I'm looking to set the value of a variable to one thing if it was already set or another if it was not. Here's an example of what I mean
export RESULT=${VALID:+Yes:-No}
Where the value of ${VALID:+Yes:-No} would be Yes if the variable was set or No if it was not.
One way I can do it now:
if [ -n "${VALID}" ]; then
export RESULT=Yes
else
export RESULT=No
fi
I could do it like this, but it would be nice to have a "one-liner".
Is it possible to do this in one line?
There's no way to do multiple parameter expansions within one variable assignement.
Without using an if statement, you can just use a couple of parameter expansions.
$ VALID="aaa"
$ RESULT="${VALID:+Yes}"; RESULT="${RESULT:-No}"; echo $RESULT
Yes
$ VALID=""
$ RESULT="${VALID:+Yes}"; RESULT="${RESULT:-No}"; echo $RESULT
No
It's not a single statement, but it's short enough that it fits on one line without the complexity of a subshell and if.
You can use an array with 2 elements (no yes) and based on variable's length decide which value to be returned:
# variable set case
>>> VALID=foo
>>> arr=(no yes) && echo "${arr[$((${#VALID} > 0))]}"
yes
# variable not set
>>> unset VALID
>>> arr=(no yes) && echo "${arr[$((${#VALID} > 0))]}"
no
The -v VAR printf option is a bash extension. Without it, you could use command substitution. (Variable names deliberately down-cased.)
printf -v result %.3s ${valid:+YES}NO
One line, requirement met:
export RESULT=$([ -n "$VALID" ] && echo Yes || echo No)
Related
I am new to Bash scripting, having a lot more experience with C-type languages. I have written a few scripts with a conditional that checks the value of a non-instantiated variable and if it doesn't exist or match a value sets the variable. On top of that the whole thing is in a for loop. Something like this:
for i in ${!my_array[#]}; do
if [ "${my_array[i]}" = true ]
then
#do something
else
my_array[i]=true;
fi
done
This would fail through a null pointer in Java since my_array[i] is not instantiated until after it is checked. Is this good practice in Bash? My script is working the way I designed, but I have learned that just because a kluge works now doesn't mean it will work in the future.
Thanks!
You will find this page on parameter expansion helpful, as well as this one on conditionals.
An easy way to test a variable is to check it for nonzero length.
if [[ -n "$var" ]]
then : do stuff ...
I also like to make it fatal to access a nonexisting variable; this means extra work, but better safety.
set -u # unset vars are fatal to access without exception handling
if [[ -n "${var:-}" ]] # handles unset during check
then : do stuff ...
By default, referencing undefined (or "unset") variable names in shell scripts just gives the empty string. But is an exception: if the shell is run with the -u option or set -u has been run in it, expansions of unset variables are treated as errors and (if the shell is not interactive) cause the shell to exit. Bash applies this principle to array elements as well:
$ array=(zero one two)
$ echo "${array[3]}"
$ echo "array[3] = '${array[3]}'"
array[3] = ''
$ set -u
$ echo "array[3] = '${array[3]}'"
-bash: array[3]: unbound variable
There are also modifiers you can use to control what expansions do if a variable (or array element) is undefined and/or empty (defined as the empty string):
$ array=(zero one '')
$ echo "array[2] is ${array[2]-unset}, array[3] is ${array[3]-unset}"
array[2] is , array[3] is unset
$ echo "array[2] is ${array[2]:-unset or empty}, array[3] is ${array[3]:-unset or empty}"
array[2] is unset or empty, array[3] is unset or empty
There are a bunch of other variants, see the POSIX shell syntax standard, section 2.6.2 (Parameter Expansion).
BTW, you do need to use curly braces (as I did above) around anything other than a plain variable reference. $name[2] is a reference to the plain variable name (or element 0 if it's an array), followed by the string "[2]"; ${name[2]}, on the other hand, is a reference to element 2 of the array name. Also, you pretty much always want to wrap variable references in double-quotes (or include them in double-quoted strings), to prevent the shell from "helpfully" splitting them into words and/or expanding them into lists of matching files. For example, this test:
if [ $my_array[i] = true ]
is (mostly) equivalent to:
if [ ${my_array[0]}[i] = true ]
...which isn't what you want at all. But this one:
if [ ${my_array[i]} = true ]
still doesn't work, because if my_array[i] is unset (or empty) it'll expand to the equivalent of:
if [ = true ]
...which is bad test expression syntax. You want this:
if [ "${my_array[i]}" = true ]
This question already has answers here:
How can I declare and use Boolean variables in a shell script?
(25 answers)
Closed 5 years ago.
How can I write an 'if then' statement to switch between these to variables as in the following?
if(switch){
server_var_shortname=$server_shared_shortname
server_var=$server_shared
server_var_bare=$server_shared_bare
} else {
server_var_shortname=$server_vps_shortname
server_var=$server_vps
server_var_bare=$server_vps_bare
}
I'm not familiar with Bash syntax and basically just need an 'if/else' statement on a Boolean. Also, can I use true / false values as such? Also how do I do the 'else' statement?
$switch=true;
if $switch
then
server_var_shortname=$server_shared_shortname
server_var=$server_shared
server_var_bare=$server_shared_bare
fi
First, shells (including Bash) don't have Booleans; they don't even have integers (although they can sort of fake it). Mostly, they have strings.
Bash also has arrays... of strings. There are a number of ways of faking Booleans; my favorite is to use the strings "true" and "false". These also happen to be the names of commands that always succeed and fail respectively, which comes in handy, because the if statement actually takes a command, and runs the then clause if it succeeds and the else clause if it fails. Thus, you can "run" the Boolean, and it'll succeed if set to "true" and fail if set to "false". Like this:
switch=true # This doesn't have quotes around it, but it's a string anyway.
# ...
if $switch; then
server_var_shortname=$server_shared_shortname
server_var=$server_shared
server_var_bare=$server_shared_bare
else
server_var_shortname=$server_vps_shortname
server_var=$server_vps
server_var_bare=$server_vps_bare
fi
Note that the more usual format you'll see for if has square-brackets, like if [ something ]; then. In this case, [ is actually a command (not some funny sort of grouping operator) that evaluates its argument as an expression; thus [ "some string" = "some other string" ] is a command that will fail because the strings aren't equal. You could use if [ "$switch" = true ]; then, but I prefer to cheat and use the fake Boolean directly.
Caveat: if you do use the cheat I'm suggesting, make sure your "Boolean" variable is set to either "true" or "false" -- not unset, not set to something else. If it's set to anything else, I take no responsibility for the results.
Some other syntax notes:
Use $ on variables when fetching their values, not when assigning to them. You have $switch=true; up there, which will get you an error.
Also, you have a semicolon at the end of that line. This is unnecessary; semicolons are used to separate multiple commands on the same line (and a few other places), but they aren't needed to end the last (/only) command on a line.
The [ command (which is also known as test) has a kind of weird syntax. Mostly because it's a command, so it goes through the usual command parsing, so e.g. [ 5 > 19 ] is parsed as [ 5 ] with output sent to a file named "19" (and is then true, because "5" is nonblank). [ 5 ">" 19 ] is better, but still evaluates to true because > does string (alphabetical) comparisons, and "5" is alphabetically after "19". [ 5 -gt 19 ] does the expected thing.
There's also [[ ]] (similar, but cleaner syntax and not available in all shells) and (( )) (for math, not strings; also not in all shells). See Bash FAQ #31.
Putting commands in variables is generally a bad idea. See Bash FAQ #50.
shellcheck.net is your friend.
Bash doesn't have any concept of Boolean - there are no true / false values. The construct
[ $switch ]
will be true except when switch variable is not set or is set to an empty string.
[ ] && echo yes # Nothing is echoed
[ "" ] && echo yes # Nothing is echoed
unset switch && [ $switch ] && echo yes # Nothing is echoed
switch=1 && [ $switch ] && echo yes # 'yes' is echoed
switch=0 && [ $switch ] && echo yes # 'yes' is echoed - the shell makes no distinction of contents - it is true as long it is not empty
See also:
How can I declare and use Boolean variables in a shell script?
Here is a good guide for If else. But I want to show a different approach (which you will find also in the link on page 3).
Your coding looks like JavaScript, so I think with Switch you could also mean the case command instead of if. Switch in JavaScript is similar to case within a shell, but there isn't any method to check for Booleans. You can check string values for like true and false, and you can check for numbers.
Example...
#!/bin/bash
case "$Variable" in
false|0|"")
echo "Boolean is set to false."
;;
*)
echo "Boolean is set to true."
;;
esac
Addition
Keep in mind, there are many programs and tools that uses Boolean values in different forms.
Two examples...
SQL in general uses numbers as Boolean.
JavaScript uses true and false values.
Meaning: Your Bash script has to know the format of Booleans, before processing them!
You need something like this:
if
CONDITION_SEE_BELOW
then
server_var_shortname=$server_shared_shortname
server_var=$server_shared
server_var_bare=$server_shared_bare
else
server_var_shortname=$server_vps_shortname
server_var=$server_vps
server_var_bare=$server_vps_bare
fi
In Bash (and other shells), the CONDITION_SEE_BELOW part has to be a command. A command returns a numerical value, and by convention 0 means "true" and any non-zero value means "false". The then clause will execute if the command returns 0, or the else clause in all other cases. The return value is not the text output by the command. In shells, you can access it with the special variable expansion $? right after executing a command.
You can test that with commands true and false, which do one thing: generate a zero (true) and non-zero (false) return value. Try this at the command line:
true ; echo "true returns $?"
false ; echo "false returns $?"
You can use any command you want in a condition. There are two commands in particular that have been created with the idea of defining conditions: the classic test command [ ] (the actual command only being the opening bracket, which is also available as the test command), and the double-bracketed, Bash-specific [[ ]] (which is not technically a command, but rather special shell syntax).
For instance, say your switch variable contains either nothing (null string), or something (string with at least one character), and assume in your case you mean a null string to be "false" and any other string to be "true". Then you could use as a condition:
[ "$switch" ]
If you are OK with a string containing only spaces and tabs to be considered empty (which will happen as a result of standard shell expansion and word splitting of arguments to a command), then you may remove the double quotes.
The double-bracket test command is mostly similar, but has some nice things about it, including double-quoting not being needed most of the time, supporting Boolean logic with && and || inside the expression, and having regular expression matching as a feature. It is, however a Bashism.
You can use this as a reference to various tests that can be performed with both test commands:
6.4 Bash Conditional Expressions
If at all interested in shell programming, be sure to find out about the various tests you can use, as you are likely to be using many of them frequently.
As addition to Gordon's excellent answer, in Bash you can also use the double-parentheses construct. It works for integers, and it is the closest form to other languages. Demo:
for i in {-2..2}; do
printf "for %s " "$i"
if (( i )) # You can omit the `$`
then
echo is nonzero
else
echo is zero
fi
done
Output:
for -2 is nonzero
for -1 is nonzero
for 0 is zero
for 1 is nonzero
for 2 is nonzero
You can use any arithmetic operations inside, e.g.:
for i in {1..6}; do
printf "for %s " "$i"
if (( i % 2 )) #modulo
then
echo odd
else
echo even
fi
done
Output
for 1 odd
for 2 even
for 3 odd
for 4 even
for 5 odd
for 6 even
Consider this PS1
PS1='\n${_:+$? }$ '
Here is the result of a few commands
$ [ 2 = 2 ]
0 $ [ 2 = 3 ]
1 $
1 $
The first line shows no status as expected, and the next two lines show the
correct exit code. However on line 3 only Enter was pressed, so I would like the
status to go away, like line 1. How can I do this?
Here's a funny, very simple possibility: it uses the \# escape sequence of PS1 together with parameter expansions (and the way Bash expands its prompt).
The escape sequence \# expands to the command number of the command to be executed. This is incremented each time a command has actually been executed. Try it:
$ PS1='\# $ '
2 $ echo hello
hello
3 $ # this is a comment
3 $
3 $ echo hello
hello
4 $
Now, each time a prompt is to be displayed, Bash first expands the escape sequences found in PS1, then (provided the shell option promptvars is set, which is the default), this string is expanded via parameter expansion, command substitution, arithmetic expansion, and quote removal.
The trick is then to have an array that will have the k-th field set (to the empty string) whenever the (k-1)-th command is executed. Then, using appropriate parameter expansions, we'll be able to detect when these fields are set and to display the return code of the previous command if the field isn't set. If you want to call this array __cmdnbary, just do:
PS1='\n${__cmdnbary[\#]-$? }${__cmdnbary[\#]=}\$ '
Look:
$ PS1='\n${__cmdnbary[\#]-$? }${__cmdnbary[\#]=}\$ '
0 $ [ 2 = 3 ]
1 $
$ # it seems that it works
$ echo "it works"
it works
0 $
To qualify for the shortest answer challenge:
PS1='\n${a[\#]-$? }${a[\#]=}$ '
that's 31 characters.
Don't use this, of course, as a is a too trivial name; also, \$ might be better than $.
Seems you don't like that the initial prompt is 0 $; you can very easily modify this by initializing the array __cmdnbary appropriately: you'll put this somewhere in your configuration file:
__cmdnbary=( '' '' ) # Initialize the field 1!
PS1='\n${__cmdnbary[\#]-$? }${__cmdnbary[\#]=}\$ '
Got some time to play around this weekend. Looking at my earlier answer (not-good) and other answers I think this may be probably the smallest answer.
Place these lines at the end of your ~/.bash_profile:
PS1='$_ret$ '
trapDbg() {
local c="$BASH_COMMAND"
[[ "$c" != "pc" ]] && export _cmd="$c"
}
pc() {
local r=$?
trap "" DEBUG
[[ -n "$_cmd" ]] && _ret="$r " || _ret=""
export _ret
export _cmd=
trap 'trapDbg' DEBUG
}
export PROMPT_COMMAND=pc
trap 'trapDbg' DEBUG
Then open a new terminal and note this desired behavior on BASH prompt:
$ uname
Darwin
0 $
$
$
$ date
Sun Dec 14 05:59:03 EST 2014
0 $
$
$ [ 1 = 2 ]
1 $
$
$ ls 123
ls: cannot access 123: No such file or directory
2 $
$
Explanation:
This is based on trap 'handler' DEBUG and PROMPT_COMMAND hooks.
PS1 is using a variable _ret i.e. PS1='$_ret$ '.
trap command runs only when a command is executed but PROMPT_COMMAND is run even when an empty enter is pressed.
trap command sets a variable _cmd to the actually executed command using BASH internal var BASH_COMMAND.
PROMPT_COMMAND hook sets _ret to "$? " if _cmd is non-empty otherwise sets _ret to "". Finally it resets _cmd var to empty state.
The variable HISTCMD is updated every time a new command is executed. Unfortunately, the value is masked during the execution of PROMPT_COMMAND (I suppose for reasons related to not having history messed up with things which happen in the prompt command). The workaround I came up with is kind of messy, but it seems to work in my limited testing.
# This only works if the prompt has a prefix
# which is displayed before the status code field.
# Fortunately, in this case, there is one.
# Maybe use a no-op prefix in the worst case (!)
PS1_base=$'\n'
# Functions for PROMPT_COMMAND
PS1_update_HISTCMD () {
# If HISTCONTROL contains "ignoredups" or "ignoreboth", this breaks.
# We should not change it programmatically
# (think principle of least astonishment etc)
# but we can always gripe.
case :$HISTCONTROL: in
*:ignoredups:* | *:ignoreboth:* )
echo "PS1_update_HISTCMD(): HISTCONTROL contains 'ignoredups' or 'ignoreboth'" >&2
echo "PS1_update_HISTCMD(): Warning: Please remove this setting." >&2 ;;
esac
# PS1_HISTCMD needs to contain the old value of PS1_HISTCMD2 (a copy of HISTCMD)
PS1_HISTCMD=${PS1_HISTCMD2:-$PS1_HISTCMD}
# PS1_HISTCMD2 needs to be unset for the next prompt to trigger properly
unset PS1_HISTCMD2
}
PROMPT_COMMAND=PS1_update_HISTCMD
# Finally, the actual prompt:
PS1='${PS1_base#foo${PS1_HISTCMD2:=${HISTCMD%$PS1_HISTCMD}}}${_:+${PS1_HISTCMD2:+$? }}$ '
The logic in the prompt is roughly as follows:
${PS1_base#foo...}
This displays the prefix. The stuff in #... is useful only for its side effects. We want to do some variable manipulation without having the values of the variables display, so we hide them in a string substitution. (This will display odd and possibly spectacular things if the value of PS1_base ever happens to begin with foo followed by the current command history index.)
${PS1_HISTCMD2:=...}
This assigns a value to PS1_HISTCMD2 (if it is unset, which we have made sure it is). The substitution would nominally also expand to the new value, but we have hidden it in a ${var#subst} as explained above.
${HISTCMD%$PS1_HISTCMD}
We assign either the value of HISTCMD (when a new entry in the command history is being made, i.e. we are executing a new command) or an empty string (when the command is empty) to PS1_HISTCMD2. This works by trimming off the value HISTCMD any match on PS1_HISTCMD (using the ${var%subst} suffix replacement syntax).
${_:+...}
This is from the question. It will expand to ... something if the value of $_ is set and nonempty (which it is when a command is being executed, but not e.g. if we are performing a variable assignment). The "something" should be the status code (and a space, for legibility) if PS1_HISTCMD2 is nonempty.
${PS1_HISTCMD2:+$? }
There.
'$ '
This is just the actual prompt suffix, as in the original question.
So the key parts are the variables PS1_HISTCMD which remembers the previous value of HISTCMD, and the variable PS1_HISTCMD2 which captures the value of HISTCMD so it can be accessed from within PROMPT_COMMAND, but needs to be unset in the PROMPT_COMMAND so that the ${PS1_HISTCMD2:=...} assignment will fire again the next time the prompt is displayed.
I fiddled for a bit with trying to hide the output from ${PS1_HISTCMD2:=...} but then realized that there is in fact something we want to display anyhow, so just piggyback on that. You can't have a completely empty PS1_base because the shell apparently notices, and does not even attempt to perform a substitution when there is no value; but perhaps you can come up with a dummy value (a no-op escape sequence, perhaps?) if you have nothing else you want to display. Or maybe this could be refactored to run with a suffix instead; but that is probably going to be trickier still.
In response to Anubhava's "smallest answer" challenge, here is the code without comments or error checking.
PS1_base=$'\n'
PS1_update_HISTCMD () { PS1_HISTCMD=${PS1_HISTCMD2:-$PS1_HISTCMD}; unset PS1_HISTCMD2; }
PROMPT_COMMAND=PS1_update_HISTCMD
PS1='${PS1_base#foo${PS1_HISTCMD2:=${HISTCMD%$PS1_HISTCMD}}}${_:+${PS1_HISTCMD2:+$? }}$ '
This is probably not the best way to do this, but it seems to be working
function pc {
foo=$_
fc -l > /tmp/new
if cmp -s /tmp/{new,old} || test -z "$foo"
then
PS1='\n$ '
else
PS1='\n$? $ '
fi
cp /tmp/{new,old}
}
PROMPT_COMMAND=pc
Result
$ [ 2 = 2 ]
0 $ [ 2 = 3 ]
1 $
$
I need to use great script bash-preexec.sh.
Although I don't like external dependencies, this was the only thing to help me avoid to have 1 in $? after just pressing enter without running any command.
This goes to your ~/.bashrc:
__prompt_command() {
local exit="$?"
PS1='\u#\h: \w \$ '
[ -n "$LASTCMD" -a "$exit" != "0" ] && PS1='['${red}$exit$clear"] $PS1"
}
PROMPT_COMMAND=__prompt_command
[-f ~/.bash-preexec.sh ] && . ~/.bash-preexec.sh
preexec() { LASTCMD="$1"; }
UPDATE: later I was able to find a solution without dependency on .bash-preexec.sh.
I have the following code in my ~/.bashrc:
date=$(which date)
date() {
if [[ $1 == -R || $1 == --rfc-822 ]]; then
# Output RFC-822 compliant date string.
# e.g. Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:18:11 +0100
$date | sed "s/[^ ][^ ]*$/$($date +%z)/"
else
$date "$#"
fi
}
This works fine, as far as I can tell. Is there a reason to avoid having a variable and a function with the same name?
It's alright apart from being confusing. Besides, they are not the same:
$ date=/bin/ls
$ type date
date is hashed (/bin/date)
$ type $date
/bin/ls is /bin/ls
$ moo=foo
$ type $moo
-bash: type: foo: not found
$ function date() { true; }
$ type date
date is a function
date ()
{
true*emphasized text*
}
$ which true
/bin/true
$ type true
true is a shell builtin
Whenever you type a command, bash looks in three different places to find that command. The priority is as follows:
shell builtins (help)
shell aliases (help alias)
shell functions (help function)
hashed binaries files from $PATH ('leftmost' folders scanned first)
Variables are prefixed with a dollar sign, which makes them different from all of the above. To compare to your example: $date and date are not the same thing. So It's not really possible to have the same name for a variable and a function because they have different "namespaces".
You may find this somewhat confusing, but many scripts define "method variables" at the top of the file. e.g.
SED=/bin/sed
AWK=/usr/bin/awk
GREP/usr/local/gnu/bin/grep
The common thing to do is type the variable names in capitals. This is useful for two purposes (apart from being less confusing):
There is no $PATH
Checking that all "dependencies" are runnable
You can't really check like this:
if [ "`which binary`" ]; then echo it\'s ok to continue.. ;fi
Because which will give you an error if binary has not yet been hashed (found in a path folder).
Since you always have to use $ to dereference a variable in Bash, you're free to use any name you like.
Beware of overriding a global, though.
See also:
http://tldp.org/LDP/Bash-Beginners-Guide/html/sect_03_02.html
An alternative to using a variable: use bash's command keyword (see the manual or run help command from a prompt):
date() {
case $1 in
-R|--rfc-2822) command date ... ;;
*) command date "$#" ;;
esac
}
I wanted to conditionally run a command as a background or foreground process, so I wrote something like this:
test $some_var; bg_suffix=&
long_command $bg_suffix
it doesn't work because bg_suffix is always empty whether it's been assigned or not.
But
test $some_var; bg_suffix="&"
long_command $bg_suffix
doesn't work either because now bg_suffix is interpreted as a string.
Any ideas how to solve this problem? Thanks!
Here is how to do it without using a quote-breaking eval
inBackground () {
t=$1
shift
if $t; then
"$#"&
else
"$#"
fi
}
This lets you do something like:
inBackground false echo '$$'
inBackground true sleep 4
This gets around the problem that all the eval-based solutions have: new and sometimes impossible quoting rules. For example, try to pass the '$$' through eval. Because true and false are not significant to the parser they can be in variables and things will still work.
Of course, if you wanted shell metachars to work (say, you redirect i/o) then eval is better, or you need to define a procedure for the command, and if you define a procedure, you problem is solved:
complicated_command () {
sleep 3
echo replace this with something complex
}
do_background=true
$do_background && (complicated_command&) || complicated_command
How about:
if [[ ${somevar} ]] ; then
long_command &
else
long_command
fi
or, if it is a long command you don't want to have to enter twice:
long_command=insert your big honking command here
if [[ ${somevar} ]] ; then
${long_command} &
else
${long_command}
fi
Just as an aside, I hope you're aware that the command sequence:
test ${condition}; x=2
will set x to 2 regardless of the test results. You may have meant to write:
test ${condition} && x=2
did you try
eval (long_command $bg_suffix)
using bg_suffix="&"
I don't know why I am not able comment, but anyway
test $some_var; bg_suffix="&"
would cause bg_suffix to be set regardless of the result of test.