My app needs to GET results from the GSA based on entity name, is this possible? I can retrieve results based on metadata using requiredfields but I cannot seem to find any documentation on how to retrieve results based on entity names (entity name:entity value pairs). Using the indexing diagnostics on the the GSA I can see that the GSA is tagging the appropriate docs with the correct entity name: entity value pairs.
Entities are pushed as metadata, but their are prefixed with "gsaentity_", so it's really working the same way as metadata. The prefix is just there to avoid colliding with your existing metadata.
For instance, let's pick the default "Date" entity preloaded in the box. If you wanted to use it, you should do :
&requiredfields=gsaentity_Date:value
Related
I am trying to get the field list from an entity, in example contact, I have successfully done it doing a Request to:
EntityDefinitions(LogicalName='contact')/Attributes/Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.AttributeMetadata
But now I need to get the Navigation Properties defined on this entity, I have found information on how to get Navigation Properties when querying a specific record by id, but in this case I need it when getting the field list.
Thanks in advance for your help
Referring the docs: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powerapps/developer/data-platform/webapi/query-metadata-web-api
You already have the Lookup attributes, AttributeMetadata has everything.
If you want to only read the metadata of lookups, change the type to LookupAttributeMetadata.
EntityDefinitions(LogicalName='contact')/Attributes/Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.LookupAttributeMetadata
To obtain relationships info alongside the columns list then an additional query is required, RelationshipDefinitions:
/RelationshipDefinitions/Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.OneToManyRelationshipMetadata
/RelationshipDefinitions/Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.ManyToManyRelationshipMetadata
filter on ReferencedEntity / ReferencingEntity to limit the results
/RelationshipDefinitions/Microsoft.Dynamics.CRM.ManyToManyRelationshipMetadata
filter on Entity1LogicalName / Entity2LogicalName / IntersectEntityName
All,
I am building a Power Flow. I am returning an object that has a relationship to another entity.
I want to get some values from the related entity.
I am attemping to use the "Get Record" connector. The returning object returns just the logicalEntityName (in this case "opportunities") but Get Record wants an Entity Name that is the Schema Name ("Working Opportunities").
Big Question: What's the secret to use CDS to get information from a related record in another object?
Little Question: How do I do get the Schema Name?
The logical name will be the same as schema name except some casing difference, ie schema name will have camel casing (first letter of first/second word with capitals, you can notice it clearly in custom entity which will have publisher prefix like new_entityname) and logical name will have pascal casing (all lower case).
You can find the details in XrmToolBox metadata browser or in Solution.
In the below snip, (Logical) Name = Opportunity and Schema Name = Opportunity, also Display Name can be anything and can be changed anytime.
Regarding the related entities, you should use List Records: GetItems_V2 and you can use filter by passing parent record to get related child records. Read more
Could you please share flow screenshot and response to help you with your requirement?
As suggested by Arun you could use List Record and filter query to pass parent record id which will be available from dynamic content.
see below link.
https://crmkeeper.com/2019/08/31/cds-list-records-filter-query-using-flow/
Please mark my answer verified if i were helpful
Correct me if I'm wrong but it appears that the admin-sdks's Users>list operation doesnt support searching users by ID (According to the docs here).
For example I use the Members api to get all the members of a given group. It returns a list or User Ids.
The only way to fetch data about those users is to call the get operation for each user. Seems pretty inefficient to me.
How come this functionality is not implemented (or perhaps I'm missing something)?
Search feature means you have a pattern and you want the list of all entities which relate to given pattern. It assumes you don't have the unique id of the entity you need. The output of search feature is the list of unique ids with optional additional minimal information which matches to search pattern. To get full information of the individual entity, you need to use unique id and use get information feature.
However, if you already have the unique id, then you don't need the search function. Directly use get information feature.
So google has provided sufficient functionality. If you already have userid, why using search call, use retrieve user call directly.
CouchDB's versioning is an absolute boon to the application I'm writing, but each of the objects I want to represent in the database has it's own unique identifier (let's call it my_id), so I don't really need the _id field.
Is there a way for me to tell CouchDB that I want to make my field the primary hey (not _id)?
I'm using ruby's couchrest_model, so I know I can do Model.find_by_my_id(params[:my_id]) if I've put view_by :my_id in my class, but this feels like I'm storing an _id for no purpose. Should I care?
would it not be possible to, when you create the document, provide your own id instead of the default one couchb assigns? I don't know if ruby's couchrest can do it, but it's available in the CouchDB API
See here: http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/HTTP_Document_API#PUT
The document ID is passed into the url.
I've made a custom entity that will work as an data modification audit (any entity modified will trigger creating an instance of this entity). So far I have the plugin working fine (tracking old and new versions of properties changed).
I'd like to also keep track of what entity this is related to. At first I added a N:1 from DataHistory to Task (eg.) and I can indeed link back to the original task (via a "new_tasksid" attribute I added to DataHistory).
The problem is every entity I want to log will need a separate attribute id (and an additional entry in the form!)
Looking at how phone, task, etc utilize a "regardingobjectid", this is what I should do. Unfortunately, when I try to add a "dataobjectid" and map it to eg Task and PhoneCall, it complains (on the second save), that the reference needs to be unique. How does the CRM get around this and can I emulate it?
You could create your generic "dataobjectid" field, but make it a text field and store the guid of the object there. You would lose the native grids for looking at the audit records, and you wouldn't be able to join these entities through advanced find, fetch or query expressions, but if that's not important, then you can whip up an ASPX page that displays the audit logs for that record in whatever format you choose and avoid making new relationships for every entity you want to audit.
CRM has a special lookup type that can lookup to many entity types. That functionality isn't available to us customizers, unfortunately. Your best bet is to add each relationship that could be regarding and hide the lookups that aren't in use for this particular entity.