How could I implement switching accounts like Facebook ( Private Account -> Page Account ).
The case would be identical to Facebook scenario:
User logs in , create eg. a business account, and then he can switch to that account and continue as a company ( in order to change settings etc. ). Then he can switch back on personal account.
One company account could access multiple users (eg . Employees )
I would add that the only way to switch to the company account, is the earlier log in as user (no logon directly to the company's account - no password).
How could I implement that in Spring? Maybe spring security has similar functionality?
Use Spring Session. It supports multiple account logins in the browser.
Multiple Browser Sessions - Spring Session supports managing multiple users' sessions in a single browser instance (i.e. multiple authenticated accounts similar to Google).
Docs here: http://docs.spring.io/spring-session/docs/1.0.2.RELEASE/reference/html5/
Related
I am trying to implement a feature similar to Slack where my application is a multi-tenant app, and a user can be logged into multiple accounts. Each account will be tied to a different domain. If logged into 2 different accounts, the user should be able to switch back and forth between the accounts. Also, the sessions should be managed independently. If one session expires, and the user needs to login, that expired session should not affect the other active sessions.
View Slack Image
The issue I am seeing is the different domain sessions override each other. This is a react frontend with Okta
Thanks for your time.
There are some gaps which require details, but here are few pointers that might help you.
Post authentication, you should be storing the authentication information like the session expiry, username in some form (local / session storage)
If I login to your application and choose a domain like (acme.com), the session information should be stored in a key like acme.com or hash(acme.com) so that how much ever domains, I login into, there will be unique keys to identify sessions and there will be no conflict of keys.
Once the domains are changed (like you switch workspaces in slack) there will be a new login session established (first time), which sets up the session information like described above.
For every workspace / domain change, the authentication libraries would be called and they would validate the stored session information, which gives the right data and expiry and user gets to use the application without issues.
Do share your implementation details or any issues had you implemented this solution.
I have a custom application for internal use only where currently users are created by a super admin. Some of the users are from within the business and some external e.g. suppliers/customers.
I'm looking for a way to integrate MS Active Directory as a login option but want to be able to restrict which users from the business can actually use this method.
I have search through all the MS docs and have all the documentation on the different oauth approaches but not sure which one would be suitable for my needs.
I am thinking that perhaps i need to give the admin a way to browse the AD and select the users that can login which then creates inactive user accounts in the mysql database with some sort of MS user ID. Then provide a 'Sign in with MS' button that does the usual auth redirection process to MS and back to the site. At that point I can check an ID and if that matches an allowed user account and if so, sync the rest of the data e.g. name, email, phone etc..
Links I've already found:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/active-directory/develop/authentication-scenarios
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-gb/graph/tutorials/php
https://github.com/microsoftgraph/msgraph-training-phpapp/tree/master/Demos/03-add-msgraph
Your first order of business is enabling a user to sign in to the Laravel-based app. For this, I strongly recommend not trying to re-invent the wheel (at least not completely), and make use of an existing Laravel package. Laravel Socialite is probably the best place to start, since it has a long list of existing community-provided Socialite providers, including three which work with Azure AD already: Microsoft, Microsoft-Graph and Microsoft-Azure. (Note: Though I haven't tested any of these myself, the first two seem to be the most promising, as they use the newer v2 endpoint.)
When it comes to authorization (controlling access), you have two options:
Control at Azure AD
Once you've got the app integrated with Azure AD, you can configure the app in Azure AD to require user assignment, and then control access to the app by assigning (or not) users to the app. Users who are not assigned won't even make it past the sign-in page.
You can use Azure AD's existing experiences for managing user and role assignment for the app, or you could go all-out and build this experience directly into the Laravel-based app itself, making use of the Azure AD Graph API to create the [app role assignments](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/azure/ad/graph/api/entity-and-complex-type-reference#approleassignment-entity and user picker experience.
Hint: In either case, remember that you can make the app "superuser" an "owner" of the app in Azure AD (Azure AD > Enterprise apps > (app) > Owners), which will allow them to assign users without needing to give them any additional privileges in Azure AD.
Control at the app
In this approach, you allow all users to sign in to the app with Azure AD, but then you use your app's own authorization logic to decide who makes it any further, and what roles they get in the app.
In reality, you will most likely find the best approach is to use a combination of the two, with some of the authorization enforced by Azure AD and the next level enforced by the app itself.
If you would do it in this way, it will be necessary that the super-admin has always this permissions in the AAD. From my point of view it is less practical.
I would perfer such app-assigments with help of Service Principal. You assign a role (look for app roles) to the user and then your business logic must decide which permissions the user has. If you would use the app roles feature, then you can restrict access to the role with it's help. All the user can login, but only users with a specific role would be able to see a content of the app.
I hope this hints can help to find a right direction, but there is no silver bullet solution... :/
My goal is to create a single click registration / sign on for my site using social media that's painfree yet secured using oauth and SocialAuthenticationFilter.
Ideally you'd be able to login to the same account with either twitter / Facebook etc (without first connecting them to a user account).
An example I'm working from is the Spring Social Showcase found on git, it's fantastic but it still requires an intermediary 'sign up' step.
I can't figure out a way of making a secure account using only the info from Facebook login using aouth and I'd prefer it if a user didn't have to sign up and connect as per the example.
So, is there a secure way of doing this or am I misunderstanding something?
Thanks
Using OAuth / OIDC is the right way to go.
In order to automatically match the logins from different social login providers, you have to rely on the email address as the primary user identifier.
Once relying on the email address, you may automatically register new users inside your internal DB.
However users may want to change their email address. This may complicate the processes significantly, depending on what options you want to support.
I'm converting an existing Google Apps Marketplace app to support OAuth2.
I understand the use of access keys to identify the user account but how can this be used to link a user to a 'company' or 'domain'?
Our app supports having multiple user logins under one business account - we need to be able to identify what company a user belongs to using OAuth2. How can this be done? (we're using C#).
Is there an additional user API that needs to be called after initial authentication, if so, which one? (we're using C#).
We are having a hosted web application and it uses forms authentication.
This webapplication is accessed by users belong to different partner organizations.
Currently users belong to the partner organizations are accessing the application using the credentials that we give it to them.
Now, some partner organizations wants their users to access the application using their active directory credentials.
We are planning to use ADFS for these partner organizations, so the users will be authenticated using Active Directory within their network and claims will be sent to the webapp via the Authentication token cookie set by the ADFS. From the claims, we map the users to the internal userIds of the web application.
My questions are , if we make the web application ADFS enabled,
1)Is it possible to still allow the other partner organization users(who don't want to use ADFS) to login to the web application using the existing login page(forms authentication)?
2) Should every page in the ADFS enabled webapp be accessed through https?
Any solutions or pointers would be much appreciated.
Thanks
-arul
Your app needs to require claims that describe the user, regardless of where they login from. It should not handle authentication in either case; this should be delegated to a trusted issuer, an STS. This will allow it to interact w/ users in a uniform way irrespective of where and how they authenticate. This means that you're going to need to use ADFS in two roles: that of an Identity Provider (IP) STS and of a Federation Provider (FP) STS. For users of partner companies that don't want to maintain users themselves, you'll be the IP-STS; for those that do, you'll be an FP-STS. In the latter case, ADFS will redirect users from your realm back to the partner's site where their IP-STS will authenticate them and send them to your FP-STS. It will map your partner's user ID and claims into ones that make sense in your realm. This and other information about the user will be included in the set of claims that are issued from your FP-STS. As a result, your app, only trusts your STS regardless of which scenario is appropriate for different users. Note that in this scenerio, there will be two STSs: your ADFS FP-STS and your partner's IP-STS, which may or may not be ADFS. In the other case, there will only be one STS: your IP-STS.
Not every page on your ADFS Web app needs to be accessed via HTTPS; however, everyone that's used in the authentication process should be.
This is really a non-trivial undertaking. If you want to talk about it more, please feel free to get in touch w/ me.