That's what we have. It's Swift code:
class Process {
// Some methods and properties
}
class SomeClass {
var list: [Process]? = nil
// ...
func someFunc () {
// ...
if list !=nil {
for i in list! {
if list[i].
}
}
Inserting a point (.) in the last line, I do not get a list of methods and properties.
If I change the index i to digit, then I'll get a list of methods and properties of its class Process
How it's look like
What should I do to use a variable in the index I could use the methods of its class?
P.S. Sorry for my English, I used machine translation
With for x in y you don't have to subscript because x is not an index, it's the current iterator object:
func someFunc () {
if let list = list {
for item in list {
item.
} ^^^^ here auto-suggest will work
}
}
If the suggested methods don't work or don't make sense it's usually because you have a syntax error. Same for auto-indenting the code.
Here what you're doing is iterating the list, and expecting that to give you an index, when what it's really doing is giving you the objects in list.
So the code should simply be:
for i in list! {
if i.XXX ...
where XXX is whatever you're trying to test.
Related
Lets say I have the following interface:
interface MathThing {
fun mathFunction(x : Int)
}
Let's say the constraint I want to put onto this function is that x cannot be negative.
How can I make sure that every time this (or any other arbitrary) condition isn't met on a object of type MathThing, a (custom) exception is thrown?
One way is to use a wrapper class for your function parameters. You can make an extension function so it's a little easier to pass values to the function.
data class NonNegative(val value: Int) {
init{ if (value < 0) throw IllegalArgumentException("Input must not be negative.") }
}
fun Int.nonNegative() = NonNegative(this)
interface MathThing {
fun mathFunction(x : NonNegative)
}
I'm using Kotlin reflection to check if attributes that have a certain annotation are null.
Given the following example:
data class DataClass(
#SomeRandomAnnotation
val otherAnnotated: String?,
val inner: InnerClass
)
data class AnotherDataClass(
#SomeRandomAnnotation
val annotatedProperty: String?,
val dataClass: DataClass
) {
fun checkCreditAnalysisConstrain() {
print(checkConstrain(this))
}
}
And the function that checks it:
fun checkConstrain(parentClass: Any): List<String> {
val filter = parentClass::class.memberProperties.filter {
if (memberIsDataClass(it)) checkConstrain(getMemberPropertyInstance(parentClass, it))
hasAnnotation(it) && propertyIsNull(it, parentClass)
}
return filter.map { formatResult(parentClass, it) }
}
The idea is that the function is going to iterate through the attributes of my classes checking if they have the annotation and checking if the value is null.
If the property is a data class, the code evaluates the properties of the childs, recursively.
After that, I map the results, transforming the KProperty's into a simple String that is human readable, containing the class name and the attribute name.
The problem is that the above code does not work as expected. The properties returned are only the properties from the first-level class.
If, instead of doing a filter, I just run a forEach and print the result, I get the expected attributes. So I'm pretty sure it's related to the recurring inside a filter.
Do you see any way of doing this in a more functional way? I'm just concerned I won't need a "temp" list and add values to the list and reset it afterwards.
Your function recursively calls itself, but does nothing with the returned list of that recursive call. That's why you only get results for the top-level class.
Also, in my opinion, you shouldn't rely on side effects happening from your filter call. It probably works, but the function's documentation does not provide a guarantee that it will be called exactly once per item in the collection. So there should be a separate for-loop to do the recursive calls, and the result should be added onto existing results.
fun checkConstrain(parent: Any): List<String> {
val memberProperties = parent::class.memberProperties
var result = memberProperties
.filter { hasAnnotation(it) && propertyIsNull(it, parent) }
.map { formatResult(parent, it) }
memberProperties.filter { memberIsDataClass(it) }
.mapNotNull { getMemberPropertyInstance(parent, it) }
.forEach { result += checkConstrain(it) }
return result
}
You didn't provide code for several of the functions you used. This is what I used for them:
val KProperty<*>.returnTypeClass get() = this.returnType.classifier as? KClass<*>
fun <T> memberIsDataClass(member: KProperty<T>) = member.returnTypeClass?.isData == true
fun <T> getMemberPropertyInstance(parent: Any, property: KProperty<T>) = property.getter.call(parent)
fun <T> hasAnnotation(property: KProperty<T>) = property.annotations.firstOrNull { it.annotationClass == SomeRandomAnnotation::class } != null
fun <T> propertyIsNull(property: KProperty<T>, parent: Any) = getMemberPropertyInstance(parent, property) == null
fun formatResult(parent: Any, property: KProperty<*>) = "$parent's property(${property.name}) is annotated with SomeRandomAnnotation and is null."
As the title, what is exactly the difference of these two defs in Groovy?
Maybe it's a documentation problem, I can't find anything...
A method declaration without static marks a method as an instance method. Whereas a declaration with static will make this method static - can be called without creating an instance of that class - see https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/static-methods-vs-instance-methods-java/
def in groovy defines a value as duck typed. The capabilities of the value are not determined by its type, they are checked at runtime. The question if you can call a method on that value is answered at runtime - see optional typing.
static def means that the method will return a duck typed value and can be called without having instance of the class.
Example:
Suppose you have these two classes:
class StaticMethodClass {
static def test(def aValue) {
if (aValue) {
return 1
}
return "0"
}
}
class InstanceMethodClass {
def test(def aValue) {
if (aValue) {
return 1
}
return "0"
}
}
You are allowed to call StaticMethodClass.test("1"), but you have to create an instance of InstanceMethodClass before you can call test - like new InstanceMethodClass().test(true).
I have a package containing some structure and functions associated with it:
package samplepkg
type SampleStruct struct {
FirstString string
SecondString string
}
func init() {
// some operations
}
func CheckSomething(s *SampleStruct) bool {
// check something
}
Now I'm trying to run this function in another package:
import (
"MyProject/samplepkg"
)
func testFunc() {
var s = samplepkg.SampleStruct{"a", "b"}
if s.CheckSomething() {
// do some operations
}
}
But I get an error that s.CheckSomething is undefined. (&s).CheckSomething gives the same result. I can access s.FirstString and s.SecondString as well as use this method by calling
if samplepkg.CheckSomething(&s) {
// do some operations
}
But I feel it could be written in a better way. I'm aware that Go is not object-oriented language but is method invocation like this possible?
In Golang a Method set is defined as:
A type may have a method set associated with it. The method set of an
interface type is its interface. The method set of any other type T
consists of all methods declared with receiver type T. The method set
of the corresponding pointer type *T is the set of all methods
declared with receiver *T or T (that is, it also contains the method
set of T). Further rules apply to structs containing embedded fields,
as described in the section on struct types. Any other type has an
empty method set. In a method set, each method must have a unique
non-blank method name.
There is a mistake because you are using the pointer receiver with method when calling the function. So change the function when defining to method as:
func init() {
// some operations
}
func(s *SampleStruct) CheckSomething() bool {
// check something
}
Or when calling the method it should be function with argument SampleStruct which will be like
import (
"MyProject/samplepkg"
)
func testFunc() {
var s = &samplepkg.SampleStruct{"a", "b"}
if CheckSomething(s) {
// do some operations
}
}
I have a couple of structures, like:
type SomeObject struct {
sample int
}
I want to fill the sample variable based on what I get in the request body. To do this, I want to create a function, pass request body as a string to it, create an empty structure inside, fill the structure with data, return it, and replace chosen structure with this.
How do I do this? What do I return from the function? Is there a way to do this?
If you're dealing with multiple types then you should make your method return an interface{}. For all of the applicable types, create a convenience method like;
func NewSomeObject(reqBody string) *SomeObject {
return &SomeObject{sample:reqBody}
}
Which takes a string and returns a new instance of the type with that field set to whatever was passed in. Your question is missing information about how you determine which type should be instantiated but assuming you have a few, you'll likely need an if/else or a switch in the method which receives the request body so to give a very vague example it would be something like;
func ProcessRequest(reqBody string) interface{} {
if someCondition {
return NewSomeObject(reqBody)
} else if otherCondition {
return NewSomeOtherObject(reqBody)
} // potentially several other statements like this
return nil // catch all, if no conditions match
}
How about
func foo (s *SomeObject) {
s.sample = 123
}
or
func (s *SomeObject) foo() {
s.sample = 123
}