I'm in difficulty doing this operation correctly.
I have an Order and for every item I have to get the data from the API, what I'm doing is this:
if ($scope.order.order_items.length > 0) {
var itemArray = [];
for (var i = 0; i < $scope.order.order_items.length; i++) {
var itemId = $scope.order.order_items[i].id;
Items.get({
itemId: itemId
}).$promise.then(function (data) {
itemArray.push(data.item);
});
}
$scope.order.order_items = itemArray;
}
The API receive the request and send the data back but the promise do not return anything...
One more error here is from jshint: Don't make functions within a loop.
It will be nice to solve both the issues for me... I tried to create an external function but having the same issue not returning data I don't know if I was doing it well, the external function I was doing is:
function addItem(id) {
Items.get({
itemId: id
}).$promise.then(function (data) {
console.log(data);
return data.item;
});
}
You are making an asynchronous call from the code and thinking that it will work like synchronously. As you are assigning itemArray to $scope.order.order_items outside the factory, at that time itemArray is blank. Before making that assignment you need to ensure that all the ajax call the each item has been completed or not. You could use $q.all for such scenario. $q.all need an promise array & it will call the .then function when all the promise gets resolved.
if ($scope.order.order_items.length > 0) {
var itemArray = [], promiseArray = [];
for (var i = 0; i < $scope.order.order_items.length; i++) {
var itemId = $scope.order.order_items[i].id;
var currentPromise = Items.get({
itemId: itemId
}).$promise.then(function (data) {
itemArray.push(data.item);
return true; //returning dummy value from promise.
});
promiseArray.push(currentPromise); //creating promise array
}
$q.all(promiseArray) //giving promise array input.
.then(function(data){ //success will call when all promises get resolved.
$scope.order.order_items = itemArray;
},function(error){
console.log("Error occured")
});
}
I would avoid reading and writing to the same array and instead use another array for the actual items.
As Resource returns an instance that gets filled on success you should be fine adding the instances to the scope directly. With that you reduce your code a lot and also remove the jshint warning.
if ($scope.order.order_items.length > 0) {
$scope.order.order_items_with_data = [];
for (var i = 0; i < $scope.order.order_items.length; i++) {
var itemId = $scope.order.order_items[i].id;
$scope.order.order_items_with_data.push(Items.get({itemId: itemId}));
}
}
Related
I have data returned from an Ajax call, but need to pass variables into or out of the Ajax onSuccess function to insert the results into my page. I'm pretty sure this is a scope problem.
I posted a complicated question here yesterday, mostly about the Ajax part of this, and that part is now working - I'm getting the results back correctly. I could insert it into my page code in two ways, but one involves getting a variable value out of the onSuccess function; the other needs to get a variable value into it! I can't make either of them work. Here's a stripped-down version of the code:
var base = 'http://10.0.1.2:90/~dvds/';
// initialization routines
document.observe ('dom:loaded', function() {
// set up handler for variable numbers of selects
var addselects = $$('.addselect');
for (var i = 0; i < addselects.length; i++) {
var addselect = addselects[i];
addselect.onchange = newSelect;
}
});
// handler for adding new field to array
function newSelect() {
var thisid = this.id;
var newhtml;
var url = base + 'ajaxtest';
// send request to do the business
var myAjax = new Ajax.Request (url, {
method: 'post',
onSuccess: function (req) {
var xml = req.responseXML;
var id = xml.getElementsByTagName('id')[0].firstChild.nodeValue;
if (id) {
newhtml = '\t\t<li>\r\t\t\t<select class="addselect" name="newlist" id="newlist" />\r\t\t\t\t<option value="" selected="selected"></option>\r';
// loop
var newid, newname;
var ids = xml.getElementsByTagName('id');
var names = xml.getElementsByTagName('name');
for (var i = 0; i < ids.length; i++) {
newid = ids[i].firstChild.nodeValue;
newname = names[i].firstChild.nodeValue;
newhtml += '\t\t\t\t<option value="' + newid + '">' + newname + '</option>\r';
}
newhtml += '\t\t\t</select>\r\t\t</li>\r';
// alert (thisid);
$('thisid').up('ul').insert (newhtml);
}
else {
alert (’ng');
newhtml = '<li>No good.</li>';
}
},
onFailure: function() {
alert ('Script failure.');
newhtml = '<li>No good.</li>';
}
});
// alert (newhtml);
// if (newhtml) {
// this.up('ul').insert (newhtml);
// }
}
Having established the variable thisid as this.id, I don't understand why $('thisid') doesn't work in the line $('thisid').up('ul').insert (newhtml); - especially as the value of thisid does show up correctly in the alert I've put in for testing (commented out). Why is this? If I put newhtml into that alert instead it's also correct.
And given that that seems not to work, I tried the alternative of passing the value of newhtml out (having declared it at the top) and inserting it in the page in the last block of code that's commented out - but that doesn’t work either.
Where am I going wrong?
I am trying to use parse.com promises to retrieve job data as well as user relation data associated with the job. I have a function that returns promises but not job data. How do I get the job & employee information from the returned promises?
Logically I want to:
1) Query Parse to get array of jobs
2) For each job, query Parse again to get the employee relation information
3) Create local object that contains job & employee details
4) Add each job object to local array
5) Load table with array of objects once all information has been retrieved from Parse
I can do steps 1-4 but I can't figure out how to wait until all information has been retrieved from Parse to refresh the local table.
function getJobPromises (){
var promises = [];
var Job = Parse.Object.extend("Job");
var query = new Parse.Query(Job);
query.equalTo("company", company);
query.notEqualTo("isDeleted", true);
query.limit(1000); // raise limit to max amount
query.find().then(function(results) {
// Create a trivial resolved promise as a base case.
var promise = Parse.Promise.as();
_.each(results, function(result) {
// For each item, extend the promise with a function to add it to the job array
promise = promise.then(function() {
// Return a promise that will be resolved when the job details have been added to the array
var object = result;
promises.push(getEmployeeName(object));
allJobDataArray = promises;
});
});
return Parse.Promise.when(promises);
}).then(function() {
// Every job has been retrieved
console.log("All items have been returned. Refresh table...");
console.log(allJobDataArray);
});
}
The function that does the relational query to get the users associated with the job
function getEmployeeName(jobObject) {
var employeeNameArray = [];
//Query to get array of employees for the passed in job
var rQuery = jobObject.relation("employee");
return rQuery.query().find({
success: function(employees){
//Get employees full name for each job
for (var i = 0; i < employees.length; i++) {
var objEmployee = employees[i];
var fullName = objEmployee.get("fullName");
employeeNameArray.push(fullName);
console.log(employeeNameArray);
}
},
error: function(error){
response.error(error);
}
});
}
Update
It is now working thanks to #eduardo
I have a public array to hold the job objects.
var jobObjectsArray = [];
In the getEmployeeName function I am creating the job objects and adding them to that array
function getJobPromises (){
var promises = [];
var Job = Parse.Object.extend("Job");
var query = new Parse.Query(Job);
query.equalTo("company", company);
query.notEqualTo("isDeleted", true);
query.limit(1000); // raise limit to max amount
query.find().then(function(results) {
_.each(results, function(result) {
promises.push(getEmployeeName(result));
});
return Parse.Promise.when(promises);
}).then(function(allJobDataArray) {
// allJobDataArray should be actually an Array of Array
console.log(jobObjectsArray);
refreshTable();
});
}
function getEmployeeName(jobObject) {
var employeeNameArray = [];
//Query to get array of employees for the passed in job
var rQuery = jobObject.relation("employee");
return new Promise(
function(resolve, reject) {
rQuery.query().find({
success: function(employees){
//Get employees full name for each job
for (var i = 0; i < employees.length; i++) {
var objEmployee = employees[i];
var fullName = objEmployee.get("fullName");
employeeNameArray.push(fullName);
var objAllJobs = new Object();
objAllJobs["jobId"] = jobObject.id;
objAllJobs["location"] = jobObject.get("location");
objAllJobs["startTime"] = jobObject.get("startTime");
objAllJobs["employee"] = employeeNameArray;
jobObjectsArray.push(objAllJobs);
}
console.log(employeeNameArray);
resolve(employeeNameArray);
},
error: function(error){
reject(error);
}
});
}
);
There was a few incorrect uses of the promise concept. I will go through them, but first here is the final code:
function getJobPromises (){
var promises = [];
var Job = Parse.Object.extend("Job");
var query = new Parse.Query(Job);
query.equalTo("company", company);
query.notEqualTo("isDeleted", true);
query.limit(1000); // raise limit to max amount
query.find().then(function(results) {
_.each(results, function(result) {
promises.push(getEmployeeName(result));
});
return Parse.Promise.when(promises);
}).then(function(allJobDataArray) {
// allJobDataArray should be actually an Array of Array
console.dir(allJobDataArray);
console.log(allJobDataArray[0]);
});
}
function getEmployeeName(jobObject) {
var employeeNameArray = [];
//Query to get array of employees for the passed in job
var rQuery = jobObject.relation("employee");
return rQuery.query().find({
success: function(employees){
//Get employees full name for each job
for (var i = 0; i < employees.length; i++) {
var objEmployee = employees[i];
var fullName = objEmployee.get("fullName");
employeeNameArray.push(fullName);
}
console.log(employeeNameArray);
return employeeNameArray;
},
error: function(error){
response.error(error);
}
});
}
"Parse.Promise.as()" should be used only if you have a value that you want to return as a promise. Something like:
Parse.Promise.as("my value").then(function(foo) {
console.log(foo) // "my value"
});
So if your "getEmployeeName" function is returning a promise, which means that this "rQuery.query().find" returns a promise, you don't have to create a new promise or use the "Parse.Promise.as()", it is already a promise and you can push it to the promises array.
Another problem was that you were not return anything in the "getEmployeeName" method callback. Take a look into my version, I'm returning "employeeNameArray".
My version will only work if this "rQuery.query().find" method returns a promise. If that is not the case, you can create a new promise using its callbacks like this:
function getEmployeeName(jobObject) {
var employeeNameArray = [];
//Query to get array of employees for the passed in job
var rQuery = jobObject.relation("employee");
return new Promise(
function(resolve, reject) {
rQuery.query().find({
success: function(employees){
//Get employees full name for each job
for (var i = 0; i < employees.length; i++) {
var objEmployee = employees[i];
var fullName = objEmployee.get("fullName");
employeeNameArray.push(fullName);
}
console.log(employeeNameArray);
resolve(employeeNameArray);
},
error: function(error){
reject(error);
}
});
}
);
}
Please notice this "new Promise()" depends on the browser support of Promise, I don't know if Parse has an equivalent. Anyways you can use it with a polyfill that implements the necessary code if the browser has no support.
More about standard promises: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Promise
Polyfill: https://github.com/jakearchibald/es6-promise/
Hope this helps.
I wrote some backend code for a Parse.com mobile app a couple of years ago, and have just been asked to add a feature. However, I found that after a small tweak the code wouldn't succeed. So, I rolled back to the working copy, downloaded, then deployed that back and it wouldn't work either! I wonder if this is a change in the Parse software?
The code is failing at the save method as all the logs are fine until then. The log for the error case shows 'No message provided'. If I don't use the message attribute it just shows '{}', so I presume it's empty. I have put the promise resolution in the error case to stop the job timing out while I debug. One thing I have never understood is why I have to make two Seed objects and piggy-back off one to save correctly. If I did a.save(null,...) it wouldn't work.
Any help would be fantastic. Thanks!
PS: Apologies for the indenting below - it is correct in my file.
function flush() {
//Clear the previous records from the class.
var Seed = Parse.Object.extend("Seeds");
var _ = require("underscore");
var arr = [];
var query = new Parse.Query(Seed);
return query.find().then(function(oldSeeds) {
_.each(oldSeeds, function(oldSeed) {
arr.push(oldSeed.destroy());
});
return Parse.Promise.when(arr);
});
}
Parse.Cloud.job("fetchjson", function(request, status) {
var url = 'someurl';
flush().then(function() { Parse.Cloud.httpRequest({url: url}).then(function(httpResponse){
var Seed = Parse.Object.extend("Seeds");
var jsonobj = JSON.parse(httpResponse.text);
var _ = require("underscore");
var results = [];
// do NOT iterate arrays with `for... in loops`
_.each(jsonobj.seeds, function(s) {
var p = new Parse.Promise();
results.push(p); // Needs to be done here or when() will execute immediately with no promises.
var seed = new Seed();
var a = new Seed(s);
var image_url = a.get("image")
//Get the JSON.
Parse.Cloud.httpRequest({url: image_url}).then(function(response) {
console.log("Fetching image at URL: " + image_url);
//Create a new image object and save, passing ref through promise.
var file = new Parse.File('thumb.jpg', { base64: response.buffer.toString('base64', 0, response.buffer.length) });
return file.save();
}).then(function(thumb) {
console.log("Attaching thumb to object");
//Set image ref as object attribute.
a.set("imageFile", thumb);
console.log("Parsing views into viewsint");
//Save decimal string as int into another attribute.
a.set("viewsInt", parseInt(a.get("views")));
console.log("Parsing description into descriptionarray");
//Save string as array into another attribute.
var dar = new Array(1);
//dar[0] = a.get("description")
a.set("descriptionarray", [a.get("description")]);
}, function(error) {
console.log("Error occurred :(");
}).then(function(){
console.log("Saving object");
//Save the object and resolve the promise so we can stop.
seed.save(a,{
success: function(successData){
console.log(successData);
p.resolve(successData);
},
error: function(error){
console.log(error.message);
p.resolve(error);
}
});
});
});
// .when waits for all promises to be resolved. This is async baby!
Parse.Promise.when(results).then(function(data){
console.log("All objects saved");
status.success("Updated Succesfully");
});
}, function(error) {
//Oh noes :'(
console.error('Request failed with response code ' + httpResponse.status);
status.error("Update Failed");
});
});
});
I changed your code a bit and put some comments to explain:
// DEFINE THESE ON THE TOP. NO NEED TO REPEAT.
var _ = require("underscore");
var Seed = Parse.Object.extend("Seeds");
function flush() {
//Clear the previous records from the class.
var arr = [];
var query = new Parse.Query(Seed);
return query.find().then(function(oldSeeds) {
_.each(oldSeeds, function(oldSeed) {
arr.push(oldSeed.destroy());
});
return Parse.Promise.when(arr);
});
}
Parse.Cloud.job("fetchjson", function(request, status) {
var url = 'someurl';
flush().then(function() {
Parse.Cloud.httpRequest({url: url}).then(function(httpResponse){
var jsonobj = JSON.parse(httpResponse.text);
var results = [];
_.each(jsonobj.seeds, function(s) {
// ONE SEED OBJECT WITH INITIAL SET OF DATA FROM JSON
var seed = new Seed(s);
var image_url = seed.get("image")
// A SERIAL PROMISE FOR EACH SEED
var promise = Parse.Cloud.httpRequest({url: image_url}).then(function(response) {
console.log("Fetching image at URL: " + image_url);
//Create a new image object and save, passing ref through promise.
var file = new Parse.File('thumb.jpg', { base64: response.buffer.toString('base64', 0, response.buffer.length) });
return file.save();
}).then(function(thumb) {
// SETTING MORE PROPERTIES
//Set image ref as object attribute.
console.log("Attaching thumb to object");
seed.set("imageFile", thumb);
//Save decimal string as int into another attribute.
console.log("Parsing views into viewsint");
seed.set("viewsInt", parseInt(seed.get("views")));
//Save string as array into another attribute.
console.log("Parsing description into descriptionarray");
seed.set("descriptionarray", [seed.get("description")]);
// SAVING THE OBJECT
console.log("Saving object");
return seed.save();
});
// PUSH THIS PROMISE TO THE ARRAY TO PERFORM IN PARALLEL
results.push(promise);
});
Parse.Promise.when(results).then(function(data){
console.log("All objects saved");
status.success("Updated Succesfully");
});
}, function(error) {
console.error('Request failed with response code ' + httpResponse.status);
status.error("Update Failed");
});
});
});
Thanks knshn. I had refactored the code a lot since that version (including several of the changes you made), but I had posted the version that was identical to that which was working fine before. Your changes let me see the right error. For some reason doing the simple single object implementation didn't work for me originally, hence the nasty workaround. It works now though.
I have now found the culprit - the Seed class had an attribute called 'id'. With the old version this worked fine, but when I deployed that code now it gave an error 101: 'object not found for update'. This must be because the new Parse code is mixing that up with the internal objectId and getting confused that the id is different to what it expects. I wonder how that could still work with the rollback though. Perhaps the at version was tagged to use the older Parse code.
My fix was to use a different name for the id - 'seed_id'.
Is it possible to use $q to fire ajax requests synchronously in AngularJS?
I have a long list of vehicles, each vehicle has events associated with them and I need to retrieve the eventdetails of each event when the user expands the listing.
Right now, if the user expands the listing, I am firing up to 15 calls asynchronously and it seems to be causing issues with the API I'm consuming, so I'd like to see if performance is improved if I wait for each request finishes before firing the next.
I'm attempting to implement $q to delay the next request until the previous is finished, however I can't seem to wrap my head around using the service, here is what I currently have:
// On click on the event detail expander
$scope.grabEventDetails = function(dataReady, index) {
if (dataReady == false) {
retrieveEventDetails($scope.vehicles[index].events);
}
}
var retrieveEventDetails = function(events) {
// events is array
var deferred = $q.defer();
var promise = deferred.promise;
var retrieveData = function(data) {
return $http({
url: '/api/eventdetails',
method: 'POST',
data: {
event_number: data.number
},
isArray: true
});
}
_.each(events, function(single_event) {
promise.then(retrieveData(single_event).success(function(data) {
console.log(data);
}));
});
}
This is still firing asynchronously, Where am I going wrong with this?
I understand firing the requests synchronously isn't the best idea, at the moment I just want to see if performance is improved with the API at all.
You don't need $q to implement a promise as $http returns one.
_.each fires all the callbacks without especially waiting the promise.
All you do is call retrieveData for all events whenever your promise is resolved, and since you don't do a first call, it shouldn't even be working
You could do some recursive call like this :
var retrieveEventDetails = function(events) {
var evt = events.shift();
$http({
url: '/api/eventdetails',
method: 'POST',
data: {
event_number: evt.number
},
isArray: true
}).then(function(response){
console.log(response.data);
retrieveEventDetails(events);
});
}
I do think you should use $q as some other part of your application might need to get a promise.
A good example would be $routeProvider resolve option.
I made a little demo in plunker.
Solution:
retrieveData function should return a function (which returns a promise) instead of a just a promise.
That way we can create a promise chain: promise.then(fn).then(fn).then(fn).then(null,errorFn)
We must resolve the first promise to kick the chain.
var retrieveEventDetails = function(events) {
// events is array
var deferred = $q.defer();
var promise = deferred.promise;
var retrieveData = function(data) {
return function(){
return $http({
url: '/api/eventdetails',
method: 'POST',
data: {
event_number: data.number
},
isArray: true
})
}
}
deferred.resolve();
return events.reduce(function(promise, single_event){
return promise.then(retrieveData(single_event));
}, promise);
}
I'm not sure you even need $q here. In this example, each piece of data is registered in the controller as soon as it comes back from the call.
Live demo (click).
var app = angular.module('myApp', []);
app.controller('myCtrl', function($scope, myService) {
$scope.datas = myService.get();
});
app.factory('myService', function($http) {
var myService = {
get: function() {
var datas = {};
var i=0;
var length = 4;
makeCall(i, length, datas);
return datas;
}
}
function makeCall(i, length, datas) {
if (i < length) {
$http.get('test.text').then(function(resp) {
datas[i] = resp.data+i;
++i;
makeCall(i, length, datas);
});
}
}
return myService;
});
Here's a way using $q.all() that you can wait for all of the data to come through before passing it to the controller: Live demo (click).
var app = angular.module('myApp', []);
app.controller('myCtrl', function($scope, myService) {
myService.get().then(function(datas) {
$scope.datas = datas;
})
});
app.factory('myService', function($q, $http) {
var myService = {
get: function() {
var deferred = $q.defer();
var defs = [];
var promises = [];
var i=0;
var length = 4;
for(var j=0; j<length; ++j) {
defs[j] = $q.defer();
promises[j] = defs[j].promise;
}
makeCall(i, length, defs);
$q.all(promises).then(function(datas) {
deferred.resolve(datas);
});
return deferred.promise;
}
}
function makeCall(i, length, defs) {
if (i < length) {
$http.get('test.text').then(function(resp) {
defs[i].resolve(resp.data+i);
++i;
makeCall(i, length, defs);
})
}
}
return myService;
});
I've been trying to figure out how to update a global variable using an AJAX request. I'm stuck and need some help.
var markerArray = [];
function JSONload(position){ //Loads JSON and markers
console.log("data getting jsoned");
$.getJSON('json/***.json', function(result){ //gets the json and parses it into results
$.each(result, function(index, value){ //for each result, give the index and the value
reps.push({value: value, index: index}); //push the value at to the array. ex. Ian Calderon
});
try{
for (var i=0; i<reps.length; i++){
if(reps[i].value.lat !== 'undefined' && reps[i].value.position === position){
var marker = (createMarker(reps[i].value.lat, reps[i].value.long, reps[i].index)); //only try to create the marker if there is the values
updateArray(markerArray, marker);
}}}
catch(e){
}
});
}
I have tried doing this:
function updateArray(array, obj){
$.ajax({
success : function(){
array.push(obj);
}
}
);
But frankly I'm not sure how to proceed
I think the function scope is throwing you off.
Try this:
var that = this;
console.log("data getting jsoned");
updateArray(that.markerArray, marker);
The that variable should have access to your global variable in your function.