Jira JQL - Show all issues by Epic assignee - filter

I am using a vanilla version of Jira (I can't install any add-ons - it's company wide).
I'm trying to filter to show all issues for a given team. The ideal way to do this IMO is to assign their team leader to their epics and have Jira filter to show all the issues within that set of epics.
So far, I've hit a brick wall. I can easily setup a filter to return the epic for a given user - or return all tickets assigned to a user generally. However, I cannot seem to return all tasks related to all epics of which the specified user is the assignee.
Any help is hugely appreciated.

Related

Proactively Install / Push Apps in Teams for Multiple Users

I have a query regarding, How to Proactively Install / Push Apps in Teams for Multiple Users ?.
We have added our Bot Application as part of Teams App Catalogue, and I followed below document regarding Manage App Setup Policies in Microsoft Teams to install apps:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-US/microsoftteams/teams-app-setup-policies?WT.mc_id=TeamsAdminCenterCSH#install-apps
Though above link clearly states that it automatically installs apps for users, but when we follow above link it only adds application as part of Teams App Catalogue.
So just wanted to know that does installation here mean, only adding in App List and not installing as such on user machine ?.
The other method we can follow is to create a custom script and use Graph API queries as described in below link:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/platform/graph-api/proactive-bots-and-messages/graph-proactive-bots-and-messages#proactive-app-installation-in-teams
So wanted to know as per Microsoft, what is the recommended way of Pushing Bot App to multiple users on MS Teams. Can this be handled with Teams Admin Center ?.
Any help or guidance on the approach to achieve proactive app installation in Teams would be great.
Thanks In Advance!!!..
Both of these approaches should work fine. App Setup Policies is the easiest though as you don't need to write any code, but be aware that it can take a while for the policy to apply (I think up to a day or even two). There's a way to force it to update, I think if the user signs out of Teams entirely and signs back in.
I tried with Teams Admin Center and tested 2 scenarios:
1.) For User Already Logged In
2.) For New User Logging the First Time
The policies take time to be applied / be effective for users (not immediate). In my testing, I logged in after ~2 hours for New User and waited ~2 days for already logged in User. We have to test the same for your respective environment. Also these are not Standard Timelines, and we have Test in our environment accordingly.

unable to get suggestions in qna maker after enabling active leaning filter by suggestions option

Hi,
I'm unable to get suggestions for qna pair in qna maker after enabling active learning feature, and when filter by suggestions is ON I'm getting the display as above. Though the qna pairs are added i can not see them after the filter by suggestion option is ON. So can you please suggest me how to solve this senario. I can get the answer for the qna pair while testing in bot framework emulator.
Thanks
Active Learning suggestions will not appear immediately after turning the feature on in the portal. They'll appear after the qna model has received enough feedback to offer up a suggestion.
See comment I wrote back in Feb of last year regarding how suggestions are trigged and when they'll show up in the portal, in MS Docs discussion for full context of the conversation. But the main thing is this:
When there is a low confidence score difference between the top answers, we collect weighted implicit and explicit feedback to cluster suggestions for any QnA ID.
=> When enough feedback is collected for any given suggestion, it will show in the KB.
More specifically, we cluster similar user queries to generate suggestions. When minimum required feedback is collected, only then will the suggestions show in the KB.
The QnA team wants to avoid publicly divulging the exact logic of what
exactly is the "minimum required feedback" and how often suggestions
are generated (besides, the team is working on improving and
optimizing the logic behind active learning as well)
--however to see suggestions appear in the qnamaker.ai portal:
not only ensure that you've given the bot enough feedback
but also
give the back end "some time" to allow for the suggestions to appear
in the portal. Again, feedback is collected when your user types in a
query that returns answers from QnA that have confidence scores that
are close together.
It is also good to note that feedback is not collected in the Test
panel in the qnamaker.ai portal as of now. You will need to chat with
your bot via emulator or a channel to provide feedback to your bot
that it can use for active learning.
Additional resource: 48.qnamaker-active-learning-bot

getStream - Flat Feed where multiple users can post

we are implementing stream in our application and so far we love the out of the box react components as well as the backend implementation stream ruby - this is our setup currently.
We are close to deploying a first MVP but found that it seems to be not possible to post activities to a flat feed from multiple users by default.
Our use case is that we have a group of people that want to post activities about a certain topic (think facebook groups). Therefore we create a feed for the object (lets say a company) and want each user to be able to post activities there. Our current workaround is to add the author id as additional data and add a custom header to a activity - obviously not the best solution as reactions won't work that way.
Looking around we found that this seems to not work out of the box see this issue and this question.
Is this a feature that is only available to paying customers or how can we activate it?
Thank you in advance!
When using Stream with React users can only post to their own user feed, this is a default permission policy that can be changed by Stream.
I suggest reaching to Stream support by email and ask to change the permission policy.

Instagram Location Data

I am working on developing a platform which is integrated with Instagram. My app is still in the review process currently but would like some clarification on what is the best way to build one of the modules.
An important part of our application involves us selecting the most appropriate user to carry out a task. In order to make this decision, we need to see the demographic information of a certain user’s followers. More precisely, we need to know how many followers lie in each country
The current workflow we have gone ahead with is, by fetching the list of follower’s of a user’s profile, checking any random post on their profile and fetching the geolocation of that follower. This however has lead to inaccurate information.
Can you suggest if there is an alternate to getting this done?
Thank You
There is no accurate way to get location of a user. You can use 2 methods to get best guess:
check the bio information for location
get all photos and get geo location area from where most of the posts are coming from.

Should I use Recurring Profiles (Beta) for my recurly recurring payments module?

This probably seems like a stupid question off hand, and maybe it is actually, but there are a few specific reasons I'm leaning away from using them. The paypal recurring profiles implementation seems like it doesn't work very well for a couple reasons:
There are a number of bugs in the process, including that new customers aren't created for first time checkouts using it.
Orders don't seem to be created for Recurring Profiles - maybe I have something misconfigured...?
Recurring Profiles have a Related Orders association, which is empty for my tests.
Apparently, Transactions are supposed to be used for recurring profiles (I read that on another thread recently), however I don't see those being populated either, needless to say.
What I'm leaning towards is the following:
Products can be associated to Subscription Plans within Recurly
During checkout, if a product with an association to a Subscription Plan is in the cart, the Recurly payment method will be available.
Upon purchase, an account and subscription will be created for the Magento user account.
In addition to the Order that is created, I will create a Transaction and associate it to the Order.
On the successful_payment_notification, I will insert a fresh Transaction against the original Order.
In the My Account section for the end user, I will extend the order detail template with a list of transactions.
Having a config option to suppress the Recurring Profiles section from My Account to avoid confusion on the part of the end users.
I'm sure someone much smarter than me has thought through this already, look forward to any insight you may be able to offer! Thanks!
UPDATE: My original question was kind of broken into two parts: one being why aren't my recurring profiles working even with PayPal, and the other being - does it make sense to use Recurring Profiles for my subscriptions feature. I didn't really get any answer for the latter, so I accepted the answer that was given to assist with the former issue.
I have since posted a new question related specifically to the question of whether or not to use Recurring Profiles: https://magento.stackexchange.com/questions/3202/should-i-use-recurring-profiles-for-subscriptions-feature
I have same problem and just found this:
Working with Recurring Profiles
where written that:
The Related Orders tab lists the orders which have been created according to the payment system notifications referenced by this recurring profile.
Important
To have information updated on the Recurring Profile View page, Instant Payment Notifications (IPN) must be set up in merchant account of the PayPal payment system.
I guess this is the solution to the problem

Resources