I have some Spring Boot JUnit tests that require a somewhat lengthy server start up (I'm loading a complex domain in JPA). I've put them into a test suite, but each test kicks off a new server start up.
Is it possible to set them up in such a way that the server is only started once and each test is loaded onto it and run as if the server were started by the test itself?
Okay, so the solution here is actually built in to Spring testing. That is, it caches ApplicationContexts for tests, as described here, as long as the various things like properties are the same.
Ironically, I screwed this up by trying to speed up the tests by using test properties to limit what was loaded.
Related
I am writing some BDD tests using Cucumber for my Spring Boot application (v2.2.1), and it works OK.
However, I am facing some performance issue, because the application gets started/stopped for every scenario in the feature file : I am using in-memory DB with Liquibase, so for each scenario, this gets executed (takes a few seconds).
Sure, it's currently guaranteed that my scenarios are very well isolated.. Maybe in some cases I will want this behaviour, but right now, most of my feature files would benefit from a one time set up : since each scenario sets up different records (with no overlap) it needs in the in-memory DB, I could theoretically executed my scenarios in parallel on a single Spring Boot application running.
I saw https://blog.codecentric.de/en/2017/02/integration-testing-strategies-spring-boot-microservices-part-2/ , but it requires to have built the application first, then start it from the jar.
Isn't there a way to do the same, but with the application started once from the Cucumber runner ? any example somewhere ?
Thanks to #mpkorstanje link, I was able to find the issue : while trying to replicate the suggestion in my project, I discovered that one of the config that was scanned had a #DirtiesContext(classMode = DirtiesContext.ClassMode.AFTER_CLASS) annotation.. So that was the issue. Now I need to look at a workaround like what is suggested here : #DirtiesContext tears context down after every cucumber test scenario, not class
I was reading through the guide for using Spring Boot Test and there was a paragraph that got me confused.
“As our profiles get richer, it's tempting to swap every now and then in our integration tests. There are convenient tools to do so, like #ActiveProfiles. However, every time we pull a test with a new profile, a new ApplicationContext gets created.”
https://www.baeldung.com/spring-tests
So it assumes that if all tests are run under the same profile, there is only one ApplicationContext created — but how is it possible? I thought that all the objects are recreated for each test suite anyway. Am I missing something?
The official reference says that it's cached.
https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/testing.html#testing-ctx-management
But how does it get loaded into the JUnit runner or Spock one across multiple test suites?
What was missing in my understanding is the fact that all the test suites are run as a part of a single program, so it's easy to cache any objects that are required by all of them, including Spring context.
I am working on a sample application right now using Spring Boot, Spring Data JPA, and Spring Data Elasticsearch. I want to be able to run the unit tests as part of a pipeline build, but they require Elasticsearch to be running to work as the service makes calls to said ES server. SQL works fine because I am using an in-memory H2 instance.
I have implemented some code to attempt to launch ES as an "embedded" server. The embedded server works just fine, but it seems like, at least from what I can tell, it is started AFTER the context loads. Most importantly after the ElasticSearchConfiguration does it's thing.
I think I need refactor the code out of AbstractElasticsearchTest into a separate class that can run prior to ElasticSearchConfiguration generates the client/template, but I am not sure how to do it, nor how to Google said process.
Is there some mechanism in Spring Boot that could be used to start the embedded servers prior to running any of the configurations? Or is there some way I could enhance ElasticSearchConfiguration to do it prior to creating the client/template, but only when running the unit tests?
Edit:
So, just to be a little more specific...what I am looking for is a means/way to either run ES 5 in "embedded" mode OR how to mock up the Spring Data ES code enough so that it works for the CI server. The code linked above currently is mixing unit tests with integration tests, I know, as it's currently making calls to a physical ES server. That's what I am trying to correct: I should be able to stub/mock enough of the underlying Spring Data code to make the unit test think it's talking to the real-deal. I can then change the tests that determine if the documents made it to ES and test things like type-ahead searches to be integration tests instead so they do not run when CI or Sonar runs.
Ok, so for those that might come back here in the future, this commit shows the changes I made to get ES to run as "embedded".
The nuts-and-bolts of it was to start the node as "local" then physically return node.client(). Then in the Spring Bean method that gets the client, check if you have "embedded" turned on, if so start the node and return it's Client (the local one), if not just build the client just as normal.
Is it possible to write junit test that persist in mysql using hibernate / jpa?
If so any example available?
I'm using spring/hibernate for my application
When you have real database connection I would not call your test unit test, but more like integration test. To be honest this kind of tests is not a good idea in most cases. It requires some maintenance (every time you have changes in db), and in most cases just tests if it is possible to connect do database (and save some simple object).
Focus on writing good tests for domain level classes. Simple database integration tests will only give you illusion of high quality application.
If you want to write an integration test that looks like a unit test, you could try Arquillian.
What Arquillian does is basically start an application container (Glassfish I think is the default), then it deploys your server-side application in the container and runs the tests against the just-deployed application.
What you write in the unit tests is really client code, so that what you are effectively running is an integration test (with a real database and all the services you would have in a real environment), just in a junit-like way.
They also have a specific tutorial for persistence testing.
I have two applications. I did integration unit tests for one of these applications, but the services that call the other application are mocked up (instead of injecting the real service, I inject another one which is mocked up).
Is there a possible way to make a real connection to the other application without having to mock it up.
A simple example would be really helpful.
Thanks in advance!
just inject the real services and do your integration test. The issue is to make sure that everything that everything that needs to be injection can be injected. Lets call your services foo and bar where foo depends on bar. if bar depends on something in the application server then starting it up during a unit might be a problem, since you are not running the app in the application server.
Integration testing is important and valuable, but it requires some careful thought to setup. The way that I have managed to setup integration testing in my application is to use spring profiles to seperate the combinations of configuration. For example I have profiles called.
production
development
container
standalone
So that way you can have a test that is launched with the proper profile that setups all the correct beans to be injected like so.
#ActiveProfile(profiles={"deveolpment","standalone"})
#RunWith ... etc other spring annotations to configure a test
public class SomeJunitTest {
}
Using profiles makes it very easy to have fine grained control over which set of beans are configured for each test.
Also for integartion testing I have found TestNG to be much easier to use that JUnit because it has features that make writing integration tests easier.