I am trying to build my software using cygwin-x86(32 bit version) on Windows-7.
Cygwin-x64(64 bit) works perfectly fine on the same machine. I want to build 32-bit executable.
Whenever I try cygwin-x86, I get the following errors:
[main] make 7780 child_info_fork::abort:
C:\cygwin\bin\cygiconv-2.dll: Loaded to different address:
parent(0x440000) != child(0x5F0000) make: fork: Resource temporarily
unavailable
I have checked this thread Cygwin Error
I have already tried everything mentioned in there, but I still continue to face the same issue.
Whenever i try /usr/bin/rebaseall -v or cd /usr/bin && ./rebaseall -v as mentioned in the step 7 of the accepted answer in the above mentioned thread, I get this error:
/usr/x86_64-pc-cygwin/sys-root/usr/bin/cygvtv_stubs-0.dll: skipped
because wrong machine type.
/usr/x86_64-pc-cygwin/sys-root/usr/bin/cygz.dll: skipped because wrong
machine type. Segmentation fault (core dumped)
I get this wrong machine type error for a lot of other .dll's as well.
As mentioned earlier I have cygwin-64 installed on my machine & working as expected. But while running rebaseall it is somehow looking for x86-64-pc-cygwin instead of 32 bit version.
The thread is obsolete.
run /usr/bin/rebase-trigger, close all cygwin processes and run again setup-x86.exe. Also without installing anything will execute a rebase for you.
You can also specify the option full.
Additional note:
The most likely cause of fork problems on 32 bit system are too many programs and libraries installed.
for example:
/usr/x86_64-pc-cygwin/sys-root/usr/bin/cygz.dll
belongs to cygwin64-zlib a cross library for building cygwin64 programs from cygwin32. Do you really need it ? If not, as I suspect, remove all cywgin64 packages .
The problem can also be triggered by an anti-virus program. (I saw it happening with Avast.) You can test if this is the cause by disabling it.
Could also be caused by this update
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4561616/windows-10-update-kb4561616
You can also kill each of the latest process of ash, dash or bash that was forked, setup.exe will simply skip this script and continue with the rest.
I had to kill about 10-20 of them, mostly in latex postinstall scripts.
For me, the solution was to remove the .new file extention of the libs from c:\cygwin64\bin\
I had the same problem using git. various dlls depending on the git command used where included in the error message stating that it was loaded to "different adress".
In fact a corporate antivirus or a loaded program had probably prevent un update during the rebase phase while installing a new program (git-svn in my case)
some required libraries where not installed but cleverly left in the target with the .new file extention.
I just had to remove the .new extention (and rename the original lib to .old) to solve the problem.
In my case the list of lib involved was:
cygcrypto-1.1.dll
cyggcc_s-seh-1.dll
cygintl-8.dll
cygwin1.dll
Related
I am trying to use the latest version of the appImage-builder because appimages of my application built with the old version of appImage-builder do not run on ubuntu 22.04 anymore. So I got the order to try and see if it works with the new appImage-builder.
Currently (June 2022), only versions below 1.0 which are based on ubuntu 18.04 are available on docker (which we previously used to build our appimage).
The newer versions are available via github (https://github.com/AppImageCrafters/appimage-builder/releases).
However, I seem to be unable to execute:
appimage-builder --generate
or
appimage-builder --recipe AppImageBuilder.yml
Is there any documentation available on how to correctly use the .appimage version of appImage-builder? All I could find in https://appimage-builder.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ seems to refer to the docker version or a manually built version of appImage-builder.
Depending on the error message you get, there could be a couple of issues at play here.
If you got an error related to FUSE, then you need to install the libfuse2 package with apt install libfuse2. AppImages rely on libfuse2, but Ubuntu has stopped including it since 22.04, in favor of libfuse3.
If you get an error related to "file not found", then it could be that you do not have AppImageLauncher installed. Sadly, with type 2 AppImages the design decision was taken to modify the ELF header of the executable with 3 magic bytes at offset 8 of the executable. This means that Linux linkers will not run the file. AppImageLauncher actually copies the file to a temporary directory and zeroes out the magic number in order to be able to execute it.
A good starting point for debugging issues like this is to run the strace command, which will let you see which system call likely cause the error. Keep in mind that if you try to execute a file and you get File not found, it might mean that the linker specified by the file can not be found on the system or the ELF header is not valid. You can also run the executable by using the linker directly, which might give you more clues. For example with: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 <NAME-OF-YOUR-EXECUTABLE>.
Since I installed according to the guide here on wsl2 ubuntu 20.04, I've been having errors related to libstc++.so.6, specifically GLIBCXX_3.4.26 not found (required by ...) where ... refers to different files within /opt/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-v2006/platforms/linux64/gcc-6.3.0/lib64/ ending in .so, .so.1, .so.6 and so on (for instance, when running paraFoam the error would appear with respect to about 20 such files). I am able to successfully visualize the cavity tutorial (in paraview installation on windows).
I could get the errors to go away by doing what the user laborg suggested on Jan 4 for a similar problem with julia (see here), specifically copy libstdc++.so.6 from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu to /opt/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-v2006/platforms/linux64/gcc-6.3.0/lib64/.
The questions is whether this copy-paste solution is recommended; will it come back and haunt me later? Is the libstdc++.so.6 from system installation going to be an issue if used in the lib64 folder of openfoam?
An additional info concerning openfoam installation, foamInstallationTest shows *not installed* errors against flex, wmake, gcc, g++, icoFoam and *critical error* for gcc, g++, icoFoam; but I as given here, foamInstallationTest is not meant for installation from the tar file. Openfoam installation seems to be alright based on the running of the cavity tutorial.
ok, please don't do copy past operation to solve this problem. The error means that you haven't installed the pre request libraries in your ubuntu. It seems that you have missed the first step in the tutorial.
It is not recommended but it will not hurt as long as the GLIBC versions returned from this command
strings /opt/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-v2006/platforms/linux64/gcc-6.3.0/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 | grep GLIBC
are a subset of the GLIBC versions from this command.
strings /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 | grep GLIBC
which was no doubt the case for your Ubuntu setup.
A less risky route would be to redirect the soft link /opt/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-v2006/platforms/linux64/gcc-6.3.0/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 to point to your other libstdc++.so.6 (that way you retain both versions)
ln -sf /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 /opt/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-v2006/platforms/linux64/gcc-6.3.0/lib64/libstdc++.so.6
Then, if you hit an issue, you can always reset the link back to its original target. Of course /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 is itself a soft link, but you can point to it all the same or you can point to its target.
I believe the issue you are hitting is a derivative of the one mentioned here https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/229027-persistence-glibcxx_3-4-26-not-found.html, which would point towards the fact that it is not an installation error on your part but an issue related to the packaging of the OpenFoam binaries. I agree it would screw up the wsl2 setup owing to the way OpenFoam prepends everything to paths. Of course the safest route is to compile from source using the Ubuntu system's gcc and thereby bypass the ThirdParty.
Seeing as you are using Ubuntu in the WSL instance, could also just install the Ubuntu package directly:
https://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/wikis/precompiled/debian
This problem comes from this line in the tutorial:
echo "source /opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v2012/etc/bashrc" >> ~/.bashrc
This will point to OpenFOAM's libstdc++ everytime you open a terminal (or start a WSL2 session). If your workflow is not related to OpenFOAM, that can be an issue. If you remove or comment that line in your ~/.bashrc things should get back to normal. You can use nano in WSL2.
nano ~/.bashrc
Then comment:
#source /opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v2012/etc/bashrc
However, as OpenFOAM uses that bashrc, you will need to source the OpenFOAM bashrc in each terminal before using openFOAM.
source /opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v2012/etc/bashrc
My personal choice is to keep that line commented and, if I have a long work session using OpenFOAM, I just use nano to uncomment it, so every shell that I open works without sourcing again.
There are more elegant or complex approaches, but I prefer this one.
This answer should be valid with the 2006 version too, the link you shared points to 2012, so I guess they just updated the tutorial. If you installed 2006, just make sure when you source comment/uncomment to use the correct name.
In the same manner, if you followed another tutorial with another tool and sourced another library, you may experience issues.
Just start by taking a look at your bashrc and cleaning it.
I have been using Qt Creator for some time now without a problem. Now i try to start it and it just doesn't. It looks like it's loading and then it crashes.
I have tried to fix it by reinstalling it several times, i deleted all the config files, just in case, nothing.
I'm on Arch Linux and here is the error it throws when i launch it from the terminal:
/usr/bin/qtcreator: line 2: 4379 Bus error (core dumped) QT_LOGGING_TO_CONSOLE=1 qtcreator-bin $#
Try to run qtcreator in gdb to find out where (in which library) it crashes. Try to reinstall that library.
Or: I assume you installed qtcreator via your distribution packages. QT offers binary packages for qtcreator, which you can try.
Got similar. Debugging into showed that systemd service cannot open journal files properly (memory mapped it is, thats why SIGBUS).
You can test with issuing command and seeing output like below:
journalctl --disk-usage
An error was encountered while opening journal file or directory /var/log/journal/606980f452a14d4bb7327a74a7ff41ee/system#00057ba473706a85-48f3052664924467.journal~,
ignoring file: Input/output error Archived and active journals take up
171.0M in the file system.
To fix that you must do full disk check (on start, press E in grab and add kernel parameter fsck.mode=force).
Then delete all journals and restart service (well, you will lose some old messages, add path where you journals are according to prev ouput):
sudo rm -rf /var/log/journal
sudo systemctl kill --kill-who=main --signal=SIGUSR2 systemd journald.service
Problem will go away itself in couple days maybe, if systemd will do rotation and delete old journals. Any way, in my case it was caused by power loss.
I am trying to run git from the command line on my Windows 7, 64 bit machine. It works fine for the most part. I tried pushing my local changes up to my private repository in the cloud.
The command I am trying to run is git push origin master
I use Cygwin 6.1 and it is causing the following error. Presumably related to the fact that I am running on a 64 bit machine
0 [main] git-remote-http 6168 fork: child -1 - died waiting for longjmp before initialization, retry 10, exit code 0xC0000135, errno 11 error: cannot fork() for send-pack: Resource temporarily unavailable
I followed the suggestions here to update my rebaseall file and reran the rebase command. But it didn't really seem to have helped.
Can anyone else reproduce the problem or have found a solution?
Thanks in advance for the help.
The Cygwin mantra I used is "fork failures are rebase issues". longjmp is not the issue, fork is. Rebase is the only solution unfortunately. In the past I have used custom scripts to build the rebase list. I do this because you may be missing some DLLs, especially if you have hand-built stuff. You can build a list with find and then pass it in to rebaseall with -T. You should also consider trying a different base address other than the default one in rebaseall, look at the -b option. 64-bit machines seem to require larger spacing than 32-bit ones and so the default didn't work well for me.
Also if you change any DLLs on your system at all, you'll need to rebase again.
Note: Even after all this fork can still fail in Cygwin. Virus scanners inject their DLLs which screw things up and Windows address space randomization doesn't help either.
The answer mfisch gave worked wonders for my problem.
A quick google search yielded this result which let me git push again in no time at all. The required packages came with the default cygwin install, so I didn't even have to install anything.
The other alternative is to use the msysgit distribution, which will allows you to make any git command without depending on the cygwin environment.
See also "Difference between msysgit and 'cygwin + git'?".
I'm trying to deploy my site using Fabric and Mercurial. In the Windows command line, running hg push works perfectly with no problems.
But when I try writing
local("hg push")
in a fabfile and running it, I get the error:
'"hg push"' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file.
Googling gave me an idea that it might be a problem with the PATH variable in Python subprocesses, for example here: Why would an "command not recognized" error occur only when a window is populated?.
Can you help me out? Is the bug in Fabric or in my own code?
Thanks.
As Chris R mentions, we don't do a ton of Windows support as none of the core devs are Windows users; we have to rely on reports and suggestions from our more savvy Windows users.
It sounds like this could be related to this recently fixed, but not released, bug -- it will be in Fabric 1.0.2 which should be out soon. If you're feeling brave, you can test it out now via:
pip install -e git+git://github.com/bitprophet/fabric#1.0#egg=Fabric
If you then do fab -V, it should say it's 1.0.2a -- if so, running your fabfile may work better. Please let us know if you do this!
It sounds like the you need to add Mercurial to the Fabric process's PATH.
Maybe something like:
fabric.context_managers.path(<path to your hg.exe>)
run('hg push')
See the docs for the path context manager. It wasn't clear if path applies to local commands, but run commands are explicitly referenced.
Neither of the fixes provided worked, but changing
local("hg push")
to
os.system("hg push")
solved the problem.