I'm writing a simple pagination TagHelper, where I want the output to look like this:
<ul>
<li>Some Text</li>
<li>Some Other Text</li>
...
</ul>
I had the idea that in defining my class I'd generate "a" elements, and decorate them with asp-controller, asp-action, etc., attributes, which would get rendered as the correct href link. Here's the code I came up with:
protected TagBuilder CreatePageLink( int page, bool enabled, string inner )
{
TagBuilder a = new TagBuilder( "a" );
a.MergeAttribute( "asp-controller", AspController );
a.MergeAttribute( "asp-action", AspAction );
a.MergeAttribute( "asp-route-page", page.ToString() );
a.MergeAttribute( "asp-route-itemsPerPage", ItemsPerPage.ToString() );
a.MergeAttribute( "title", $"goto page {page}" );
if( !enabled ) a.AddCssClass( "disabled" );
if( (page == Page) && String.IsNullOrEmpty(inner) ) a.AddCssClass( "active" );
if( String.IsNullOrEmpty( inner ) ) inner = page.ToString();
a.InnerHtml.AppendHtml( inner );
TagBuilder li = new TagBuilder( "li" );
li.InnerHtml.Append( a );
return li;
}
But it doesn't work. The "MVC magic attributes" like asp-controller show up in the output, but the resulting links don't work. I have to add, in code, a specific href attribute to the embedded "a" element for the link to work.
How do I go about nesting TagHelpers, like the LinkTagHelper, inside my own custom TagHelper?
This video on tag helpers might be helpful: https://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Web+Camps+TV/Update-on-TagHelpers-with-Taylor-Mullen
Skip ahead to about 35 minutes in.
Also they put the code up on github: https://github.com/NTaylorMullen/WebCampsTV_TagHelpers1
The part that you will find relevant is here:
[OutputElementHint("ul")]
public class ControllerNavigationTagHelper : TagHelper
{
public ControllerNavigationTagHelper(IUrlHelper urlHelper)
{
UrlHelper = urlHelper;
}
private IUrlHelper UrlHelper { get; }
public Type ControllerType { get; set; }
public string Exclude { get; set; }
public override void Process(TagHelperContext context, TagHelperOutput output)
{
output.TagName = "ul";
var actionNames = ControllerType.GetTypeInfo().DeclaredMethods
.Where(methodInfo => methodInfo.IsPublic)
.Select(methodInfo => methodInfo.Name);
var controllerName = ControllerType.Name;
if (controllerName.EndsWith("Controller", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
{
controllerName = controllerName.Substring(0, controllerName.Length - "Controller".Length);
}
foreach (var name in actionNames)
{
if (!string.Equals(name, Exclude, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
{
var displayName =
string.Equals(name, "Index", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) ? controllerName : name;
output.PostContent.Append($"<li><a href='{UrlHelper.Action(name, controllerName)}'>{displayName}</a></li>");
}
}
}
}
The basic premises is that there is an IUrlHelper service, I think built in to mvc (asp.net core mvc), that can be injected into your tag helper which you can use to construct the reference.
Once the IUrlHelper is injected you can use it to construct the url:
UrlHelper.Action(name, controllerName)
Related
Can anyone help me on how to use UniDynArray on ASP.net MVC3 (MS Visual Studio 2010) View Page?
I managed to add reference (U2.Data.Client) to the project and I'm able to use it in the Controller, but not in View page.
The reason to utilize the UniDynArray is that, I would like to pass a dynamic array from Controller to View and back to controller. This way I will not have to set every field to VIEWDATA in order to be use in View.
I would like to explain how to pass UniDynArray to MVC View from Controller the following ways:
MVVM Pattern (Raw UniDynArray)
ViewBag Pattern (Raw UniDynArray)
MVVM Pattern (flatten UniDynArray, UniDynArray to .NET Object DataTable)
MVVM Pattern (flatten UniDynArray, UniDynArray to POCO Object)
In this post , I will answer MVVM Pattern (Raw UniDynArray). Later I will cover rest.
Create ASP.NET MVC3 Project
Create a Model
Add a controller
Create a View
Open ‘CustomerViewModel.cs’ file and paste the following code
namespace Test_MvcApplication.Models
{
public class CustomerViewModel
{
public Customer MyCustomer { get; set; }
public CustomerViewModel(Customer pCustomer)
{
MyCustomer = pCustomer;
}
}
public class Customer
{
private UniDynArray myVar;
public UniDynArray MyUniDynArray
{
get
{
U2ConnectionStringBuilder conn_str = new U2ConnectionStringBuilder();
conn_str.UserID = "user";
conn_str.Password = "pass";
conn_str.Server = "localhost";
conn_str.Database = "HS.SALES";
conn_str.ServerType = "UNIVERSE";
conn_str.AccessMode = "Native"; // FOR UO
conn_str.RpcServiceType = "uvcs"; // FOR UO
conn_str.Pooling = false;
string s = conn_str.ToString();
U2Connection con = new U2Connection();
con.ConnectionString = s;
con.Open();
Console.WriteLine("Connected.........................");
// get RECID
UniSession us1 = con.UniSession;
UniSelectList sl = us1.CreateUniSelectList(2);
// Select UniFile
UniFile fl = us1.CreateUniFile("CUSTOMER");
fl.RecordID = "2";
myVar = fl.Read();
return myVar;
}
set
{
myVar = value;
}
}
}
}
Open ‘MyUniDynArrayController.cs’ and paste the following code. As you notice that you are passing object to view and that object has UniDynArray
namespace Test_MvcApplication.Controllers
{
public class MyUniDynArrayController : Controller
{
//
// GET: /MyUniDynArray/
public ActionResult Index()
{
Customer c = new Customer();
UniDynArray r = c.MyUniDynArray;
var l = new CustomerViewModel(c);
return View(l);
}
}
}
Open ‘MyUniDynArray\ Index.cshtml’ and paste the following code. #Model contains ViewModel object (UniDynArray)
#{
ViewBag.Title = "Index";
}
MyUniDynArray
==================
#Model.MyCustomer.MyUniDynArray
Open ‘Shared\Layout.cshtml’ file and add the following line
<nav>
<ul id="menu">
<li>#Html.ActionLink("MyUniDynArray", "Index", "MyUniDynArray")</li>
<li>#Html.ActionLink("Home", "Index", "Home")</li>
<li>#Html.ActionLink("About", "About", "Home")</li>
</ul>
</nav>
Run the application and press ‘MyUniDynArray’. You will see UniDynArray in View. I am not sure how are you going to bind UniDynArray with HTML5/Razor Controls. That’s why I sugest you to flatten UniDynArray.
Typed UniDynArray in MVC View
In this post , I would like to describe 'MVVM Pattern (flatten UniDynArray, UniDynArray to .NET Object Object) '.
Create a Model
Create Controller
Create View
Open Model file (Models\CustomerViewModel2.cs) and paste the coode
namespace Test_MvcApplication.Models
{
public class Customer2
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public DateTime HireDate { get; set; }
}
public class Customer2Repository
{
private List<Customer2> m_custList = new List<Customer2>();
public List<Customer2> CustomerList
{
get
{
U2ConnectionStringBuilder l = new U2ConnectionStringBuilder();
l.Server = "localhost";
l.UserID = "user";
l.Password = "pass";
l.Database = "HS.SALES";
l.ServerType = "universe";
string lconnstr = l.ToString();
U2Connection c = new U2Connection();
c.ConnectionString = lconnstr;
c.Open();
U2Command command = c.CreateCommand();
command.CommandText = "CALL MV_TO_DATASET_SELECT_SUBROUTINE(?,?)"; // UniVerse subroutine
command.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;
U2Parameter p1 = new U2Parameter();
p1.Direction = ParameterDirection.InputOutput;
p1.Value = "";
p1.ParameterName = "#arg1";
U2Parameter p2 = new U2Parameter();
p2.Direction = ParameterDirection.InputOutput;
p2.Value = "";
p2.ParameterName = "#arg2";
command.Parameters.Add(p1);
command.Parameters.Add(p2);
command.ExecuteNonQuery();
string lRetValue = (string)command.Parameters[1].Value;
//command.Parameters[1].MV_To_POCO<int>();
m_custList = command.Parameters[1].MV_To_POCO<Customer2>();
return m_custList;
}
set
{
m_custList = value;
}
}
}
public class CustomerViewModel2
{
public Customer2 MyCustomer2 { get; set; }
public List<Customer2> CustomerList { get; set; }
public CustomerViewModel2(Customer2 pCustomer)
{
MyCustomer2 = pCustomer;
}
public CustomerViewModel2(List<Customer2> pCustomerList)
{
CustomerList = pCustomerList;
}
}
}
Open Controller file (Controllers\MyUniDynArray2Controller.cs)
namespace Test_MvcApplication.Controllers
{
public class MyUniDynArray2Controller : Controller
{
//
// GET: /MyUniDynArrayController2/
public ActionResult Index()
{
Customer2Repository lvar = new Customer2Repository();
List<Customer2> lCustomer2List = lvar.CustomerList;
var l = new CustomerViewModel2(lCustomer2List);
return View(l);
}
}
}
Open View File (Views\MyUniDynArray2\Index.cshtml)
#{
ViewBag.Title = "Index";
}
<h2>Index</h2>
<table border="1">
<tr>
<td>ID</td>
<td>Name</td>
<td>HireDate</td>
</tr>
#foreach (var myItem in Model.CustomerList)
{
<tr>
<td>#myItem.ID</td>
<td>#myItem.Name</td>
<td>#myItem.HireDate</td>
</tr>
}
</table>
Open ‘Shared\Layout.cshtml’ file and add the following line
<nav>
<ul id="menu">
<li>#Html.ActionLink("MyUniDynArray2", "Index", "MyUniDynArray2")</li>
<li>#Html.ActionLink("MyUniDynArray", "Index", "MyUniDynArray")</li>
<li>#Html.ActionLink("Home", "Index", "Home")</li>
<li>#Html.ActionLink("About", "About", "Home")</li>
</ul>
</nav>
Run the application and press ‘MyUniDynArray2’. You will see Flatten UniDynArray. Basically UniDynArray becomes array of .NET objects(List)
Used UniVerse Subroutine
SUBROUTINE MV_TO_DATASET_SELECT_SUBROUTINE(ARG_INPUT,ARG_OUTPUT)
x = ARG_INPUT
ARG_OUTPUT = "100":#VM:"101":#VM:"102":#VM:"103":#FM:"Nancy":#VM:"Andrew":#VM:"Janet":#VM:"Margaret":#FM:"01/06/1991":#VM:"06/07/1996":#VM:"11/08/1999":#VM:"12/10/2001"
RETURN
I'm wondering how is it possible to add a CSS Class to the current page in your navigation when using ASP.NET MVC 3? Here is my navigation in my _Layout.cshtml file:
<p>#Html.ActionLink("Product Search", "Index", new { controller = "Home" }, new { #class = "current" })
| #Html.ActionLink("Orders", "Index", new { controller = "Orders" })
| #Html.ActionLink("My Account", "MyAccount", new { controller = "Account" })
| #Html.ActionLink("Logout", "LogOff", new { controller = "Account" })</p>
As you can see I have 4 links in my navigation with the first one having the CSS class "current" applied to it, I'd like to be able to add/remove this class to the different links in my navigation depending on which page the user is at. Is this possible?
Cheers
You can do this
#{
var currentController = ViewContext.RouteData.Values["controller"] as string ?? "Home";
var currentAction = ViewContext.RouteData.Values["action"] as string ?? "Index";
var currentPage = (currentController + "-" + currentAction ).ToLower();
}
#Html.ActionLink("Product Search", "Index", "Home", null,
new { #class = currentPage == "home-index" ? "current" : "" })
#Html.ActionLink("MyAccount", "MyAccount", "Account", null,
new { #class = currentPage == "account-myaccount" ? "current" : "" })
I would recommend using an extension method for this. Something like:
public static HtmlString NavigationLink(
this HtmlHelper html,
string linkText,
string actionName,
string controllerName)
{
string contextAction = (string)html.ViewContext.RouteData.Values["action"];
string contextController = (string)html.ViewContext.RouteData.Values["controller"];
bool isCurrent =
string.Equals(contextAction, actionName, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase) &&
string.Equals(contextController, controllerName, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase);
return html.ActionLink(
linkText,
actionName,
controllerName,
routeValues: null,
htmlAttributes: isCurrent ? new { #class = "current" } : null);
}
Then you can use it in your View by including the namespace of your extension and just calling your method:
#using MyExtensionNamespace;
...
#Html.NavigationLink("Product Search", "Index", "Home")
| #Html.NavigationLink("Orders", "Index", "Orders")
| #Html.NavigationLink("My Account", "MyAccount", "Account")
| #Html.NavigationLink("Logout", "LogOff", "Account")
This has the benefit of keeping your razor a little cleaner and is easily reusable in other views.
#{
var controller = ViewContext.RouteData.Values["controller"].ToString();
var action = ViewContext.RouteData.Values["action"].ToString();
var isActiveController = new Func<string, string, string, string, string>((ctrl, act, activeStyle, inactiveStyle) => controller == ctrl && action == act ? activeStyle : inactiveStyle);
}
Then in your class attribute in your HTML you can do:
class="#isActiveController("controlername","action","activecssstyleclass","inactiveccsstyle")"
Just an other way of #dknaack his answer.. bit more generic and less functionality to repeat in your code.
In my case,assume I have a Home page and a menu.
Add a ViewBag.Active as a placeholder in Home page like this:
#{
ViewBag.Title = "Home";
ViewBag.Active = "Home";
}
Then place it to your li class as a condition to active it or not:
<li class="#(ViewBag.Active=="Home"? "active" : "")">
<span>#ViewBag.Title</span>
</li>
I used this tutorial to get this done, it's a lot simpler to understand and takes 2 minutes
Hightlight Active menu item
You can also override the AnchorTagHelper (the default <a> tag helper) to create your own tag helper. The advantage is that it already has all required information by providing the asp-controller and even allows for autocomplete etc. by your IDE.
This is my TagHelper:
public class NavAnchorTagHelper : AnchorTagHelper
{
public NavAnchorTagHelper(IHtmlGenerator generator) : base(generator)
{
}
public override void Process(TagHelperContext context, TagHelperOutput output)
{
base.Process(context, output);
var contextController = (string)ViewContext.RouteData.Values["controller"];
if (contextController?.Equals(this.Controller) == true)
{
output.AddClass("text-dark", HtmlEncoder.Default);
}
output.TagName = "a";
}
}
And I use it like that:
<nav-anchor class="nav-link" asp-controller="MyController" asp-action="Index">Test</nav-anchor>
I have a ViewModel wrapping two complex types:
public class EditProductViewModel
{
public ProductData ProductData { get; set; }
public FridgeContent FridgeContent { get; set; }
}
and this view:
#model EditProductViewModel
#using (Html.BeginForm("Edit", "ProductData", FormMethod.Post))
{
#Html.EditorForModel()
[...]
}
ProductData and FridgeContent contain POCO properties with DataAnnotations like this:
public class FridgeContentMetadata : DatabaseEntityMetadataBase
{
[Required]
[HiddenInput(DisplayValue = false)]
public int ProductDataId { get; set; }
[Required]
[UIHint("StringReadOnly")]
public int ScaleId { get; set; }
[Required]
[UIHint("StringReadOnly")]
[Range(0.01, float.MaxValue, ErrorMessage = "The weight of a product must be positive.")]
public float Weight { get; set; }
[...]
}
I want to edit both ProductData and FridgeContent in the EditProductView using the appropriate data annotations from those classes and the EditorForModel() method (I don't want to generate the templates myself). I therefore created the templates ProductData.cshtml and FridgeContent.cshtml in /Views/Shared/EditorTemplates/:
#model FridgeContent
#Html.EditorForModel()
Unfortunately, the view for EditProductViewModel is empty (no errors raised). If I use EditorForModel for either FridgeContent or ProductData alone, it's working fine. I also tried adding [UIHInt("..")] annotations to EditProductViewModel but that doesn't make a difference.
What am I missing?
#model EditProductViewModel
#using (Html.BeginForm("Edit", "ProductData", FormMethod.Post))
{
#Html.EditorFor(o=> o.ProductData )
#Html.EditorFor(o=> o.FridgeContent )
}
or create an edit template for you ViewModel containing these two lines
#Html.EditorFor(o=> o.ProductData )
#Html.EditorFor(o=> o.FridgeContent )
UPADTE:
Oh got it finally because the rendering engine will not go more that one step in object hierarchy, you can find it in asp.net mvc code also.
Check the MVC 3.0 Source Code Here:
There is a file named DefaultEditorTemplates.cs which contains this method:
internal static string ObjectTemplate(HtmlHelper html, TemplateHelpers.TemplateHelperDelegate templateHelper) {
ViewDataDictionary viewData = html.ViewContext.ViewData;
TemplateInfo templateInfo = viewData.TemplateInfo;
ModelMetadata modelMetadata = viewData.ModelMetadata;
StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
if (templateInfo.TemplateDepth > 1) { // DDB #224751
return modelMetadata.Model == null ? modelMetadata.NullDisplayText : modelMetadata.SimpleDisplayText;
}
foreach (ModelMetadata propertyMetadata in modelMetadata.Properties.Where(pm => ShouldShow(pm, templateInfo))) {
if (!propertyMetadata.HideSurroundingHtml) {
string label = LabelExtensions.LabelHelper(html, propertyMetadata, propertyMetadata.PropertyName).ToHtmlString();
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(label)) {
builder.AppendFormat(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, "<div class=\"editor-label\">{0}</div>\r\n", label);
}
builder.Append("<div class=\"editor-field\">");
}
builder.Append(templateHelper(html, propertyMetadata, propertyMetadata.PropertyName, null /* templateName */, DataBoundControlMode.Edit, null /* additionalViewData */));
if (!propertyMetadata.HideSurroundingHtml) {
builder.Append(" ");
builder.Append(html.ValidationMessage(propertyMetadata.PropertyName));
builder.Append("</div>\r\n");
}
}
return builder.ToString();
}
which clearly states that if the TemplateDepth > 1 just render a simple text.
As the above answer shows, this problem seems related to the framework limiting the depth of nesting it will consider.
One way to work around the problem is to use your own editor template. Create the partial view, Object.cshtml, in Views/Shared/EditorTemplates. Here's an example template taken from here:
#{
Func<ModelMetadata, bool> ShouldShow = metadata =>
metadata.ShowForEdit && !ViewData.TemplateInfo.Visited(metadata);
}
#if (ViewData.TemplateInfo.TemplateDepth > 5) {
if (Model == null) {
#ViewData.ModelMetadata.NullDisplayText
} else {
#ViewData.ModelMetadata.SimpleDisplayText
}
} else {
foreach (var prop in ViewData.ModelMetadata.Properties.Where(ShouldShow)) {
if (prop.HideSurroundingHtml) {
#Html.Editor(prop.PropertyName)
} else {
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(Html.Label(prop.PropertyName).ToHtmlString())==false) {
<div class="editor-label">
#Html.Label(prop.PropertyName)
</div>
}
<div class="editor-field">
#Html.Editor(prop.PropertyName)
#Html.ValidationMessage(prop.PropertyName)
</div>
}
}
}
In the above example, you can set the maximum nesting depth by changing the 5 constant.
In the _Layout.cshtml file, I have a section at the bottom of the body called "ScriptsContent" declared like this:
#RenderSection("ScriptsContent", required: false)
In my view, I can then use this section to add scripts to be executed. But what if I also have a PartialView that also need to use this section to add additional scripts?
View
#section ScriptsContent
{
<script type="text/javascript">
alert(1);
</script>
}
#Html.Partial("PartialView")
PartialView
#section ScriptsContent
{
<script type="text/javascript">
alert(2);
</script>
}
Result
Only the first script is rendered. The second script doesn't exist in source code of the webpage.
Razor seems to only output the first #section ScriptsContent that it sees. What I would like to know is if there's a way to merge each call to the section.
If we cannot do this, what do you propose?
Here's a solution for that problem. It's from this blog: http://blog.logrythmik.com/post/A-Script-Block-Templated-Delegate-for-Inline-Scripts-in-Razor-Partials.aspx
public static class ViewPageExtensions
{
private const string SCRIPTBLOCK_BUILDER = "ScriptBlockBuilder";
public static MvcHtmlString ScriptBlock(this WebViewPage webPage, Func<dynamic, HelperResult> template)
{
if (!webPage.IsAjax)
{
var scriptBuilder = webPage.Context.Items[SCRIPTBLOCK_BUILDER] as StringBuilder ?? new StringBuilder();
scriptBuilder.Append(template(null).ToHtmlString());
webPage.Context.Items[SCRIPTBLOCK_BUILDER] = scriptBuilder;
return new MvcHtmlString(string.Empty);
}
return new MvcHtmlString(template(null).ToHtmlString());
}
public static MvcHtmlString WriteScriptBlocks(this WebViewPage webPage)
{
var scriptBuilder = webPage.Context.Items[SCRIPTBLOCK_BUILDER] as StringBuilder ?? new StringBuilder();
return new MvcHtmlString(scriptBuilder.ToString());
}
}
so anywwhere in your View or PartialView you can use this:
#this.ScriptBlock(
#<script type='text/javascript'>
alert(1);
</script>
)
and in your _Layout or MasterView, use this:
#this.WriteScriptBlocks()
There is no way to share sections between a view and partial views.
Absent a ScriptManager-like solution, you could have a collection of script files (initialized in your view and stored either in HttpContext.Items or in ViewData) to which the partial view would append the script file names it requires. Then towards the end of your view you would declare a section that fetches that collection and emits the right script tags.
The problem with the accepted answer is that it breaks Output Caching. The trick to solving this is to overwrite the OutputCache attribute with your own implementation. Unfortunately we can't extend the original attribute since it has lots of internal methods which we need to access.
I actually use Donut Output Caching which overwrites the OutputCache attribute itself. There are alternative libraries which also use their own OutputCache attribute so I will explain the steps I made to get it to work so that you can apply it to whichever one you're using.
First you need to copy the existing OutputCache attribute and place it within your application. You can get the existing attribute by looking at the source code.
Now add the following property to the class. This is where we store the script blocks so we can render the correct ones when retrieving from the cache.
public static ConcurrentDictionary<string, StringBuilder> ScriptBlocks = new ConcurrentDictionary<string, StringBuilder>();
Now inside the OnActionExecuting method you need to store the cache key (the unique identifier for the output cache) inside the current requests collection. For example:
filterContext.HttpContext.Items["OutputCacheKey"] = cacheKey;
Now modify the ViewPageExtensions class by adding the following (replacing CustomOutputCacheAttribute with the name of your attribute):
var outputCacheKey = webPage.Context.Items["OutputCacheKey"] as string;
if (outputCacheKey != null)
CustomOutputCacheAttribute.ScriptBlocks.AddOrUpdate(outputCacheKey, new StringBuilder(template(null).ToHtmlString()), (k, sb) => {
sb.Append(template(null).ToHtmlString());
return sb;
});
before:
return new MvcHtmlString(string.Empty);
Note: For a slight performance boost you'll also want to make sure you only call "template(null).ToHtmlString()" once.
Now return to your custom OutputCache attribute and add the following only when you are retrieving from the cache inside the OnActionExecuting method:
if (ScriptBlocks.ContainsKey(cacheKey)) {
var scriptBuilder = filterContext.HttpContext.Items["ScriptBlockBuilder"] as StringBuilder ?? new StringBuilder();
scriptBuilder.Append(ScriptBlocks[cacheKey].ToString());
filterContext.HttpContext.Items["ScriptBlockBuilder"] = scriptBuilder;
}
Here's the final code of my attribute:
using System;
using System.Collections.Concurrent;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Globalization;
using System.IO;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Web;
using System.Web.Mvc;
using System.Web.UI;
using DevTrends.MvcDonutCaching;
public class CustomOutputCacheAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute, IExceptionFilter {
private readonly IKeyGenerator _keyGenerator;
private readonly IDonutHoleFiller _donutHoleFiller;
private readonly IExtendedOutputCacheManager _outputCacheManager;
private readonly ICacheSettingsManager _cacheSettingsManager;
private readonly ICacheHeadersHelper _cacheHeadersHelper;
private bool? _noStore;
private CacheSettings _cacheSettings;
public int Duration { get; set; }
public string VaryByParam { get; set; }
public string VaryByCustom { get; set; }
public string CacheProfile { get; set; }
public OutputCacheLocation Location { get; set; }
public bool NoStore {
get { return _noStore ?? false; }
set { _noStore = value; }
}
public static ConcurrentDictionary<string, StringBuilder> ScriptBlocks = new ConcurrentDictionary<string, StringBuilder>();
public DonutOutputCacheAttribute() {
var keyBuilder = new KeyBuilder();
_keyGenerator = new KeyGenerator(keyBuilder);
_donutHoleFiller = new DonutHoleFiller(new EncryptingActionSettingsSerialiser(new ActionSettingsSerialiser(), new Encryptor()));
_outputCacheManager = new OutputCacheManager(OutputCache.Instance, keyBuilder);
_cacheSettingsManager = new CacheSettingsManager();
_cacheHeadersHelper = new CacheHeadersHelper();
Duration = -1;
Location = (OutputCacheLocation)(-1);
}
public override void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext filterContext) {
_cacheSettings = BuildCacheSettings();
var cacheKey = _keyGenerator.GenerateKey(filterContext, _cacheSettings);
if (_cacheSettings.IsServerCachingEnabled) {
var cachedItem = _outputCacheManager.GetItem(cacheKey);
if (cachedItem != null) {
filterContext.Result = new ContentResult {
Content = _donutHoleFiller.ReplaceDonutHoleContent(cachedItem.Content, filterContext),
ContentType = cachedItem.ContentType
};
if (ScriptBlocks.ContainsKey(cacheKey)) {
var scriptBuilder = filterContext.HttpContext.Items["ScriptBlockBuilder"] as StringBuilder ?? new StringBuilder();
scriptBuilder.Append(ScriptBlocks[cacheKey].ToString());
filterContext.HttpContext.Items["ScriptBlockBuilder"] = scriptBuilder;
}
}
}
if (filterContext.Result == null) {
filterContext.HttpContext.Items["OutputCacheKey"] = cacheKey;
var cachingWriter = new StringWriter(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture);
var originalWriter = filterContext.HttpContext.Response.Output;
filterContext.HttpContext.Response.Output = cachingWriter;
filterContext.HttpContext.Items[cacheKey] = new Action<bool>(hasErrors => {
filterContext.HttpContext.Items.Remove(cacheKey);
filterContext.HttpContext.Response.Output = originalWriter;
if (!hasErrors) {
var cacheItem = new CacheItem {
Content = cachingWriter.ToString(),
ContentType = filterContext.HttpContext.Response.ContentType
};
filterContext.HttpContext.Response.Write(_donutHoleFiller.RemoveDonutHoleWrappers(cacheItem.Content, filterContext));
if (_cacheSettings.IsServerCachingEnabled && filterContext.HttpContext.Response.StatusCode == 200)
_outputCacheManager.AddItem(cacheKey, cacheItem, DateTime.UtcNow.AddSeconds(_cacheSettings.Duration));
}
});
}
}
public override void OnResultExecuted(ResultExecutedContext filterContext) {
ExecuteCallback(filterContext, false);
if (!filterContext.IsChildAction)
_cacheHeadersHelper.SetCacheHeaders(filterContext.HttpContext.Response, _cacheSettings);
}
public void OnException(ExceptionContext filterContext) {
if (_cacheSettings != null)
ExecuteCallback(filterContext, true);
}
private void ExecuteCallback(ControllerContext context, bool hasErrors) {
var cacheKey = _keyGenerator.GenerateKey(context, _cacheSettings);
var callback = context.HttpContext.Items[cacheKey] as Action<bool>;
if (callback != null)
callback.Invoke(hasErrors);
}
private CacheSettings BuildCacheSettings() {
CacheSettings cacheSettings;
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(CacheProfile)) {
cacheSettings = new CacheSettings {
IsCachingEnabled = _cacheSettingsManager.IsCachingEnabledGlobally,
Duration = Duration,
VaryByCustom = VaryByCustom,
VaryByParam = VaryByParam,
Location = (int)Location == -1 ? OutputCacheLocation.Server : Location,
NoStore = NoStore
};
} else {
var cacheProfile = _cacheSettingsManager.RetrieveOutputCacheProfile(CacheProfile);
cacheSettings = new CacheSettings {
IsCachingEnabled = _cacheSettingsManager.IsCachingEnabledGlobally && cacheProfile.Enabled,
Duration = Duration == -1 ? cacheProfile.Duration : Duration,
VaryByCustom = VaryByCustom ?? cacheProfile.VaryByCustom,
VaryByParam = VaryByParam ?? cacheProfile.VaryByParam,
Location = (int)Location == -1 ? ((int)cacheProfile.Location == -1 ? OutputCacheLocation.Server : cacheProfile.Location) : Location,
NoStore = _noStore.HasValue ? _noStore.Value : cacheProfile.NoStore
};
}
if (cacheSettings.Duration == -1)
throw new HttpException("The directive or the configuration settings profile must specify the 'duration' attribute.");
if (cacheSettings.Duration < 0)
throw new HttpException("The 'duration' attribute must have a value that is greater than or equal to zero.");
return cacheSettings;
}
}
I also had to modify the Donut Output Cache library to make IExtendedOutputCacheManager and the OutputCacheManager constructor public.
Please note this has been extracted from my application and may require some minor tweaks. You should also place WriteScriptBlocks at the bottom of the page so it is not called until after all child actions are triggered.
Hope this helps.
Hi so I'm pretty new to MVC3 and Razor and I've been trying to get my head around it the past few days. I've been given a task by my project architect to create a helper method that sorts a drop down list in an MVC View. I have a View that retrieves various data from a Controller and I'm returning some values that I want to appear in a drop down list. I've been told not to sort it in the Controller and also to pass the field that we want to sort by into the helper method. I could do it like below but the architect wants to keep the view free of c sharp code:
#Html.DropDownListFor(model => model.StudyName, new SelectList(ViewBag.StudyTypes, "Value", "Text").OrderBy(l => l.Text))
So I've created some sample code and some extension methods to try and get it to work. My idea is to replicate the existing Html.DropDownList method and allow the passing of 'object htmlAttributes' so I can set the style as part of the method call.
Here's my code so far. I'm returning the data for the drop down in ViewBag.StudyTypes in the Edit Controller method:
public ActionResult Edit(int id)
{
IEnumerable<SelectListItem> mySelectList = new List<SelectListItem>();
IList<SelectListItem> myList = new List<SelectListItem>();
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
{
myList.Add(new SelectListItem()
{ Value = i.ToString(), Text = "My Item " + i.ToString(), Selected = i == 2 }
);
}
mySelectList = myList;
ViewBag.StudyTypes = mySelectList;
StudyDefinition studydefinition = db.StudyDefinitions.Find(id);
return View(studydefinition);
}
Here's my View code:
#model MyStudyWeb.Models.StudyDefinition
#using MyStudyWeb.Helpers
#{
ViewBag.Mode = "Edit";
}
<div>
#Html.DropDownListSorted(new SelectList(ViewBag.StudyTypes, "Value", "Text"))<br />
#Html.DropDownListSorted("MyList", new SelectList(ViewBag.StudyTypes, "Value", "Text"))<br />
</div>
Finally below are the extension methods I'm trying to get to work. The first extension method does nothing, I just get a blank space at that point in the View. The second method kind of works but it's ugly. For the 3rd method I don't know how to specify an 'order by' parameter as the OrderBy on an IEnumerable expects a Linq expression.
namespace StudyDefinition.Helpers
{
public static class HtmlHelperExtensions
{
// 1st sort method: sort the passed in list and return a new sorted list
public static SelectList DropDownListSorted(this HtmlHelper helper, IEnumerable<SelectListItem> selectList)
{
var x = new SelectList(selectList.ToList()).OrderBy(l => l.Text);
return x as SelectList;
}
// 2nd sort method: return IHtml string and create <select> list manually
public static IHtmlString DropDownListSorted(this HtmlHelper helper, string name, SelectList selectList)
{
StringBuilder output = new StringBuilder();
(selectList).OrderBy(l => l.Text);
output.Append("<select id=" + name + " name=" + name + ">");
foreach (var item in selectList)
{
output.Append("<option value=" + item.Value.ToString() + ">" + item.Text + "</option>");
}
output.Append("</select>");
return MvcHtmlString.Create(output.ToString());
}
// 3rd sort method: pass in order by parameter - how do I use this?
public static IHtmlString DropDownListSorted(this HtmlHelper helper, string name, SelectList selectList, string orderBy)
{
StringBuilder output = new StringBuilder();
//How do I use the orderBy parameter?
(selectList).OrderBy(l => l.Text);
output.Append("<select id=" + name + " name=" + name + ">");
foreach (var item in selectList)
{
output.Append("<option value=" + item.Value.ToString() + ">" + item.Text + "</option>");
}
output.Append("</select>");
return MvcHtmlString.Create(output.ToString());
}
}
}
I really don't know the best approach to take, there may be a much simpler way that I'm totally missing and I might be at the point where I can't see the wood for the trees anymore. Some questions
Should I return a SelectList or an MvcHtmlString, or something else entirely?
For the first extension method how do I get the returned SelectList to render in the View?
How to I pass in a parameter to my extension methods that specifies the sort order?
How do I pass an 'object htmlAttributes' parameter, and how do I apply this object / parameter to the SelectList?
If anyone has some ideas or suggestions then I'd appreciate some feedback :)
The first and most important part of your code would be to get rid of any ViewBag/ViewData (which I personally consider as cancer for MVC applications) and use view models and strongly typed views.
So let's start by defining a view model which would represent the data our view will be working with (a dropdownlistg in this example):
public class MyViewModel
{
public string SelectedItem { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<SelectListItem> Items { get; set; }
}
then we could have a controller:
public class HomeController : Controller
{
public ActionResult Index()
{
var model = new MyViewModel
{
// I am explicitly putting some items out of order
Items = new[]
{
new SelectListItem { Value = "5", Text = "Item 5" },
new SelectListItem { Value = "1", Text = "Item 1" },
new SelectListItem { Value = "3", Text = "Item 3" },
new SelectListItem { Value = "4", Text = "Item 4" },
}
};
return View(model);
}
}
and a view:
#model MyViewModel
#Html.DropDownListForSorted(
x => x.SelectedItem,
Model.Items,
new { #class = "foo" }
)
and finally the last piece is the helper method which will sort the dropdown by value (you could adapt it to sort by text):
public static class HtmlExtensions
{
public static IHtmlString DropDownListForSorted<TModel, TProperty>(
this HtmlHelper<TModel> helper,
Expression<Func<TModel, TProperty>> expression,
IEnumerable<SelectListItem> items,
object htmlAttributes
)
{
var model = helper.ViewData.Model;
var orderedItems = items.OrderBy(x => x.Value);
return helper.DropDownListFor(
expression,
new SelectList(orderedItems, "Value", "Text"),
htmlAttributes
);
}
}
Just add in the sorting before you return the items to the dropdown list.
Do this:
Models: StudyViewModel.cs
public class StudyViewModel {
public string StudyName { get; set; }
public string StudyTypes { get; set; }
}
Controller: StudyController.cs
using System.Web.Mvc;
public class StudyController
{
public List<SelectListItem> studyTypes()
{
List<SelectListItem> itemList = new List<SelectListItem>();
for (var i=0; i<5; i++)
{
itemList.Add = new SelectListItem({
Value = i.ToString();
Text = "My Item";
});
}
// You can sort here....
List<SelectListItem> sortedList = itemList.OrderBy(x=>x.Text);
return sortedList;
}
public ActionResult Edit(int id)
{
//You won't need this because you get it using your
//controller's routine, instead
//ViewBag.StudyTypes = studySlots.OrderBy(e => e.Value);
//-- unless you need to add these values to the model for
// some reason (outside of filling the ddl), in which case....
// StudyViewModel svm = new StudyViewModel();
// svm.StudyTypes = studySlots.OrderBy(e => e.Value);
// svm.StudyName = "My Item";
// return View(svm);
// Otherwise, just....
return View();
}
}
View: Edit.cshtml
#Html.DropDownListFor(model => model.StudyName)
.OptionLabel('Select...')
.DataTextField('Text')
.DataValueField('Value')
.Datasource(source =>
{
// This is where you populate your data from the controller
source.Read(read =>
{
read.Action("studyTypes", "Study");
});
})
.Value(Model.StudyName != null ? Model.StudyName.ToString() : "")
)
This way will avoid ViewBags and just use a function to fill in the values, directly.
If you are using a database you can use a query to define the sort element
using (BDMMContext dataContext = new BDMMContext())
{
foreach (Arquiteto arq in dataContext.Arquitetos.SqlQuery("SELECT * FROM Arquitetos ORDER BY Nome"))
{
SelectListItem selectItem = new SelectListItem { Text = arq.Nome, Value = arq.Arquiteto_Id.ToString() };
//
list.Add(selectItem);
}
}