I will use online compiler which is ACE https://ace.c9.io/#nav=about i can put the editor but i dont know how to compile and get the result.
Ace is an editor, not a compiler you can't use it to compile code.
You will have to use the hackerrank api view the documentation for more info to enable one to choose different languages to compile.
Related
The provided documentation for the basic c++ packages within clion seems to be very short, and sometimes it is not possible to find any documentation for basic functions like e.g. the tangens function of the math package.
Is it somehow possible to include the offline-version of cppreference.com into clion's doxygen-based documentation viewer?
At the moment CLion doesn't support such functionality, here's the ticket for that https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/CPP-9413.
As workaround, in case you use Linux you can install standard library with documentation, for instance:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/libstdc++-6-doc
https://packages.debian.org/sid/glibc-doc
After that CLion will have to work with lib-sources which documentation comments.
Thinking about NetBeans or Eclipse I was wondering how an IDE compiles code when you click run. Does it open a command line in the background to compile it? How exactly does it work?
Each IDE will have it's own approach for how they actually achieve compilation. Usually they will have their own compilers or wrappers around existing compilers to which they delegate actual compilation.
Eclipse comes with a built in compiler of its own:
How does Eclipse compile classes with only a JRE?
I don't actually personally know much about how other ones achieve the compilation in any detail; somebody else may provide a better answer in that regard.
IDEs use compilers. That's actually the difference between them.
For instance, Code::Blocks uses MinGW Compiler which is a port of the GCC set of compilers.
Every compiler has its own method, some use their own wrappers and ports for known compilers. (See Codeblocks)
I also noticed that some basic IDEs out there, just run the simple command line using gcc, clang, etc and let you pass parameters from an option window.
I have a solution with some projects in that make up a library. I use this library in some of my other solutions. I do this by making a reference to the dll which is generated when the library solution is compiled. So far, so good.
Now I'm debugging one of those "other solutions". I see that I'm using a function from the library I built and I want to see what the code does. I hit F12 and I'm taken to a very useless page where I see only the signature.
I could add the library projects to my solution. this is unsatisfactory because when someone is editing the solution I want it to be clear that the messing about with the library bit is going to affect other programs. If I can describe my desire crudely, I would say I want the library solution to be show when I hit F12, but be read only.
How can I do this?
I think it depends on the complied option of the library. If the library is built without debug symbols, it would not be possible to debug inside in a normal human readable way. I suggest you compile/build the library with debug option. That may solve your problem.
HTH!
I use Visual Studio for development and I am quite used to Intellisense. But when writting CoffeeScript you don't really get any Syntax Checking or Intellisense.
Is there a plugin for VS that would allow this?
Thanks
You can't have more than syntax checking/coloring with coffeescript (on any IDE) AFAIK.
As an alternative, you can use TypeScript to get the full Visual Studio tooling support (and stay close to the javascript), or some transcompilers that transform code to javascript, for C# there is Saltarelle and for CIL (.NET bytecode, so compatible with any .NET language), I just found JSIL but I have no idea how well it works.
Note than the generated code "look" can be important for debugging and using external libraries get a bit of work to be included in Typed languages.
For js code readability I would recommand TypeScript (similar to coffeescript, even easier, but less powerfull as a language).
Saltarelle code looks readable (didn't tried a lot), for JSIL I have no idea.
A list of languages that compiles to JS: https://github.com/jashkenas/coffee-script/wiki/List-of-languages-that-compile-to-JS
Webstorm and all of the JetBrains IDEs recently added some code completion and refactoring support. It knows what methods are in my own classes and will prompt to complete as I type. The red squiggly underline compile as you type is not quite there yet but it is coming. I bet Webstorm is the first to implement CS source map also. They have added so much in the last 11 months.
Check this out: http://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/2b96d16a-c986-4501-8f97-8008f9db141a
Here is another: http://chirpy.codeplex.com/
I think this should do what you want.
I want to write an own c/c++ IDE with syntax-check etc. And of course I need a compiler-functionality. For this I want to use gcc, I think it is a good option, isn't it? The IDE should not call a gcc-binary to compile, it should include the gcc source code, because after compiling the IDE I want a stay alone executable.
So my question: Is there sth like a tutorial or a good hint how to realize this?
btw it's for Mac, I'll write the IDE with XCode
Thank you!
Use LLVM's Clang and its libClang API, it's built for this purpose. GCC is not made to be used as a library.
You might develop a plugin for GCC, or a GCC MELT extension. But it could be that on MacOSX GCC plugins are not supported yet. You might also look into GCCSense which might fill some of your goals (but I never used it).