at the moment we use Spring 4 and have a Java class loading all of our xml-config files:
Root: Basic Framework
Child: Project Application Services
Child: Project Application Workflow
Child: Framework Controller
Child: CXF Webapplication Context
Every child knows the beans of it's parent and everythings works fine. Now I have to use an IBM EJB on an Websphere Application Server for communication with legacy systems. This EJB gets called and now I want to use our Spring Context to get some services.
The EJB is defined as
#Stateless(mappedName = "ejb/LegacyRocks")
#RemoteHome(com.ibm.websphere.ola.ExecuteHome.class)
public class WolaUseCaseOne {...}
I have alreade read about the SpringBeanAutowiringInterceptor, but I do not get the point. I do not a a simple xml-file to get loaded, so can anybody provide me another way the autowire mit Spring Beans inside the EJB ?
PS:
I have also found this post (http://www.schakko.de/2013/10/11/sharing-the-spring-application-context-from-a-war-with-ejbs/), but we do not use JSF and it does not help me
I have already read, there is no way to inject the complete context, because we have a Webapplication Context, and there is not such a Web Context inside EJB... ?
you need to create ejb as per following
#Local
public interface TestManager {
boolean isValid();
}
#Stateless(name = "java:global/TestManagerImpl", mappedName = "java:global/TestManagerImpl")
#EJB(name = "java:global/TestManagerImpl", beanInterface = TestManager.class)
public class TestManagerImpl implements TestManager {
#PostConstruct
public void ejbCreate() {
}
#PreDestroy
public void ejbDestroy() {
}
#Override
public boolean isValid(){
//your code
}
}
and you need to implement spring service class with
#Service(value = "testServiceImpl")
public class TestServiceImpl {
#EJB(name = "java:global/TestManagerImpl", mappedName = "java:global/TestManagerImpl")
private TestManager testManager;
#Override
public boolean isValid(){
retrun testManager.isValid();
}
}
Edited
call ejb to spring service method
#Stateless
#Interceptors(SpringBeanAutowiringInterceptor.class)
public class TestManagerImpl implements TestManager {
// automatically injected with a matching Spring bean
#Autowired
private TestService testService ;
// for business method, delegate to POJO service impl.
public String myFacadeMethod(...) {
return testService.myMethod(...);
}
...
}
Hope it work for you!!
Related
As far as I understood, Spring manages autowiring mechanism with AutowiredAnnotationBeanPostProcessor on postProcessBeforeInitialization stage. But how does it inject proxies that ought to be created on postProcessAfterInitialization stage?
EDIT 1
Suppose I have this Spring configuration
#Service
class RegularBean {
// injected on postProcessBeforeInitialization stage
#Autowired
private TransactionBean tBean;
// invoked in between of postProcessBeforeInitialization and postProcessAfterInitialization
#PostConstruct
void init() {
tBean.transactionMethod();
}
}
#Service
class TransactionBean {
// transactional proxy is created on postProcessAfterInitialization stage
#Transactional
public void transactionMethod() { ... }
}
Transactional proxy is created on postProcessAfterInitialization stage. But #PostConstruct is called right before it. Is injected tBean wrapped with transactional proxy? If it so, then why? Because it should not be. If it is not wrapped, then how transactions are going to be handled in the future?
Suppose that I replace field-injection with constructor-injection. Will it change the behavior somehow?
When you use autowiring on method or field ,Spring Container not always create and inject the required field/attribute instance. Spring internally create smart proxies and inject the proxies to your bean. This smart proxy will resolve the bean at later point and delegate call to actual bean during method invocation. This is a common strategy we use to resolve request and session scoped beans to singleton instance (Say service layer beans) using Scope annotation.
Adding small snippet to show Spring internally create proxies for Object. Consider a classic circular dependency case when we use Constructor injection.
#Component
public class CircularDependencyA {
private CircularDependencyB circB;
public CircularDependencyA(#Lazy CircularDependencyB circB) {
System.out.println("CircularDependencyA Ctr ->"+circB.getClass().getName());
this.circB = circB;
}
}
#Component
public class CircularDependencyB {
private CircularDependencyA circA;
public CircularDependencyB(CircularDependencyA circA) {
System.out.println("CircularDependencyB Ctr ->"+circA.getClass().getName());
this.circA = circA;
}
}
#Configuration
#ComponentScan(basePackages = { "com.example.springdemo.cd" })
public class TestConfig {
}
public class TestCircularDependency {
public static void main(String[] args) {
try(AnnotationConfigApplicationContext context
= new AnnotationConfigApplicationContext(TestConfig.class);){
}
}
}
Based on our hints Spring is creating Proxy(using CGLIB) for CircularDependencyB Object and see the op from the CircularDependencyA Constructor
CircularDependencyA Ctr ->com.example.springdemo.cd.CircularDependencyB$$EnhancerBySpringCGLIB$$e6be3b79
Thanks
have have these two apps which actually do the same (if I am correct)
#SpringBootApplication
public class DemoApplication {
#Autowired
HelloWorld helloWorld;
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(DemoApplication.class, args);
}
#Bean
public CommandLineRunner run() {
helloWorld.setMessage("wow");
return (load) -> {
helloWorld.getMessage();
};
}
}
and
public class MainApp {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ApplicationContext context = new
ClassPathXmlApplicationContext("Beans.xml");
HelloWorld obj = (HelloWorld) context.getBean("helloWorld");
obj.getMessage();
}
}
both uses
#Component
public class HelloWorld {
private String message;
public void setMessage(String message) {
this.message = message;
}
public void getMessage() {
System.out.println("Your Message : " + message);
}
}
The only difference at the helloWord obj is, that if I use the MainApp-class in my program, then the helloWorld class doesn't need the #Component annotation.
My Question:
If I am correct the SpringBoot annotation makes it unnecessary to define a ClassPathXMLApplicationContext. #Autowire does that for me.
I am now interested if I AutoWire lets say 100 objects at the beginning, all these objects are now in the IoC container correct?
If so: Is not possible to just hand out that container in a CTOR of another class and have access to all saved objects there like:
(HelloWorld) context.getBean("helloWorld"); or
(someRandomClass) context.getBean("someRandomClass")
public CTOR(IOCContainer container) {
this.container = container;
}
Instead of that implementation
public CTOR(HelloWorld helloWorld, SomeRandomClass someRandomClass) {
this.helloWorld = helloWorld;
this.someRandomClass = someRandomClass;
}
And if that is possible, how can I do that?
(There is no use case/task behind my question, i am just interested if that is possible)
The XML'ish way of configuration where you define your bean and wiring via
<bean ... etc. pp.
can be completely replaced by either using
#Component
public class MyClass ....
or by
#Bean
public MyClass myClass() {return new MyClass();}
definition in a configuration class. Both ways place the entity in the IoC container of Spring.
The #Autowire just informs the IoC container of Spring that you would like to have a bean fulfilling the contract of the entity marked with #Autowire injected into this place.
In order to get access to the container you just need to inject the ApplicationContext where you would like to have it.
There are two ways of creating beans in Spring. One is through XML config and the other is through annotation config. Annotation config is the preferred approach as it has lot of advantages over xml config.
Spring boot doesnt have any thing to do with annotation or xml config. Its just a easy way to boot spring application. #Component creates the object of the annotated bean in the application context. #Import or #ImportResource are the annotations used to load the configs from Annotations or through XML configs in Spring boot. With Spring boot u need not create ClassPathXMlCOntext or AnnotationContext objects, but its created internally by spring boot.
#Autowired is a way of getting the beans into any object by injecting rather than tight coupling to the code. Spring container(Application context) do this job of injecting. Just autowiring any class wont create the objects in Spring context. Its just an indication for the Spring context to set the object in the Application context here. You need to create them explicitly inside a xml config/ or annotations like #Component #Service others.
There is no need of hand out of container anywhere. U can just #Autowire ApplicationContext context; in any other spring bean object. With which you can call getBean(YourBean.class) to get that bean.
Java 8 added a new feature by which we can provide method implementation in interfaces.
Is there any way in Spring 4 by which we can inject beans in the interface which can be used inside the method body?
Below is the sample code
public interface TestWiring{
#Autowired
public Service service;// this is not possible as it would be static.
//Is there any way I can inject any service bean which can be used inside testWiringMethod.
default void testWiringMethod(){
// Call method of service
service.testService();
}
}
This is a bit tricky but it works if you need the dependency inside the interface for whatever requirement.
The idea would be to declare a method that will force the implemented class to provide that dependency you want to autowire.
The bad side of this approach is that if you want to provide too many dependencies the code won't be pretty since you will need one getter for each dependency.
public interface TestWiring {
public Service getService();
default void testWiringMethod(){
getService().testService();
}
}
public class TestClass implements TestWiring {
#Autowire private Service service;
#Override
public Service getService() {
return service;
}
}
You can created Class utils of application context and use it everywhere even not bean class .
you can have code somethins this :
public class ApplicationContextUtil implements ApplicationContextAware {
private static ApplicationContext applicationContext;
#Override
public void setApplicationContext(ApplicationContext context) {
ApplicationContextUtil.applicationContext = context;
}
public static ApplicationContext getApplicationContext() {
return applicationContext;
}
}
and add this to your spring configuration
<bean class="com.example.ApplicationContextUtil" id="applicationContextUtil"/>
now simple to use when you need :
ApplicationContextUtil.getApplicationContext().getBean(SampleBean.class)
this word in web and simple spring app.
I'm testing a web application using JUnit. The buisness layer of this application is writed in EJB stateless classes.
So I do "in container" tests with JUnit and Glassfish-embedded.
All works fine so far, EJBs are injected using lookup functions.
Here are a simple test case :
public class SupportTest {
private static EJBContainer container;
private static MyEJB myEjb;
#BeforeClass
public static void setUpServices() throws NamingException {
Map<String, Object> properties = new HashMap<String, Object>();
properties.put(EJBContainer.MODULES, new File("target/classes"));
container = EJBContainer.createEJBContainer(properties);
myEjb = (MyEJB) container.getContext().lookup("java:global/classes/MyEJB");
}
#Test
public void test() {
myEjb.doSomething("user_login");
}
}
Now I have a SessionScoped POJO (CDI) which keep information such as user login and so on.
This Pojo is injected inside a static class. Like this :
public class MyStaticClass {
public static boolean verifyLogin(String login) {
MySessionPojo mySessionPojo = CDI.current().select(MySessionPojo.class).get();
return mySessionPojo.getLogin().equals(login);
}
}
This static class is used in EJB to secure the buisness code, like this :
#Stateless
public class MyEJB {
public void doSomething(String login) {
if(MyStaticClass.verifyLogin(login)){
//do something
}
}
}
Inside a normal Glassfish 4.1 server, the injection of the POJO inside the static class works fine.
Inside the Glassfish-embedded, the POJO injection fails with this message :
WELD-001303: No active contexts for scope type javax.enterprise.context.SessionScoped
I assume this is because there is no Http Session bound to it.
Is there a way to simulate/create à SessionContext programmatically?
Thanks.
Ok, I finally find a workaround. I use the framework JMockit to replace the static class by a mock class, with fake methods which always return TRUE. (I had already tested Mockito and PowerMock, but both didn't work).
I'm using Jersey 2 and Spring, and I'm trying to initialize my Jersey application (i.e. the class derived from ResourceConfig) with parameters from the Spring context.
Background: I have a single Jersey application that I build (i.e. a single WAR) and I deploy it across a server cluster with different Spring configurations on different servers to enable or disable different parts of the server, e.g. some of the servers have /search resources turned on, etc. This was really easy in Jersey 1.0: I just put,
<context:component-scan base-package="com.mycompany.resources.search"/>
in a Spring config to have Jersey scan that particular package and enable the JAX-RS resource providers in it.
Now in Jersey 2.0 the Spring <context:component-scan ... /> doesn't work, so resources have to be programmatically registered in a startup class derived from ResourceConfig:
public class MyApplication extends ResourceConfig {
public MyApplication() {
packages("com.mycompany.resources.search");
}
}
So far so good, but I need to conditionally scan that package, and I can't figure out how to get any Spring configuration into the MyApplication class. I thought that constructor injection might work:
public class MyApplication extends ResourceConfig {
#Autowired
public MyApplication(#Qualifier("my-config") MyConfiguration myConfiguration) {
if (myConfiguration.isEnabled()) {
packages("com.mycompany.resources.search");
}
}
}
However HK2 complains that it can't find a default constructor to use... so this indicates to me that DI is in play in the construction of this class, but that the DI isn't using Spring.
Similarly, using the the Spring bean lifecycle doesn't work:
public class MyApplication extends ResourceConfig implements InitializingBean {
#Autowired
private MyConfiguration myConfiguration;
public MyApplication() {
}
#Override
public void afterPropertiesSet() throws Exception {
if (myConfiguration.isEnabled()) {
packages("com.mycompany.resources.search");
}
}
}
(The afterPropertiesSet method isn't called.)
So now I'm stuck: is there any way to configure a Jersey ResourceConfig application object using Spring?
UPDATE:
I accepted #JohnR's answer below but I'll also include my eventual solution which I think is a bit cleaner. #JohnR's answer was to have the object initialized twice: first by Spring and then by Jersey/HK2. When Spring initializes the object you cache the dependencies in a static member, and then when Jersey/HK2 initializes it later you can retrieve the dependencies.
I ended up doing this:
public class MyApplication extends ResourceConfig {
public MyApplication() {
ApplicationContext rootCtx = ContextLoader.getCurrentWebApplicationContext();
MyConfiguration myConfiguration = rootCtx.getBean(MyConfiguration.class);
if (myConfiguration.isEnabled()) {
packages("com.mycompany.resources.whatever");
}
}
}
Rather than having the object initialized twice, we let Jersey/HK2 initialize it but then we retrieve the dependencies from Spring.
Both solutions are vulnerable to timing: they both assume that Spring is initialized before Jersey/HK2.
Expanding on my previous comment:
Trying to extend ResourceConfig is dangerous if you don't know what you're doing. Jersey becomes unpredictable, and if you try to subclass it into an Abstract class, Jersey crashes.
Instead, the JAX-RS specification provides us with a very useful interface called Feature: It allows you to register any classes you want as if you were configuring your own application. Furthermore, you don't need to use the awkward AbstractBinder, you just specify what contracts you register your classes with.
import org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext;
import org.springframework.web.context.support.WebApplicationContextUtils;
import javax.ws.rs.container.DynamicFeature;
import javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerRequestFilter;
import javax.ws.rs.container.ContainerResponseFilter;
import javax.ws.rs.core.Context;
import javax.ws.rs.core.Feature;
import javax.ws.rs.core.FeatureContext;
// Don't use #Component here, we need to inject the Spring context manually.
public class MySpringFeature implements Feature {
#Context
private ServletContext servletContext;
private ApplicationContext applicationContext;
#Autowired
private MySecurityDAO mySecurityDAO;
#Autowired
private MySpringResponseFilter myResponseFilter;
#Override
public boolean configure(FeatureContext context) {
if(this.servletContext == null) {
return false; // ERROR!
}
this.applicationContext = WebApplicationContextUtils.getWebApplicationContext(servletContext);
if(this.applicationContext == null) {
return false; // ERROR!
}
// This is where the magic happens!
AutowireCapableBeanFactory bf = applicationContext.getAutowireCapableBeanFactory();
bf.autowireBean(this);
// From here you can get all the beans you need
// Now we take a Spring bean instance,
// and register it with its appropriate JAX-RS contract
context.register(myResponseFilter, ContainerResponseFilter.class);
// Or, we could do this instead:
SomeSecurityFilter mySecurityFilter = new SomeSecurityFilter();
mySecurityFilter.setSecurityDAO(mySecurityDAO);
context.register(mySegurityFilter, ContainerRequestFilter.class);
// Or even this:
SomeOtherSpringBean someOtherBean = applicationContext.getBean(SomeOtherSpringBean.class);
context.register(someOtherBean, SomeOtherJerseyContract.class);
// Success!
return true;
}
}
And in your ResourceConfig:
public class MyApplication extends ResourceConfig() {
public MyApplication() {
register(MySpringFeature.class);
}
}
Ta-da!
So now I'm stuck: is there any way to configure a Jersey
ResourceConfig application object using Spring?
I don't think you can configure Jersey to obtain your ResourceConfig from Spring as a Spring managed bean. It's a bit hackish, but you could do something like this. Note that you'll end up with two instance of your ResourceConfig: one managed by Spring and another by Jersey:
public class MyApplication extends ResourceConfig {
// static, available to all instances
private static MyConfiguration myConfiguration;
public MyApplication() {
// when Spring creates the first instance of MyApplication, myConfiguration
// will be null because the setter wasn't called yet
if (myConfiguration != null)
{
// second instance created by jersey... Spring will have autowired
// the first instance, and myConfiguration is static
if (myConfiguration.isEnabled())
packages("com.mycompany.resources.search");
}
}
#Autowired
public void setMyConfiguration(MyConfiguration config)
{
// instance level setter saves to a static variable to make it available for
// future instances (i.e. the one created by jersey)
MyApplication.myConfiguration = config;
}
}
Again, this is fairly hackish. You'll want to make sure Spring is initialized before Jersey and look closely at any threading issues that could occur during initialization.