By default, SimpleWebRTC uses https://sandbox.simplewebrtc.com:443/ as its signaling server. Now, this is an XHR endpoint, and somehow, signal master seems to switch it to a web socket connection.
Now, I’m trying to use my own signaling server with SimpleWebRTC. And it’s a straightforward websocket endpoint. So when creating the SimpleWebRTC object, I have SimpleWebRTC { “url” : ”ws://<my-IP>/chatroom" ...}
But upon creating the SimpleWebRTC object, it proceeds to try and connect to a different URI: http://my-IP/socket.io/?EIO=3&transport=polling&t=1450985796761-0.
How can I get SimpleWebRTC to just connect directly to ws://my-IP/chatroom, and have those parameters just passed along to other peers as signal master does? Does my signaling server have to do anything other than pass along the parameters / message that the initiator sends?
SimpleWebRTC uses socket.io instead of raw websockets. If you want to use raw websockets you can try replacing https://github.com/andyet/SimpleWebRTC/blob/master/socketioconnection.js with your raw websocket connection.
Or you implement the socket.io protocol in your server.
Here is signal master for your question:
github signalmaster
For run it, you must to install module of npm in server.js file.
Replace:
https://sandbox.simplewebrtc.com:443/
↓
http://<yourip>:8888/
But I don't understand, if we using that signal server, can we increase performance of frame rate and speed, and no need stun and turn server of google? When I deployed that signalserver on my cloud host? BTW, I can't understand when reading config for install turnserver on github.
Related
I was experimenting hashicorp/yamux over gorilla/websocket, and got stuck.
I started with vanilla WebSocket using the echo example from Gorilla WebSocket project. It was very a straight forward client-server setup. Then image that the server is now behind a firewall, thus the client cannot make a direct connection to it. So I introduced a hub and an agent. The hub is supposed to be publicly visible and connectable for the client. The agent would run alongside the server, who would first make a WebSocket connection to the hub and then multiplex the connection using Yamux so that the hub can then initiate requests to the server. In this way, I effectively "exposed" the server beyond the firewall.
For normal HTTP endpoints, things are good. The client can make requests to the hub, who would proxy these requests to the agent using the WebSocket connection initiated by the hub, and then the hub would further proxy these requests to the server.
However, this trick failed to work with WebSocket endpoints. For the echo example, the client can access the HTML on / through the hub-agent-server chain, but would fail on the /echo path, which is a WebSocket endpoint.
My question is, is this WebSocker over Yamux over WebSocket fundamentally impossible, or do I just need some extra lines to get things work? Here's the code I've been experimenting with. Really appreciate your helps!
I'm trying to get a better understanding of how the server-side architecture works for WebSockets with the goal of implementing it in an embedded application. It seems that there are 3 different server-side software components in play here: 1) the web server to serve static HTTP pages and handle upgrade request, 2) a WebSockets library such as libwebsockets to handle the "nuts and bolts" of WebSockets communications, and 3) my custom application to actually figure out what to do with incoming data. How do all these fit together? Is it common to have a separate web server and WebSocket handling piece, aka a WebSocket server/daemon?
How does my application communicate with the web server and/or WebSockets library to send/receive data? For example, with CGI, the web server uses environmental variables to send info to the custom application, and stdout to receive responses. What is the equivalent communication system here? Or do you typically link in a WebSocket library into the customer application? But then how would communication with the web server to the WebSocket library + custom application work? Or all 3 combined into a single component?
Here's why I am asking. I'm using the boa web server on a uClinux/no MMU platform on a Blackfin processor with limited memory. There is no native WebSocket support in boa, only CGI. I'm trying to figure out how I can add WebSockets support to that. I would prefer to use a compiled solution as opposed to something interpreted such as JavaScript, Python or PHP. My current application using long polling over CGI, which does not provide adequate performance for planned enhancements.
First off, it's important to understand how a webSocket connection is established because that plays into an important relationship between webSocket connections and your web server.
Every webSocket connection starts with an HTTP request. The browser sends an HTTP request to the host/port that the webSocket connection is requested on. That request might look something like this:
GET /chat HTTP/1.1
Host: example.com:8000
Upgrade: websocket
Connection: Upgrade
Sec-WebSocket-Key: dGhlIHNhbXBsZSBub25jZQ==
Sec-WebSocket-Version: 13
What distinguishes this request from any other HTTP request to that server is the Upgrade: websocket header in the request. This tells the HTTP server that this particular request is actually a request to initiate a webSocket connection. This header also allows the web server to tell the difference between a regular HTTP request and a request to open a webSocket connection. This allows something very important in the architecture and it was done this way entirely on purpose. This allows the exact same server and port to be used for both serving your web requests and for webSocket connections. All that is needed is a component on your web server that looks for this Upgrade header on all incoming HTTP connections and, if found, it takes over the connection and turns it into a webSocket connection.
Once the server recognizes this upgrade header, it responds with a legal HTTP response, but one that signals the client that the upgrade to the webSocket protocol has been accepted that looks like this:
HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols
Upgrade: websocket
Connection: Upgrade
Sec-WebSocket-Accept: s3pPLMBiTxaQ9kYGzzhZRbK+xOo=
At that point, both client and server keep that socket from the original HTTP request open and both switch to the webSocket protocol.
Now, to your specific questions:
How does my application communicate with the web server and/or
WebSockets library to send/receive data?
Your application may use the built-in webSocket support in modern browsers and can initiate a webSocket connection like this:
var socket = new WebSocket("ws://www.example.com");
This will instruct the browser to initiate a webSocket connection to www.example.com use the same port that the current web page was connected with. Because of the built-in webSocket support in the browser, the above HTTP request and upgrade protocol is handled for you automatically from the client.
On the server-side of things, you need to make sure you are using a web server that has incoming webSocket support and that the support is enabled and configured. Because a webSocket connection is a continuous connection once established, it does not really follow the CGI model at all. There must be at least one long-running process handling live webSocket connections. In server models (like CGI), you would need some sort of webServer add-on that supports this long-running process for your webSocket connections. In a server environment like node.js which is already a long running process, the addition of webSockets is no change at all architecturally - but rather just an additional library to support the webSocket protocol.
I'd suggest you may find this article interesting as it discussions this transition from CGI-style single request handling to the continuous socket connections of webSocket:
Web Evolution: from CGI to Websockets (and how it will help you better monitor your cloud infrastructure)
If you really want to stick with the stdin/stdout model, there are libraries that model that for your for webSockets. Here's one such library. Their tagline is "It's like CGI, twenty years later, for WebSockets".
I'm trying to figure out how I can add WebSockets support to that. I
would prefer to use a compiled solution as opposed to something
interpreted such as JavaScript, Python or PHP.
Sorry, but I'm not familiar with that particular server environment. It will likely take some in-depth searching to find out what your options are. Since a webSocket connection is a continuous connection, then you will need a process that is running continuously that can be the server-side part of the webSocket connection. This can either be something built into your webServer or it can be an additional process that the webServer starts up and forwards incoming connections to.
FYI, I have a custom application at home here built on a Raspberry Pi that uses webSockets for real-time communication with browser web pages and it works just fine. I happen to be using node.js for the server environment and the socket.io library that runs on top of webSockets to give me a higher level interface on top of webSockets. My server code checks several hardware sensors on a regular interval and then whenever there is new/changed data to report, it sends messages down any open webSockets so the connected browsers get real-time updates on the sensor readings.
You would likely need some long-running application that incoming webSocket connections were passed from the web server to your long running process or you'd need to make the webSocket connections on a different port than your web server (so they could be fielded by a completely different server process) in which case you'd have a whole separate server to handle your webSocket requests and sockets (this server would also have to support CORS to enable browsers to connect to it since it would be a different port than your web pages).
I am trying to deploy my dart application on heroku but even when i have got my stream server running in the dyno, i don't have any idea as to how can i get the port number on client side code to connect to the server via websocket. Since i cannot use Platform.environment['PORT'], i don't know how to get the port.
My client side websocket address is this:
var port = '<The port number i need>';
var url = 'ws://0.0.0.0:$port/ws';
It has taken a lot of effort to deploy successfully to heroku. Please tell me that there is a way to make this work.
I haven't used Heroku myself yet but here the doc says
The Heroku platform automatically routes HTTP requests sent to your app’s > hostname(s) to your web dynos. The entry point for all applications on >the Cedar stack is the herokuapp.com domain which offers a direct routing path to your web dynos.
It should be possible to make a HTTP request to the hostname of your web dyno to connect to your server and your server should be able to do the Platform.environment['PORT'] and report the result back.
Referring to the link given by Gunter Why won't my app establish websocket connection on Heroku?, it just happens to be that the client side doesn't require an actual port to connect.
Doing the window.location.origin and replacing http:// with ws:// did the trick! Although problem is that even when my database opens up and all, there's some problem when using objectory to query upon it.
You can try " heroku run bash " and run your server in terminal then you can easily find your port in which your app is running.
I'm starting with Websockets and I have a problem.
I have a sails.js application that uses sockets to update the client side.
On the client side it makes an API call using socket.get("/api/v1/actor...") to bring all the items of the database. When I see what the WebSocket's traffic on the Chrome console:
As you can see, the connection has been established and the API call has been correctly done through the socket.
The problem is, there is no answer from the server, not even an error.
If I make the same API call using ajax, I get response, but it doesn't work using WebSockets.
Any idea what might be producing this behavior?
EDIT: I add here the code here that processes the request and this one here that sends the request, but the problem is that it never execute this code. I think we we are closer to the find the cause, since we think it has to do with a network problem. We figured there is an F5 reverse-proxy which is not properly set up to handle websockets
The answer didn't make any sense now that I've seen the code that's why I've edited it. I only answered because I could't comment on your question and ask you for the code.
Your calling code seems correct and the server side of things the process of response should be handled automatically by the framework, you only need to return some JSON in the controller method.
I instantiated a copy of the server (just changed the adapters to run it locally) and the server replied to the web socket requests (although I only tested the route '/index').
Normally when the problems are caused by a reverse proxy the socket simply refuses to connect and you can't even send data to server. Does the property "socket.socket.connected" returns true?
The best way to test is to write a small node application with socket.io client and test it in the same machine that the application server is running, then you can exclude network problems.
I am working on a dropbox like system and I am wondering how the client gets notified when the files change on the server side. It is my impression that both dropbox and ubuntu one operate over HTTP ports and work as follows:
1. if files change on client machine, inotify detects it and preforms a push from the client to the server. (I get this part)
2. if files change on the server a simple unsolicited notification (just a message saying "time to sync") is sent from the server to the client. Then the client initiates a sync to the server.
I dont really care which language I do this in. I am just wondering how the client gets contacted. Specifically, what if a client is behind a firewall with its own local IP addresses. How does the server locate it?
Also, what kind of messaging protocols would be used to do something like this? I was planning on doing this over HTTP or SSH, but I have no attachment do that.
I'm not sure what Dropbox is using, but it could be websockets (unlikely, it's a pretty new and not widely deployed thing) or more likely a pending Ajax request from the client to the server -- to which the server only responds when it has new stuff for the client. The latter is the common way to implement (well, OK -- "hack";-) some form of "server push" with HTTP.
It took a little research into networking to see how this would work, but it is far more trivial then I expected. I am now using standard Java sockets for this. Start up the server process which listens for a socket connection. Then start up the client which connects to the server.
Once the connection is made, messages can be sent back and fourth. This works through NAT (network address translation) which is standard method for routing packets on private networks behind a firewall.