This question already has answers here:
Sass - Manipulate inherited property?
(4 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
I have the following mixin:
#mixin rhombus() {
#include transform(rotate(45deg));
}
and another one:
#mixin centerVertically() {
#include transform(transform(0, -50%));
position: absolute;
top: -50%
}
Now I would like to use them both on the same element and of course it will fail because the last called will be a winner.
There is a similar question for LESS but I could not find any solution for SASS.
Don't stick to the code above, this is just an example. I don't ask how to center the element or how to rotate it; I also know the order of transformation can matter, but still, is there any way to make the transform property be merged?
EDIT
the question is marked as a duplicate, but the question is totally different (and answer is not covering my question as well). I am asking about sharing the properties within a single block:
div {
#mixin rhombus;
#mixin centerVertically;
}
The attached question is asked about accessing inherited properties and same level properties. My case is different and I believe the answer can be different as well. I don't search for manipulating the inherited property. I search for the way to merge the property values into one. And I already found an answer although the 'duplicate' question does not have the one which solves the problem.
I've made some research and found the following feature request on a SASS'es repo which describes exactly this case.
Yes, there is no nice solution for that SASS-wise. But there is a workaround by mahdaen which might be really helpful. The code below is fully belonging to this good guy
$tmp-box-shadow-value: none;
#mixin box-shadow($value, $append: false) {
#if ($tmp-box-shadow-value == none) {
$tmp-box-shadow-value: $value !global;
}
#else {
$tmp-box-shadow-value: ($tmp-box-shadow-value, $value) !global;
}
#if ($append == false) {
#include prefixer(box-shadow, $tmp-box-shadow-value, true);
$tmp-box-shadow-value: none !global;
}
}
with usage like
.shadow-elem {
// Appending values.
#include box-shadow(0 0 1px #ccc, true);
#include box-shadow(0 0 1px #ddd, true);
// Append and write the style.
#include box-shadow(0 0 1px #eee);
}
Although it may seem dirty in somebody's eyes, I really like it as after small adaptions it fully solves my problem.
Related
This question already has an answer here:
Sass extend and parent selector
(1 answer)
Closed 1 year ago.
I'd like to generate the content of a %-class within a pseudo selector. #extend works rather unexpected here. Can someone tell me how I would get the expected CSS?
My SASS
%ext
&:aaa
color: red
button
&:bbb
#extend %ext // expected: .button:bbb:aaa
Actual Generated CSS
button:aaa:bbb {
color: red;
}
Expected CSS
button:bbb:aaa {
color: red;
}
The answer is: The order doesn't matter for the resulting CSS.
Therefore: Don't mind.
This question already has an answer here:
Append the parent selector to the end with Sass
(1 answer)
Closed 7 years ago.
you surely know reverse nesting in sass. So i got an advanced question for you.
.profile{
.avatar{
color: blue;
.friends &{
color: grey;
}
}
}
Compiles to:
.friends .profile .avatar {
How to get a result like:
.profile.friends .avatar {
Is there a solution with out changing the structure of the sass.
No, you must change the structure of the Sass. The upcoming #at-root feature can partially unwind selectors, but it will not work in this instance.
I'm wondering how the 0 margin on the last child is supposed to come in.
I've got:
body {
#include outer-container;
.content-main.with-sidebar { #include span-columns(8);}
aside { #include span-columns(4); }
}
Body is centered with a max max width -- both .content-main and aside are getting the correct widths, but neither are getting the :last-child { margin-right: 0;} that they're supposed to. There's other stuff in body, but it's the only parent they've got.
Clearly I'm not doing something right -- but the fact that they're getting widths at all seems like it would indicate that everything is #importing correctly.
With thanks --
Without looking at your HTML I can only guess that those aren't actually the last-child. For cases like this there is the omega() mixin to use. Look here for the documentation: http://neat.bourbon.io/docs/#omega
I have a 2 column grid and two divs which I both want to span a single column starting in the first column. I want these to stack on top of each other but they are being overlayed on top of each other. Here is the scss:
#first {
background: red;
height: 30px;
#include grid-span(1, 1);
}
#second {
background: red;
height: 30px;
#include grid-span(1, 1);
}
I've fixed it by inserting an additional div between these two divs and using #include clearfix; or alternatively I can fix it by using #include isolate-span(2,1,'both'); on the second div.
Is there a more 'best practice' way of clearing a row like this?
As discussed in this similar question, Singularity doesn't clear your floats for you when you're using Isolation output (isolation being when each float is isolated from one another's position, as opposed to float where they are not).
The short version of that answer is to use the CSS clear property, as explained very well in the Mozilla Developer Docs
I have a question. So in a mixing I am making a reference to the parent selector "&". This works as long as the mixin is not nested. Is there a way to to detect if the mixing is being used in a non nested scenario, or to check if "&" is null?
This works when the mixin call is not nested
=myresponsiveMixin($media)
#if $media == small {
#media only screen and (max-width: $break-small)
#content
#else if $media == medium
#media only screen and (min-width: $break-small + 1) and (max-width: $break-large - 1)
#content
This works great when the mixin call is nested, but will not resolve '&' when not nested
=myresponsiveMixin($media)
#if $media == small {
#media only screen and (max-width: $break-small)
.classInHTMLToAllowMediaQueries &
#content
#else if $media == medium
#media only screen and (min-width: $break-small + 1) and (max-width: $break-large - 1)
.classInHTMLToAllowMediaQueries &
#content
So the question is, if there is a way to be able to check the value of parent selector "&", so I can cover all bases in a single mixin?
#mixin does-parent-exist {
#if & {
.exists & {
color: red;
}
} #else {
.doesnt-exist {
color: red;
}
}
}
http://sass-lang.com/documentation/file.SASS_REFERENCE.html#parent-script
You're trying a wrong solution to solve your issue.
Have a look at how this problem is addressed in powerful SASS frameworks. Let's take Susy by Eric Meyer as a great example.
Let's imagine you've got the following HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="parent">
<div class="child">
Bla bla
</div>
</div>
</div>
When you call a mixin for the first time, you're doing it simply (the code is in the indented .sass syntax):
$total-columns: 8 // Declaring a varible that will be used by the mixin
.parent
+span-columns(4) // Span four of eight columns
But when you call that for a child element, the proportions would be crooked, because the parent is already proportioned:
.child
+span-columns(2) // This will fail. You want 2 of 8 columns,
// but due to nesting the math is crooked.
// It will be "2 of (4 of 8)".
To address the issue, you provide an optional argument: a context that is used to do the math:
.child
+span-columns(2, 4) // Now the mixin will take 2 parts of 4
// instead of 2 parts of four
The source code for this mixin is available on GitHub.
In short, it creates an optional argument like this (the code is in the CSS-like .scss syntax):
#mixin span-columns(
$columns,
$context: $total-columns
//...
) {
//...
width: columns($cols, $context /*...*/);
//...
}
See how $context has a default value? Thanks to the default value this argument can be omitted. In other words, $context is an optional argument.
When calling this mixin, if $context is not provided (e. g. span-columns(2)), then it is set equal to $total-columns. The $total-columns variable should be set prior to calling the mixin for the first time (see my example above).
Then the two arguments are used to calculate the width.
UPD 2013-03-30
I am not trying to figure out things in regards to columns... I have modifier my question to make it clearer.
First of all, my recommendation concerns not only grid columns. It's a universal technique you can adopt.
Secondly, now i see that you're trying to nest media queries.
Well, some media queries of different type can be combined in CSS3: e. g. print and width. But you can't put a min-width: 601px inside max-width: 600px, this just won't work!
There's an extensive answer here on StackOverflow describing why you should not nest media queries of the same type: https://stackoverflow.com/a/11747166/901944
Thirdly, you're trying to invent the wheel. There's already a fantastic mixin for crunching media queries: Respond To by Snugug. It's super easy to use and very effective.
Fourthly, the XY thing. Instead of asking about your crooked mixin, please describe the problem that you're trying to solve with it! Show us the actual HTML and explain what behavior you would like to achieve.
We will show you that it can be solved with a simple, elegant, semantic solution that does not require SASS hacking.