I'm trying to see how it would be possible to chain together x number of ObservableCollections.CollectionChanged event, exposed as a N level depth object tree to a single parent level CollectionChanged event that consumers can listen to? Essentially I want to funnel or bubble all child CollectionChanged events up to the top most parent. A number of solution I've noticed that tackle similar issues make an assumption of a fixed number of levels, say 2 deep. I idea is to support any level of depth.
Originally I had hoped I could just pass the instance of the FieldInfos to the child constructors and attach directly to the handler. However i get an error stating the "Event 'CollectionChanged' can only appear on the left hand side of+= or -=.
Thanks,
public class FieldInfos
{
public event NotifyCollectionChangedEventHandler CollectionChanged;
private ObservableCollection<Field> _fields;
public ObservableCollection<Field> Fields => _fields ?? (_fields = new ObservableCollection<Field>());
}
public class Field
{
public string Name;
private ObservableCollection<FieldInstance> _instances;
public ObservableCollection<FieldInstance> Instances => _instances ?? (_instances = new ObservableCollection<FieldInstance>());
}
public class FieldInstance
{
public string Id { get; set; }
}
The simplest approach is subclass the original ObservableCollection<T>.
You'd need at least one interface to avoid covariance problems. You can also have your own classes to implement the INotifyDescendantsChanged interface.
public interface INotifyDescendantsChanged
{
event NotifyCollectionChangedEventHandler DescendantsChanged;
}
public class ObservableBubbleCollection<T> : ObservableCollection<T>, INotifyDescendantsChanged
{
public event NotifyCollectionChangedEventHandler DescendantsChanged;
protected virtual void OnDescendantsChanged(object sender, NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
NotifyCollectionChangedEventHandler handler = DescendantsChanged;
if (handler != null)
handler(sender, e);
}
private readonly Func<T, INotifyDescendantsChanged> childSelector;
public ObservableBubbleCollection() { }
public ObservableBubbleCollection(Func<T, INotifyDescendantsChanged> childSelector)
{
this.childSelector = childSelector;
}
protected override void OnCollectionChanged(NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
base.OnCollectionChanged(e);
OnDescendantsChanged(this, e);
if (childSelector == null)
return;
if (e.NewItems != null)
foreach (var item in e.NewItems.Cast<T>())
childSelector(item).DescendantsChanged += OnDescendantsChanged;
if (e.OldItems != null)
foreach (var item in e.OldItems.Cast<T>())
childSelector(item).DescendantsChanged -= OnDescendantsChanged;
}
}
To use it, replace instances of ObservableCollection and pass a selector to the collection.
public class FieldInfos
{
private ObservableBubbleCollection<Field> _fields;
public ObservableBubbleCollection<Field> Fields => _fields ?? (_fields = new ObservableBubbleCollection<Field>(fi => fi.Instances));
}
public class Field
{
public string Name;
private ObservableBubbleCollection<FieldInstance> _instances;
public ObservableBubbleCollection<FieldInstance> Instances => _instances ?? (_instances = new ObservableBubbleCollection<FieldInstance>());
}
public class FieldInstance
{
public string Id { get; set; }
}
static class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var fi = new FieldInfos();
fi.Fields.DescendantsChanged += (sender, e) =>
{
Console.WriteLine("Change from {0}", sender.GetType());
};
var field = new Field();
fi.Fields.Add(field);
field.Instances.Add(new FieldInstance());
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
Related
I have a carouselview, in that view I have an ObservableCollection binded as an itemssource. I am able to bind the collection and it would show when I execute the viewmodel's command in the OnAppearing event.
Code that works:
Second Page
public partial class SecondPage : ContentPage
{
public Coll(bool hard, string subject)
{
InitializeComponent();
var vm = (DataSelectionViewModel)BindingContext;
vm.Hard = hard;
vm.Subject = subject;
/* had to set "hard" and "subject" here again, otherwise data won't load */
}
protected override async void OnAppearing()
{
var vm = (DataSelectionViewModel)BindingContext;
base.OnAppearing();
await vm.LoadData.ExecuteAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
}
}
The viewmodel for second page
public class DataSelectionViewModel : BaseViewModel
{
private string subject;
public string Subject { get => subject; set => SetProperty(ref subject, value); }
private bool hard;
public bool Hard { get => hard; set => SetProperty(ref hard, value); }
public ObservableCollection<Items> FilteredData { get; set; }
public UserSelectionViewModel()
{
_dataStore = DependencyService.Get<IDataStore>();
LoadData= new AsyncAwaitBestPractices.MVVM.AsyncCommand(FilterData);
FilteredData = new ObservableCollection<Items>();
}
public async Task FilterData()
{
FilteredData.Clear();
var filtereddata = await _dataStore.SearchData(Hard, Subject).ConfigureAwait(false);
foreach (var data in filtereddata)
{
FilteredData.Add(data);
}
}
}
First Page where second page gets Hard and Subject values
private async void ButtonClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
var vm = (BaseViewModel)BindingContext;
vm.Hard = HardButtonSelected == Hard;
vm.Subject = vm.Subject.ToLower();
await Navigation.PushAsync(new SecondPage(vm.Hard, vm.Subject));
}
So I want to change my code so that if I press the button on the first page, data instantly starts to filter and add to the ObservableCollection and when it's finished, then navigate to the second page. However if I try to load it to the BaseViewModel and then get the data from the second viewmodel it won't show the data.
Code that doesn't work:
Second Page
public partial class SecondPage : ContentPage
{
public SecondPage()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
}
The viewmodel for second page
public class DataSelectionViewModel : BaseViewModel
{
public ObservableCollection<Items> FilteredData { get; set; }
public UserSelectionViewModel()
{
FilteredData = new ObservableCollection<Items>();
}
}
BaseViewModel
public class BaseViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
private string subject;
public string Subject { get => subject; set => SetProperty(ref subject, value); }
private bool hard;
public bool Hard { get => hard; set => SetProperty(ref hard, value); }
public ObservableCollection<Items> FilteredData { get; set; }
/* BaseViewModel has implementation of SetProperty */
}
First Page where second page gets Hard and Subject values
private async void ButtonClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
var vm = (BaseViewModel)BindingContext;
vm.Hard = HardButtonSelected == Hard;
vm.Subject = vm.Subject.ToLower();
}
First Page viewmodel
public class FirstPageViewModel : BaseViewModel
{
public IAsyncCommand MehetButtonClickedCommand { get; }
readonly IPageService pageService;
readonly IFeladatokStore _feladatokStore;
public FeladatValasztoViewModel()
{
_dataStore = DependencyService.Get<IDataStore>();
ButtonClickedCommand = new AsyncCommand(ButtonClicked);
pageService = DependencyService.Get<IPageService>();
}
private async Task ButtonClicked()
{
await FilterData();
await pageService.PushAsync(new SecondPage());
}
private async Task FilterData()
{
FilteredData.Clear();
var datas = await _dataStore.SearchData(Subject, Hard).ConfigureAwait(false);
foreach (var data in datas)
{
FilteredData.Add(data);
}
}
So basically this gives a null exception error. I also tried giving the ObservableCollection as an argument for SecondPage(ObservableCollection x) and that did work, but because I had to make another ObservableCollection for it and copy from one to another it stopped being async and froze for a couple of seconds. So my question is how can I make this async?
To avoid delay, build the new collection in a private variable. Then set the property to that variable:
// Constructor with parameter
public SomeClass(IList<Items> data)
{
SetFilteredDataCopy(data);
}
public ObservableCollection<Items> FilteredData { get; set; }
private void SetFilteredDataCopy(IList<Items> src)
{
var copy = new ObservableCollection<Items>();
foreach (var item in src)
copy.Add(item);
FilteredData = copy;
//MAYBE OnPropertyChanged(nameof(FilteredData));
}
Trying to model a system sending out notifications from a number of publishers using RX.
I have two custom interfaces ITopicObservable and ITopicObserver to model the fact that the implementing classes will have other properties and methods apart from the IObservable and IObserver interfaces.
The problem I have is that my thinking is I should be able to add a number of observables together, merge them together and subscribe to an observer to provide updates from all merged observables. However the code with "the issue" comment throws an invalid cast exception.
The use case is a number of independent sensors each monitoring a temperature in a box for example that aggregate all their reports to one temperature report which is then subscribed to by a temperature health monitor.
What am I missing here? Or is there a better way to implement the scenario using RX?
Code below
using System;
using System.Reactive.Linq;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace test
{
class MainClass
{
public static void Main (string[] args)
{
Console.WriteLine ("Hello World!");
var to = new TopicObserver ();
var s = new TopicObservable ("test");
var agg = new AggregatedTopicObservable ();
agg.Add (s);
agg.Subscribe (to);
}
}
public interface ITopicObservable<TType>:IObservable<TType>
{
string Name{get;}
}
public class TopicObservable:ITopicObservable<int>
{
public TopicObservable(string name)
{
Name = name;
}
#region IObservable implementation
public IDisposable Subscribe (IObserver<int> observer)
{
return null;
}
#endregion
#region ITopicObservable implementation
public string Name { get;private set;}
#endregion
}
public class AggregatedTopicObservable:ITopicObservable<int>
{
List<TopicObservable> _topics;
private ITopicObservable<int> _observable;
private IDisposable _disposable;
public AggregatedTopicObservable()
{
_topics = new List<TopicObservable>();
}
public void Add(ITopicObservable<int> observable)
{
_topics.Add ((TopicObservable)observable);
}
#region IObservable implementation
public IDisposable Subscribe (IObserver<int> observer)
{
_observable = (ITopicObservable<int>)_topics.Merge ();
_disposable = _observable.Subscribe(observer);
return _disposable;
}
#endregion
#region ITopicObservable implementation
public string Name { get;private set;}
#endregion
}
public interface ITopicObserver<TType>:IObserver<TType>
{
string Name{get;}
}
public class TopicObserver:ITopicObserver<int>
{
#region IObserver implementation
public void OnNext (int value)
{
Console.WriteLine ("next {0}", value);
}
public void OnError (Exception error)
{
Console.WriteLine ("error {0}", error.Message);
}
public void OnCompleted ()
{
Console.WriteLine ("finished");
}
#endregion
#region ITopicObserver implementation
public string Name { get;private set;}
#endregion
}
}
My first thought, is that you shouldn't implement IObservable<T>, you should compose it by exposing it as a property or the result of a method.
Second thought is that there are operators in Rx that excel at merging/aggregating multiple sequences together.
You should favor using those.
Third, which is similar to the first, you generally don't implement IObserver<T>, you just subscribe to the observable sequence and provide delegates for each call back (OnNext, OnError and OnComplete)
So your code basically is reduced to
Console.WriteLine("Hello World!");
var topic1 = TopicListener("test1");
var topic2 = TopicListener("test2");
topic1.Merge(topic2)
.Subscribe(
val => { Console.WriteLine("One of the topics published this value {0}", val);},
ex => { Console.WriteLine("One of the topics errored. Now the whole sequence is dead {0}", ex);},
() => {Console.WriteLine("All topics have completed.");});
Where TopicListener(string) is just a method that returns IObservable<T>.
The implementation of the TopicListener(string) method would most probably use Observable.Create.
It may help to see examples of mapping Rx over a Topic based messaging system.
There is an example of how you can layer Rx over TibRv topics here https://github.com/LeeCampbell/RxCookbook/blob/master/IO/Comms/TibRvSample.linq
The signature of the .Merge(...) operator that you're using is:
IObservable<TSource> Merge<TSource>(this IEnumerable<IObservable<TSource>> sources)
The actual type returned by this .Merge() is:
System.Reactive.Linq.ObservableImpl.Merge`1[System.Int32]
...so it should be fairly clear that calling (ITopicObservable<int>)_topics.Merge(); would fail.
Lee's advice not to implement either of IObservable<> or IObserver<> is the correct one. It leads to errors like the one above.
If you had to do something like this, I would do it this way:
public interface ITopic
{
string Name { get; }
}
public interface ITopicObservable<TType> : ITopic, IObservable<TType>
{ }
public interface ITopicSubject<TType> : ISubject<TType>, ITopicObservable<TType>
{ }
public interface ITopicObserver<TType> : ITopic, IObserver<TType>
{ }
public class Topic
{
public string Name { get; private set; }
public Topic(string name)
{
this.Name = name;
}
}
public class TopicSubject : Topic, ITopicSubject<int>
{
private Subject<int> _subject = new Subject<int>();
public TopicSubject(string name)
: base(name)
{ }
public IDisposable Subscribe(IObserver<int> observer)
{
return _subject.Subscribe(observer);
}
public void OnNext(int value)
{
_subject.OnNext(value);
}
public void OnError(Exception error)
{
_subject.OnError(error);
}
public void OnCompleted()
{
_subject.OnCompleted();
}
}
public class AggregatedTopicObservable : Topic, ITopicObservable<int>
{
List<ITopicObservable<int>> _topics = new List<ITopicObservable<int>>();
public AggregatedTopicObservable(string name)
: base(name)
{ }
public void Add(ITopicObservable<int> observable)
{
_topics.Add(observable);
}
public IDisposable Subscribe(IObserver<int> observer)
{
return _topics.Merge().Subscribe(observer);
}
}
public class TopicObserver : Topic, ITopicObserver<int>
{
private IObserver<int> _observer;
public TopicObserver(string name)
: base(name)
{
_observer =
Observer
.Create<int>(
value => Console.WriteLine("next {0}", value),
error => Console.WriteLine("error {0}", error.Message),
() => Console.WriteLine("finished"));
}
public void OnNext(int value)
{
_observer.OnNext(value);
}
public void OnError(Exception error)
{
_observer.OnError(error);
}
public void OnCompleted()
{
_observer.OnCompleted();
}
}
And run it with:
var to = new TopicObserver("watching");
var ts1 = new TopicSubject("topic 1");
var ts2 = new TopicSubject("topic 2");
var agg = new AggregatedTopicObservable("agg");
agg.Add(ts1);
agg.Add(ts2);
agg.Subscribe(to);
ts1.OnNext(42);
ts1.OnCompleted();
ts2.OnNext(1);
ts2.OnCompleted();
Which gives:
next 42
next 1
finished
But apart from being able to give everything a name (which I'm not sure how it helps) you could always do this:
var to =
Observer
.Create<int>(
value => Console.WriteLine("next {0}", value),
error => Console.WriteLine("error {0}", error.Message),
() => Console.WriteLine("finished"));
var ts1 = new Subject<int>();
var ts2 = new Subject<int>();
var agg = new [] { ts1, ts2 }.Merge();
agg.Subscribe(to);
ts1.OnNext(42);
ts1.OnCompleted();
ts2.OnNext(1);
ts2.OnCompleted();
Same output with no interfaces and classes.
There's even a more interesting way. Try this:
var to =
Observer
.Create<int>(
value => Console.WriteLine("next {0}", value),
error => Console.WriteLine("error {0}", error.Message),
() => Console.WriteLine("finished"));
var agg = new Subject<IObservable<int>>();
agg.Merge().Subscribe(to);
var ts1 = new Subject<int>();
var ts2 = new Subject<int>();
agg.OnNext(ts1);
agg.OnNext(ts2);
ts1.OnNext(42);
ts1.OnCompleted();
ts2.OnNext(1);
ts2.OnCompleted();
var ts3 = new Subject<int>();
agg.OnNext(ts3);
ts3.OnNext(99);
ts3.OnCompleted();
This produces:
next 42
next 1
next 99
It allows you to add new source observables after the merge!
When my view wants the value of LogoStation, it returns null because my program has not yet executed LoadStation_Completed.
I want my program waits that LoadStation_Completed is executed before continuing.
Thx
public class Infos
{
#region propriétés
private DataServiceCollection<SyndicObject> _infosStation;
public DataServiceCollection<SyndicObject> InfosStation
{
get
{
return _infosStation;
}
set
{
_infosStation = value;
}
}
#endregion
string nameStation;
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
public void NotifyPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
if (PropertyChanged != null)
{
PropertyChanged(this,
new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
private ImageSource _logoStation;
public ImageSource LogoStation
{
get
{
return _logoStation;
}
set
{
_logoStation = value;
NotifyPropertyChanged("LogoStation");
}
}
public Infos(string station)
{
nameStation = station;
getInfos();
}
public void getInfos()
{
SyndicationContext service = new SyndicationContext(new Uri("http://test/817bee9d-faf4-4680-9d05-e41c2c90ae5a/"));
IQueryable<SyndicObject> requete = (from objectSki in service.Objects
where objectSki.NOMSTATION == nameStation
select objectSki);
Deployment.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(() =>
{
InfosStation = new DataServiceCollection<SyndicObject>();
InfosStation.LoadCompleted += new EventHandler<LoadCompletedEventArgs>(InfoStation_LoadCompleted);
InfosStation.LoadAsync(requete);
}
);
}
void InfoStation_LoadCompleted(object sender, LoadCompletedEventArgs e)
{
LogoStation = new BitmapImage(new Uri(#"http://test/upload/" + InfosStation[0].LOGO, UriKind.Absolute));
}
}
By using the property setter you are using NotifyPropertyChanged (correctly) to tell the UI bound to LogoStation that it has been updated. This should mean that the UI will display nothing initially and then the image when the load has completed.
Without seeing your view code what you have here looks correct - apart from the fact that your Infos class doesn't inherit from INotifyPropertyChanged. This means that the event never gets sent.
Update your class definition and you should be good to go.
I'd like to be able to simulate the compass sensor when running a Windows Phone 7.1 in the emulator.
At this stage I don't particularly care what data the compass returns. Just that I can run against something when using the emulator to test the code in question.
I'm aware that I could deploy to my dev unlocked phone to test compass functionality but I've found the connection via the Zune software to drop out frequently.
Update
I've looked into creating my own wrapper class that could simulate the compass when running a debug build and the compass isn't otherwise supported.
The Microsoft.Devices.Sensors.CompassReading struct has me a bit stumpted. Because it is a struct where the properties can only be set internally I can't inherit from it to provide my own values back. I looked at using reflection to brute force some values in but Silverlight doesn't appear to allow it.
as you already noticed I had a similar problem. when I mocked the compass sensor, I also had difficulties because you cannot inherite from the existing classes and write your own logic. Therefore I wrote my own compass interface which is the only compass functionality used by my application. Then there are two implementations, one wrapper to the WP7 compass functionalities and my mock compass.
I can show you some code, but not before weekend as I'm not at my delevopment machine atm.
Edit:
You already got it but for other people who have the same problem I'll add my code. As I already said, I wrote an interface and two implementations, one for the phone and a mock implementation.
Compass Interface
public interface ICompass
{
#region Methods
void Start();
void Stop();
#endregion
#region Properties
CompassData CurrentValue { get; }
bool IsDataValid { get; }
TimeSpan TimeBetweenUpdates { get; set; }
#endregion
#region Events
event EventHandler<CalibrationEventArgs> Calibrate;
event EventHandler<CompassDataChangedEventArgs> CurrentValueChanged;
#endregion
}
Used data classes and event args
public class CompassData
{
public CompassData(double headingAccurancy, double magneticHeading, Vector3 magnetometerReading, DateTimeOffset timestamp, double trueHeading)
{
HeadingAccuracy = headingAccurancy;
MagneticHeading = magneticHeading;
MagnetometerReading = magnetometerReading;
Timestamp = timestamp;
TrueHeading = trueHeading;
}
public CompassData(CompassReading compassReading)
{
HeadingAccuracy = compassReading.HeadingAccuracy;
MagneticHeading = compassReading.MagneticHeading;
MagnetometerReading = compassReading.MagnetometerReading;
Timestamp = compassReading.Timestamp;
TrueHeading = compassReading.TrueHeading;
}
#region Properties
public double HeadingAccuracy { get; private set; }
public double MagneticHeading { get; private set; }
public Vector3 MagnetometerReading { get; private set; }
public DateTimeOffset Timestamp { get; private set; }
public double TrueHeading { get; private set; }
#endregion
}
public class CompassDataChangedEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public CompassDataChangedEventArgs(CompassData compassData)
{
CompassData = compassData;
}
public CompassData CompassData { get; private set; }
}
WP7 implementation
public class DeviceCompass : ICompass
{
private Compass _compass;
#region Implementation of ICompass
public void Start()
{
if(_compass == null)
{
_compass = new Compass {TimeBetweenUpdates = TimeBetweenUpdates};
// get TimeBetweenUpdates because the device could have change it to another value
TimeBetweenUpdates = _compass.TimeBetweenUpdates;
// attach to events
_compass.CurrentValueChanged += CompassCurrentValueChanged;
_compass.Calibrate += CompassCalibrate;
}
_compass.Start();
}
public void Stop()
{
if(_compass != null)
{
_compass.Stop();
}
}
public CompassData CurrentValue
{
get { return _compass != null ? new CompassData(_compass.CurrentValue) : default(CompassData); }
}
public bool IsDataValid
{
get { return _compass != null ? _compass.IsDataValid : false; }
}
public TimeSpan TimeBetweenUpdates { get; set; }
public event EventHandler<CalibrationEventArgs> Calibrate;
public event EventHandler<CompassDataChangedEventArgs> CurrentValueChanged;
#endregion
#region Private methods
private void CompassCalibrate(object sender, CalibrationEventArgs e)
{
EventHandler<CalibrationEventArgs> calibrate = Calibrate;
if (calibrate != null)
{
calibrate(sender, e);
}
}
private void CompassCurrentValueChanged(object sender, SensorReadingEventArgs<CompassReading> e)
{
EventHandler<CompassDataChangedEventArgs> currentValueChanged = CurrentValueChanged;
if (currentValueChanged != null)
{
currentValueChanged(sender, new CompassDataChangedEventArgs(new CompassData(e.SensorReading)));
}
}
#endregion
}
Mock implementation
public class MockCompass : ICompass
{
private readonly Timer _timer;
private CompassData _currentValue;
private bool _isDataValid;
private TimeSpan _timeBetweenUpdates;
private bool _isStarted;
private readonly Random _random;
public MockCompass()
{
_random = new Random();
_timer = new Timer(TimerEllapsed, null, Timeout.Infinite, Timeout.Infinite);
_timeBetweenUpdates = new TimeSpan();
_currentValue = new CompassData(0, 0, new Vector3(), new DateTimeOffset(), 0);
}
#region Implementation of ICompass
public void Start()
{
_timer.Change(0, (int)TimeBetweenUpdates.TotalMilliseconds);
_isStarted = true;
}
public void Stop()
{
_isStarted = false;
_timer.Change(Timeout.Infinite, Timeout.Infinite);
_isDataValid = false;
}
public CompassData CurrentValue
{
get { return _currentValue; }
}
public bool IsDataValid
{
get { return _isDataValid; }
}
public TimeSpan TimeBetweenUpdates
{
get { return _timeBetweenUpdates; }
set
{
_timeBetweenUpdates = value;
if (_isStarted)
{
_timer.Change(0, (int) TimeBetweenUpdates.TotalMilliseconds);
}
}
}
public event EventHandler<CalibrationEventArgs> Calibrate;
public event EventHandler<CompassDataChangedEventArgs> CurrentValueChanged;
#endregion
#region Private methods
private void TimerEllapsed(object state)
{
_currentValue = new CompassData(_random.NextDouble()*5,
(_currentValue.MagneticHeading + 0.1)%360,
_currentValue.MagnetometerReading,
new DateTimeOffset(DateTime.UtcNow),
(_currentValue.TrueHeading + 0.1)%360);
_isDataValid = true;
EventHandler<CompassDataChangedEventArgs> currentValueChanged = CurrentValueChanged;
if(currentValueChanged != null)
{
currentValueChanged(this, new CompassDataChangedEventArgs(_currentValue));
}
}
#endregion
}
I'm wondering if I can do something like this in c#:
public CustomerManagerScreen()
{
[TestAttirubute("CustomerManagerScreen_Load")]
private void CustomerManagerScreen_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
CustomerLoad();
}
}
as you can see, method name is a parameter of TestAttribute, what I want to achieve is CustomerManagerScreen_Load will be discarded depending on the result of the TestAttirubute
this is the attribute class...
public class TestAttirubute: System.Attribute
{
private string _MethodName = string.Empty;
public TestAttirubute(string MethodName)
{
this._MethodName = MethodName;
}
public bool hasPermission()
{
return (SessionManager.CurrentUser.UserRole.Role.Rights.Where(a => a.Resource.Code == this._MethodName).Count() != 0) ? true: false;
}
}
Not like that, but with the ConditionalAttribute you can.
One restriction however is that your methods must return void.