I'm new to both node, fine uploader and aws.
i'm trying to use the examples to upload to S3, using the s3handler.js example.
at the top of the file you set up the serverPublicKey, which i understand, the serverSecretKey, which i understand, but there is also a variable for 'clientSecretKey', I don't understand what this variable needs to be? does it have some sort of relationship with the clientpublickey which is used in the frontend javascript? I can't see any explanation of what the 'clientSecretKey' is
When you provision credentials for your uploader, you should have two pairs of keys: server-side, and client-side. The client-side keys should be heavily restricted. Only the most necessary privileges should be assigned to this IAM role/user. The server-side keys can be associated with an administrative-level user, if you prefer. In other words, create a client-side role that is specific to the operations that must be performed client-side by Fine Uploader. You can re-use an existing administrative-level user for all server-side tasks.
Related
I am using laravel to build an app in BigCommerce. I am able to get access token but I need to store that for future requests. What is the best possible way to store the app data for BigCommerce?
I've got this working by creating a DB schema in Laravel where in there are tables like stores, users, app_settings.
Whenever the user installs an app, I am storing an access token and other information like store hash in stores table and user details in users table.
Whenever the app is loaded I could get the store and user information via verify signed request payload. Using this I am able to configure my app settings for the user and store those in app settings table.
So when I create a Webhook for the store, I could get the store hash from response as producer key and accordingly I can find the access token for the store using store hash in stores table.
If you're git ignoring your config.json or .env files, you could store these there. However after speaking with one of our Developer Advocates, I wanted to pass along some best practice advice. :) You may want to consider using a secrets manager for option #1 in your decision here. A secrets manager meaning a tool to safely store these variables like Secrets in Github or Key Vault in Azure.
Also, this resource may be helpful to review for your use case. https://www.codementor.io/#ccornutt/keeping-credentials-secure-in-php-kvcbrk55z
Is there any way to login other users account for admin user ?
Currently authentication based on Meteor Accounts
I saw this post but didn't working at all now.
The feature is important for us because when user have problem in system then admin need to see it this by simulating user account.
Thanks in advance.
It seems you want to impersonate a user. This means that you want to have Meteor.userId (or this.userId depending on context) reflect the _id of a specific user both on the client and the server.
afaict the only way to do this is to login as the user. Presumably you don't want to ask the user for their password so you have a couple of choices:
Save their existing password, replace it (temporarily) with a password of your choosing, then after you're done impersonating their account, restore their existing password.
You probably don't want to ask the user for their password and you don't need to. All you need to do is set aside Meteor.user.findOne(userId).services.password.bcrypt, then reset the password to your temporary value, then restore the original bcrypt value later.
The downside is that the original user would not be able to login while you are logged-in. Plus it's really hacky.
Extend Meteor's Accounts package to provide impersonation capability in a more elegant manner.
You might also look at validateLoginAttempt. The docs are unclear as to whether a failed login attempt could be overridden with a successful one but if it could then that would provide another pathway to solve your problem.
Instead of logging in as the users, which requires their password and which is a total no-no, you may use rather alanning:roles and allow the admin to assign the role of any user in order to draw views based the user's role.
This requires a well designed role system.
As a plus you could then at least load the documents associated with the user who you want to support.
This requires a well designed document and data model.
But generally spoken you should rather focus on writing good tests (test driven development) for components as unit tests, integration tests and UI tests.
This will reduce the need to manually view the app as an end user a lot.
The most common end user problems can be reduced by creating a good knowledge base like a wiki or video tutorials.
Even if then an error occurs in the end user side, I would rather try to implement a well designed error log that allows users automatically create tickets on error which also include the error stack.
All the above methods are to be favored before logging in AS THE USER.
As #Jankpunkt has already mentioned alanning-roles I can add something you can use without installing any external package.
Just keep a type key in the profile object of the users collection. Then define some types like 1 for super-admin, 2 for admin, 3 for general etc. Then check the authorisation of particular action by checking the value of user.profile.type key.
Caveats: Make sure you are checking the type in server side. By default profile field is writable from the client end, so if you are putting type field in the profile object make sure that you are not allowing users to modify users collection in the client end.
Here is how to restrict client end update in users collection:
Meteor.users.deny({
update() { return true; }
});
Read more on roles and permissions here:
https://guide.meteor.com/accounts.html#roles-and-permissions
Is it possible to disable requests sent to Parse without a master key? I'd like to only access Parse through my custom backend and not give users direct access. Does public 'read' set on the User class mean that anyone can read the records in that class? If so, why is this a default - wouldn't that be against good security practices?
Thanks,
Daniel
Public read means that anyone with your api key can read the user collection from your parse server. Api key is not the best approach to protect your app because anybody can know it by putting "sniffing" your network requests.
In order to protect and provide access you can protect your objects with ACL's which allows you to create access for specific user (who is logged in) or to specific role. So you have couple of options:
Create a master user - each user must have username and password and when you create your parse objects make sure that only this specific user create/read/delete and update them. You must only to make sure that when you create an object you create ACL for this user so only this user will be able to modify and read the object. You can read more about parse-server security and ACL's in here: http://docs.parseplatform.org/rest/guide/#security
Using parse cloud code - In cloud code there is a nice feature of useMasterKey which provide full access to any object of parse-server so for each operation that you run (via JS SDK) you can also set the useMasterKey to true and then parse-server will ignore all the ACL's and will execute the query for you. The useMasterKey feature work only in cloud code context so it's safe. If you want to provide additional level of security you can run the cloud code function with your master user (from section 1) and check inside the cloud code for the user session so if the session is empty then you can return an error.
You can read more about cloud code in here: http://docs.parseplatform.org/cloudcode/guide/
This is the code which validate the user session:
if (!request.user || !request.user.get("sessionToken")) {
response.error("only logged in users are allowed to use this service");
return;
}
I'm designing an app that counts on accessing multiple API's that need the certain users credentials which are provided when a user allows access via OAuth. I'm new to designing programs like this and I'm trying to wrap my head around the easiest way to do this. Here is what I was thinking:
During the Oauth process I specify the callback url (lets call it A)
Create a POST route for url A that points to a function in the user controller
That function then parses the JSON data with the API Key+Secret, hashes the data, and stores it in a column of the user table.
Would this be the best way to go about this?
One thing I'll say is don't tie these directly to your users. Sometimes users may want to authorize multiple accounts, and sometimes multiple users may authorize the same account. Since you can only have one active refresh token per oauth account, these creds should be kept in a separate table and then linked with a many-to-many for flexibility
I have a custom hash that I apply to passwords so that it matches the legacy .net membership provider hashing. I apply the hash clientside when registering users, but the forgot password link, since it is done by parse without the has, creates an issue.
Can I create a cloud code method or event handler that can capture password reset events so that I can hash it?
I tried creating my own forgot password cloud code function but it seems to not be able set the password since there is no logged in user during the cloud code function request.
If you want to manipulate user objects while in Cloud Code, use the Parse.useMasterKey() method to override the normal security settings. Although I can't really recommend trying to manipulate the password yourself of course.