In auth.php configuration file I have default setting:
'defaults' => [
'guard' => 'api',
'passwords' => 'users',
],
It means that by defauls will be used api authorization with api_token.
How to use web/api guard in the same time?
Because I have two parts of application, web and RESTfull.
When I use 'guard' => 'api' and try to logout/Login from web version of application, I get error:
Call to undefined method Illuminate\Auth\TokenGuard::attempt()
Call to undefined method Illuminate\Auth\TokenGuard::logout()
Related
We have several Laravel applications that use Backpack for the admin panel. A developer wrote a package that used Single sign-on. We have removed this package as it was not working correctly. Once Composer was used to updating Laravel and remove the package, there are NO routes to deal with admin login. Our applications use Laravel 5.8/6 and Backpack 3.6/4.0.
I created another test application with Laravel 5.8 using Backpack 3.6, and the routes are available for login. As you can see, all the login routes are available.
If you look at the following image, you can see the login routes are all missing.
Is there a way to add the routes in again? Laravel Backpack is still installed, but I need to re-register the routes.
All the settings in the application are set to default. I have even made the default authentication guard in config/auth.php to Backpack.
config/auth.php
'defaults' => [
'guard' => 'backpack',
'passwords' => 'users',
],
'providers' => [
'users' => [
'driver' => 'eloquent',
'model' => App\Models\User::class,
],
],
config/backpack/base.php
'route_prefix' => 'admin',
'setup_auth_routes' => false,
'setup_dashboard_routes' => true,
'setup_my_account_routes' => true,
'user_model_fqn' => App\Models\BackpackUser::class,
'middleware_class' => [
App\Http\Middleware\CheckIfAdmin::class,
\Illuminate\Foundation\Http\Middleware\ConvertEmptyStringsToNull::class,
// \Backpack\Base\app\Http\Middleware\UseBackpackAuthGuardInsteadOfDefaultAuthGuard::class,
],
// Alias for that middleware
'middleware_key' => 'admin',
'authentication_column' => 'email',
'authentication_column_name' => 'Email',
'guard' => 'backpack',
'passwords' => 'backpack',
config/backpack/permissionmanager.php
'models' => [
'user' => App\Models\BackpackUser::class,
'permission' => Backpack\PermissionManager\app\Models\Permission::class,
'role' => Backpack\PermissionManager\app\Models\Role::class,
],
'allow_permission_create' => false,
'allow_permission_update' => false,
'allow_permission_delete' => false,
'allow_role_create' => true,
'allow_role_update' => true,
'allow_role_delete' => true,
'multiple_guards' => true,
app/Models/BackpackUser.php
class BackpackUser extends User
{
use CrudTrait;
use HasRoles;
use InheritsRelationsFromParentModel;
protected $table = 'users';
public function sendPasswordResetNotification($token)
{
$this->notify(new ResetPasswordNotification($token));
}
public function getEmailForPasswordReset()
{
return $this->email;
}
}
So pretty much standard settings. I cannot figure out why the routes are not registered and available. If you get to http://localhost/admin, I get redirected to http://localhost/admin/login, which gives a 404 error. Can anyone help?
You have to enable 'setup_auth_routes' => true in config/base.php. This will allow Backpack to use the standard routes. Then the second step is to use Auth::routes(); inside your routes/web.php
If you are missing some/all of the controllers or UIs then you can scaffold them:
Install laravel/ui part using composer require laravel/ui
Use php artisan ui vue --auth or php artisan ui bootstrap --auth or php artisan ui react --auth depending on what you use for the front-end.
I'm writing my first Laravel app that also includes Vue. I'm pretty new to both Laravel and Vue so please be gentle ;-) I'm using Laravel 8.4.x and Vue 2.6.12 on Windows 10.
In my very first axios invocation, I'm trying to write of a single record to a database table in a submit method of my Vue component, I'm getting Http status code 500, internal server error. The response in the console says that Laravel doesn't see a controller with the name ToDoController. I have no idea why that would be since I created it properly with php artisan and I can see it in VS Code.
In looking at other posts to try to understand this problem, I see that people recommend looking in the server logs to find out more information. I'm not sure if the logs will have information not found in the response situated in the browser console but I won't know until I look at it. The problem is that I don't know where to look for my log.
According to the Laravel docs, logging is governed by config/logging.php and that file says:
<?php
use Monolog\Handler\NullHandler;
use Monolog\Handler\StreamHandler;
use Monolog\Handler\SyslogUdpHandler;
return [
/*
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Default Log Channel
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| This option defines the default log channel that gets used when writing
| messages to the logs. The name specified in this option should match
| one of the channels defined in the "channels" configuration array.
|
*/
'default' => env('LOG_CHANNEL', 'stack'),
/*
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Log Channels
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| Here you may configure the log channels for your application. Out of
| the box, Laravel uses the Monolog PHP logging library. This gives
| you a variety of powerful log handlers / formatters to utilize.
|
| Available Drivers: "single", "daily", "slack", "syslog",
| "errorlog", "monolog",
| "custom", "stack"
|
*/
'channels' => [
'stack' => [
'driver' => 'stack',
'channels' => ['single'],
'ignore_exceptions' => false,
],
'single' => [
'driver' => 'single',
'path' => storage_path('logs/laravel.log'),
'level' => env('LOG_LEVEL', 'debug'),
],
'daily' => [
'driver' => 'daily',
'path' => storage_path('logs/laravel.log'),
'level' => env('LOG_LEVEL', 'debug'),
'days' => 14,
],
'slack' => [
'driver' => 'slack',
'url' => env('LOG_SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL'),
'username' => 'Laravel Log',
'emoji' => ':boom:',
'level' => env('LOG_LEVEL', 'critical'),
],
'papertrail' => [
'driver' => 'monolog',
'level' => env('LOG_LEVEL', 'debug'),
'handler' => SyslogUdpHandler::class,
'handler_with' => [
'host' => env('PAPERTRAIL_URL'),
'port' => env('PAPERTRAIL_PORT'),
],
],
'stderr' => [
'driver' => 'monolog',
'handler' => StreamHandler::class,
'formatter' => env('LOG_STDERR_FORMATTER'),
'with' => [
'stream' => 'php://stderr',
],
],
'syslog' => [
'driver' => 'syslog',
'level' => env('LOG_LEVEL', 'debug'),
],
'errorlog' => [
'driver' => 'errorlog',
'level' => env('LOG_LEVEL', 'debug'),
],
'null' => [
'driver' => 'monolog',
'handler' => NullHandler::class,
],
'emergency' => [
'path' => storage_path('logs/laravel.log'),
],
],
];
If I'm understanding this correctly, that means that errors at DEBUG or above are being written to logs/laravel.log, which I should be seeing in VS Code. But I do not even have a logs directory, let alone a laravel.log file.
Do I need to do something to create these logs in the first place as part of creating a new project? If so, what? If not, why don't I see my log? A server error is significant enough to get written into the log, right?
Also, while we're on the subject of logs, I have a chicken and egg question: does the value of LOG_CHANNEL in the logging.php file get set from the .env file or does the .env file get the value in the logging.php file? In other words, if I want to change my logging behaviour, which one do I alter?
The logs directory is located in the storage directory. So it's storage/logs/laravel.log.
Also, you can choose to log anything you want to using the Log facade. See laravel writing log messages [https://laravel.com/docs/8.x/logging#writing-log-messages]. Anything that is wrapped in the env() function is being pulled from the env file. The second param allows you to set a default if that value is not set or available in the env file. 1
#Donkarnash - I strongly suspect you've identified the problem. I'm not up on the new features of Laravel 8. What would my Route look like if I have a FQCN for the controller? I've tried all the variations I can think of but nothing works, including url('app/Http/Controllers/ToDoController')
Since Laravel 8 the default namespace App\Http\Controllers is not set in the RouteServiceProvider - which is a welcome change.
So now when defining routes in routes files say routes/web.php FQCN of the controller must be used
use App\Http\Controllers\ToDoController;
Route::get('/todos', [ToDoController::class, 'index']);
//OR without importing the use statement
Route::get('/todos', [\App\Http\Controllers\ToDoController::class, 'index']);
If you want you can also use namespace method for route groups
Route::namespace('App\Http\Controllers')
->group(function(){
Route::get('/todos', 'ToDoController#index');
Route::get('/todos/{todo}', 'ToDoController#show');
});
Using FQCN as in either importing use statement or inline also provides benefits of easy navigation and code suggestions in IDE's
To revert back to the old convention and set default namespace you should declare
$namespace in RouteServiceProvider
/**
* The controller namespace for the application.
*
* When present, controller route declarations will automatically be prefixed with this namespace.
*
* #var string|null
*/
protected $namespace = 'App\\Http\\Controllers';
PHP 7.3
Laravel 5.8
Until now I was using Predis for my cache in the Laravel project. Now I want to switch to PhpRedis. I've read it's really simple (just config changes), but I have a lot of problems. I don't know what to begin with, so I'll write all what I know.
My hosting provider claims that PhpRedis is enabled.
The code below executed in a controller (Predis is set) works fine - I receive the set value.
$redis = new \Redis();
$redis->connect( 'socket path', 0 );
$redis->set('test', 'testValue');
print_r( $redis->get('test') );
However, the same code in the raw PHP file executed via SSH returns "Uncaught Error: Class 'Redis' not found in..."
Let's go to changes in config/database.php. Here is my configuration:
'redis' => [
'client' => env('REDIS_CLIENT', 'predis'/*'phpredis'*/),
'cluster' => true,
'options' => [
'cluster' => env('REDIS_CLUSTER', 'predis'/*'redis'*/),
'prefix' => Str::slug(env('APP_NAME'), '_').'_',
'parameters' => ['password' => env('REDIS_PASSWORD', null)],
],
'default' => [
'scheme' => 'unix',
'path' => env('REDIS_HOST'),
'host' => env('REDIS_HOST'),
'password' => env('REDIS_PASSWORD'),
'port' => env('REDIS_PORT'),
'database' => env('REDIS_CACHE_DB', 0)
],
(...) // other
],
When I change values to these in comments, my website shows just a blank page - any errors in the mailbox.
Furthermore, when I run for example "php73 artisan config:clear" in the SSH, console returns "Please remove or rename the Redis facade alias in your "app" configuration file in order to avoid collision with the PHP Redis extension." in the Illuminate/Redis/Connectors/PhpRedisConnector.php.
When I change the alias in config/app.php from "Redis" to "RedisManager" and try again it returns
Uncaught Error: Class 'Redis' not found in /path/vendor/laravel/framework/src/Illuminate/Redis/Connectors/PhpRedisConnector.php:70.
What's going on? How to set Laravel's configuration to use PhpRedis? Maybe it's my hosting provider issue? Thanks in advance for every advice.
If I missed some important code, give me a sign - I will add it.
The PHPRedis libraries are not installed by default in a shared hosting environment, and are generally not part of a PHP installation by default. You would have to ask your host to install these libraries within their shared hosting platform.
I am trying to figure out to provide multiple ways of authentication for the API service within my Laravel app. The app is a SPA using Vue.js and uses the API route to render and present all the view components. Currently, I am using a JWT driver for the API guard within the application. However, I'd also like to offer my clients the ability to access the same API via OAuth and Laravel's personal API token. With that being said, how do I protect my resources with the Auth middleware where it can be accessed internally with a JWT or externally by a client with OAuth or an API Token.
Controller:
/**
* Create a new controller instance.
*
* #return void
*/
public function __construct()
{
// Make sure user is authenticated
$this->middleware('auth:api');
//$this->middleware('auth:oauth');
}
Auth Guards:
'guards' => [
'web' => [
'driver' => 'session',
'provider' => 'users',
],
'api' => [
'driver' => 'jwt',
'provider' => 'users',
],
'oauth' => [
'driver' => 'token',
'provider' => 'users',
]
],
If you want to be able allow multiple guards for your routes you can supply the different guards to the middleware call, like you have done already with the api guard, except you supply them as comma separated values:
$this->middleware('auth:api,oauth,web');
This will mean that if a user has been authenticated with one of the guards they will be able to access the route(s).
I have changed settings in Auth.php file on the default API guard:
'defaults' => [
'guard' => 'api',
'passwords' => 'users',
],
Now when I try to register a new user using web form I get error:
FatalThrowableError in RegistersUsers.php line 32:
Call to undefined method Illuminate\Auth\TokenGuard::login()
How can I fix it and register new user with RESTful mechanism?