that explicitly defines the App structure as "extension-based" but I can't find it!
Edit: More clarification... I am trying to handle the special method that gets called after you run the HealthKit method startWatchApp(with:completion:)
The special method for watch extensions is func handle(_ workoutConfiguration: HKWorkoutConfiguration)
I cannot seem to find a way to link this function on the new App structure for watch apps.
Ok, I found it. The solution is to simply replace WKExtensionDelegate with the new WKApplicationDelegate!
You can try this solution, it is simple and universal.
import WatchKit
class ExtensionDelegate: NSObject, WKExtensionDelegate {
static var current: ExtensionDelegate? {
return (WKExtension.shared().delegate as? ExtensionDelegate)
}
...
}
Then access this current instance like below, because it is Singleton, you can access it in the entire project scope.
ExtensionDelegate.current?.dosomething()

How to port a network extension NEPacketTunnelProvider class from Obj-C/Swift to Xamarin C#?

I'm trying to figure out how to make a network extension so that my iOS app can programmatically open an custom VPN tunnel in C#, but looking at some similar Obj-C projects I'm not sure if it's possible in Xamarin (as I don't see a network extension project in Visual Studio) and how to port a what I gather is a required PacketTunnelProvider class which I think must be present and listed as an extension in the plist.info first...I'm in particular having most trouble in how to port the parts of that class which appear at the end as an extension and some event handlers named like this func Adapter(adapter: Adapter, configureTunnelWithNetworkSettings networkSettings: NEPacketTunnelNetworkSettings, completionHandler: #escaping (AdapterPacketFlow?) -> Void) and func Adapter(adapter: Adapter, handleEvent event: AdapterEvent, message: String?) as they both have a different signature than an event handler in C# which accepts sender and eventArgs (or something derived)…if anyone did this in C# I'd like to know at least if it's possible if not how to port such a class?
I've found this one project https://github.com/ss-abramchuk/OpenVPNAdapter (since it seems to do most of what I want) that I managed to translate into a Xamarin binding library but I'm unsure how and if to incorporate its PacketTunnelProvider class in Xamarin (as that is what the readme says you should use to incorporate something like that adapter)...I gather one should add to plist.info something like this first:
<key>NSExtension</key>
<dict>
<key>NSExtensionPointIdentifier</key>
<string>com.apple.networkextension.packet-tunnel</string>
<key>NSExtensionPrincipalClass</key>
<string>$(PRODUCT_MODULE_NAME).PacketTunnelProvider</string>
</dict>
but where do you go from there to use the binding library? This is the Obj-C code that says and seemingly does what I want to do to after i.e. add that custom VPN protocol tunnel to an app using the library:
import NetworkExtension
import OpenVPNAdapter
class PacketTunnelProvider : NEPacketTunnelProvider
{
lazy var vpnAdapter: OpenVPNAdapter = {
let adapter = OpenVPNAdapter()
adapter.delegate = self
return adapter
}
()
let vpnReachability = OpenVPNReachability()
var startHandler: ((Error?) -> Void)?
var stopHandler: (() -> Void)?
override func startTunnel(options: [String: NSObject]?, completionHandler: #escaping (Error?) -> Void)
{
// There are many ways to provide OpenVPN settings to the tunnel provider. For instance,
// you can use `options` argument of `startTunnel(options:completionHandler:)` method or get
// settings from `protocolConfiguration.providerConfiguration` property of `NEPacketTunnelProvider`
// class. Also you may provide just content of a ovpn file or use key:value pairs
// that may be provided exclusively or in addition to file content.
// In our case we need providerConfiguration dictionary to retrieve content
// of the OpenVPN configuration file. Other options related to the tunnel
// provider also can be stored there.
guard
let protocolConfiguration = protocolConfiguration as? NETunnelProviderProtocol,
let providerConfiguration = protocolConfiguration.providerConfiguration
else
{
fatalError()
}
guard let ovpnFileContent: Data = providerConfiguration["ovpn"] as? Data else
{
fatalError()
}
let configuration = OpenVPNConfiguration()
configuration.fileContent = ovpnFileContent
configuration.settings = [
// Additional parameters as key:value pairs may be provided here
]
// Apply OpenVPN configuration
let properties: OpenVPNProperties
do
{
properties = try vpnAdapter.apply(configuration: configuration)
}
catch
{
completionHandler(error)
return
}
// Provide credentials if needed
if !properties.autologin {
// If your VPN configuration requires user credentials you can provide them by
// `protocolConfiguration.username` and `protocolConfiguration.passwordReference`
// properties. It is recommended to use persistent keychain reference to a keychain
// item containing the password.
guard let username: String = protocolConfiguration.username else
{
fatalError()
}
// Retrieve a password from the keychain
guard let password: String = ... {
fatalError()
}
let credentials = OpenVPNCredentials()
credentials.username = username
credentials.password = password
do
{
try vpnAdapter.provide(credentials: credentials)
}
catch
{
completionHandler(error)
return
}
}
// Checking reachability. In some cases after switching from cellular to
// WiFi the adapter still uses cellular data. Changing reachability forces
// reconnection so the adapter will use actual connection.
vpnReachability.startTracking { [weak self] status in
guard status != .notReachable else { return }
self?.vpnAdapter.reconnect(interval: 5)
}
// Establish connection and wait for .connected event
startHandler = completionHandler
vpnAdapter.connect()
}
override func stopTunnel(with reason: NEProviderStopReason, completionHandler: #escaping () -> Void)
{
stopHandler = completionHandler
if vpnReachability.isTracking {
vpnReachability.stopTracking()
}
vpnAdapter.disconnect()
}
}
extension PacketTunnelProvider: OpenVPNAdapterDelegate {
// OpenVPNAdapter calls this delegate method to configure a VPN tunnel.
// `completionHandler` callback requires an object conforming to `OpenVPNAdapterPacketFlow`
// protocol if the tunnel is configured without errors. Otherwise send nil.
// `OpenVPNAdapterPacketFlow` method signatures are similar to `NEPacketTunnelFlow` so
// you can just extend that class to adopt `OpenVPNAdapterPacketFlow` protocol and
// send `self.packetFlow` to `completionHandler` callback.
func openVPNAdapter(_ openVPNAdapter: OpenVPNAdapter, configureTunnelWithNetworkSettings networkSettings: NEPacketTunnelNetworkSettings, completionHandler: #escaping (OpenVPNAdapterPacketFlow?) -> Void)
{
setTunnelNetworkSettings(settings) {
(error) in
completionHandler(error == nil ? self.packetFlow : nil)
}
}
// Process events returned by the OpenVPN library
func openVPNAdapter(_ openVPNAdapter: OpenVPNAdapter, handleEvent event: OpenVPNAdapterEvent, message: String?)
{
switch event {
case .connected:
if reasserting {
reasserting = false
}
guard let startHandler = startHandler else { return }
startHandler(nil)
self.startHandler = nil
case .disconnected:
guard let stopHandler = stopHandler else { return }
if vpnReachability.isTracking {
vpnReachability.stopTracking()
}
stopHandler()
self.stopHandler = nil
case .reconnecting:
reasserting = true
default:
break
}
}
// Handle errors thrown by the OpenVPN library
func openVPNAdapter(_ openVPNAdapter: OpenVPNAdapter, handleError error: Error)
{
// Handle only fatal errors
guard let fatal = (error as NSError).userInfo[OpenVPNAdapterErrorFatalKey] as? Bool, fatal == true else
{
return
}
if vpnReachability.isTracking {
vpnReachability.stopTracking()
}
if let startHandler = startHandler {
startHandler(error)
self.startHandler = nil
} else
{
cancelTunnelWithError(error)
}
}
// Use this method to process any log message returned by OpenVPN library.
func openVPNAdapter(_ openVPNAdapter: OpenVPNAdapter, handleLogMessage logMessage: String)
{
// Handle log messages
}
}
// Extend NEPacketTunnelFlow to adopt OpenVPNAdapterPacketFlow protocol so that
// `self.packetFlow` could be sent to `completionHandler` callback of OpenVPNAdapterDelegate
// method openVPNAdapter(openVPNAdapter:configureTunnelWithNetworkSettings:completionHandler).
extension NEPacketTunnelFlow: OpenVPNAdapterPacketFlow {}
How do I port to C# then or maybe I'm doing it all wrong (because of the comment bellow - the binding dll is bigger than 15MB - or is that limit in regard to use of memory which isn't related to file size)? Should I actually be just referencing the custom VPN library to open up a VPN tunnel from code directly and go on from there like it's business as usual (as I also found a project/app https://github.com/passepartoutvpn which uses a TunnelKit cocoapod, but that app's lib won't work with sharpie to make the binding library, and if so would the app like that even be admissible to the AppStore)? Thank you for any help in advance.
Per #SushiHangover advice, I've tried binding TunnelKit, as that project seemed smaller, and succeeded, partially... I've managed to build ~3MB dll, which seems much smaller than 21MB OpenVPNAdapter, and I think I'm almost there with the NetworkExtension project...I've got just to figure out the did I do ok with #escaping completionHandler and how to get some group constants which I guess should be set within the Host app somehow?
public override void StartTunnel(NSDictionary<NSString, NSObject> options, Action<NSError> completionHandler)
{
//appVersion = "\(GroupConstants.App.name) \(GroupConstants.App.versionString)";
//dnsTimeout = GroupConstants.VPN.dnsTimeout;
//logSeparator = GroupConstants.VPN.sessionMarker;
base.StartTunnel(options, completionHandler);
}
I've commented out the groupcontants for now but at least I'm hoping that's good enough porting of Swift3's:
override func startTunnel(options: [String : NSObject]?, completionHandler: #escaping (Error?) -> Void) {
appVersion = "\(GroupConstants.App.name) \(GroupConstants.App.versionString)"
dnsTimeout = GroupConstants.VPN.dnsTimeout
logSeparator = GroupConstants.VPN.sessionMarker
super.startTunnel(options: options, completionHandler: completionHandler)
}
If anyone else knows about the group constants and how to get them I'd be grateful (but I should also note that sharpie pod didn't give/expose any of those fields I should be assigning. Maybe I did it wrong as that's TunnelKit is a completely Swift3 project unlike the OpenVPNAdapter :/
Should I actually be just using the a custom VPN library to open up a VPN tunnel and go from there, but would the app then be admissible to the AppStore?
For iOS 12+, you absolutely have to use the Network Extension framework to be Store eligible.
The Xamarin.iOS build task (ValidateAppBundle) correctly identifies com.apple.networkextension.packet-tunnel as a valid extension (.appex) so yes you can build an NEPacketTunnelProvider extension.
You are correct the VS does not have build-in templating for Network Provider .appex's for tunnels, dns proxy, filter control|data, proxy types, but that does not mean you can not just use another one of the templates (or create the project from scratch) and modify it (I create an Xcode iOS project and start adding extension targets and just mirror those changes in VS).
(FYI: That is Swift code in your example, not ObjC...)
Now due to limitations in .appex size (and performance issues in some cases), a lot of extensions are very difficult to do via Xamarin.iOS. Most devs that encounter this, go native using ObjC/Swift for at least the appex development...

Swift 4.2.1 requesting JSON with Xcode 10.1

My code:
let cgpurl = URL(string: "https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3/ping")!
let task = URLSession.shared.dataTask(with: cgpurl) { (Data, URLResponse, Error) in
if let data = Data, let string = String(data: data, encoding: .utf8) {
let CGPing = string } ; resume() }
The problem is with the 2nd use of "cgpurl". I've tried changing case to no effect. The error I'm getting is, "Cannot use instance member 'cgpurl' within property initializer; property initializers run before 'self' is available". Ok... but I can't even replace cgpurl with the actual link? Then I get the error message "Ambiguous reference to member 'dataTask(with:completionHandler:)'" I realize this release of swift was supposed to be "small" & just to "fix errors" but I've not been able to find any current documentation on this release. I'm using swift 4.2.1 with Xcode 10.1
This code was taken directly from a teaching manual for Swift 4.2
No, it wasn't. The code you have was never right, in Swift 4.2 or any other version of Swift. You have blindly copied and pasted perhaps, without looking at the overall context.
The problem is that the code, as you have it, is sitting "loose" at the top of your view controller or other class declaration, perhaps something along these lines:
class MyViewController : UIViewController {
let cgpurl = // ...
let task = // ...
}
That's wrong. The most basic rule of Swift programming is that executable code can exist only in a function. For example:
class MyViewController : UIViewController {
override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()
let cgpurl = // ...
let task = // ...
}
}
That may not solve all your issues, but at least you'll get past the most basic mistake you're making and the "Cannot use instance member" compile error will go away.

Call to swift method from JavaScript hangs xcode and application

I am writing an iOS App (using xcode 7.3 and swift 2.2) using JavascriptCode framework. Calling javascript methods from swift works perfect, but when I call the swift method from javascript, xcode simply shows a "loading" type of symbol and nothing happens. I need to "force quit" xcode to get out of this state.
I have followed https://www.raywenderlich.com/124075/javascriptcore-tutorial and http://nshipster.com/javascriptcore/ and I am trying pretty simple calls.
Has anyone faced this kind of issue?
My swift code is as follows:
#objc protocol WindowJSExports : JSExport {
var name: String { get set }
func getName() -> String
static func createWindowWithName(name: String) -> WindowJS
}
#objc class WindowJS : NSObject, WindowJSExports {
dynamic var name: String
init(name: String) {
self.name = name
}
class func createWindowWithName(name: String) -> WindowJS {
return WindowJS(name: name)
}
func getName() -> String {
NSLog("getName called from JS context")
return "\(name)"
}
}
I am initializing the context as follows:
runContext = JSContext()
runContext.name = "test_Context"
windowToJs = WindowJS(name: "test")
runContext.setObject(windowToJs.self, forKeyedSubscript: "WindowJS")
If I replace the last two lines in above code with below code without instantiating it, the code simply fails to load.
runContext.setObject(WindowJS.self, forKeyedSubscript: "WindowJS")
And the javascript code is as simple as
function check() {
return WindowJS.getName()
}
I do see the breakpoint being hit in the JS function check and when the WindowJS.getName gets called, xcode simply becomes unresponsive.
The setTimeout could be solved by adding following piece of code to my swift function.
let setTimeout: #convention(block) (JSValue, Int) -> () =
{ callback, timeout in
let timeVal = Int64(timeout)
dispatch_after(dispatch_time(DISPATCH_TIME_NOW, timeVal), dispatch_get_main_queue(), { callback.callWithArguments(nil)})
}
To expose this native code to the JS context, I also added following.
runContext.setObject(unsafeBitCast(setTimeout, AnyObject.self), forKeyedSubscript: "setTimeout")
Things then worked fine.
You're creating a deadlock since you are calling from Swift to JavaScript back to Swift. I'm not sure exactly why it is a deadlock but I had a similar issue with WKWebView on Mac recently.
You need to decouple this and make the communication asynchronous. This obviously means you cannot simply return a value from your JS function in this case.
To decouple, you can break the deadlock by deferring the work the JavaScript function needs to do out of the current runloop iteration using setTimeout:
function myFunction() {
setTimeout(function() {
// The actual work is done here.
// Call the Swift part here.
}, 0);
}
The whole native ↔︎ JavaScript communication is very, very tricky. Avoid it if you can. There's a project called XWebView that may be able to help you as it tries to ease bridging between the two worlds.

Can I receive a callback whenever an NSPasteboard is written to?

I've read Apple's Pasteboard Programming Guide, but it doesn't answer a particular question I have.
I'm trying to write a Cocoa application (for OS X, not iOS) that will keep track of everything that is written to the general pasteboard (so, whenever any application copies and pastes, but not, say, drags-and-drops, which also makes use of NSPasteboard). I could (almost) accomplish this by basically polling the general pasteboard on a background thread constantly, and checking changeCount. Of course, doing this would make me feel very dirty on the inside.
My question is, is there a way to ask the Pasteboard server to notify me through some sort of callback any time a change is made to the general pasteboard? I couldn't find anything in the NSPasteboard class reference, but I'm hoping it lurks somewhere else.
Another way I could imagine accomplishing this is if there was a way to swap out the general pasteboard implementation with a subclass of NSPasteboard that I could define myself to issue a callback. Maybe something like this is possible?
I would greatly prefer if this were possible with public, App Store-legal APIs, but if using a private API is necessary, I'll take that too.
Thanks!
Unfortunately the only available method is by polling (booo!). There are no notifications and there's nothing to observe for changed pasteboard contents. Check out Apple's ClipboardViewer sample code to see how they deal with inspecting the clipboard. Add a (hopefully not overzealous) timer to keep checking for differences and you've got a basic (if clunky) solution that should be App-Store-Friendly.
File an enhancement request at bugreporter.apple.com to request notifications or some other callback. Unfortunately it wouldn't help you until the next major OS release at the earliest but for now it's polling until we all ask them to give us something better.
There was once a post on a mailing list where the decision against a notification api was described. I can't find it right now though. The bottom line was that probably too many applications would register for that api even though they really wouldn't need to. If you then copy something the whole system goes through the new clipboard content like crazy, creating lots of work for the computer. So i don't think they'll change that behavior anytime soon. The whole NSPasteboard API is internally built around using the changeCount, too. So even your custom subclass of NSPasteboard would still have to keep polling.
If you really want to check if the pasteboard changed, just keep observing the changeCount very half second. Comparing integers is really fast so there's really no performance issue here.
Based on answer provided by Joshua I came up with similar implementation but in swift, here is the link to its gist: PasteboardWatcher.swift
Code snippet from same:
class PasteboardWatcher : NSObject {
// assigning a pasteboard object
private let pasteboard = NSPasteboard.generalPasteboard()
// to keep track of count of objects currently copied
// also helps in determining if a new object is copied
private var changeCount : Int
// used to perform polling to identify if url with desired kind is copied
private var timer: NSTimer?
// the delegate which will be notified when desired link is copied
weak var delegate: PasteboardWatcherDelegate?
// the kinds of files for which if url is copied the delegate is notified
private let fileKinds : [String]
/// initializer which should be used to initialize object of this class
/// - Parameter fileKinds: an array containing the desired file kinds
init(fileKinds: [String]) {
// assigning current pasteboard changeCount so that it can be compared later to identify changes
changeCount = pasteboard.changeCount
// assigning passed desired file kinds to respective instance variable
self.fileKinds = fileKinds
super.init()
}
/// starts polling to identify if url with desired kind is copied
/// - Note: uses an NSTimer for polling
func startPolling () {
// setup and start of timer
timer = NSTimer.scheduledTimerWithTimeInterval(2, target: self, selector: Selector("checkForChangesInPasteboard"), userInfo: nil, repeats: true)
}
/// method invoked continuously by timer
/// - Note: To keep this method as private I referred this answer at stackoverflow - [Swift - NSTimer does not invoke a private func as selector](http://stackoverflow.com/a/30947182/217586)
#objc private func checkForChangesInPasteboard() {
// check if there is any new item copied
// also check if kind of copied item is string
if let copiedString = pasteboard.stringForType(NSPasteboardTypeString) where pasteboard.changeCount != changeCount {
// obtain url from copied link if its path extension is one of the desired extensions
if let fileUrl = NSURL(string: copiedString) where self.fileKinds.contains(fileUrl.pathExtension!){
// invoke appropriate method on delegate
self.delegate?.newlyCopiedUrlObtained(copiedUrl: fileUrl)
}
// assign new change count to instance variable for later comparison
changeCount = pasteboard.changeCount
}
}
}
Note: in the shared code I am trying to identify if user has copied a
file url or not, the provided code can easily be modified for other general
purposes.
For those who need simplified version of code snippet that gets the job done in Swift 5.7,
it just works (base on #Devarshi code):
func watch(using closure: #escaping (_ copiedString: String) -> Void) {
let pasteboard = NSPasteboard.general
var changeCount = NSPasteboard.general.changeCount
Timer.scheduledTimer(withTimeInterval: 1.0, repeats: true) { _ in
guard let copiedString = pasteboard.string(forType: .string),
pasteboard.changeCount != changeCount else { return }
defer {
changeCount = pasteboard.changeCount
}
closure(copiedString)
}
}
how to use is as below:
watch {
print("detected : \($0)")
}
then if you attempt copy any text in your pasteboard, it will watch and print out to the console like below..
detected : your copied message in pasteboard
detected : your copied message in pasteboard
in case, full code sample for how to use it for example in SwiftUI:
import SwiftUI
#main
struct TestApp: App {
var body: some Scene {
WindowGroup {
ContentView()
.onAppear {
watch {
print("detect : \($0)")
}
}
}
}
func watch(using closure: #escaping (_ copiedString: String) -> Void) {
let pasteboard = NSPasteboard.general
var changeCount = NSPasteboard.general.changeCount
Timer.scheduledTimer(withTimeInterval: 1.0, repeats: true) { _ in
guard let copiedString = pasteboard.string(forType: .string),
pasteboard.changeCount != changeCount else { return }
defer {
changeCount = pasteboard.changeCount
}
closure(copiedString)
}
}
}
It's not necessary to poll. Pasteboard would generally only be changed by the current view is inactive or does not have focus. Pasteboard has a counter that is incremented when contents change. When window regains focus (windowDidBecomeKey), check if changeCount has changed then process accordingly.
This does not capture every change, but lets your application respond if the Pasteboard is different when it becomes active.
In Swift...
var pasteboardChangeCount = NSPasteboard.general().changeCount
func windowDidBecomeKey(_ notification: Notification)
{ Swift.print("windowDidBecomeKey")
if pasteboardChangeCount != NSPasteboard.general().changeCount
{ viewController.checkPasteboard()
pasteboardChangeCount = NSPasteboard.general().changeCount
}
}
I have a solution for more strict case: detecting when your content in NSPasteboard was replaced by something else.
If you create a class that conforms to NSPasteboardWriting and pass it to -writeObjects: along with the actual content, NSPasteboard will retain this object until its content is replaced. If there are no other strong references to this object, it get deallocated.
Deallocation of this object is the moment when new NSPasteboard got new content.

Resources