I need to know how IBM Websphere MQ works.
As of my knowledge.
IBM Websphere MQ is an application that runs continuously
IBM Websphere MQ has a queue manager, queue name, port, host where it is runs, channel name.
We have a two different application in two different remote place.
Two applications and the IBM Websphere MQ applications are connected through network.
Using IBM Websphere MQ credentials the applications are able to send and receive messages between them via IBM Websphere MQ.
If I have anything wrong then please guide me.
My questions are:
If one application sends a message to the queue then where will the memory be consumed?
Where do we run the MQ listeners? On the applications environment or the Websphere environment (where we installed the IBM Websphere MQ)?
Do we need to run any programs in the application environments or are the IBM Websphere MQ credentials (queue manager, queue name, port, host where it is runs, channel name) enough to send and receive the messages?
If one application sends a message to the queue then where will the memory be consumed?
A Running Queue Manager requires memory in order to run and handle processing/storage of messages. As well as that every MQ Client application that connects to a Queue Manager requires memory to connect to and put/get messages. This is no different than any application that runs on any system.
Where do we run the MQ listeners?
Assuming you mean MQ Listeners. The MQ Listeners are run on the Queue Manager and specify the (TCP) port you want the Queue Manager to listen on.
Do we need to run any programs in the application environments or are the IBM Websphere MQ credentials (queue manager, queue name, port, host where it is runs, channel name) enough to send and receive the messages?
To run a Queue Manager on a machine, your machine must meet the System requirements stated in the System Requirements for WebSphere MQ page.
Here is the MQ v8 one
Likewise to run a MQ Client application that can connect into a Queue Manager, the application needs to have be ran on a machine that has the IBM MQ Client libraries installed on and meet the system requirements.
You also need to tell the application:
The location of the Queue Manager hostname/IP Address and port number.
The channel to connect into, which must exist on the Queue Manager
The Queue name to interact with, which must exist on the Queue Manager
Depending on your Queue Manager's configuration you need to ensure that your application is running with the correct user/supplying the correct user to ensure it is properly authorized to access the Queue Manager.
Related
I am doing lot of analysis for a new Java MQ client requirement got some doubts. Currently in the Unix system Queues Queue manager all created where MQ server is running.
In order to run Java MQ client we are going to install MQ client on other Unix Solaris system. Mean while we had one windows server where MQ client installed before going to MQ client installation on unix System need to clear my clarifications.
Since I am new MQ.
Can we run Java MQ client from windows server to connect MQ server unix system(Queues,Queuue Manager)
If yes what need for this to connect Windows Server to unix Solaris
The code is compiled with MQ libraries
Is any error will come to face.
It would be great if you provide steps or solution.
Yes, you can run the Java MQ client from any machine to connect to a queue manager on any other machine. The MQ Clients (Java, 'C' or .NET version) all support any platform to any platform combinations, and all support any MQ version to any MQ version. So for example, you can have a V8 Client on Windows connecting to a V9 Queue manager on Unix. Equally you can have a V9 Client on Windows connection to a V8 Queue manager on Unix, i.e. any to any version can be upwards or downwards.
In order to connect a client to a queue manager, you will need the client libraries on the client machine, in your case the Java client.
You will also need to ensure that your queue manager has a TCP/IP listener running and that you know the port number.
You will need a channel definition on the queue manager of a type called SVRCONN, and know the name of it. e.g.
DEFINE CHANNEL(MQGEM.SVRCONN) CHLTYPE(SVRCONN) DESCR('Channel for my client application to connect to')
In order for your Java client to connect to the queue manager it will need to use
The channel name
The host name of the machine where the queue manager is running
The port number of the TCP/IP listener
If you face any errors, they may be related to connectivity, because your application is connected by the network to the queue manager. Remember to pay attention to any return codes you get from MQ, they will be in the form of 4 digits, e.g. 2059. For Java you should ensure you get hold of the linked exception. It may also be useful to look in the error log of the queue manager too.
You may also face security errors if this is your first use of IBM MQ. The queue manager is locked down by default so that remote applications cannot simply connect in and do damage (e.g. delete important messages from other applications!). There are a number of posts on here that describe these errors and their solutions. Best advise, get the MQRC code (4-digits) and the AMQERR01.LOG error message from the queue manager. Armed with this information you should be able to describe and diagnose any error situations you encounter.
I'm trying to configure a clustered websphere application server that connects to a clustered MQ.
However, the the information I have is details for two instances of MQ with different host names, server channels and queue manager which belongs to the same MQ cluster name.
On the websphere console, I can see input fields for hostname, queue manager and server channel, I cannot find anything that I can specify multiple MQ details.
If I pick one of the MQ detail, will MQ clustering still work? If not, how will I enable MQ clustering given the details I have?
WebSphere MQ clustering affects the behavior of how queue managers talk amongst themselves. It does not change how an application connects or talks to a queue manager so the question as asked seems to be assuming some sort of clustering behavior that is not present in WMQ.
To set up the app server with two addresses, please see Configuring multi-instance queue manager connections with WebSphere MQ messaging provider custom properties in the WAS v7 Knowledge Center for instructions on how to configure a connection factory with a multi-instance CONNAME value.
If you specify a valid QMgr name in the Connection Factory and the QMgr to which the app connects doesn't have that specific name then the connection is rejected. Normally a multi-instance CONNAME is used to connect to a multi-instance QMgr. This is a single highly available queue manager that can be at one of two different IP addresses so using a real QMgr name works in that case. But if the QMgrs to which your app is connecting are two distinct and different-named queue managers, which is what you described, you should specify an asterisk (a * character) as the queue manager name in your connection factory as described here. This way the app will not check the name of the QMgr when it gets a connection.
If I pick one of the MQ detail, will MQ clustering still work? If not,
how will I enable MQ clustering given the details I have?
Depends on what you mean by "clustering". If you believe that the app will see one logical queue which is hosted by two queue managers, then no. That's not how WMQ clustering works. Each queue manager hosting a clustered queue gets a subset of messages sent to that queue. Any apps getting from that queue will therefore only ever see the local subset.
But if by "clustering" you intend to connect alternately to one or the other of the two queue managers and transmit messages to a queue that is in the same cluster but not hosted on either of the two QMgrs to which you connect, then yes it will work fine. If your Connection Factory knows of only one of the two QMgrs you will only connect to that QMgr, and sending messages to the cluster will still work. But set it up as described in the links I've provided and your app will be able to connect to either of the two QMgrs and you can easily test that by stopping the channel on the one it connects to and watching it connect to the other one.
Good luck!
UPDATE:
To be clear the detail provide are similar to hostname01, qmgr01,
queueA, serverchannel01. And the other is hostname02, qmgr02, queueA,
serverchannel02.
WMQ Clients will connect to two different QMgrs using a multi-instance CONNAME only when...
The channel name used on both QMgrs is the exactly the same
The application uses an asterisk (a * character) or a space for the QMgr name when the connection request is made (i.e. in the Connection Factory).
It is possible to have WMQ connect to one of several different queue managers where the channel name differs on each by using a Client Connection Definition Table, also known as a CCDT. The CCDT is a compiled artifact that you create using MQSC commands to define CLNTCONN channels. It contains entries for each of the QMgrs the client is eligible to connect to. Each can have a different QMgr name, host, port and channel. However, when defining the CCDT the administrator defines all the entries such that the QMgr name is replaced with the application High Level Qualifier. For example, the Payroll app wants to connect to any 1 of 3 different QMgrs. The WMQ Admin defines a CCDT with three entries but uses PAY01, PAY02, and PAY03 for the QMgr names. Note this does not need to match the actual QMgr names. The application then specifies the QMgr name as PAY* which selects all three QMgrs in the CCDT.
Please see Using a client channel definition table with WebSphere MQ classes for JMS for more details on the CCDT.
Is MQ cluster not similar to application server clusters?
No, not at all.
Wherein two-child nodes are connected to a cluster. And an F5 URL will
be used to distribute the load to each node. Does not WMQ come with a
cluster url / f5 that we just send message to and the partitioning of
messages are transparent?
No. The WMQ cluster provides a namespace within which applications and QMgrs can resolve non-local objects such as queues and topics. The only thing that ever connects to a WebSphere MQ cluster is a queue manager. Applications and human users always connect to specific queue managers. There may be a set of interchangeable queue managers such as with the CCDT, but each is independent.
With WAS the messaging engine may run on several nodes, but it provides a single logical queue from which applications can get messages. With WMQ each node hosting that queue gets a subset of the messages and any application consuming those messages sees only that subset.
HTTP is stateless and so an F5 URL works great. When it does maintain a session, that session exists mainly to optimize away connection overhead and tends to be short lived. WMQ client channels are stateful and coordinate both single-phase and two-phase units of work. If an application fails over to another QMgr during a UOW, it has no way to reconcile that UOW.
Because of the nature of WMQ connections, F5 is never used between QMgrs. It is only used between client and QMgr for connection balancing and not message traffic balancing. Furthermore, the absence or presence of an MQ cluster is entirely transparent to the application which, in either case, simply connects to a QMgr to get and./or put messages. Use of a Multi-Instance CONNAME or a CCDT file makes that connection more robust by providing multiple equivalent QMgrs to which the client can connect but that has nothing whatever to do with WMQ clustering.
Does that help?
Please see:
Clustering
How Clusters Work
Queue manager groups in the CCDT
Connecting WebSphere MQ MQI client applications to queue managers
An MQ Input node can only connect to the MQ that is bound to the MessageBroker installation. I would like to connect to a remote MQ. I would like to avoid using the JMS Input.
Would it be possible to use the MQ Service for connecting to a remote MQ?
I'm using tve version 9, so actually the IIB.
You can deliver outbound messages to remote queue managers via the broker's queue manager if suitable channels and xmit queues are setup.
This however is not the same as a client connection to a remote queue manager which is not currently supported.
You could use a JCN to call the MQ base API or you could raise a request for enhancement here:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/?PROD_ID=532
I'm new in using Websphere MQ. I need help in this.
I have a websphere located in a server remotely and I have an application that retrieves and sends the information to the websphere. Is it possible to send my queue to a remote websphere server and at the same time retrieve it? It's something like this.
If yes, how should I configure this one in the websphere remote server? Thanks!
Sorry to say your question is confusing. You don't send/receive queue. You send/receive messages to queue or topic. Can you clarify?
Update:
You can have WebSphere MQ queue manager running on machine and client application on different machine. Application can send and receive messages to/from remote queue manager. This is called as the client mode connection to queue manager and most commonly used type of connection mode.
Please read the WebSphere MQ InfoCenter.
I'm unable to connect remotely from WebSphere Application Server with Queue Manager at WebSphere MQ. Anyhow it get connected to Queue Manager from WAS that is installed on same machine. I'm using version 7.5 of WebSphere MQ and version 7.0 of WebSphere Application Server.
While attempting to connect WAS remotely to Queue Manager following error messages were logged.
Error Message from WebSphere MQ:
1/30/2013 21:12:09 - Process(3624.6) User(MUSR_MQADMIN)
Program(amqrmppa.exe)
Host(KHILT-269) Installation(Installation1)
VRMF(7.5.0.0) QMgr(QM.TEST)
AMQ9504: A protocol error was detected for channel 'TEST_CHANNEL'. EXPLANATION: During communications with the
remote queue manager, the channel program detected a protocol error.
The failure type was 11 with associated data of 0. ACTION: Contact the
systems administrator who should examine the error logs to determine
the cause of the failure.
Error Message at WebSphere Application Server:
A connection could not be made to WebSphere MQ for the following
reason: CC=2;RC=2009
As it can be seen from logs, I have created Queue Manager as QM.TEST and channel as TEST_CHANNEL. The listener port defined for the Queue Manager is 1417 along with protocol TCP.
I did lot of google but didn't find any appropriate solution. I appreciate any help in this regard.
Thanks in adv, KAmeer
I had a similar issue where I have WAS 7 and WMQ 7.5. I was able to make a connection to my existing WMQ 7.0 QM but not my new WMQ 7.5 QM. Apparently there was a change to the WMQ components bundled with WAS 7 after the initial release 7.0.0.0. After updating the resource adapter I was able to make a successfull connection to both queue managers.
The queue manager generates protocol error and terminates the connection immediately when it receives unexpected TSH flow from the client. As a result the client receives 2009 error. Technically, low level MQ client will be able communicate with higher version MQ queue manager and vice versa unless there are known restrictions and/or there is a MQ defect/APAR. The error message indicates the queue manager is running at MQ 7500 and this is MQ base 7.5 version. It is recommended upgrading the queue manager to the latest fixpack available to rule out any known problems. You could also try disabling shared conversion on the SVRCONN(i.e. setting SHARECNV to 0) channel and check whether it workarounds the problem until the problem is resolved.
Open a PMR with IBM as this sounds like a bug.
the cause for this is mq 7 client cannot talk to mq 7.5, the client needs to use mq 7.5 jar files
I had this problem. In my case was the mq library that was doing an MQGET with an infinite loop, so the lib was locked on the mqget while i called the kill and generated an event and tried to disconnect while the get was still running. As the mqget does not support unlocking via signal, i had to change the code to not stay infinite on get and add some flags on the kill command so the app could detect that it was time to die, when it returned from the get.