I am trying to use the latest version of the appImage-builder because appimages of my application built with the old version of appImage-builder do not run on ubuntu 22.04 anymore. So I got the order to try and see if it works with the new appImage-builder.
Currently (June 2022), only versions below 1.0 which are based on ubuntu 18.04 are available on docker (which we previously used to build our appimage).
The newer versions are available via github (https://github.com/AppImageCrafters/appimage-builder/releases).
However, I seem to be unable to execute:
appimage-builder --generate
or
appimage-builder --recipe AppImageBuilder.yml
Is there any documentation available on how to correctly use the .appimage version of appImage-builder? All I could find in https://appimage-builder.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ seems to refer to the docker version or a manually built version of appImage-builder.
Depending on the error message you get, there could be a couple of issues at play here.
If you got an error related to FUSE, then you need to install the libfuse2 package with apt install libfuse2. AppImages rely on libfuse2, but Ubuntu has stopped including it since 22.04, in favor of libfuse3.
If you get an error related to "file not found", then it could be that you do not have AppImageLauncher installed. Sadly, with type 2 AppImages the design decision was taken to modify the ELF header of the executable with 3 magic bytes at offset 8 of the executable. This means that Linux linkers will not run the file. AppImageLauncher actually copies the file to a temporary directory and zeroes out the magic number in order to be able to execute it.
A good starting point for debugging issues like this is to run the strace command, which will let you see which system call likely cause the error. Keep in mind that if you try to execute a file and you get File not found, it might mean that the linker specified by the file can not be found on the system or the ELF header is not valid. You can also run the executable by using the linker directly, which might give you more clues. For example with: /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 <NAME-OF-YOUR-EXECUTABLE>.
Related
I'm trying to use pp (the perl compiler) to create an application that can run independent of the perl installed library and interpreter.
It successfully creates a compiled executable although I had to use the -x -c options to get it to find dependencies successfully. It will run on my machine but when I try it on another machine I get this error so clearly there is still some dependency:
501 Protocol scheme 'https' is not supported (LWP::Protocol::https not installed)
I am running it on MacOS 10.14.1 if that makes any difference. Thanks!
LWP::Protocol::https is loaded dynamically when needed, so pp has no way of knowing it's needed by default.
Solution 1
Pass -x to pp, and make sure the module is actually loaded in the run pp uses to determine the modules to include. This would probably be achieved by using LWP to make an HTTPS request during that run. --xargs=... might come in useful for this.
Solution 2
Pass -M LWP::Protocol::https to pp. You could also pass -M 'LWP::Protocol::**' to get all protocols handlers you have installed.
Solution 3
Add use LWP::Protocol::https (); to your script or an included module. Including a comment indicating why you are doing this would be appropriate.
You were building Net::SSLeay on MacOS 10.14 linking it to libssl.44.dylib which is not present on MacOS 10.12 where you try to run it.
I've found it annoying having to switch between build and test systems to find out which of the libraries are missing or incompatible and need to be packed.
I am now using the following strategy:
I use perlbrew instead of system perl.
For alien dependencies I use homebrew instead of the system libraries.
I build the packed executable using pp and run the resulting program with export DYLD_PRINT_LIBRARIES=YES being set (on the development machine)
I examine the list of loaded libraries and add all those referenced in the homebrew directory tree (/usr/local/opt/ and /usr/local/cellar/in my case) using pp -l /full/path/name -l ...
I rebuild the executable.
I still check on a target machine before deploying, but chances are very high now that it just works.
Since I installed according to the guide here on wsl2 ubuntu 20.04, I've been having errors related to libstc++.so.6, specifically GLIBCXX_3.4.26 not found (required by ...) where ... refers to different files within /opt/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-v2006/platforms/linux64/gcc-6.3.0/lib64/ ending in .so, .so.1, .so.6 and so on (for instance, when running paraFoam the error would appear with respect to about 20 such files). I am able to successfully visualize the cavity tutorial (in paraview installation on windows).
I could get the errors to go away by doing what the user laborg suggested on Jan 4 for a similar problem with julia (see here), specifically copy libstdc++.so.6 from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu to /opt/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-v2006/platforms/linux64/gcc-6.3.0/lib64/.
The questions is whether this copy-paste solution is recommended; will it come back and haunt me later? Is the libstdc++.so.6 from system installation going to be an issue if used in the lib64 folder of openfoam?
An additional info concerning openfoam installation, foamInstallationTest shows *not installed* errors against flex, wmake, gcc, g++, icoFoam and *critical error* for gcc, g++, icoFoam; but I as given here, foamInstallationTest is not meant for installation from the tar file. Openfoam installation seems to be alright based on the running of the cavity tutorial.
ok, please don't do copy past operation to solve this problem. The error means that you haven't installed the pre request libraries in your ubuntu. It seems that you have missed the first step in the tutorial.
It is not recommended but it will not hurt as long as the GLIBC versions returned from this command
strings /opt/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-v2006/platforms/linux64/gcc-6.3.0/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 | grep GLIBC
are a subset of the GLIBC versions from this command.
strings /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 | grep GLIBC
which was no doubt the case for your Ubuntu setup.
A less risky route would be to redirect the soft link /opt/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-v2006/platforms/linux64/gcc-6.3.0/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 to point to your other libstdc++.so.6 (that way you retain both versions)
ln -sf /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 /opt/OpenFOAM/ThirdParty-v2006/platforms/linux64/gcc-6.3.0/lib64/libstdc++.so.6
Then, if you hit an issue, you can always reset the link back to its original target. Of course /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 is itself a soft link, but you can point to it all the same or you can point to its target.
I believe the issue you are hitting is a derivative of the one mentioned here https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/main/229027-persistence-glibcxx_3-4-26-not-found.html, which would point towards the fact that it is not an installation error on your part but an issue related to the packaging of the OpenFoam binaries. I agree it would screw up the wsl2 setup owing to the way OpenFoam prepends everything to paths. Of course the safest route is to compile from source using the Ubuntu system's gcc and thereby bypass the ThirdParty.
Seeing as you are using Ubuntu in the WSL instance, could also just install the Ubuntu package directly:
https://develop.openfoam.com/Development/openfoam/-/wikis/precompiled/debian
This problem comes from this line in the tutorial:
echo "source /opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v2012/etc/bashrc" >> ~/.bashrc
This will point to OpenFOAM's libstdc++ everytime you open a terminal (or start a WSL2 session). If your workflow is not related to OpenFOAM, that can be an issue. If you remove or comment that line in your ~/.bashrc things should get back to normal. You can use nano in WSL2.
nano ~/.bashrc
Then comment:
#source /opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v2012/etc/bashrc
However, as OpenFOAM uses that bashrc, you will need to source the OpenFOAM bashrc in each terminal before using openFOAM.
source /opt/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v2012/etc/bashrc
My personal choice is to keep that line commented and, if I have a long work session using OpenFOAM, I just use nano to uncomment it, so every shell that I open works without sourcing again.
There are more elegant or complex approaches, but I prefer this one.
This answer should be valid with the 2006 version too, the link you shared points to 2012, so I guess they just updated the tutorial. If you installed 2006, just make sure when you source comment/uncomment to use the correct name.
In the same manner, if you followed another tutorial with another tool and sourced another library, you may experience issues.
Just start by taking a look at your bashrc and cleaning it.
I have a C++ program where I need the current path to later create a folder. The location of my executable is, let's say /home/me/foo/bin. This is what I run:
//Here I expect '/home/me/foo/bin/', but get ''
auto currentPath = boost::filesystem::current_path();
//Here I expect '/home/me/foo/', but get ''
auto parentPath = currentPath.parent_path();
//Here I expect '/home/me/foo/foo2/', but get 'foo2/'
string subFolder = "foo2";
string folderPath = parentPath.string() + "/" + subFolder + "/";
//Here I expect to create '/home/me/foo/foo2/', but get a core dump
boost::filesystem::path boostPath{ folderPath};
boost::filesystem::create_directories( boostPath);
I am running on Ubuntu 16.04, using Boost 1.66 installed with the package manager Conan.
I used to run this successfully with a previous version of Boost (1.45 I believe) without using Conan. Boost was just normally installed on my machine. I now get a core dump when running create_directories( boostPath);.
Two questions:
Why isn't current_path() providing me with the actual path, and returns and empty path instead?
Even if current_path() returned nothing why would I still have a core dump even if I run it with sudo? Wouldn't I simply create the folder(s) at root?
Edit:
Running the compiled program, having some cout outputs of the above variables in between the lines rather than using debug mode, normally gives me the following output:
currentPath: ""
parentPath: ""
folderPath: /foo2/
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
But sometimes (about 20% of the times) gives me the following output:
currentPath: "/"
parentPath: "/home/me/fooA�[oFw�[oFw#"
folderPath: /home/me/fooA�[oFw�[oFw#/foo2/
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::filesystem::filesystem_error'
what(): boost::filesystem::create_directories: Invalid argument
Aborted (core dumped)
Edit 2:
Running conan profile show default I get:
[settings]
os=Linux
os_build=Linux
arch=x86_64
arch_build=x86_64
compiler=gcc
compiler.version=5
compiler.libcxx=libstdc++
build_type=Release
[options]
[build_requires]
[env]
There is some discrepance between the libcxx used in the dependencies, and the one that you are using to build your application.
In g++ (linux) there are 2 standard library modes you can use, libstdc++, built without C++11 enabled, and libstdc++11, built with C++11 enabled. When you are building an executable (application or shared library), all the individual libraries linked together must link with the same libcxx.
libstdc++11 was made the default for g++ >= 5, but this also depends on the linux distro. It happens that even if you install a g++ >=5 in older distros like Ubuntu 14, the default libcxx will still be libstdc++, apparently it is not easy to upgrade it without breaking. It also happens that very popular CI services used in open-source, like travis-ci, used older linux distros, and thus libstdc++ linkage was the most popular.
libstdc++ was the default for g++ < 5.
For historical and backwards compatibility reasons, conan default profile always use libstdc++, even for modern compilers in modern distros. You can read your default profile the first time conan is executed, but also find it as a file in .conan/profiles/default, or show it with conan profile show default. This will likely change in conan 2.0 (or even sooner), and the correct libcxx will be detected for each compiler if possible.
So, if you are not changing the default profile (using your own profiles is recommended for production), then when you execute conan install, the depedencies which are installed are built against libstdc++. Note that this conan install is independent on the build in most cases, it just downloads, unzip and configure the dependencies you want, with the requested configuration (from the default profile).
Then, when you are building, if you are not changing _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI, then you can be using your system compiler default, in this case, libstdc++11. In most cases, a linking error appears that shows this discrepance. But in your case you were unlucky, and your application managed to link, but then crashed at runtime.
There are a couple of approaches to solve this:
Build your application with libstdc++ too. Make sure to define _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0.
Install your dependencies for libstdc++11. Edit your default profile to use libstdc++11, then issue a new conan install and rebuild your app.
I'm trying to compile the libxkbcommon library for kodi for my Raspberry Pi 2.
The host machine is a dedicated Server running Ubuntu 16.04 x64.
Now there are two errors when I'm trying to compile libxkbcommon, depending on what yacc I'm using:
byacc:
YACC src/xkbcomp/parser.c
yacc: e - line 219 of
"/opt/kodi/xbmc/tools/depends/target/libxkbcommon/raspberry-pi2-release/src/xkbcomp/parser.y", syntax error
%destructor { FreeStmt((ParseCommon *) $$); }
^
Makefile:1637: recipe for target 'src/xkbcomp/parser.c' failed
btyacc:
parser.y:85: syntax error
Here is the source code of libxkbcommon:
https://github.com/xkbcommon/libxkbcommon
The xbcomp/parser.y file requires a number of (very useful) bison extensions, so it can't be processed by all yacc variants.
btyacc does not support bison-compatible pure-parser declarations. (It has a different, not entirely compatible mechanism which implements the same feature.) So it fails on the first instance of one of those declarations.
It should be possible to use byacc, but not the version which is available in the Ubuntu package repository. Although the Ubuntu package repository change history seems to suggest that the intention was to include the build option which allows %destructor, the actual binary currently available in the byacc repository was built without that option. (It is also several years old, and I think it would be useful to use a more recent version.) I reported this as launchpad bug 1776270, along with a suggestion for a possible fix.
I'm sure you'll be able to build the software using Gnu bison, which is available as the Ubuntu package bison. Since that's the most popular yacc version installed on developer machines, a failure to build with bison would probably have been noticed long ago.
If you would prefer to use byacc, for whatever reason, you'll have to download and build it yourself. You can get the most recent version from Thomas Dickey's byacc page, and then build it with the usual procedure: untar, configure, make, make install. When I tested this, I used the following configure line:
./configure --enable-btyacc --program-prefix=b --prefix=/usr
Only the first option is mandatory
* --program-prefix=b Install it as `byacc` rather than `yacc`
* --enable-btyacc Necessary for %destructor support
* --prefix=/usr Install it in /usr/bin and /usr/man. The default
is /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/man, which failed on
my Ubuntu install because of a missing -D option in the
install command in the Makefile.
I am trying to build my software using cygwin-x86(32 bit version) on Windows-7.
Cygwin-x64(64 bit) works perfectly fine on the same machine. I want to build 32-bit executable.
Whenever I try cygwin-x86, I get the following errors:
[main] make 7780 child_info_fork::abort:
C:\cygwin\bin\cygiconv-2.dll: Loaded to different address:
parent(0x440000) != child(0x5F0000) make: fork: Resource temporarily
unavailable
I have checked this thread Cygwin Error
I have already tried everything mentioned in there, but I still continue to face the same issue.
Whenever i try /usr/bin/rebaseall -v or cd /usr/bin && ./rebaseall -v as mentioned in the step 7 of the accepted answer in the above mentioned thread, I get this error:
/usr/x86_64-pc-cygwin/sys-root/usr/bin/cygvtv_stubs-0.dll: skipped
because wrong machine type.
/usr/x86_64-pc-cygwin/sys-root/usr/bin/cygz.dll: skipped because wrong
machine type. Segmentation fault (core dumped)
I get this wrong machine type error for a lot of other .dll's as well.
As mentioned earlier I have cygwin-64 installed on my machine & working as expected. But while running rebaseall it is somehow looking for x86-64-pc-cygwin instead of 32 bit version.
The thread is obsolete.
run /usr/bin/rebase-trigger, close all cygwin processes and run again setup-x86.exe. Also without installing anything will execute a rebase for you.
You can also specify the option full.
Additional note:
The most likely cause of fork problems on 32 bit system are too many programs and libraries installed.
for example:
/usr/x86_64-pc-cygwin/sys-root/usr/bin/cygz.dll
belongs to cygwin64-zlib a cross library for building cygwin64 programs from cygwin32. Do you really need it ? If not, as I suspect, remove all cywgin64 packages .
The problem can also be triggered by an anti-virus program. (I saw it happening with Avast.) You can test if this is the cause by disabling it.
Could also be caused by this update
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4561616/windows-10-update-kb4561616
You can also kill each of the latest process of ash, dash or bash that was forked, setup.exe will simply skip this script and continue with the rest.
I had to kill about 10-20 of them, mostly in latex postinstall scripts.
For me, the solution was to remove the .new file extention of the libs from c:\cygwin64\bin\
I had the same problem using git. various dlls depending on the git command used where included in the error message stating that it was loaded to "different adress".
In fact a corporate antivirus or a loaded program had probably prevent un update during the rebase phase while installing a new program (git-svn in my case)
some required libraries where not installed but cleverly left in the target with the .new file extention.
I just had to remove the .new extention (and rename the original lib to .old) to solve the problem.
In my case the list of lib involved was:
cygcrypto-1.1.dll
cyggcc_s-seh-1.dll
cygintl-8.dll
cygwin1.dll