I tried to load simple page using HTMLUnit it is throwing below error
Enclosed exception:
net.sourceforge.htmlunit.corejs.javascript.EcmaError: ReferenceError: "define" is not defined.
I think this is problem because of ECMA6 ? But I am not able to find any way to resolve
My first attempt would be to ignore all javascript related Exceptions because on most web sites the interesting parts work even if some of the javascript is not executed.
webClient.getOptions().setThrowExceptionOnScriptError(false); // we never want Exceptions because of javascript
Some other properties which are often useful (not directly related to your problem) are:
webClient.setJavaScriptTimeout(30000); // limit to e.g.30s
webClient.getOptions().setTimeout(300000); // timeout to e.g. 300s = 5min
webClient.getOptions().setCssEnabled(false);
webClient.getOptions().setPopupBlockerEnabled(true);
webClient.setRefreshHandler(new WaitingRefreshHandler(...)); // limit the time for refreshes
Related
For handling entities in Drupal I'm using Entity Metadata Wrappers (the "Drupal way").
It's really easy to start coding and see all the advantages it has... except when you get a fatal error and you are not clear where it comes from.
This is what the database log shows:
EntityMetadataWrapperException: Unknown data property
field_whatever. at EntityStructureWrapper->getPropertyInfo()
(line 335 of
/var/www/html/sites/all/modules/entity/includes/entity.wrapper.inc).
Sadly, many times that "field_whatever" is "nid", "uid" or some very common property, so it's name is spread all over my code, which makes me difficult to get to the origin of the error.
I'm currently doing this:
Write a tiny piece of code and then run to see if something fails.
Using getPropertyInfo when handling entities with "not so common" fields.
Loosing hair.
What is worst is that sometimes the error does not appear when you are coding, but a week later. So it could be anywhere...
Is there any way of handling entity metadata wrapper errors better? Can I get better information in the database log and not just a line? A backtrace maybe?
Thanks.
Well, having the devel module active (just to see the nice krumo message) we can do something like this inside our module:
<?php
set_exception_handler('exception_with_trace');
function exception_with_trace($e)
{
dpm($e->getTrace());
}
That will return the backtrace error of the exception thrown by the entity metadata handler on the next page load (some page in your site where everything is running fine).
Also you can set the exception handler exclusively and more elegant just for some pages or some users with some role... or when some parameter in the url is met, or when in some state of your Drupal site is met (ex. when a bool persistent variable 'exception_with_trace' is true). Even, under certain conditions and control, you can use it in production too.
If the site does not work "at all" you can include it in your settings.php file, but instead of printing the trace, you must write the trace to a file and watch the trace in a different context (not Drupal but some php file).
If exceptions are too long and are causing memory problems then getting the trace as string is also possible. See http://php.net/manual/es/exception.gettraceasstring.php
Hope that helps.
I have inherited some GEB tests that are testing logging into a site (and various error cases/validation warnings).
The test runs through some validation failures and then it attempts to re-navigate to the same page (just to refresh the page/dom) and attempts a valid login. Using GEB's to() method, it detects that you are attempting to navigate to the page you are on, it just calls refresh - the problem here is that attempts to refresh the last POST request, and the driver displays the
"To display this page, Firefox must send information that will repeat any action (such as a search or order confirmation) that was performed earlier"
message - as the test is not expecting this popup, it hangs and the tests timeout.
Is there a way to turn off these warnings in Firefox webdriver? or to auto-ignore/accept them via Selenium or GEB?
GEB Version: 0.9.2,
Selenium Version: 2.39.0
(Also tried with minor version above: 0.9.3 & 2.40.0)
Caveats:
I know about the POST/Re-direct/GET pattern - but am not at liberty to change the application code in this case
The warning message only causes an issue intermittently (maybe 1 in 5 times) - I have put this down to speed/race conditions whereby the test completes the next actions before the message appears - I know a possible solution is to update tests to wait for message to appear and then accept, but my question is, is there a global setting that can just avoid these being triggered/displayed?
That refresh() is there to work around an issue with IE driver which ignores calls to driver.get() with the same url as the current one.
Instead of monkey patching Browser class (which might bite you somewhere down the line or might not) I would change the url of your login page class. You might for example add an insignificant query string - I think that simply a ? at the end should suffice. The driver.currentUrl == newUrl condition will evaluate to false and you will not see that popup anymore.
If I understand you issue properly this might help. In Groovy you can modify a class on the fly.
We use Spock with Geb and I placed this in a Super class which all Spock Spec inherit from. Eg: QSpec extends GebSpec.
It is the original method slightly modified with the original code commented out so you know what has been changed. I use this technique in several required places to alter Geb behaviour.
static {
Browser.metaClass.go = { Map params, String url ->
def newUrl = calculateUri(url, params)
// if (driver.currentUrl == newUrl) {
// driver.navigate().refresh()
// } else {
// driver.get(newUrl)
// }
driver.get(newUrl)
if (!page) {
page(Page)
}
}
}
Going from Joomla 2.5 to 3.0 with my extension, I'm struggling with how to do the DB error handling (since GetErrorNum is deprecated, see also Joomla! JDatabase::getErrorNum() is deprecated, use exception handling instead).
The way that seems to be the one to go according to the question linked above, is to add the following code for each db->query() code:
if (!$db->query()) {
throw new Exception($db->getErrorMsg());
}
In my opinion, that makes DB error handling more awkward than it was before. So far, I simply called a checkDBError() function after a DB call, which queried the ErrorNum and handled any possible error accordingly.
That was independent from how the DB query was actually triggered - there are different ways to do that, and different results on an error: $db->loadResult() returns null on error, $db->query() returns false. So there will now be different checks for different DB access types.
Isn't there any generic way to handle this, e.g. a way to tell Joomla to throw some exception on DB problems? Or do I have to write my own wrapper around the DatabaseDriver to achieve that? Or am I maybe missing something obvious?
Or should I just ignore the deprecation warning for now and continue with using getErrorNum()? I'd like to make my extension future-proof, but I also don't want to clutter it too much with awkward error handling logic.
Just found this discussion: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/joomla-dev-general/O-Hp0L6UGcM/XuWLqu2vhzcJ
As I interpret it, there is that deprecation warning, but there is no proper replacement yet anyway...
Unless somebody points out any other proper documentation of how to do it in 3.0, I will keep to the getErrorNum method of doing stuff...
Get getErrorNum() function will solve your problem....
$result = $db->loadResult();
// Check for a database error.
if ($db->getErrorNum())
{
JFactory::getApplication()->enqueueMessage($db->getErrorMsg());
return false;
}
I am trying to implement a custom web resource using jquery/ajax and odata. I ran into trouble and eventually found that when I call:
var serverUrl = context.getServerUrl();
The code throws exceptions.
However, when I change serverUrl to the literal url, it works. I then found forum posts that said I should verify my .aspx page manually by going to https://[org url]//WebResources/ClientGlobalContext.js.aspx to verify that it is working. When I did that I received a warning page:
The XML page cannot be displayed
Cannot view XML input using style sheet. Please correct the error and then click the Refresh button, or try again later.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Invalid at the top level of the document. Error processing resource 'https://[org url]//WebResources/Clien...
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="'+'\x26\x2347\x3b_common\x26\x2347\x3bglobal.ashx\x26\x2363\x3bver\x2...
What the heck does that mean?
Hard to tell outside of context (pun not intended) of your code, but why aren't you doing this?
var serverUrl = Xrm.Page.context.getServerUrl();
(Presumably, because you have defined your own context var?)
Also, this method is deprecated as of Rollup 12, see here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/d7d0b052-abca-4f81-9b86-0b9dc5e62a66. You can now use getClientUrl instead.
I now it is late but hope this will be useful for other people who will face this problem.
Until nowadays even with R15 there are two available ClientGlobalContext.js.aspx
https://[org url]/WebResources/ClientGlobalContext.js.aspx (the bad one)
https://[org url]/[organization name]/[publication id]/WebResources/ClientGlobalContext.js.aspx (The good one)
I don't know why exist 1. but it causes many issues like:
It could not be published or hold information (Your case #Steve).
In a deployment with multiple organizations, seems it saves info only for the last organization deployed causing that methods under Xrm.Page.context. will return info from a fixed organization. Actually each method that underground uses these constants included in ClientGlobalContext.js.aspx: USER_GUID, ORG_LANGUAGE_CODE, ORG_UNIQUE_NAME, SERVER_URL, USER_LANGUAGE_CODE, USER_ROLES, CRM2007_WEBSERVICE_NS, CRM2007_CORETYPES_NS, AUTHENTICATION_TYPE, CURRENT_THEME_TYPE, CURRENT_WEB_THEME, IS_OUTLOOK_CLIENT, IS_OUTLOOK_LAPTOP_CLIENT, IS_OUTLOOK_14_CLIENT, IS_ONLINE, LOCID_UNRECOGNIZE_DOTC, EDIT_PRELOAD, WEB_SERVER_HOST, WEB_SERVER_PORT, IS_PATHBASEDURLS, LOCID_UNRECOGNIZE_DOTC, EDIT_PRELOAD, WEB_RESOURCE_ORG_VERSION_NUMBER, YAMMER_IS_INSTALLED, YAMMER_IS_CONFIGURED_FOR_ORG, YAMMER_APP_ID, YAMMER_NETWORK_NAME, YAMMER_GROUP_ID, YAMMER_TOKEN_EXPIRED, YAMMER_IS_CONFIGURED_FOR_USER, YAMMER_HAS_CONFIGURE_PRIVILEGE, YAMMER_POST_METHOD. For instance method Xrm.Page.context.getUserId() is implemented as return window.USER_GUID;
To be sure that your URL is the correct just follow the link posted by #Chris
I have a coworker who's written the following line in the page load method in an aspx page:
myDataSet = (DataSet)HttpContext.Current.Cache["dataset"];
The first time I hit the page HttpContext.Current.Cache["dataset"] reads null. When he does it, the value is "" (string.Empty) and he gets a cast exception.
We're both running ASP.Net 2.0 on our development machines, he's cleared his browser cache and run an iisreset, yet that thing still reads "" the first time he hits the page. Does anyone have ideas on what we can check to explain this discrepancy?
Try this instead for now, you'll at least avoid hitting the exception:
myDataSet = HttpContext.Current.Cache["dataset"] as DataSet;
I'd search your code and see what is actually assigning "dataset" into the cache. Something's got to be putting an empty string in there. Finding that may lead you to some other code that would explain the different results.
Without any real code samples, it's hard to troubleshoot.
Perhaps you should try to use HttpRuntime.Cache instead of the HttpContext.Current.Cache.
http://theengineroom.provoke.co.nz/archive/2007/04/27/caching-using-httpruntime-cache.aspx
Difference between HttpRuntime.Cache and HttpContext.Current.Cache?