I'm currently trying to set-up Apache Ignite with C3P0 as my JDBC Connection pool, but I noticed that since the Ignite driver doesn't support transactions, C3P0's not usable.
Has anyone had any luck getting a JDBC connection pool going with the Ignite driver? Suggestions?
EDIT:
Updating with exactly why C3P0 doesn't work with Ignite's JDBC Driver
So take a look at this line of code
To create a new pooled connection, C3P0 attempts to set transaction isolation through the connection/driver.
That eventually leads us to this line of code in the Ignite driver, which basically tells us that the Ignite driver doesn't support SQL transactions.
Ignite itself DOES support transactions as specified here but it appears the JDBC implementation does not.
So I need an alternative to C3P0 if I want to set up a JDBC connection pool; any suggestions?
It turns out the JDBC driver for Apache Ignite isn't currently JDBC compliant. Specifically the part that breaks it is that it doesn't have transaction support. As a result, your typical JDBC-pool implementation won't work with the Ignite Driver
There's now a ticket for this here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4191
BasicDataSource ds = new BasicDataSource();
ds.setDriverClassName("org.apache.ignite.IgniteJdbcDriver");
ds.setUrl("jdbc:ignite:cfg://cache=default#file:///the/path/to/ignite-config.xml");
ds.setInitialSize(2);
ds.setMinIdle(2);
Try BasicDataSource http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-dbcp/configuration.html
Related
I'm using Quarkus and have a project with two default datasources connecting to the same database, one uses JDBC (Agroal) for a postgres copy operation, the other uses reactive (PgPool) for all other sql operations.
There's an option in quarkus QUARKUS_DATASOURCE_JDBC_POOLING_ENABLED that can be set to false to disable connection pooling for JDBC datasource. So my question is:
Does reactive and JDBC datasources share the same connection pool? If I disable the JDBC pooling, will it affect the reactive connection pool?
Is there a way to verify such behavior?
Thank you all.
Trying to figure out the behavior between reactive and JDBC datasource regarding connection pooling. Expecting that turning off the pooling for JDBC via the config QUARKUS_DATASOURCE_JDBC_POOLING_ENABLED will not impact reactive connection pool.
Currently we are using and have configured Oracle using the JDBC Driver.
We configure the org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource bean.
But how can failover parameters like ONSConfiguration and FastConnectionFailover be configured?
Is this the right way?
<property name="connectionProperties" value="ONSConfiguration=adczatdb01:6200,adczatdb02:6200,slcc17adm01:6200,slcc17adm02:6200" />
You need to use Universal Connection Pool (ucp.jar) to use Fast Connection Failover (FCF) along with the JDBC driver (ojdbc8.jar). Also, the UCP version that you are using is important too. Check out the whitepaper for more details on how these connection properties are set. Also, check out UCP developer's guide.
I am using hive 2.1.0 version.
I have a jdbc connection from java side to connect to hive server2. But now i need to create a jdbc connection once and create a datasource pool so that the multiple queries do not create a new connection everytime and use the pooling mechanism instead. Is there any way to implement the pooling mechanism in hive?
Thanks in advance...
I have an Enterprise Application (ear) deployed in this configuration enviroment:
Weblogic 12c (12.1.1) + Oracle RAC 11g (release 2).
Web Module is an MVC application, implemented with Struts 2 and Spring-framework (3.2.2) for core services. Spring JDBC is used for database access with simple JdbcTemplate for single statements and DatasourceTransactionManager for complex ones. I noticed a strange behavior when I enable Weblogic jdbc logs. When I start a new transaction, I can see jdbc info logs about transaction creation, retriving jdbc connection from weblogic datasource pool and setting autocommit property to false value over connection itself. But I can't see transaction releasing connection log, and restoring autocommit flag to true value after commit/rollback invocation.
It's possible that Spring Transaction Manager does not release jdbc connection and does not restore "autocommit" value flag (to true)? After a while I can see within my application some persistent locks on db tables, causing an overall defect of my application and that I would not have depended on the behavior of the transaction manager.
Has anyone noticed a similar behavior?
Is it possible that jdbc connection is not released by the framework and it can compete in multiple transactions (as seen in jdbc log)?
Thanks
Paolo
Since you are using managed DataSource from WebLogic (JNDI?) you have to use managed TransactionManager as well:
<tx:jta-transaction-manager/>
should be enough:
if (weblogicPresent) {
return WEBLOGIC_JTA_TRANSACTION_MANAGER_CLASS_NAME;
}
And it is instead of that DatasourceTransactionManager.
What's the difference between MysqlConnectionPoolDataSource and C3p0, BoneCP or dbcp library for connection pooling? I don't understand why use a library if mysql connector give connection pooling.
A ConnectionPoolDataSource is not a connection pool (or at least: it shouldn't be), it is intended to be used by a DataSource that provides pooling (eg from an application server). A ConnectionPoolDataSource provides the physical connections that will be held in the connection pool. Besides creating those physical connections a ConnectionPoolDataSource shouldn't do anything else.
So if you are working in an application server, use the pooling provided by the DataSources of the application server. If you are in a standalone application or a server that doesn't provide datasources on its own, use third party connection pools like BoneCP, c3p0 or Apache DBCP. If MySQL also provides a normal DataSource that provides pooling, then you could use that.