During development stage, sometimes I changed the column name of a parse class and my Query.find() is returning the following error
{"code":106,"message":"key objectId not present"}
The parse help says, I am tinkering with the internals of parse. Certainly no.... Is this a known issue? Do i need to clear the session or something like clear the schema cache?
Please help.
Changing a column name in a class on parse server is not (yet) available as of parse server 2.2.9.
I assume you are changing its name directly in the mongoDB so it is clearly tinkering with the internals of parse server.
However you could technically change a column name if you know which data to adapt, e.g. the _SCHEMA collection (only visible in the database, not in the dashboard) has to account for the new name as has the field name of every document in the collection.
The easier way to do it is deleting the column you don't need and creating a new one with the desired name in parse dashboard. And maybe planning a bit further ahead so you don't have to change column names so often ;)
Related
Our particular situation is that we have a DateOnly field and would like to change it to DateTime field supporting also the time portion. The operation is not allowed in UI and it's also stated in the documentation. Hence, I excepted deleting the field and recreating it with the new setting would work.
However when I try to create the field with the same name the Duplicate Field Name error is thrown. I've read the column actually still exists behind in the DB.
Of course, I could create a field with a new name but it would require changing all related workflows and code customizations.
Is there a way how to overcome this issue?
Deleting and recreating an attribute with the same name but different type should work - of course with the caveat that you have to remove all dependencies before deleting the attribute and recreate them with the new attribute.
The Duplicate Field Name error seems to indicate that the field still exists - perhaps the entity needs to be published after deleting.
You may also find the XrmToolbox tool Attribute Manager helpful.
It allows you to migrate an attribute and its data to a new attribute.
All,
I am building a Power Flow. I am returning an object that has a relationship to another entity.
I want to get some values from the related entity.
I am attemping to use the "Get Record" connector. The returning object returns just the logicalEntityName (in this case "opportunities") but Get Record wants an Entity Name that is the Schema Name ("Working Opportunities").
Big Question: What's the secret to use CDS to get information from a related record in another object?
Little Question: How do I do get the Schema Name?
The logical name will be the same as schema name except some casing difference, ie schema name will have camel casing (first letter of first/second word with capitals, you can notice it clearly in custom entity which will have publisher prefix like new_entityname) and logical name will have pascal casing (all lower case).
You can find the details in XrmToolBox metadata browser or in Solution.
In the below snip, (Logical) Name = Opportunity and Schema Name = Opportunity, also Display Name can be anything and can be changed anytime.
Regarding the related entities, you should use List Records: GetItems_V2 and you can use filter by passing parent record to get related child records. Read more
Could you please share flow screenshot and response to help you with your requirement?
As suggested by Arun you could use List Record and filter query to pass parent record id which will be available from dynamic content.
see below link.
https://crmkeeper.com/2019/08/31/cds-list-records-filter-query-using-flow/
Please mark my answer verified if i were helpful
There seems to have no way to enforce uniqueness in Parse. I have a parse object in which one of the fields is a url. I require that url to be unique as it is the most important field in the object: everything else is meta data about it. So is there a way to override the objectId of a Parse Object? That way I can always check for existence in a simple way before trying to create the object.
Actually this might still fail. So any ideas that do not include cloud code?
I know this can be done because Parse is able to ensure username and email are unique for each User object. I am hoping it's an elegant solution and someone here knows how I might accomplish something similar. After all, database tables with unique fields are commonplace.
I am using the Turbogears-2.3 framework and now I know how to upload the files in the database using the tgext.datahelpers. I understand that the file gets uploaded in the disk and in the database the metadata gets stored in the JSON format. Now I want to query the database and wanted that the link to get generated in the file collumn so if someone clicks on it then the file can get downloaded. However when I tried to query the database and viewed the table, in the file column I get text like trai.model.model.F_AttachedFile object at 0xa7325bac (trai is the name of the project).
When I iterated through the table and printed the value of the element in the javascript console, the same thing is getting printed. Could anyone please tell me how to generate the downloadable link from this.
Thank you very much
Not sure that I full understood your question, a little snippet of code might have helped understanding the context, but if I guessed correctly you are trying to the the url of a tgext.datahelpers uploaded file.
In such case see https://bitbucket.org/axant/tgext.datahelpers#rst-header-attachments each attachment Column provides an url property, so you can get the URL from there.
There is also an example that saves and Document model with a file field and queries it back printing the url.
As far as I know, all QuickBase API calls are called using the following syntax: http://<quickbase>/db/<dbid>?
Is there a way to get the dbid field without navigating to that database table within QuickBase?
If the above is not possible, would anyone recommend anything other than creating another table that stores the IDs of the tables you want?
With the latter method, I believe I would only need to store one dbid and could pull down the rest (which I believe would still need to be user entered, but would be better than requiring them to change the code).
Thanks for the help!
API_GetSchema will return the list of dbids.
https://www.quickbase.com/db/<yourApplicationId>?act=API_GetSchema&apptoken=<yourApplicationTokenId>&fmt=flat