This post should be a little more complex than usual.
We have created a new field for an account.invoice.line : pack_operation. With this field, we can print serial/lot number for each line on the PDF invoice (this part works well).
Many hours passed trying to write the domain to select the EXACT and ONLY stock pack operation for each invoice line.
In the code below, we used the domain [('id','=', 31)] to make our tests printing the PDF.
Ho to write this domain to be sure at 100 % that we will get the right stock pack operation for each invoice line?
I really need your help here... Too complex for my brain.
Our code :
class AccountInvoiceLine(models.Model):
_inherit = "account.invoice.line"
pack_operation = fields.Many2one(comodel_name='stock.pack.operation', compute='compute_stock_pack_operation_id')
def compute_stock_pack_operation_id(self):
stock_operation_obj = self.env['stock.pack.operation']
stock_operation = stock_operation_obj.search( [('id','=', 31)] )
self.pack_operation = stock_operation[0]
EDIT#1
I know that you won't like my code. But, this one seems to work. I take any comments and improvements with pleasure.
class AccountInvoiceLine(models.Model):
_inherit = "account.invoice.line"
pack_operation = fields.Many2one(comodel_name='stock.pack.operation', compute='compute_stock_pack_operation_id')#api.one
def compute_stock_pack_operation_id(self):
procurement_order_obj = self.env['procurement.order']
stock_operation_obj = self.env['stock.pack.operation']
all_picking_ids_for_this_invoice_line = []
for saleorderline in self.sale_line_ids:
for procurement in saleorderline.procurement_ids:
for stockmove in procurement.move_ids:
if stockmove.picking_id.id not in all_picking_ids_for_this_invoice_line
all_picking_ids_for_this_invoice_line.append(stockmove.picking_id.id)
all_picking_ids_for_this_invoice_line))
stock_operation = stock_operation_obj.search(
[ '&',
('picking_id','in',all_picking_ids_for_this_invoice_line),
('product_id','=',self.product_id.id)
]
)
self.pack_operation = stock_operation[0]
The pack_operation field is a computed field, that be default means that the field will not be saved on the database unless you set store=True when you define your field.
So, what you can do here is change:
pack_operation = fields.Many2one(comodel_name='stock.pack.operation', compute='compute_stock_pack_operation_id')
to:
pack_operation = fields.Many2one(comodel_name='stock.pack.operation', compute='compute_stock_pack_operation_id', store=True)
And try running your query again.
Related
So I have 2 variable for storing the selected time of the user ('time_to' and 'time_from) with these sample data('7:30','8:00')
How can I save these two into 1 column('c_time') so it would look like this('7:30-8:00')?
if i understand you correctly, you can create a column of string (varchar) type. and then create the data for your column like this :
$time_to = '7:30';
$time_from= '8:00';
$colValueToBeStored = "(".$time_to."-".$time_from.")";
then just put $colValueToBeStored inside your column.
and to reverse it:
$colValueToBeStored = "(7:30-8:00)";
$res = explode("-",str_replace([")","("],"",$colValueToBeStored));
$time_to = $res[0];
$time_from = $res[1];
define your c_time column type as JSON, that way you can store multiple values, as it will be easier to retrieve as well. Like,
...
$cTime['time_to'] = "7:30";
$cTime['time_from'] = "8:00";
$cTimeJson = json_encode($cTime);
// save to db
...
Hi i have been trying to make a user defined function that allows the user to select the values which the function will use from a list.
I have tried setting the parameter i want as a list to type list in my function but this only seems to accept columns rather than a list of values a user can select from.
let
ListOfDays = {1.1,0.5,2,3,1},
DayOfTheWeek = (Day as list, HoursWorked ) =>
let
Earnings = Day * HoursWorked
in
Earnings
in
DayOfTheWeek
What i would like is for me to allow the user to select a single value from the ListOfDays list. I used typed list within my function parameters so that it can give the user a dropdown list kind of option.
I believe this is the relevant documentation you are looking for:
github.com/microsoft/DataConnectors/docs/function-docs.md: Adding Function Documentation
In particular, look at the definition for Documentation.AllowedValues:
List of valid values for this parameter. Providing this field will change the input from a textbox to a drop down list. Note, this does not prevent a user from manually editing the query to supply alternate values.
This (and other Documentation fields) are part of the meta typing of the function arguments. Scroll down to the code snippet which shows how to use them:
[DataSource.Kind="HelloWorldWithDocs", Publish="HelloWorldWithDocs.Publish"]
shared HelloWorldWithDocs.Contents = Value.ReplaceType(HelloWorldImpl, HelloWorldType);
HelloWorldType = type function (
message as (type text meta [
Documentation.FieldCaption = "Message",
Documentation.FieldDescription = "Text to display",
Documentation.SampleValues = {"Hello world", "Hola mundo"}
]),
optional count as (type number meta [
Documentation.FieldCaption = "Count",
Documentation.FieldDescription = "Number of times to repeat the message",
Documentation.AllowedValues = { 1, 2, 3 }
]))
as table meta [
Documentation.Name = "Hello - Name",
Documentation.LongDescription = "Hello - Long Description",
Documentation.Examples = {[
Description = "Returns a table with 'Hello world' repeated 2 times",
Code = "HelloWorldWithDocs.Contents(""Hello world"", 2)",
Result = "#table({""Column1""}, {{""Hello world""}, {""Hello world""}})"
],[
Description = "Another example, new message, new count!",
Code = "HelloWorldWithDocs.Contents(""Goodbye"", 1)",
Result = "#table({""Column1""}, {{""Goodbye""}})"
]}
];
HelloWorldImpl = (message as text, optional count as number) as table =>
let
_count = if (count <> null) then count else 5,
listOfMessages = List.Repeat({message}, _count),
table = Table.FromList(listOfMessages, Splitter.SplitByNothing())
in
table;
They also provide a screenshot of what this should look like when invoked:
If the user is able to open up the Query Editor, then they can choose a Day parameter from a dropdown list and have this automatically apply to the query.
You would create the parameter from the Manage Parameters > New Parameter menu
The drop-down at the upper right of the image is how the user would select the choice.
Your User Defined Function fn_DayOfTheWeek would be the following:
let
DayOfTheWeek = (Day as number, HoursWorked as number) =>
let
Earnings = Day * HoursWorked
in
Earnings
in
DayOfTheWeek
Note that Day is a number, not a list. You want to choose from a list, not pass a list into the function.
Now you can invoke your function with your parameter to actually produce a result.
let
Source = fn_DayOfTheWeek(Day, <HoursWorked value here>)
in
Source
This result will update when you change the parameter.
As you can see, whether a user has access to the Query Editor is rather a critical question for this approach. I'm not sure if it's possible to somehow set a parameter directly within a custom connector dialog box or not but this should be equivalent in functionality.
I have been battling with this for a while. none of the two options are working neither were they giving errors. i commented the pythonic constrain method for you to see.
code snippet:
class house_development(models.Model):
_name = 'house.development'
_description = 'Development'
_inherit = ["mail.thread"]
name = fields.Char(string="Name", required=True, track_visibility='onchange')
description = fields.Text(string="Description", track_visibility='onchange')
# #api.one
# #api.constrains('name')
# def _identify_same_name(self):
# for record in self:
# if record.name in self:
# raise exceptions.ValidationError("There is another development/project with the same name: %s" % record.name)
_sql_constraints = [
('name_unique',
'UNIQUE(name)',
"There is another development/project with the same name"),
]
It should be like that,
#api.multi
#api.constrains('name')
def _identify_same_name(self):
for record in self:
obj = self.search([('name','=ilike',record.name),('id','!=',record.id)])
if obj:
raise exceptions.ValidationError("There is another development/project with the same name: %s" % record.name)
You need to search for the same name but not with the same id.
And for database unique constrains you may add like that.
_sql_constraints = [
('name_unique', 'unique(name)', 'There is another development/project with the same name!!!'),
]
Database constrains will not be added if there are duplicate name in
table. Sql constrains will apply only if the rule is not violated by
the existing data. I think in your case that's the point with Sql
constrains. And make sure for that you need to upgrade module. first
check duplicate records in database by firing that query.
Select name, count(*) from table_name
group by name
having count(*) > 1;
Available operators in domain in odoo Click to see more.
I'm trying to create a field “complete_name” that displays a hierarchy name similar to whats done on the product categories grid but I can't seem to get it to work. It just puts Odoo in an endless loading screen when I access the relevant view using the new field "complete_name".
I have tried to copy the code used in addons/product/product.py and migrate to work with Odoo 9 API by using compute instead of .function type but it did not work.
Can someone help me understand whats wrong? Below is my model class which works fine without the complete_name field in my view.
class cb_public_catalog_category( models.Model ):
_name = "cb.public.catalog.category"
_parent_store = True
parent_left = newFields.Integer( index = True )
parent_right = newFields.Integer( index = True )
name = newFields.Char( string = 'Category Name' )
child_id = newFields.One2many( 'catalog.category', 'parent_id', string = 'Child Categories' )
complete_name = newFields.Char( compute = '_name_get_fnc', string = 'Name' )
def _name_get_fnc( self ):
res = self.name_get( self )
return dict( res )
Your compute function is supposed to define the value of an attribute of your class, not return a value. Ensure the value you are assigning complete_name is a string.
Also name_get() returns a tuple. I am not sure if you really want a string representation of this tuple or just the actual name value.
Try this
def _name_get_fnc( self ):
self.complete_name = self.name_get()[1]
If you really want what is returned by name_get() then try this.
def _name_get_fnc( self ):
self.complete_name = str(self.name_get())
If you are still having issues I would incorporate some logging to get a better idea of what you are setting the value of complete_name to.
import logging
_logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
def _name_get_fnc( self ):
_logger.info("COMPUTING COMPLETE NAME")
_logger.info("COMPLETE NAME: " + str(self.name_get()))
self.complete_name = self.name_get()
If this does not make it apparent what the issue is you could always try statically assigning it a value in the off chance that there is a problem with your view.
def _name_get_fnc( self ):
self.complete_name = "TEST COMPLETE NAME"
After further review I think I have the answer to my own question. It turns out as with a lot of things its very simple.
Simply use "_inherit" and inherit the product.category
model. This gives access to all the functions and fields
of product.category including the complete_name field
and computes the name from my custom model data. I was
able to remove my _name_get_func and just use the inherited
function.
The final model definition is below. Once this
update was complete I was able to add a "complete_name" field
to my view and the results were as desired!
class cb_public_catalog_category( models.Model ):
_name = "cb.public.catalog.category"
_inherit = 'product.category'
_parent_store = True
parent_left = newFields.Integer( index = True )
parent_right = newFields.Integer( index = True )
name = newFields.Char( string = 'Category Name' )
child_id = newFields.One2many( 'catalog.category', 'parent_id', string = 'Child Categories' )
I need to find and update a number of records in a Rails 3.2, Ruby 2 application. The following code successfully finds the records I want. What I need to do though is add " x" (including the space) to the email address of every user and I can't figure out how to do it.
This finds the records
User.joins(:account)
.where("users.account_id NOT IN (?)", [1955, 3083, 3869])
.where("accounts.partner_id IN (?)", [23,50])
.where("users.staff = '0'")
.where("users.admin = '0'")
.where("users.api_user = '0'")
.where("users.partner_id is null")
.update_all(email: :email.to_s << " X")
but it's the last line I'm having problems with. Is this possible, or do I need to find the records another way?
The update_all method updates a collection of records, but unless you write your own SQL expression, it can only set one value. For example, if you wanted to overwrite all the email addresses with "X", you could do it easily:
User.joins(:account)
.where("users.account_id NOT IN (?)", [1955, 3083, 3869])
# ...other scopes...
.update_all(email: "X")
In your case, what you really need to do is make individual updates to all these records. One way to do it is to find the records, then loop over them and update them one at a time:
users_to_update = User.joins(:account)
.where("users.account_id NOT IN (?)", [1955, 3083, 3869])
.where("accounts.partner_id IN (?)", [23,50])
.where("users.staff = '0'")
.where("users.admin = '0'")
.where("users.api_user = '0'")
.where("users.partner_id is null")
users_to_update.each do |user|
user.update_attribute(:email, "#{user.email} X")
end
Another solution would be to use a SQL expression with update_all, as in Zoran's answer.
Try writing the last line like so:
.update_all("email = email || ' X'")
This uses SQL's string concatenation operator to append the X to the end of the emails.
Hope that helps!