I am using "artem-schander/l5-modular": "dev-master" for laravel moduler development.
For example i create an Admin module.
Folder structure is App/Modules/Admin.
So controller related to Admin modules placed under App/Modules/Admin/Controllers/ directory.
All routes related to Admin module are placed in App/Modules/Admin/routes.php file.
Here how it looks
Route::group(array('module' => 'Admin', 'middleware' => ['web'],'namespace' => 'App\Modules\Admin\Controllers'), function() {
Route::resource('admin', 'AdminController');
});
All view files related to admin module placed in App/Modules/Admin/Views folder.
I am trying to access Admin's index view using this route
Route::get('/', 'AdminController#index');
This route is place in laravel default routes.php file.
and when i browse ,I am getting this error
Class App\Http\Controllers\AdminController does not exist
From this i understood , laravel looking AdminController in its default path.
How can i overcome this challenge ?
You can access a controller by full qualified namespace if it is not in default path.
Try:
Route::resource('admin', '\App\Modules\Admin\Controllers\AdminController');
I have found two way to do it.
First Option
Changing the $namespace in RouteServiceProvider.php .
For me
private $namespace='\App\Modules';
So for Admin module i can use route as
Route::get('/', 'Admin\Controllers\AdminController#index');
I think this is bad idea to change Laravel's default value.
Second Option
Providing full path of the Controller.
So route would be like this
Route::get('/','\App\Modules\Admin\Controllers\AdminController#index');
Related
I was wondering if there was some default functionality in the Laravel routes file (web.php or any other route file) where you could do the following:
Route::get(
'pages/books/categories',
'App\\Http\\Controllers\\Page\\Book\\PageBookCategoryController#index'
);
And named route for the above would be pages/books/categories.
At the moment, I have to do the following for it to work as expected:
Route::get(
'pages/books/categories',
'App\\Http\\Controllers\\Page\\Book\\PageBookCategoryController#index'
)
->name('pages/books/categories');
Of course, this gives me the named route as pages/books/categories. The only reason why I want to do the above is that I have quite a few routes, and it's pretty tedious to add a named route if the URL for the route is the same.
How could I change laravel sanctum csrf cookie route to /api/sanctum/csrf-cookie ?
I tried adding this to api.php routes:
use Laravel\Sanctum\Http\Controllers\CsrfCookieController;
Route::get('/sanctum/csrf-cookie', CsrfCookieController::class . '#show')->middleware('web');
But it looks for this controller under app/http/controllers where it doesn't exist.
So if anyone wondering, there should be prefix within config file that is default set to 'sanctum' within a package service provider.
So if you want to change it to API routes you should go to config/sanctum.php and add 'prefix' => 'api'.
you can create a controller CsrfController and make it extends
(Laravel\Sanctum\Http\Controllers\CsrfCookieController)
use Laravel\Sanctum\Http\Controllers\CsrfCookieController
class CsrfController extends CsrfCookieController {}
and then you can link your route
Route::get('/sanctum/csrf-cookie', 'CsrfController#show')->middleware('web');
another flexible solution is to set
'routes' => false
in config/sanctum.php ,then define a new route in routes\api.php
use Laravel\Sanctum\Http\Controllers\CsrfCookieController;
Route::get('/csrf', [CsrfCookieController::class, 'get'])->name('csrf');
like so, you can choose the proper route to suit your needs
I'm currently working on my homework for school which i've read about Laravel modules and i'm currently working with this https://nwidart.com/laravel-modules package.
I've managed to create modules, migrations and models. now i want to access a module via a simple link from route. like this:
CRM
I've created 3 modules with core,crm and sell names. which base on information from internet, I've understand that i can access them with localhost/crm or sell or core. now how i can fix my problem?
I've also tried {{ route('core::index') }}. Thanks
Update 1: Views in every module are like this: Resources\views\index.blade.php if u look at above link u will see a example of what i've said.
Update 2: routes: Every module have 1 route when i create module with package.
Laravel root module routes\web :
Route::get('/', function () {
return view('welcome');
});
and CRM route module Modules\CRM\routes\web\ and rest are just like below with different names :
Route::prefix('core')->group(function() {
Route::get('/', 'CoreController#index');
});
route() helper is for named routes. You can use url() helper to match a uri, or you have to add a name to your route, like:
Route::prefix('core')->group(function() {
Route::get('/', 'CoreController#index')->name('core.index');
});
and then you can
CRM
try to set name for your route
https://laravel.com/docs/5.8/routing#named-routes
Route::prefix('core')->group(function() {
Route::get('/', 'CoreController#index')->name('crm.index');
});
and then this should work
CRM
In the latest version 6 i change the view resource config and read from modules folder like this :
'paths' => [
base_path('Modules/Duet/Resources/views'),
base_path('Modules/anotherModule/Resources/views'),
],
I use like this to address view page in module controller:
return view("module::pages.main");
module is your module name.
I was having this in my website using Laravel 5.3 :
Route::group(['namespace' => 'Admin', 'prefix' => 'admin', 'middleware'=>'auth'], function(){
Route::resource('posts', 'PostsController');
});
This lets me go to the admin panel using: mywebsite/public/admin/posts.
Now, when I migrated the site to Laravel5.5 I got this error Route[admin.posts.create] not defined when i attempt to open the link Create post which was working fine before.
I know that routing system has changed but I did not know how to have such links in new Laravel5.5. I tried url instead of route but I got the same error. I also checked the new documentation but I did not get exactly how to have the same link system.
Can anyone have a better explanation of this new routing system? (I have to migrate the site to 5.5).
Laravel names resource routes by default, you can check them by running php artisan route:list
If you want to override them for any reason you can pass in an array when you define the route and override each individual route name like so:
Route::resource('posts', 'PostsController', ['names' => [
'create' => 'admin.posts.build'
]]);
In a Laravel 4 installation, Using Jeffrey Way's Laravel 4 Generators, I set up a 'tweet' resource, using the scaffolding command from his example:
php artisan generate:scaffold tweet --fields="author:string, body:text"
This generated the model, view, controller, migration and routing information for the tweet type. After migrating the database, visiting http://localhost:8000/tweets works fine, and shows the expected content.
The contents of the routes.php file at this point is:
Route::resource('tweets', 'TweetsController');
Now I would like to move the url for tweets up one level into admin/tweets, so the above url should become: http://localhost:8000/admin/tweets. Please note that I am not treating 'Admin' as a resource, but instead just want to add it for hypothetical organizational purposes.
Changing the routes.php file to:
Route::resource('admin/tweets', 'TweetsController');
Does not work, and displays the following error:
Unable to generate a URL for the named route "tweets.create" as such route does not exist.
Similarly when using the following:
Route::group(array('prefix' => 'admin'), function() {
Route::resource('tweets', 'TweetsController');
});
As was suggested in this stackoverflow question.
Using php artisan routes reveals that the named routes also now have admin prefixed to them, turning tweets.create into admin.tweets.create.
Why is the error saying that it cannot find tweets.create? shouldn't that automatically be resolved (judging by the routes table), to use admin.tweets.create?
How can I change my routing so that this error no longer occurs?
I just tested with new resource controller and it works fine for me.
The problem is not with the Route, its with the named routes used in your application.
check your view files there are link to route like link_to_route('tweets.create', 'Add new tweet'), this is creating the error because when you add admin as prefix tweets.create doesn't exists so change it to admin.tweets.create every where, in your controller also where ever named route is used.