I am using sensu and the check-tail.rb plugin to alert if any errors appear in my app logs. The problem is that I want the check to be successful if it finds 3 or more error messages.
The solution that I came up with is using a regex like:
\^.*"status":503,.*$.*^.*"status":503,.*$.*^.*"status":503,.*$\im
But it seems to not work because of the match function: instead of passing the variable as a ruby regex it passes it as a string (this can be seen here).
You need to pass the pattern as a string literal, not as a Regexp object.
Thus, you need to remove the regex delimiters and change the modifiers to their inline option variants, that is, prepend the pattern with (?im).
(?im)\A.*"status":503,.*$.*^.*"status":503,.*$.*^.*"status":503,.*\z
Note that to match the start of string in Ruby, you need to use \A and to match the end of string, you need to use \z anchors.
Related
I'm completely new to Ruby so I was just wondering if someone could help me out.
I have the following String:
"<planKey><key>OR-J8U</key></planKey>"
What is the regex I have to write to get the center part OR-J8U?
Use the following:
str = "<planKey><key>OR-J8U</key></planKey>"
str[/(?<=\<key\>).*(?=\<\/key\>)/]
#=> "OR-J8U"
This captures anything in between opening and closing 'key' tags using lookahead and lookbehinds
If you want to get the string OR-J8U then you could simply use that string in the regular expression; the - character has to be escaped:
/OR\-J8U/
Though, I believe you want any string that is enclosed within <planKey><key> and </key></planKey>. In that case ice's answer is useful if you allow for an empty string:
/(?<=\<key\>).*(?=\<\/key\>)/
If you don't allow for an empty string, replace the * with +:
/(?<=\<key\>).*(?=\<\/key\>)/
If you prefer a more general approach (any string enclosed within any tags), then I believe the common opinion is not to use a regular expression. Instead consider using an HTML parser. On SO you can find some questions and answers in that regard.
I want to match the path "/". I've tried the following alternatives, and the first two do match, but I don't know why the third doesn't:
/\A\/\z/.match("/") # <MatchData "/">
"/\A\/\z/".match("/") # <MatchData "/">
Regexp.new("/\A\/\z/").match("/") # nil
What's going on here? Why are they different?
The first snippet is the only correct one.
The second example is... misleading. That string literal "/\A\/\z/" is, obviously, not a regex. It's a string. Strings have #match method which converts its argument to a regexp (if not already one) and match against it. So, in this example, it's '/' that is the regular expression, and it matches a forward slash found in the other string.
The third line is completely broken: don't need the surrounding slashes there, they are part of regex literal, which you didn't use. Also use single quoted strings, not double quoted (which try to interpret escape sequences like \A)
Regexp.new('\A/\z').match("/") # => #<MatchData "/">
And, of course, none of the above is needed if you just want to check if a string consists of only one forward slash. Just use the equality check in this case.
s == '/'
How can I transform a string into a regex string, properly escaping all regex-specific characters? I am using interpolation to build the regex string to allow users to customize the regex without having to touch the code (or expecting them to know regex)
Example
custom_text = "Hello"
my_regex = /#{custom_text}:\s*(\d+)/i
Which results in the following regex when my code uses it
/Hello:\s*(\d+)/i
This allows users to perhaps provide language localizations without having to worry about figuring out where my regex is used, how it's used, or whether they will break the script if they changed something.
However if they wanted to include things like periods or question marks like Hello?, I would probably need to escape them first.
Use Regexp.escape:
my_regex = /#{Regexp.escape(custom_text)}:\s*(\d+)/i
For example:
>> puts /#{Regexp.escape('Hello?')}/.inspect
/Hello\?/
How can I match a string that is NOT partners?
Here is what I have that matches partners:
/^partners$/i
I've tried the following to NOT match partners but doesn't seem to work:
/^(?!partners)$/i
Your regex
/^(?!partners)$/i
only matches empty lines because you didn't include the end-of-line anchor in your lookahead assertion. Lookaheads do just that - they "look ahead" without actually matching any characters, so only lines that match the regex ^$ will succeed.
This would work:
/^(?!partners$)/i
This reports a match with any string (or, since we're in Ruby here, any line in a multi-line string) that's different from partners. Note that it only matches the empty string at the start of the line. Which is enough for validation purposes, but the match result will be "" (instead of nil which you'd get if the match failed entirely).
not easily but with the look ahead operator it can.
Here the ruby regex
^((?!partners).)*$
Cheers
If you only want to get a true value when string is not partners then there is no need to use regex and you can just use a string comparison (which ignores case).
If you for some reason need a positive regex match for any string which does not contain partners (if it's a part of a larger regex for example) you could use several different constructs, like:
`^(?:(?!partners).)*$`
or
^(?:[^p]+|p(?!artners))*$
For example, in Java:
!"partners".equalsIgnoreCase(aString)
I have read quite a few posts here for matching nested braces in Ruby using Regexp. However I cannot adapt it to my situation and I am stuck. The Ruby 1.9 book uses the following to match a set of nested braces
/\A(?<brace_expression>{([^{}]|\g<brace_expression>)*})\Z/x
I am trying to alter this in three ways. 1. I want to use parentheses instead of braces, 2. I want a character in front (such as a hash symbol), and 3. I want to match anywhere in the string, not just beginning and end. Here is what I have so far.
/(#(?<brace_expression>\(([^\(\)]|\g<brace_expression>)*\)))/x
Any help in getting the right expression would be appreciated.
Using the regex modifier x enables comments in the regex. So the # in your regex is interpreted as a comment character and the rest of the regex is ignored. You'll need to either escape the # or remove the x modifier.
Btw: There's no need to escape the parentheses inside [].