I need to add range filter for year. I redefine the Magento class in my module FullText\Collection. I also made changes in search_request.xml file. I found the code and it works for me:
$skus = [
'CNS334',
'U012840'
];
$this->filterBuilder->setField('sku');
$this->filterBuilder->setValue($skus);
$this->filterBuilder->setConditionType('in');
$this->searchCriteriaBuilder->addFilter($this->filterBuilder->create());
But I have data in the another tables. I try to join, but I cant get any results for my filtering.
$this->getSelect()->join(
[
'my' => 'make_year',
],
'e.entity_id = my.product_id'
$this->searchCriteriaBuilder->addFilter($this->filterBuilder
->setField('year')
->setValue(2014)
->setConditionType('from')
->create());
$this->searchCriteriaBuilder->addFilter($this->filterBuilder
->setField('year')
->setValue(2015)
->setConditionType('to')
->create());
$this->searchCriteriaBuilder->addFilter($this->filterBuilder->create());
To join your query with other tables you need criteria mapper.
As an example please look at \Magento\CatalogInventory\Model\ResourceModel\Stock\Item\StockItemCriteria::setStockStatus() - here is initiated the filter.
Setting new item in data array triggers mapper method \Magento\CatalogInventory\Model\ResourceModel\Stock\Item\StockItemCriteriaMapper::mapStockStatus().
This mapper contains \Magento\Framework\DB\Select with which we are able to work like in old-style collection.
The name of mapper method correlates with criteria's data array index. So if you add $this->data['custom_field'] the mapper function should be mapCustomField().
Please also note that if there is specific mapper function for the field the mapper will try to filter by mapped fields.
Related
I am trying to build a custom sorting for the product listings in shopware 6.
I want to include a foreign table (entity is: leasingPlanEntity), get the min of one of the fields of that table (period_price) and then order the search result by that value.
I have already built a Subscriber, and try it like that, what seems to work.
public static function getSubscribedEvents(): array
{
return [
//ProductListingCollectFilterEvent::class => 'addFilter'
ProductListingCriteriaEvent::class => ['addCriteria', 5000]
];
}
public function addCriteria(ProductListingCriteriaEvent $event): void
{
$criteria = $event->getCriteria();
$criteria->addAssociation('leasingPlan');
$criteria->addAggregation(new MinAggregation('min_period_price', 'leasingPlan.periodPrice'));
// Sortierung hinzufügen.
$availableSortings = $event->getCriteria()->getExtension('sortings') ?? new ProductSortingCollection();
$myCustomSorting = new ProductSortingEntity();
$myCustomSorting->setId(Uuid::randomHex());
$myCustomSorting->setActive(true);
$myCustomSorting->setTranslated(['label' => 'My Custom Sorting at runtime']);
$myCustomSorting->setKey('my-custom-runtime-sort');
$myCustomSorting->setPriority(5);
$myCustomSorting->setFields([
[
'field' => 'leasingPlan.periodPrice',
'order' => 'asc',
'priority' => 1,
'naturalSorting' => 0,
],
]);
$availableSortings->add($myCustomSorting);
$event->getCriteria()->addExtension('sortings', $availableSortings);
}
Is this already the right way to get the min(periodPrice)? Or is it taking just a random value out of the leasingPlan table to define the sort-order?
I didn't find a way, to define the min_period_price aggregate value in the $myCustomSorting->setFields Methods.
Update 1
Some days later, I asked a less complex question in the shopware community on slack:
Is it possible to use the DAL to define a subquery for an association in the product-listing?
It should generate something like:
FROM
JOIN (
SELECT ... FROM ... WHERE ... GROUP BY ... ORDER BY ...
) AS ...
The answer there was:
Don't think so
Update 2
I also did an in-deep anlysis of the DAL-Query-Builder, and it really seems to be not possible, to perform a subquery with the current version.
Update 3 - Different approach
A different approach might be, to define custom fields in the main entity. Every time a change is made on the main entity, the values of this custom fields should be recalculated.
It is a lot of overhead work, to realize this. Especially when the fields you are adding, are dependend on other data like the availability of a product in the store, for example.
So check, if it is worth the extra work. Would be better, to have a solution for building subqueries.
Unfortunately it seems that in your case there is no easy way to achieve this, if I understand the issue correctly.
Consider the following: for each product you can have multiple leasingPlan entities, and I assume that for a given context (like a specific sales channel or listing) that still holds. This means that you would have to sort the leasingPlan entities by price, then take the one with the lowest price, and then sort the products by their lowest-price leasingPlan's price.
There seems to be no other way to achieve that, and unfortunately for you, sorting is applied at the end, even if it is sort of a subquery.
So, for example, if you have the following snippet
$criteria = $event->getCriteria();
$criteria->addAssociation('leasingPlan');
$criteria->getAssociation('leasingPlan')
->addSorting(new FieldSorting('price', FieldSorting::ASCENDING))
->setLimit(1)
;
The actual price-sorting would be applied AFTER the leasingPlan entities are fetched - essentially the results would be sorted, meaning that you would not get the cheapest leasing plan per product, instead getting the first one.
You can only do something like that with filters, but in this case there is nothing to filter by - I assume you don't have one leasingPlan per SalesChannel or per language, so that you could limit that list to just one entry that could be used for sorting
That is not to mention that this could not be included in a ProductSortingEntity, but you could always work around that by plugging into the appropriate events and modifying the criteria during runtime
I see two ways to resolve your issue
Making another table which would store the cheapest leasingPlan per product and just using that as your association
Storing the information about the cheapest leasingPlans in e.g. cache and using that for filtering (caution: a mistake here would probably break the sorting, for example if you end up with too few or too many leasingPlans per product)
public function applyCustomSorting(ProductListingCriteriaEvent $event): void
{
// One leasingPlan per one product
$cheapestLeasingPlans = $this->myCustomService->getCheapestLeasingPlanIds();
$criteria = $event->getCriteria();
$criteria->addAssociation('leasingPlan');
$criteria->getAssociation('leasingPlan')
->addSorting(new FieldSorting('price', FieldSorting::ASCENDING))
->addFilter(new EqualsAnyFilter('id', $cheapestLeasingPlans))
;
}
And then you could sort by
$criteria->addSorting(new FieldSorting('leasingPlan.periodPrice', FieldSorting::ASCENDING));
There should be no need to add the association manually and to add the aggregation to the criteria, that should happen automatically behind the scenes if your custom sorting is selected in the storefront.
For more information refer to the official docs.
quite a noob in Laravel and Livewire, I guess if there is a better way to accomplish what I have here:
I have some checkboxes in a Livewire view that allow the user to dynamically choose how to filter the data being shown in a HTML table.
On the controller I have an eloquent query that retrieves a subset of the records in the db whenever a checkbox changes state.
Like this (I tried to simplify the structure):
$filtered_items = Item::select('item_color', 'item_quantity', 'item_value')
->whereIn('item_color', [ /* array controlled by checkboxes values in view */ ])
->get();
I need to also show the sums of some columns for that specific filter setup.
As I don't want to make new queries, I try to work on the already available collection with a ->sum() for each column I want to sum:
$sums['item_quantity'] = $filtered_items->sum('item_quantity');
$sums['item_value'] = $filtered_items->sum('item_value');
It works as intended, as I have an array with the sums, but I was wondering if there is a better way to do this, or even write a function to get more columns sum at once, maybe passing an array.
Thanks for any idea or link!
Here is an example of a single query for all sums (two in this example)
$filtered_items = \DB::table('items')
->selectRaw('SUM(item_quantity) as sum_quantity, SUM(item_value) as sum_value')
->whereIn('item_color', [ /* array controlled by checkboxes values in view */ ])
->first();
The advantage is that it will return one entry/row instead of a collection of all the items which is way faster.
Can anyone help with a MongoTemplate question?
I have got a record structure which has nested arrays and I want to update a specific entry in a 2nd level array. I can find the appropriate entry easier enough by the Set path needs the indexes of both array entries & the '$' only refers to the leaf item. For example if I had an array of teams which contained an array of player I need to generate an update path like :
val query = Query(Criteria.where( "teams.players.playerId").`is`(playerId))
val update = Update()
with(update) {
set("teams.$.players.$.name", player.name)
This fails as the '$' can only be used once to refer to the index in the players array, I need a way to generate the equivalent '$' for the index in the teams array.
I am thinking that I need to use a separate Aggregate query using the something like this but I can't get it to work.
project().and(ArrayOperators.arrayOf( "markets").indexOf("")).`as`("index")
Any ideas for this Mongo newbie?
For others who is facing similar issue, One option is to use arrayFilters in UpdateOptions. But looks like mongotemplate in spring does not yet support the use of UpdateOptions directly. Hence, what can be done is:
Sample for document which contain object with arrays of arrayObj (which contain another arrays of arrayObj).
Bson filter = eq("arrayObj.arrayObj.id", "12345");
UpdateResult result = mongoTemplate.getDb().getCollection(collectionName)
.updateOne(filter,
new Document("$set", new Document("arrayObj.$[].arrayObj.$[x].someField"), "someValueToUpdate"),
new UpdateOptions().arrayFilters(
Arrays.asList(Filters.eq("x.id, "12345))
));
I need a way to locate a Magento object my multiple attributes. I can look up an object by a single parameter using the 'loadByAttribute' method, as follows.
$mageObj->loadByAttribute('name', 'Test Category');
However, I have been unable to get this to work for multiple parameters. For example, I would like to be able to do the above query using all of the following search parameters. It might look something like the following.
$mageObj->loadByAttribute(array('entity_id' => 128,
'parent_id' => 1,
'name' => 'Test Category'));
Yes, I know that you don't need all of these fields to find a single category record. However, I am writing a module to export and import a whole website, and I need to test if an object, such as a category, already exists on the target system before I create it. To do this, i have to check to see if an object of the same type, with multiple matching attributes already exists, even if it's ID is different.
This may not answer your question, but it may solve your problem.
Magento does not support loadByAttribute for multiple attributes, but instead you can do this.
$collection = $mageObj->getCollection()
->addAttributeToFilter('entity_id', 128)
->addAttributeToFilter('parent_id', 1)
->addAttributeToFilter('name', 'Test Category');
$item = $collection->getFirstItem();
if ($item->getId()){
//the item exists
}
else {
//the item does not exist
}
addAttributeToFilter works for EAV entities (products, categories, customers).
For flat entities use addFieldToFilter.
There is a special case for sales entities (orders, invoices, creditmemos and shipments) that can use both of them.
I am getting this object on list page
$_productCollection=$this->getLoadedProductCollection();
//return 3 records
now I applied filter as
$_productCollection=$_productCollection->addFieldToFilter('genre', array('finset' => '126'));
//now it should return 1 record
but it gives me a count of 3. Now, if I run the query in database by getting the query using echo $_productCollection->getSelect(); it returns 1 record.
Can anybody help me to resolve this?
Most likely this doesn't work because $this->getLoadedProductCollection() returns a collection which already has been loaded by the catalog/layer singleton.
But you could override Mage_Catalog_Model_Layer::prepareProductCollection() to get in control and add the custom filters you want.