I was able to register the single nodejs app instance using the netflix sidecar app successfully. Both nodejs and sidecar bridge app are running in Cloud foundry.
Result:
SAMPLE-NODEJS n/a (1) (1) UP (1)
When i scale the nodeJS app to 3 instances, could not see the scaled instances in Eureka service registry. It still shows 1 instance.
Can some one help me to do this....
I want to register all the instances of Nodejs app with Eureka service registry with Sidecar bridge app.
Pls.. help.
Regards
Purandhar
Sidecar, like the eureka java client is built to register only one application with the eureka server at a time. It is not a eureka proxy for multiple applications. I built a proof of concept proxy that will do what you want.
This happens because it's not your node application, which is registering to eureka, but your sidecar, which still runs in one instance.
simple solution
you scale your sidecars with your node apps. This is quite straight forward, in particular when using container based deployment. You just can craft a docker container starting both, a node instance and a sidecar.
load balancing
you can extend your sidecar application to load balance traffic to your sidecars. Then your node apps will still be shown as a single instance, but still have load balancing to scaled node instances
Related
I am trying to deploy Spring Boot microservices using Docker using Appmesh and EC2. I have deployed two sample microservices (https://github.com/amitgct/appmesh-hello) namely: caller-service and called-service using docker on a single EC2 instance and configured appmesh accordingly by following guide https://docs.aws.amazon.com/app-mesh/latest/userguide/getting-started-ec2.html. Currently, my applications are running on ec2 but they cannot communicate with each other and getting error on calling called-service from caller-service i.e. Unknown host. Can anyone tell me how can I specify hostname and register service with that host on EC2 and App mesh. (Note: I don't want to use kubernetes, ECS, AWS cloud map, AWS Route53) . If can provide example also then very thankful to you. Please help.
https://www.appmeshworkshop.com/servicediscovery/
here's a step by step process shown, and this is for http protocol...
but if you change the listeners section in virtual routes to tcp then it should work for TCP messages as well - for those systems which works on tcp protocol - example Akka Clusters
I am new to Microservices. (Learning phase). I have a question. We deploy microservices at cloud. (e.g. AWS). Cloud already provide load balancing and logs. And We also implement Load Balancing(Ribbon) and logs(Rabbit MQ and Zipkin) in Spring Boot.
What is the difference in these two implementation? Do we need both?
Can some answer these questions.
Thanks in advance.
Ribbon is a client side load balancer which means there is no any other hop in between your client and service. Basically you keep and maintain a list of service on your client.
In AWS load balancer case you need to make another hop in between the client and server.
Both have advanges and disadvantages. Former has the advantage of not having any dependency to any specific external solution. Basically with ribbon and service discovery like eureka you can deploy your product to any cloud provider or on-premise setup without additional effort. Latter has advantage of not needing an extra component of service discovery or keeping the cache of service list on client. But it has that additional hop which might be an issue if you are trying to run an very high-load system.
Although I don't have much experience with AWS CloudWatch what I know is it helps you to collect logs to a central place from different AWS components. And that is what you are trying to do with your solution.
I've started building a microservice application with the netflix stack, and have been successful in registering clients with the eureka discovery server.
I want to have two instances of each client service,
and i'm wondering what happens if one instance of a client goes down. Does loadbalancing handle such situations ? If yes, then isn't eureka also acting as a failover system ?
We have a collection of microservices built with Spring Boot, using Spring Cloud Netflix. Up until now, they've been packaged as RPMs and deployed to VMs. Using Eureka has allowed for service registration/discovery (obviously) and our cross-microservice interaction to be done using Spring's RestTemplate with a Virtual IP (VIP), like the following:
http://foo-service/<PATH_TO_RESOURCE>
Client-side load-balancing was another benefit.
Now, we are looking to use Docker and run within Rancher. I'm wondering using Eureka still makes sense in this environment.
Within Rancher, if the Service is named 'foo-service', that name is used as a VIP within the Rancher internal network so the same URL shown above can also work, sans Eureka.
Also, if there are multiple Containers backing a Service, Rancher will round-robin load-balance traffic amongst them.
Plus, it seems Rancher will know about Containers coming and going sooner than Eureka would.
I'm struggling to find a solid reason to keep Eureka.
Not much familiar with Rancher, AFAIK it enables users to deploy a choice of Cattle, Docker Swarm, Apache Mesos or Kubernetes to manage your containers.
So, it finally comes down to whether your infrastructure platform provides service discovery functionality or not (I know Docker swarm and Kubernetes provides Service discovery, not sure about the others); if you get free service discovery out of the box from your platform and if you don't need client side load balancing, eureka is an overkill.
Here is an answer for the question in context of Kubernetes
https://stackoverflow.com/a/40568412/6785908
Quoting the relevant parts
In Kubernetes platform, using Eureka (Or Consul/zookeeper any
other service registries) for service discovery is an overkill; you
can achieve the same (arguably) functionality with Kubernetes Services
(+kube DNS Addon), which will act as a referable IP address and a load
balancer (not client side) for the ephemeral Pods. Read this
[article][1] by Christian Posta. If you want to refer your service by
its name instead of IP address add KubeDNS (A kubernetes add on) to
your cluster.
http://blog.christianposta.com/microservices/netflix-oss-or-kubernetes-how-about-both/
Edit
Since you said,
Within Rancher, if the Service is named 'foo-service', it is used as a
VIP within the Rancher internal network so the same URL shown above
can also work, sans Eureka.
Also, if there are multiple Containers backing a Service, Rancher will
round-robing load-balance traffic amongst them.
So you are getting both Service discovery and the (server side) load balancer from your platform for free. So if you don't have a compelling reason to do client side load balancing, forget about eureka.
In my project we have a requirement to run two instances of spring cloud config server so if one instance goes down, other will take care the config server responsibilities.
Currently, you would need to put config server behind a load balancer. It is stateless, so that wouldn't hurt. There is an open issue to configure multiple config server url's in the client, so it could do failover there.
If you are running multiple instances of the config server, you can have them all register themselves in Eureka, and maybe do a lookup to the config server with it's application name via Eureka in all the other microservices. This way, Zuul (and Ribbon) will take care of the load balancing.
Edit:
I guess spencergibb is right. It's best to use a load balancer, for eg: ELB, if you're going to deploy on AWS.
Consider multiple spring-cloud-config-uris for high availability