I want to test my services in spring which should send emails.
I try to use org.subethamail:subethasmtp.
To acieve my goal I created service MySender where I send email:
#Autowired
private MailSender mailSender;
//...
SimpleMailMessage message = new SimpleMailMessage();
message.setTo("example#example.com");
message.setSubject("Subject");
message.setText("Text");
mailSender.send(message);
// ...
To test this piece of code I created test application.properties (in test scope):
spring.mail.host=127.0.0.1
spring.mail.port=${random.int[4000,6000]}
And test configuration class which should start Wiser SMTP server and make it reusable in tests:
#Configuration
public class TestConfiguration {
#Autowired
private Wiser wiser;
#Value("${spring.mail.host}")
String smtpHost;
#Value("${spring.mail.port}")
int smtpPort;
#Bean
public Wiser provideWiser() {
// provide wiser for verification in tests
Wiser wiser = new Wiser();
return wiser;
}
#PostConstruct
public void initializeMailServer() {
// start server
wiser.setHostname(smtpHost);
wiser.setPort(smtpPort);
wiser.start();
}
#PreDestroy
public void shutdownMailServer() {
// stop server
wiser.stop();
}
}
Expected result is that application sends email using Wiser smtp server and verify number of sended messages.
But when I run service application throws MailSendException(Couldn't connect to host, port: 127.0.0.1, 4688; timeout -1;).
But when I add breakpoint and try connect using telnet smtp server allow to connect and don't throw Connection refused.
Do you have any idea why I can't test sending mails?
Full code preview is available on github:
https://github.com/karolrynio/demo-mail
I faced same problem. If using some constant port number for spring.mail.port in test Spring configuration combined with Maven tests forking, it resulted in tests randomly failing on port conflict when starting Wiser.
As noted here in comments, using random.int doesn't help - it returns different value each time it's referenced, and it's expected behavior (see this issue).
Hence, we need a different way to initialize spring.mail.port with a random value, so it would be constant within the test execution. Here's a way to do it (thanks for advice here):
First, we may not set spring.mail.port in test properties file at all. We'll initialize it in TestPropertySource. We'll need a class like this:
public class RandomPortInitailizer implements ApplicationContextInitializer<ConfigurableApplicationContext> {
#Override
public void initialize(ConfigurableApplicationContext applicationContext) {
int randomPort = SocketUtils.findAvailableTcpPort();
TestPropertySourceUtils.addInlinedPropertiesToEnvironment(applicationContext,
"spring.mail.port=" + randomPort);
}
}
Now we can run our tests this way (not too different from what's found in OP):
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(initializers = RandomPortInitailizer.class)
public class WhenEmailingSomeStuff {
#Value("${spring.mail.host}")
String smtpHost;
#Value("${spring.mail.port}")
int smtpPort;
#Before
public void startEmailServer() {
wiser = new Wiser();
wiser.setPort(smtpPort);
wiser.setHostname(smtpHost);
wiser.start();
}
#After
public void stopEmailServer() {
wiser.stop();
}
#Test
public void testYourJavaMailSenderHere() {
//
}
}
in the application properties can you also add
mail.smtp.auth=false
mail.smtp.starttls.enable=false
The change your code to have these extra two values
#Value("${mail.smtp.auth}")
private boolean auth;
#Value("${mail.smtp.starttls.enable}")
private boolean starttls;
and put these options in your initializeMailServer
Properties mailProperties = new Properties();
mailProperties.put("mail.smtp.auth", auth);
mailProperties.put("mail.smtp.starttls.enable", starttls);
wiser.setJavaMailProperties(mailProperties);
wiser.setHostname(smtpHost);
wiser.setPort(smtpPort);
wiser.start();
let me know if this worked for you
Related
I'm trying to declare multiple SFTP sessions, wrap them in a DelegatingSessionFactory, then later use SftpRemoteFileTemplate.execute(...) during a cron job.
On the execute part of things, the code is very simple, it is already used for a single session, but I want to expand it to multiple possible sessions.
Below I extended my single session code. I just copied the methods for reference. At the end I'll show how I think the new methods should look.
public class XSession extends SftpSession {
#Scheduled(cron = "${sftp.scan.x.schedule}")
void scan() {
List<FileHistoryEntity> fileList = template.execute(this::processFiles);
...
}
private List<FileHistoryEntity> processFiles(Session<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> session) {
List.of(session.list(this.remoteDir)).forEach(file -> doWhatever());
...
}
}
But now I have multiple sessions. So I declare the following class:
#Slf4j
#Configuration
#RequiredArgsConstructor
public class DelegateSftpSessionHandler {
private final SessionFactory<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> session1;
private final SessionFactory<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> session2;
private final SessionFactory<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> session3;
private final SessionFactory<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> session4;
private final SessionFactory<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> session5;
#RequiredArgsConstructor
public enum DelegateSessionConfig {
SESSION_1("IN_REALITY_A_RELEVANT_NAME_1");
SESSION_2("IN_REALITY_A_RELEVANT_NAME_2");
SESSION_3("IN_REALITY_A_RELEVANT_NAME_3");
SESSION_4("IN_REALITY_A_RELEVANT_NAME_4");
SESSION_5("IN_REALITY_A_RELEVANT_NAME_5");
public final String threadKey;
}
#Bean
#Primary
public DelegatingSessionFactory<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> delegatingSessionFactory() {
Map<Object, SessionFactory<ChannelSftp.LsEntry>> sessionMap = new HashMap<>();
sessionMap.put(DelegateSessionConfig.SESSION_1.threadKey, session1);
sessionMap.put(DelegateSessionConfig.SESSION_2.threadKey, session2);
sessionMap.put(DelegateSessionConfig.SESSION_3.threadKey, session3);
sessionMap.put(DelegateSessionConfig.SESSION_4.threadKey, session4);
sessionMap.put(DelegateSessionConfig.SESSION_5.threadKey, session5);
DefaultSessionFactoryLocator<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> sessionLocator = new DefaultSessionFactoryLocator<>(sessionMap);
return new DelegatingSessionFactory<>(sessionLocator);
}
#Bean
SftpRemoteFileTemplate ftpRemoteFileTemplate(DelegatingSessionFactory<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> dsf) {
return new SftpRemoteFileTemplate(dsf);
}
}
Ting is, I have no idea how any of this works, and the spring sftp / fpt documentation is by no means clear. The code is virtually undocumented. And I'm just guessing. I think that I have to do the following:
public class XSession extends SftpSession {
#Autowire
DelegatingSessionFactory<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> delegatingSessionFactory;
#Autowired
SftpRemoteFileTemplate template;
#Scheduled(cron = "${sftp.scan.x.schedule}") // x == SESSION_1
#Async // for thread key
void scan() {
delegatingSessionFactory.setThreadKey(DelegateSessionConfig.SESSION_1.threadKey);
// because thread key changes the session globally? So I don't need specify
// which session this template is working with???
List<FileHistoryEntity> fileList = template.execute(this::processFiles);
...
delegatingSessionFactory.clearThreadKey();
}
private List<FileHistoryEntity> processFiles(Session<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> session) {
List.of(session.list(this.remoteDir)).forEach(file -> doWhatever());
...
}
}
I'm basing what I'm saying on the following link, github spring integration test
Honestly, I hardly understand what is happening. But it seems like setting the thread key, changes the session globally.
My only other idea is to just ... create the RemoteFileTemplate on demand
public static SftpRemoteFileTemplate getTemplateFor(DelegatingSessionFactory<ChannelSftp.LsEntry> dsf, DelegateSessionConfig session) {
return new SftpRemoteFileTemplate(dsf.getFactoryLocator().getSessionFactory(session.threadKey));
}
It does not set it globally. That's how a ThreadLocal variable works: you set a value in some thread and only this thread can see it. If you use the same object concurrently, other threads don't see that value because it does not belong to their thread state.
Not sure what is your concern, but pattern to extend an SftpSession for custom logic is not right. You should consider to use an SftpRemoteFileTemplate.execute(SessionCallback<F, T> callback) instead, but thread key must be set into a DelegatingSessionFactory before anyway and in the same thread you going to call that execute().
I am using wiremock to mock github api to do some testing of my service.
The service calls github api. For the tests I am setting endpoint property to
github.api.endpoint=http://localhost:8087
This host and port are the same as wiremock server #AutoConfigureWireMock(port = 8087) so I can test different scenarios like : malformed response, timeouts etc.
How can I make this port dynamic to avoid case when it is already used by system ? Is there a way to get wiremock port in tests and reassign endpoint property ?
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#SpringBootTest(webEnvironment = SpringBootTest.WebEnvironment.RANDOM_PORT)
#AutoConfigureWireMock(port = 8087)
#TestPropertySource(properties ={"github.api.endpoint=http://localhost:8087"})
public class GithubRepositoryServiceTestWithWireMockServer {
#Value("${github.api.client.timeout.milis}")
private int githubClientTimeout;
#Autowired
private GithubRepositoryService service;
#Test
public void getRepositoryDetails() {
GithubRepositoryDetails expected = new GithubRepositoryDetails("niemar/xf-test", null,
"https://github.com/niemar/xf-test.git", 1, "2016-06-12T18:46:24Z");
stubFor(get(urlEqualTo("/repos/niemar/xf-test"))
.willReturn(aResponse().withHeader("Content-Type", "application/json").withBodyFile("/okResponse.json")));
GithubRepositoryDetails repositoryDetails = service.getRepositoryDetails("niemar", "xf-test");
Assert.assertEquals(expected, repositoryDetails);
}
#Test
public void testTimeout() {
GithubRepositoryDetails expected = new GithubRepositoryDetails("niemar/xf-test", null,
"https://github.com/niemar/xf-test.git", 1, "2016-06-12T18:46:24Z");
stubFor(get(urlEqualTo("/repos/niemar/xf-test"))
.willReturn(aResponse()
.withHeader("Content-Type", "application/json")
.withBodyFile("/okResponse.json")
.withFixedDelay(githubClientTimeout * 3)));
boolean wasExceptionThrown = false;
try {
GithubRepositoryDetails repositoryDetails = service.getRepositoryDetails("niemar", "xf-test");
} catch (GithubRepositoryNotFound e) {
wasExceptionThrown = true;
}
Assert.assertTrue(wasExceptionThrown);
}
You have to set the WireMock port to 0 so that it chooses a random port and then use a reference to this port (wiremock.server.port) as part of the endpoint property.
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#SpringBootTest(webEnvironment = SpringBootTest.WebEnvironment.RANDOM_PORT)
#AutoConfigureWireMock(port = 0)
#TestPropertySource(properties = {
"github.api.endpoint=http://localhost:${wiremock.server.port}"
})
public class GithubRepositoryServiceTestWithWireMockServer {
....
}
See also Spring Cloud Contract WireMock.
I know this is a bit old post but still there is a documented way to have these ports dynamically. Read more here: Getting started. Just scroll down a bit to 'Random port numbers'.
From the documentation there:
What you need to do is to define a Rule like so
#Rule
public WireMockRule wireMockRule = new WireMockRule(wireMockConfig().dynamicPort().dynamicHttpsPort());
And then access them via
int port = wireMockRule.port();
int httpsPort = wireMockRule.httpsPort();
One more way, you can use dynamic port without conflict is
import org.springframework.util.SocketUtils;
int WIREMOCK_PORT = SocketUtils.findAvailableTcpPort();
public WireMockRule wireMockServer = new WireMockRule(WIREMOCK_PORT);
if you want to access it from properties file, then we have wiremock.server.portprovided by Wiremock
"github.api.endpoint=http://localhost:${wiremock.server.port}"
I am not aware of #AutoConfigureWireMock but if you are manually starting wiremock and setting up mocks, while starting spring you can setup a random port number utilizing spring random. A sample will look like this
in your wiremock class
#Component
public class wiremock {
#Value("${randomportnumber}")
private int wiremockPort;
public void startWiremockServer() {
WireMock.configureFor("localhost", wiremockPort);
wireMockServer = new com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.WireMockServer(wireMockConfig().port(wiremockPort).extensions
(MockedResponseHandler.class));
wireMockServer.start();
}
}
In your test class
//however you want to configure spring
public class wiremock {
#Value("${github.api.endpoint}")
private String wiremockHostUrl;
//use the above url to get stubbed responses.
}
in your application.properties file
randomportnumber=${random.int[1,9999]}
github.api.endpoint=http://localhost:${randomportnumber}
I wish to test the following scenarios:
Set the hystrix.command.default.execution.isolation.thread.timeoutInMillisecond value to a low value, and see how my application behaves.
Check my fallback method is called using Unit test.
Please can someone provide me with link to samples.
A real usage can be found bellow. The key to enable Hystrix in the test class are these two annotations:
#EnableCircuitBreaker
#EnableAspectJAutoProxy
class ClipboardService {
#HystrixCommand(fallbackMethod = "getNextClipboardFallback")
public Task getNextClipboard(int numberOfTasks) {
doYourExternalSystemCallHere....
}
public Task getNextClipboardFallback(int numberOfTasks) {
return null;
}
}
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#EnableCircuitBreaker
#EnableAspectJAutoProxy
#TestPropertySource("classpath:test.properties")
#ContextConfiguration(classes = {ClipboardService.class})
public class ClipboardServiceIT {
private MockRestServiceServer mockServer;
#Autowired
private ClipboardService clipboardService;
#Before
public void setUp() {
this.mockServer = MockRestServiceServer.createServer(restTemplate);
}
#Test
public void testGetNextClipboardWithBadRequest() {
mockServer.expect(ExpectedCount.once(), requestTo("https://getDocument.com?task=1")).andExpect(method(HttpMethod.GET))
.andRespond(MockRestResponseCreators.withStatus(HttpStatus.BAD_REQUEST));
Task nextClipboard = clipboardService.getNextClipboard(1);
assertNull(nextClipboard); // this should be answered by your fallBack method
}
}
Fore open the circuit in your unit test case just before you call the client. Make sure fall back is called. You can have a constant returned from fallback or add some log statements.
Reset the circuit.
#Test
public void testSendOrder_openCircuit() {
String order = null;
ServiceResponse response = null;
order = loadFile("/order.json");
// use this in case of feign hystrix
ConfigurationManager.getConfigInstance()
.setProperty("hystrix.command.default.circuitBreaker.forceOpen", "true");
// use this in case of just hystrix
System.setProperty("hystrix.command.default.circuitBreaker.forceOpen", "true");
response = client.sendOrder(order);
assertThat(response.getResultStatus()).isEqualTo("Fallback");
// DONT forget to reset
ConfigurationManager.getConfigInstance()
.setProperty("hystrix.command.default.circuitBreaker.forceOpen", "false");
// use this in case of just hystrix
System.setProperty("hystrix.command.default.circuitBreaker.forceOpen", "false");
}
I have a Spring application listener implementing ApplicationListener<ContextRefreshedEvent> as follows:
#Profile({ Profiles.DEFAULT, Profiles.CLOUD, Profiles.TEST, Profiles.DEV })
#Component
public class BootstrapLoaderListener implements ApplicationListener<ContextRefreshedEvent>, ResourceLoaderAware, Ordered {
private static final Logger log = Logger.getLogger(BootstrapLoaderListener.class);
#Override
public int getOrder() {
return HIGHEST_PRECEDENCE;
}
#Autowired
private DayToTimeSlotRepository dayToTimeSlotRepository;
#Autowired
private LanguageRepository languageRepository;
private ResourceLoader resourceLoader;
#Override
#Transactional
public void onApplicationEvent(ContextRefreshedEvent contextRefreshedEvent) {
initApplication();
}
private void initApplication() {
if (dayToTimeSlotRepository.count() == 0) {
initDayToTimeSlots();
}
if (languageRepository.count() == 0) {
initLanguages();
}
}
private void initDayToTimeSlots() {
for (Day day : Day.values()) {
for (TimeSlot timeSlot : TimeSlot.values()) {
DayToTimeSlot dayToTimeSlot = new DayToTimeSlot();
dayToTimeSlot.setDay(day);
dayToTimeSlot.setTimeSlot(timeSlot);
dayToTimeSlot.setDisabled(isDayToTimeSlotDisabled(timeSlot, day));
dayToTimeSlotRepository.save(dayToTimeSlot);
}
}
}
...
I rely on this listener class to insert reference data that is not updated nor deleted and I have a number of Spring integration tests that use this class, one of which fails because the listener is not notified (initDayToTimeSlots is not invoked).
I am trying to pinpoint where the problem comes from by debugging the tests and I noticed that when I run the problematic test class on its own, the tests contained in the class pass (indicating that the listener is notified) but when I run all of my application test classes together, the listener is not notified causing the test to fail (indicating that some other test changes/dirties the context).
Here is the problematic test class:
#ActiveProfiles({ Profiles.TEST })
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(classes = { FullIntegrationTestConfiguration.class, BaseTestConfiguration.class })
public class RegularDayToTimeSlotsTest {
private static int NUMBER_OF_REGULAR_DAY_TO_TIME_SLOTS_IN_WEEK = 25;
#Before
public void setup() {
//org.hsqldb.util.DatabaseManagerSwing.main(new String[] { "--url", "jdbc:hsqldb:mem:bignibou", "--noexit" });
}
#Autowired
private AdvertisementService advertisementService;
#Test
public void shouldNotContainSaturdayNorSunday() {
Set<DayToTimeSlot> regularDayToTimeSlots = advertisementService.retrieveRegularDayToTimeSlots();
assertThat(regularDayToTimeSlots).onProperty("day").excludes(Day.SATURDAY, Day.SUNDAY);
assertThat(regularDayToTimeSlots).onProperty("day").contains(Day.MONDAY, Day.THUESDAY);
}
#Test
public void shouldNotContainEveningNorNighttime() {
Set<DayToTimeSlot> regularDayToTimeSlots = advertisementService.retrieveRegularDayToTimeSlots();
assertThat(regularDayToTimeSlots).onProperty("timeSlot").excludes(TimeSlot.EVENING, TimeSlot.NIGHTTIME);
assertThat(regularDayToTimeSlots).onProperty("timeSlot").contains(TimeSlot.MORNING, TimeSlot.LUNCHTIME);
}
#Test
public void shouldContainCorrectNumberOfDayToTimeSlots() {
Set<DayToTimeSlot> regularDayToTimeSlots = advertisementService.retrieveRegularDayToTimeSlots();
assertThat(regularDayToTimeSlots).hasSize(NUMBER_OF_REGULAR_DAY_TO_TIME_SLOTS_IN_WEEK);
}
}
I am puzzled to see that both the prepareRefresh() and finishRefresh() methods within AbstractApplicationContext.refresh method are indeed called but that my listener is not notified...
Has anyone got any clue?
P.S. I know I could use #DirtiesContext in order to get a fresh context and I also know it would be preferable not to rely on an application listener for my tests but I am very anxious to understand what is going wrong here. Hence this post.
edit 1: When I debug the problematic test class in isolation, I notice that the event source is of type GenericApplicationContext and as explained above the test passes OK because the listener is notified. However when all test classes are run together, the event source is, oddly enough, of type GenericWebApplicationContext and no listener is found here in SimpleApplicationEventMulticaster:
#Override
public void multicastEvent(final ApplicationEvent event) {
for (final ApplicationListener<?> listener : getApplicationListeners(event)) {
Executor executor = getTaskExecutor();
if (executor != null) {
executor.execute(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
invokeListener(listener, event);
}
});
}
else {
invokeListener(listener, event);
}
}
}
edit 2: my comments in edit 1 make me asks myself what is responsible for determining the uniqueness of context configuration...
For instance, I have only two test classes with the following context configuration:
#ContextConfiguration(classes = { FullIntegrationTestConfiguration.class, BaseTestConfiguration.class })
I guess they both will use the same cached context, won't they? Now can a third class use the same cached context even though it does not have exactly the same context configuration?
Why does my test get a GenericWebApplicationContext above?
my comments in edit 1 make me asks myself what is responsible for
determining the uniqueness of context configuration...
The elements that make up the context cache key are described in the Context caching section of the "Testing" chapter in the reference manual.
For instance, I have only two test classes with the following context
configuration:
#ContextConfiguration(classes = {
FullIntegrationTestConfiguration.class, BaseTestConfiguration.class })
I guess they both will use the same cached context, won't they?
If they declare only those two configuration classes in that exact order, then yes.
Now can a third class use the same cached context even though it does not
have exactly the same context configuration?
No.
Why does my test get a GenericWebApplicationContext above?
A GenericWebApplicationContext is only loaded if your test class (or one of its superclasses) is annotated with #WebAppConfiguration.
If you are experiencing behavior that contradicts this, then you have discovered a bug in which case we would appreciate it if you could produce a scaled down test project in the issue repository and create a corresponding JIRA issue against the "Spring Framework" and its "Test" component.
Thanks,
Sam (author of the Spring TestContext Framework)
I am experiencing problems when configurating my Jersey Client with the ApacheConnector. It seems to ignore all request headers that I define in a WriterInterceptor. I can tell that the WriterInterceptor is called when I set a break point within WriterInterceptor#aroundWriteTo(WriterInterceptorContext). Contrary to that, I can observe that the modification of an InputStream is preserved.
Here is a runnable example demonstrating my problem:
public class ApacheConnectorProblemDemonstration extends JerseyTest {
private static final Logger LOGGER = Logger.getLogger(JerseyTest.class.getName());
private static final String QUESTION = "baz", ANSWER = "qux";
private static final String REQUEST_HEADER_NAME_CLIENT = "foo-cl", REQUEST_HEADER_VALUE_CLIENT = "bar-cl";
private static final String REQUEST_HEADER_NAME_INTERCEPTOR = "foo-ic", REQUEST_HEADER_VALUE_INTERCEPTOR = "bar-ic";
private static final int MAX_CONNECTIONS = 100;
private static final String PATH = "/";
#Path(PATH)
public static class TestResource {
#POST
public String handle(InputStream questionStream,
#HeaderParam(REQUEST_HEADER_NAME_CLIENT) String client,
#HeaderParam(REQUEST_HEADER_NAME_INTERCEPTOR) String interceptor)
throws IOException {
assertEquals(REQUEST_HEADER_VALUE_CLIENT, client);
// Here, the header that was set in the client's writer interceptor is lost.
assertEquals(REQUEST_HEADER_VALUE_INTERCEPTOR, interceptor);
// However, the input stream got gzipped so the WriterInterceptor has been partly applied.
assertEquals(QUESTION, new Scanner(new GZIPInputStream(questionStream)).nextLine());
return ANSWER;
}
}
#Provider
#Priority(Priorities.ENTITY_CODER)
public static class ClientInterceptor implements WriterInterceptor {
#Override
public void aroundWriteTo(WriterInterceptorContext context)
throws IOException, WebApplicationException {
context.getHeaders().add(REQUEST_HEADER_NAME_INTERCEPTOR, REQUEST_HEADER_VALUE_INTERCEPTOR);
context.setOutputStream(new GZIPOutputStream(context.getOutputStream()));
context.proceed();
}
}
#Override
protected Application configure() {
enable(TestProperties.LOG_TRAFFIC);
enable(TestProperties.DUMP_ENTITY);
return new ResourceConfig(TestResource.class);
}
#Override
protected Client getClient(TestContainer tc, ApplicationHandler applicationHandler) {
ClientConfig clientConfig = tc.getClientConfig() == null ? new ClientConfig() : tc.getClientConfig();
clientConfig.property(ApacheClientProperties.CONNECTION_MANAGER, makeConnectionManager(MAX_CONNECTIONS));
clientConfig.register(ClientInterceptor.class);
// If I do not use the Apache connector, I avoid this problem.
clientConfig.connector(new ApacheConnector(clientConfig));
if (isEnabled(TestProperties.LOG_TRAFFIC)) {
clientConfig.register(new LoggingFilter(LOGGER, isEnabled(TestProperties.DUMP_ENTITY)));
}
configureClient(clientConfig);
return ClientBuilder.newClient(clientConfig);
}
private static ClientConnectionManager makeConnectionManager(int maxConnections) {
PoolingClientConnectionManager connectionManager = new PoolingClientConnectionManager();
connectionManager.setMaxTotal(maxConnections);
connectionManager.setDefaultMaxPerRoute(maxConnections);
return connectionManager;
}
#Test
public void testInterceptors() throws Exception {
Response response = target(PATH)
.request()
.header(REQUEST_HEADER_NAME_CLIENT, REQUEST_HEADER_VALUE_CLIENT)
.post(Entity.text(QUESTION));
assertEquals(200, response.getStatus());
assertEquals(ANSWER, response.readEntity(String.class));
}
}
I want to use the ApacheConnector in order to optimize for concurrent requests via the PoolingClientConnectionManager. Did I mess up the configuration?
PS: The exact same problem occurs when using the GrizzlyConnector.
After further research, I assume that this is rather a misbehavior in the default Connector that uses a HttpURLConnection. As I explained in this other self-answered question of mine, the documentation states:
Whereas filters are primarily intended to manipulate request and
response parameters like HTTP headers, URIs and/or HTTP methods,
interceptors are intended to manipulate entities, via manipulating
entity input/output streams
A WriterInterceptor is not supposed to manipulate the header values while a {Client,Server}RequestFilter is not supposed to manipulate the entity stream. If you need to use both, both components should be bundled within a javax.ws.rs.core.Feature or within the same class that implements two interfaces. (This can be problematic if you need to set two different Prioritys though.)
All this is very unfortunate though, since JerseyTest uses the Connector that uses a HttpURLConnection such that all my unit tests succeeded while the real life application misbehaved since it was configured with an ApacheConnector. Also, rather than suppressing changes, I wished, Jersey would throw me some exceptions. (This is a general issue I have with Jersey. When I for example used a too new version of the ClientConnectionManager where the interface was renamed to HttpClientConnectionManager I simply was informed in a one line log statement that all my configuration efforts were ignored. I did not discover this log statement til very late in development.)