How do I return data out of IF statements? I have a IF statement which is meant to return a different result dependent of the result of that statement.
IF :Value = 1 THEN
SELECT Name FROM TABLE_A
ELSEIF :Value = 2 THEN
SELECT Name FROM TABLE_B
ELSEIF :Value = 3 THEN
SELECT Name FROM TABLE_C
but this doesn't work. It expects an INTO statement in those selects. I suspect this is because Oracle can't return out of a block?
Is there a quicker way to return those select statements without creating table variables to store the data or messing around with functions?
You can do this by plain SQL:
SELECT
':Value' user_input,
CASE
WHEN ':Value' IN('a1','a2','a3')
THEN (select name from table_a)
WHEN ':Value' = 'i'
THEN (select name from table_b)
END AS output
FROM
dual
(good info about case)
If you want more than one result in your cases, then you may opt to an intelligent UNION:
SELECT t1_Col_1, t1_Col_2,'&VALUE' from TABLE_1
WHERE '&VALUE' = '1'
UNION ALL
SELECT t2_Col_1, t2_Col_2,'&VALUE' from TABLE_2
WHERE '&VALUE' = '2'
In this solution, types and number of tx_Coln must be the same.
Related
So I'm trying to build a function that returns the records of items that are included in some client subscription.
So I've been building up the following:
2 types:
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE PGM_ROW AS OBJECT
(
pID NUMBER(10),
pName VARCHAR2(300)
);
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE PGM_TAB AS TABLE OF PGM_ROW;
1 function:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION FLOGIN (USER_ID NUMBER) RETURN PGM_TAB
AS
SELECTED_PGM PGM_TAB;
BEGIN
FOR RESTRICTION
IN ( SELECT (SELECT LISTAGG (ID_CHANNEL, ',')
WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY ID_CHANNEL)
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT CHA2.ID_CHANNEL
FROM CHANNELS_ACCESSES CHA2
JOIN CHANNELS CH2
ON CH2.ID = CHA2.ID_CHANNEL
WHERE CHA2.ID_ACCESS = CMPA.ID_ACCESS
AND CH2.ID_CHANNELS_GROUP = CG.ID))
AS channels,
(SELECT LISTAGG (ID_SUBGENRE, ',')
WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY ID_SUBGENRE)
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT SGA2.ID_SUBGENRE
FROM SUBGENRES_ACCESSES SGA2
JOIN CHANNELS_ACCESSES CHA2
ON CHA2.ID_ACCESS = SGA2.ID_ACCESS
JOIN CHANNELS CH2
ON CH2.ID = CHA2.ID_CHANNEL
WHERE SGA2.ID_ACCESS = CMPA.ID_ACCESS
AND CH2.ID_CHANNELS_GROUP = CG.ID))
AS subgenres,
CG.NAME,
A.BEGIN_DATE,
A.END_DATE,
CMP.PREVIEW_ACCESS
FROM USERS U
JOIN COMPANIES_ACCESSES CMPA
ON U.ID_COMPANY = CMPA.ID_COMPANY
JOIN COMPANIES CMP ON CMP.ID = CMPA.ID_COMPANY
JOIN ACCESSES A ON A.ID = CMPA.ID_ACCESS
JOIN CHANNELS_ACCESSES CHA
ON CHA.ID_ACCESS = CMPA.ID_ACCESS
JOIN SUBGENRES_ACCESSES SGA
ON SGA.ID_ACCESS = CMPA.ID_ACCESS
JOIN CHANNELS CH ON CH.ID = CHA.ID_CHANNEL
JOIN CHANNELS_GROUPS CG ON CG.ID = CH.ID_CHANNELS_GROUP
WHERE U.ID = USER_ID
GROUP BY CG.NAME,
A.BEGIN_DATE,
A.END_DATE,
CMPA.ID_ACCESS,
CG.ID,
CMP.PREVIEW_ACCESS)
LOOP
SELECT PFT.ID_PROGRAM, PFT.LOCAL_TITLE
BULK COLLECT INTO SELECTED_PGM
FROM PROGRAMS_FT PFT
WHERE PFT.ID_CHANNEL IN
( SELECT TO_NUMBER (
REGEXP_SUBSTR (RESTRICTION.CHANNELS,
'[^,]+',
1,
ROWNUM))
FROM DUAL
CONNECT BY LEVEL <=
TO_NUMBER (
REGEXP_COUNT (RESTRICTION.CHANNELS,
'[^,]+')))
AND PFT.ID_SUBGENRE IN
( SELECT TO_NUMBER (
REGEXP_SUBSTR (RESTRICTION.SUBGENRES,
'[^,]+',
1,
ROWNUM))
FROM DUAL
CONNECT BY LEVEL <=
TO_NUMBER (
REGEXP_COUNT (RESTRICTION.SUBGENRES,
'[^,]+')))
AND (PFT.LAUNCH_DATE BETWEEN RESTRICTION.BEGIN_DATE
AND RESTRICTION.END_DATE);
END LOOP;
RETURN SELECTED_PGM;
END FLOGIN;
I expect the function tu return a table with 2 columns containing all the records from table PROGRAMS_FT that are included in the user access.
For some reason, I'm getting compilation warning ORA-000947.
My understanding of the error code is that it occurs when the values inserted does not match the type of the object receiving the values, and I can't see how this can be the case here.
You're selecting two scalar values and trying to put them into an object. That doesn't happen automatically, you need to convert them to an object:
...
LOOP
SELECT PGM_ROW(PFT.ID_PROGRAM, PFT.LOCAL_TITLE)
BULK COLLECT INTO SELECTED_PGM
FROM PROGRAMS_FT PFT
...
(It's an unhelpful quirk of PL/SQL that it says 'not enough values' rather than 'too many values', as you might expect when you try to put two things into one; I'm sure I came up with a fairly convincing explanation/excuse for that once but it escapes me at the moment...)
I'm not sure your loop makes sense though. Assuming your cursor query returns multiple rows, each time around the loop you're replacing the contents of the SELECTED_PGM collection - you might think you are appending to it, but that's not how it works. So you will end up returning a collection based only on the final iteration of the loop.
Aggregating and then splitting the data seems like a lot of work too. You could maybe use collections for those; but you can probably get rid of the cursor and loop and combine the cursor query with the inner query, which would be more efficient and would allow you to do a single bulk-collect for all the combined data.
I am just wondering if use = sign operator with sub-query instead of IN
Is it correct way ? and meet the oracle standard ?
Example
select column_name from my_table_1 where id = (select max(id) from my_table_2);
The Difference is related to the number of rows returned. If you have only one row returned from nested sql you may prefer both = or in operators. But if multiple rows returned from nested query, use in operator.
So, in your sql example you may prefer using any of the operators. Since, max functions returns only one row.
As you are fetching maximum value from subquery to compare with id, Both(= and IN )will work fine. But If you are trying to fetch more than one row then you have to use IN keyword.
If you have 1 result in sub query you are fine with using = sign, except when data type is wrong, for example , checking with same data type of dummy VARCHAR2(1)
select * from dual where 'X' = (select max(dual.dummy) from dual);
Is similar to using in (also same explain plain)
select * from dual where 'X' in (select max(dual.dummy) from dual);
But checking with different/wrong data type will result with exception ORA-01722 Invalid number
select * from dual where 1 =(select max(dual.dummy) from dual);
This is on 11g. I have an INSERT ALL statement which uses a SELECT to build up the values to insert. The select has some subqueries that check that the record doesn't already exist. The problem is that the insert is taking over 30 minutes, even when there are zero rows to insert. The select statement on its own runs instantly, so the problem seems to be when it is used in conjunction with the INSERT ALL. I rewrote the statement to use MERGE but it was just as bad.
The table has no triggers. There is a primary key index, and a unique constraint on two of the columns, but nothing else that looks like it might be causing an issue. It currently has about 15000 rows, so definitely not big.
Has anyone a suggestion for what might be causing this, or how to go about debugging it?
Here's the INSERT ALL statement.
insert all
into template_letter_merge_fields (merge_field_id, letter_type_id,table_name,field_name,pretty_name, tcl_proc)
values (template_let_mrg_fld_sequence.nextval,letter_type_id,table_name,field_name, pretty_name, tcl_proc)
select lt.letter_type_id,
i.object_type as table_name,
i.interface_key as field_name,
i.pretty_name as pretty_name,
case
when w.widget = 'dynamic_select' then
'dbi::'||i.interface_key||'::get_name'
when w.widget = 'category_tree' and
i.interface_key not like '%_name' and
i.interface_key not like '%_desc' then
'dbi::'||i.interface_key||'::get_name'
else
'dbi::'||i.interface_key||'::get_value'
end as tcl_proc
from template_letter_types lt,
dbi_interfaces i
left outer join acs_attributes aa on (aa.object_type||'_'||aa.attribute_name = i.interface_key
and decode(aa.object_type,'person','party','aims_organisation','party',aa.object_type) = i.object_type)
left outer join flexbase_attributes fa on fa.acs_attribute_id = aa.attribute_id
left outer join flexbase_widgets w on w.widget_name = fa.widget_name
where i.object_type IN (select linked_object_type
from template_letter_object_map lom
where lom.interface_object_type = lt.interface_object_type
union select lt.interface_object_type from dual
union select 'template_letter' from dual)
and lt.interface_object_type = lt.interface_object_type
and not exists (select 1
from template_letter_merge_fields m
where m.sql_code is null
and m.field_name = i.interface_key
and m.letter_type_id = lt.letter_type_id)
and not exists (select 1
from template_letter_merge_fields m2
where m2.pretty_name = i.pretty_name
and m2.letter_type_id = lt.letter_type_id)
I've faced with a weird problem now. The query itself is huge so I'm not going to post it here (I could post however in case someone needs to see). Now I have a table ,TABLE1, with a CHAR(1) column, COL1. This table column is queried as part of my query. When I filter the recordset for this column I say:
WHERE TAB1.COL1=1
This way the query runs and returns a very big resultset. I've recently updated one of the subqueries to speed up the query. But after this when I write WHERE TAB1.COL1=1 it does not return anything, but if I change it to WHERE TAB1.COL1='1' it gives me the records I need. Notice the WHERE clause with quotes and w/o them. So to make it more clear, before updating one of the sub-queries I did not have to put quotes to check against COL1 value, but after updating I have to. What feature of Oracle is it that I'm not aware of?
EDIT: I'm posting the tw versions of the query in case someone might find it useful
Version 1:
SELECT p.ssn,
pss.pin,
pd.doc_number,
p.surname,
p.name,
p.patronymic,
to_number(p.sex, '9') as sex,
citiz_c.short_name citizenship,
p.birth_place,
p.birth_day as birth_date,
coun_c.short_name as country,
di.name as leg_city,
trim( pa.settlement
|| ' '
|| pa.street) AS leg_street,
pd.issue_date,
pd.issuing_body,
irs.irn,
irs.tpn,
irs.reg_office,
to_number(irs.insurer_type, '9') as insurer_type,
TO_CHAR(sa.REG_CODE)
||CONVERT_INT_TO_DOUBLE_LETTER(TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(TO_CHAR(sa.DOSSIER_NR, '0999999'), 2, 3)))
||SUBSTR(TO_CHAR(sa.DOSSIER_NR, '0999999'), 5, 4) CONVERTED_SSN_DOSSIER_NR,
fa.snr
FROM
(SELECT pss_t.pin,
pss_t.ssn
FROM EHDIS_INSURANCE.pin_ssn_status pss_t
WHERE pss_t.difference_status < 5
) pss
INNER JOIN SSPF_CENTRE.file_archive fa
ON fa.ssn = pss.ssn
INNER JOIN SSPF_CENTRE.persons p
ON p.ssn = fa.ssn
INNER JOIN
(SELECT pd_2.ssn,
pd_2.type,
pd_2.series,
pd_2.doc_number,
pd_2.issue_date,
pd_2.issuing_body
FROM
--The changed subquery starts here
(SELECT ssn,
MIN(type) AS type
FROM SSPF_CENTRE.person_documents
GROUP BY ssn
) pd_1
INNER JOIN SSPF_CENTRE.person_documents pd_2
ON pd_2.type = pd_1.type
AND pd_2.ssn = pd_1.ssn
) pd
--The changed subquery ends here
ON pd.ssn = p.ssn
INNER JOIN SSPF_CENTRE.ssn_archive sa
ON p.ssn = sa.ssn
INNER JOIN SSPF_CENTRE.person_addresses pa
ON p.ssn = pa.ssn
INNER JOIN
(SELECT i_t.irn,
irs_t.ssn,
i_t.tpn,
i_t.reg_office,
(
CASE i_t.insurer_type
WHEN '4'
THEN '1'
ELSE i_t.insurer_type
END) AS insurer_type
FROM sspf_centre.irn_registered_ssn irs_t
INNER JOIN SSPF_CENTRE.insurers i_t
ON i_t.irn = irs_t.new_irn
OR i_t.old_irn = irs_t.old_irn
WHERE irs_t.is_registration IS NOT NULL
AND i_t.is_real IS NOT NULL
) irs ON irs.ssn = p.ssn
LEFT OUTER JOIN SSPF_CENTRE.districts di
ON di.code = pa.city
LEFT OUTER JOIN SSPF_CENTRE.countries citiz_c
ON p.citizenship = citiz_c.numeric_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN SSPF_CENTRE.countries coun_c
ON pa.country_code = coun_c.numeric_code
WHERE pa.address_flag = '1'--Here's the column value with quotes
AND fa.form_type = 'Q3';
And Version 2:
SELECT p.ssn,
pss.pin,
pd.doc_number,
p.surname,
p.name,
p.patronymic,
to_number(p.sex, '9') as sex,
citiz_c.short_name citizenship,
p.birth_place,
p.birth_day as birth_date,
coun_c.short_name as country,
di.name as leg_city,
trim( pa.settlement
|| ' '
|| pa.street) AS leg_street,
pd.issue_date,
pd.issuing_body,
irs.irn,
irs.tpn,
irs.reg_office,
to_number(irs.insurer_type, '9') as insurer_type,
TO_CHAR(sa.REG_CODE)
||CONVERT_INT_TO_DOUBLE_LETTER(TO_NUMBER(SUBSTR(TO_CHAR(sa.DOSSIER_NR, '0999999'), 2, 3)))
||SUBSTR(TO_CHAR(sa.DOSSIER_NR, '0999999'), 5, 4) CONVERTED_SSN_DOSSIER_NR,
fa.snr
FROM
(SELECT pss_t.pin,
pss_t.ssn
FROM EHDIS_INSURANCE.pin_ssn_status pss_t
WHERE pss_t.difference_status < 5
) pss
INNER JOIN SSPF_CENTRE.file_archive fa
ON fa.ssn = pss.ssn
INNER JOIN SSPF_CENTRE.persons p
ON p.ssn = fa.ssn
INNER JOIN
--The changed subquery starts here
(SELECT ssn,
type,
series,
doc_number,
issue_date,
issuing_body
FROM
(SELECT ssn,
type,
series,
doc_number,
issue_date,
issuing_body,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (partition BY ssn order by type) rn
FROM SSPF_CENTRE.person_documents
)
WHERE rn = 1
) pd --
--The changed subquery ends here
ON pd.ssn = p.ssn
INNER JOIN SSPF_CENTRE.ssn_archive sa
ON p.ssn = sa.ssn
INNER JOIN SSPF_CENTRE.person_addresses pa
ON p.ssn = pa.ssn
INNER JOIN
(SELECT i_t.irn,
irs_t.ssn,
i_t.tpn,
i_t.reg_office,
(
CASE i_t.insurer_type
WHEN '4'
THEN '1'
ELSE i_t.insurer_type
END) AS insurer_type
FROM sspf_centre.irn_registered_ssn irs_t
INNER JOIN SSPF_CENTRE.insurers i_t
ON i_t.irn = irs_t.new_irn
OR i_t.old_irn = irs_t.old_irn
WHERE irs_t.is_registration IS NOT NULL
AND i_t.is_real IS NOT NULL
) irs ON irs.ssn = p.ssn
LEFT OUTER JOIN SSPF_CENTRE.districts di
ON di.code = pa.city
LEFT OUTER JOIN SSPF_CENTRE.countries citiz_c
ON p.citizenship = citiz_c.numeric_code
LEFT OUTER JOIN SSPF_CENTRE.countries coun_c
ON pa.country_code = coun_c.numeric_code
WHERE pa.address_flag = 1--Here's the column value without quotes
AND fa.form_type = 'Q3';
I've put separating comments for the changed subqueries and the WHERE clause in both queries. Both versions of the subqueries return the same result, one of them is just slower, which is why I decided to update it.
With the most simplistic example I can't reproduce your problem on 11.2.0.3.0 or 11.2.0.1.0.
SQL> create table tmp_test ( a char(1) );
Table created.
SQL> insert into tmp_test values ('1');
1 row created.
SQL> select *
2 from tmp_test
3 where a = 1;
A
-
1
If I then insert a non-numeric value into the table I can confirm Chris' comment "that Oracle will rewrite tab1.col1 = 1 to to_number(tab1.col1) = 1", which implies that you only have numeric characters in the column.
SQL> insert into tmp_test values ('a');
1 row created.
SQL> select *
2 from tmp_test
3 where a = 1;
ERROR:
ORA-01722: invalid number
no rows selected
If you're interested in tracking this down you should gradually reduce the complexity of the query until you have found a minimal, reproducible, example. Oracle can pre-compute a conversion to be used in a JOIN, which as your query is complex seems like a possible explanation of what's happening.
Oracle explicitly recommends against using implicit conversion so it's wiser not to use it at all; as you're finding out. For a start there's no guarantees that your indexes will be used correctly.
Oracle recommends that you specify explicit conversions, rather than rely on implicit or automatic conversions, for these reasons:
SQL statements are easier to understand when you use explicit data type conversion functions.
Implicit data type conversion can have a negative impact on performance, especially if the data type of a column value is converted to that of a constant rather than the other way around.
Implicit conversion depends on the context in which it occurs and may not work the same way in every case. For example, implicit conversion from a datetime value to a VARCHAR2 value may return an unexpected year depending on the value of the NLS_DATE_FORMAT
parameter.
Algorithms for implicit conversion are subject to change across software releases and among Oracle products. Behavior of explicit conversions is more predictable.
If you do only have numeric characters in the column I would highly recommend changing this to a NUMBER(1) column and I would always recommend explicit conversion to avoid a lot of pain in the longer run.
It's hard to tell without the actual query. What I would expect is that TAB1.COL1 is in some way different before and after the refactoring.
Candidates differences are Number vs. CHAR(1) vs. CHAR(x>1) vs VARCHAR2
It is easy to introduce differences like this with subqueries where you join two tables which have different types in the join column and you return different columns in your subquery.
To hunt that issue down you might want to check the exact datatypes of your query. Not sure how to do that right now .. but an idea would be to put it in a view and use sqlplus desc on it.
I have a dynamic PL/SQL that will construct the SELECT statement based on what the searching criteria input from the users,likes:
l_sql := 'SELECT * INTO FROM TABLEA WHERE 1=1 ';
IF in_param1 IS NOT NULL THEN
l_sql := l_sql || 'AND column1 = in_param1 ';
END IF;
IF in_param2 IS NOT NULL THEN
l_sql := l_sql || 'AND column2 = in_param2 ';
END IF;
...................................
IF in_paramXX IS NOT NULL THEN
l_sql := l_sql || 'AND columnXX = in_paramXX ';
END IF;
To reduce the hard parse overhead , I consider to use the binding variables. However , it is difficult to manage when supplying the actual values to the binding variables as there are so many binding variables and combination of the generated SELECT statement . I cannot use the method of DBMS_SESSION.set_context() introduced at http://www.dba-oracle.com/plsql/t_plsql_dynamic_binds.htm because my account has no right to use this package. Besides , I want the generated SQL only contains the conditions on the fields that the user did not leave empty. So I cannot change the dynamic SQL to something likes
SELECT * INTO FROM TABLEA WHERE 1=1
and ( in_param1 is NULL or column1 = in_param1)
and ( in_param2 is NULL or column2 = in_param2)
...............................................
and ( in_paramXX is NULL or columnXX = in_paramXX)
So , I want to try to use the DBMS_SQL method .Can anyone give an example about how to use DBMS_SQL to call dynamic SQL with binding variables? Especially , how can I get the result executed from DBMS_SQL.execute() to the SYS_REFCURSOR , something like :
open refcursor for select .... from
The oracle version that I use is 10g and it seems that the oracle 10g does not have DBMS_Sql.To_Refcursor()
In your Oracle version you can apply some tricks to your query in order to do this. The idea is to use a query in the following form:
select *
from
(select
:possibleParam1 as param1
-- do the same for every possible param in your query
:possibleParamN as paramN
from dual
where rownum > 0) params
inner join
-- join your tables here
on
-- concatenate your filters here
where
-- fixed conditions
then execute it with:
open c for query using param1, ..., paramN;
It works by using DUAL to generate a fake row with every single param, then inner joining this fake row to your real query (without any filters) using only the filters you want to apply. This way, you have a fixed list of bind variables in the SELECT list of the params subquery, but can control which filters are applied by modifying the join condition between params and your real query.
So, if you have something like, say:
create table people (
first_name varchar2(20)
last_name varchar2(20)
);
you can construct the following query if you just want to filter on first name
select *
from
(select
:first_name as first_name,
:last_name as last_name
from dual
where rownum > 0) params
inner join
people
on
people.first_name = params.first_name;
and this if you want to filter on both first_name and last_name
select *
from
(select
:first_name as first_name,
:last_name as last_name
from dual
where rownum > 0) params
inner join
people
on
people.first_name = params.first_name and
people.last_name = params.last_name;
and in every case you would execute with
open c for query using filterFirstName, filterLastName;
It is important for performance to use the where rownum > 0 with DUAL as it forces Oracle to "materialize" the subquery. This usually makes DUAL stop interfering with the rest of the query. Anyway, you should check the execution plans to be sure Oracle is not doing anything wrong.
In 10g a DBMS_SQL cursor can't be changed into a Ref Cursor. Going through a result set through DBMS_SQL is tortuous since, as well as looping through the rows, you also have to loop through the columns in a row.
I want the generated SQL only contains
the conditions on the fields that the
user did not leave empty
Is that purely for performance reasons ? If so, I suggest you work out what the practical execution plans are and use separate queries for them.
For example, say I'm searching on people and the parameters are first_name, last_name. gender, date_of_birth. The table has indexes on (last_name,first_name) and (date_of_birth), so I only want to allow a query if it specifies either last_name or date_of_birth.
IF :p_firstname IS NOT NULL and :p_lastname IS NOT NULL THEN
OPEN cur FOR
'SELECT * FROM PEOPLE WHERE last_name=:a AND first_name=:b AND
(date_of_birth = :c or :c is NULL) AND (gender = :d or :d IS NULL)' USING ....
ELSIF :p_lastname IS NOT NULL THEN
OPEN cur FOR
'SELECT * FROM PEOPLE WHERE last_name=:a AND
(date_of_birth = :c or :c is NULL) AND (gender = :d or :d IS NULL)' USING ....
ELSIF :p_dateofbirth IS NOT NULL THEN
OPEN cur FOR
'SELECT * FROM PEOPLE WHERE date_of_birth=:a AND
(first_name=:b OR :b IS NULL) AND (gender = :d or :d IS NULL)' USING ....
ELSE
RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR(-20001,'Last Name or Date of Birth MUST be supplied);
END IF;