Xmldoc states:
Adds a message handler to the service bus for handling a specific type
of message
But it does not require endpoint name. How then does it work? I tried this method, but nothing happened.
Is there any possibility to add handlers dynamically, while bus is running?
By connecting a handler to the bus after it has been started, messages can be sent to the bus's address directly. This is particularly useful for things like responses to requests, which should not be published and are sent immediately back to the endpoint.
When using bus.ConnectHandler(context => {...}) to add a handler to the bus dynamically, no subscriptions or exchange bindings are created on the broker. It's only possible to receive messages which are directly sent to the endpoint.
When a message is sent from the bus, such as a request, the SourceAddress is added to the message header. If a request is sent, the ResponseAddress is also set. A fault address can also be specified if you want to use a non-dynamic endpoint to capture faults (such as a failed command that is not awaited, IE, fire and forget) so that faults can be triaged and handled appropriately by another persistent endpoint.
Related
I have a Webhook Eventgrid subscription. I do not have access to the webhook logs or implementation.
Apparently ,Eventgrid receives HTTP code other than success from the webhook, but I do not have any detail visibility to that.
How can I see the exact HTTP interaction (Response message, HTTP Code) for the EventGrid WebHook Bad Requests like the ones pointed below?
You need to configure the dead letter on your event grid subscription as documented here.
Once the events are not delivered and dead letter now you can review the lastDeliveryOutcome property on the dead letter events to know what was the reason the event was not delivered to the configured endpoint.
You cannot find the reason for each request at your end as the event may be delivered at a later point in time once it is retried.
I have a stomp application and I set the ack mode to client during subscription from front-end. During the subscription the same client during a session would connect to the same queue in the message broker ActiveMQ Artemis because a session id is used for queue.But a different id is passed in the header every time the user reloads the page.
The subscription code is shown below.
consumer.subscribe(
'/queue.'+ rscSessionId,
function (response) {
console.log("resposne");
},
{
"subscription-type": "ANYCAST",
ack: "client",
id: generateId(),
}
);
Once I send message from client it gets send to frontend with following headers.
MESSAGE
subscription:1234
message-id:1543449
destination:/queue.sessionid
expires:1653914606725
redelivered:false
priority:4
persistent:true
timestamp:1653912806717
destination-type:ANYCAST
__AMQ_CID:30e64793-dd9b-11ec-8843-c238460c3152
_type:ResponseData
content-length:300
and afterwards on every reload.
MESSAGE
subscription:1235
message-id:1543449
destination:/queue.sessionid
expires:1653914606725
redelivered:true
priority:4
persistent:true
timestamp:1653912806717
destination-type:ANYCAST
__AMQ_CID:30e64793-dd9b-11ec-8843-c238460c3152
_type:ResponseData
content-length:300
You can see that redelivered is set to true after first delivery and after that every response has redelivered to false. the subscription value keeps getting changed though because of the id passed in header.
How can I make it deliver only once but with guarantee?
Are you actually acknowledging the message once you receive it? If you don't acknowledge the message then once the client closes the connection and subscribes again it will receive the same message again. The different value you're seeing for the subscription header indicates this is what is happening.
To be clear, if you're using the client acknowledgement mode then once you receive the MESSAGE frame you need to send a corresponding ACK frame in order to acknowledge the message. Your client should have a way to do this since it is a standard part of the STOMP specification.
I guess that Artemis is configured with publisher/subscriber messaging style. In this case, every new consumer/receiver/client will get the messages aka you write/read from a topic.
Changing to a point-to-point message style would fix the issue (would only be read once) aka a queue.
This is usually decided by the setup but I recall that ActiveMQ allowed producer to create those on the fly.
If you do need a topic, then you will have to handle the IDs on the client side.
I have a doubt, in a group chat system that has a database with a rest API, who should issue the event of a new message?
The client or the endpoint to create the new message?
For example: X user sends a message to group Y, then uses the api endpoint api.com/message-create and that endpoint emits the message-create event through websocket
Example 2: X user sends a message to group Y, then uses the api api.com/message-create endpoint and the endpoint does not emit the message-create event, but was emitted when the user pressed the send message button
I still don't quite understand if it would occupy more websocket channels to achieve that, if a global one is enough, etc.
The server should be responsible for communication logic. So your first example is better.
But: why do you use two communication channels for sending an creating messages?
If you use websocket, you don't need create a message from a client by using additional rest endpoint.
This approach is prone to errors. For example if the client will loose network connection after sending message through websocket and before executing call to the REST endpoint?
The message will not be stored in a database.
Your flow should looks as follows:
User clicks the send button.
Message is send through the websocket.
Message is stored in the database asynchronously (you can do it directly from communication server, or use rest endpoint)
Emit "new message" event to the group.
I have an application which uses IBM MQ to send out the request in a queue manager to a particular system B.
The response corresponding to that request is then received back from system B by the application in a sync call and then further business processing happens.
Since we are working on the offshore region, we do not actually send out the request to system B but rather capture it ourselves using the MQJExplorer tool and send back the response, which kind of simulates the prod. behaviour.
The problem here is, or i would say, the overhead is that we have to manually open the mqjexplorer tool, check the request, take a particular attribute from the request(lets say ID), and send back ID+1 so that the application recognizes the response is for ID-1 request.
I would like to know if this particular thing can be automated, with some other tool, where i can define like whenever any such kind of request is received in for eg: MQ001 queue manager and its REQ queue, just extract the ID attribute, do a ID+1 and send back the response in RESP queue of same qm.
There are a pair of IBM supplied samples that come with IBM MQ:-
amqsreq0.c - Sample C program that puts request messages to a message queue and shows the replies (example using REPLY queue)
amqsecha.c - Sample C program - echo messages to reply to queue
They are supplied to allow you to try out a request/reply application.
You already have the equivalent app to do the job that amqsreq0.c does, and you could adapt amqsecha.c to extract your ID attribute, increment it, and then the sample already has the code to send the reply back.
It can be automated by running as a triggered application too.
If 'C' language is not your thing and prefer Java then have a read of a blog posting I did in 2017. It is a complete request/reply scenario with 2 applications: BEServer01.java and RQClient01.java
You can modify BEServer01.java to your liking (and remove the SQL code). BEServer01.java contains all of the code for getting a request message and sending a reply message. Simply replace the variable 'replyText' contents with the reply message that you want.
If you are not a programmer then there is another option but it does not modify the message contents. MQ Visual Edit has a component called: SIM Server. Its purpose is to simulate a server-side component. You configure what 'request' queue to get the messages from and what the reply message text will be. When a messages lands on the request queue, the SIM Server will retrieve it and send the reply message to the queue & queue manager specified in the MQMD's ReplyToQueueName and ReplyToQueueManagerName fields.
I have the following scenario, where i can not respond directly to the request of a MassTransit RequestClient
Request Service 1 implementing a RequestClient and calling GetResponse
Another service 2 have the consumer of the request that just save the request information (messageId, requestId ...) to some storage and not send a response back.
Based on an API call in service 2, we can find the saved request information and send back the response to the RequestClient. I could achive this by sending the response to the temporaty queue of the RequestClient bus but the message ends up in the skipped queue of the temporary queue and GetResponse never gets the message.
How can i make the message arrives to the main temporary queue, and that the GetResponse consumer find it.
If anyone has a similar scenario. We achived this by implementing an event waiter mechanism in the consumer. When the external API call is made in service 2, an internal event is fired then consumer who is waiting for it through ResetEvent continue by gathering the response and send it back through out of the box RespondAsync.