fedex integration with laravel - laravel

I am integrating following git-hub library but getting following problem.
[Symfony\Component\Debug\Exception\FatalThrowableError]
Class 'Arkitecht\FedEx\Laravel\Providers\FedExServiceProvider' not found
I am doing same as mentioned in Readme file of project. GitHub project link is as follows:
ArchitechtArchitect Readme
Thanks in Advance

Put:
Arkitecht\FedEx\Laravel\Providers\FedExServiceProvider::class,
in providers within config/app.php
Don't write "Arkitecht\FedEx\Laravel\": "src/" in your composer file.
also, you may need to run composer dump-autoload in the root folder

Related

Artifactory composer packages.json 404

I am using artifactory and have no issues with the npm solution. However, I have set up composer using the "Set Me Up" instructions, i.e. installed the ~/.composer/config.json & ~/.composer/auth.json files. I now get the following error when I try to perform a composer install:
$ dcomp install
Loading composer repositories with package information
[Composer\Downloader\TransportException]
The "https://myartifactory.jfrog.io/artifactory/api/composer/php-local/packages.json" file could not be downloaded (HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found)
install [--prefer-source] [--prefer-dist] ...
The user I have configured in auth.json is an admin user, and I've pushed a single package into the Artifactory. Additionally, I noticed the url contains plural packages.json as opposed to singular package.json, so I am assuming this is an issue with the artifactory configuration itself and not the package I've uploaded.
For Artifactory to index composer packages successfully you also need to make sure that each package has version specified.
There are 3 ways to achieve that:
Include the version attribute in the package composer.json file
Set a composer.version property on the package itself.
Use the version field when deploying it via the UI.
You can easily test it inside the UI by clicking on the archive you just uploaded, then go to the properties tab and add a property for example:
composer.version with value for example 1.0.0.
The issue in my case was as a couple commenters observed: the index wasn't being generated.
For me, the fix was a matter of using a .zip compressed file to upload composer packages instead of a .tar.gz. I can't tell you why a tarball won't work, especially considering Artifactory's documentation explicitly mentions tar.gz, but it would appear .zip is the way to go.
When you first create a PHP composer repository in Artifactory it will not have the repository index yet (package.json file). The index will be created only after you deploy your first package.
It is possible that Artifactory was unable to read the package metadata for the package you deployed. In such a case, assuming this is the only package in the repository, the index will not be calculated.
In order to verify this is the case:
Browse the php-local repository in the Artifactory UI
Check for the presence of a .composer/packages.json file (relative to the repository root). If it does not exist, it is an indication that Artifactory was unable to calculate the repository index
Select the package you deployed, and switch to the Composer Info tab
Check that you can see the correct package version. If you see "No version found" - there was an issue with getting the version (probably because it is not included in the composer.json file)
Look for an error similar to the following in the artifactory log file:
Failed to persist package metadata for 'php-local/my-package.zip'.
Unable to read the package version from the extracted composer.json
file
If this is the case, you can solve the issue by:
Add a property named composer.version to your composer package and set its value to be the correct package version. You can do it by selecting the package file from the UI, switching to the Properties tab and adding a new property
If this done correctly you should be able to see the correct version in the Composer Info tab and that the packages.json file is being generated
If all of this does not help and the packages.json file is still not generated, there is probably another error which prevents Artifactory from generating it.
Try re-generating the repository index by:
Going to the root of the repository in the Artifactory UI
Right click the root of the repository and choose "Recalculate Index"
The index should be generated in the background
If the index is still not generated search the artifactory log file for any relevant error messages
Finally, one more option to try is deploying a different composer package and seeing if it behaves the same.
I have seen an Include / Exclude Pattern on the Jfrog repository that does not match the <vendor>/<package> naming standard cause this issue. We were able to upload artifacts but they were excluded metadata endpoint.
The following endpoint returned a 404 response code for every package until the Include / Exclude Pattern was fixed.
https://<org>.jfrog.io/artifactory/api/composer/<repo>/p2/<vendor>/<package>.json

GitHub Pages failed to build your site: File to import not found or unreadable: variables

I am trying to build a simple blog with Github Pages and I have tested my changes locally with jekyll serve bundler. The problem is when I push my changes to GitHub, I see the following error:
Your SCSS file blog/styles.scss has an error on line 15: File to import not found or unreadable: variables. Load path: /hoosegow/.bundle/ruby/2.5.0/gems/jekyll-theme-primer-0.5.4/_sass.
I looked at _sass/_variables.scss file and I don't see any obvious issues.
Any pointers? Appreciate any help (FYI - I new to ruby and jekyll ecosystem)
I was able to find the cause of this issue. The problem was that all my blog files were under the blog/ directory in the repository and GitHub Pages does not use that as the source to publish the blog. It expects the source to be at the root of the repository. Once I moved all the files to the root of the repository, everything worked fine.

Composer from local repos InvalidArgumentException

I am trying to create a module based on this example Oxid 6 module
https://github.com/linslin/oxid6-example-module
I have changed and cloned it to
https://github.com/v3ritas1989/gg_oxid6-example-module
as well as into my local module folder
..modules/compname/modulename
So for the beginning I want to change the modulename, submodul folder name and the namespace given
modules/companyname/modulename
Path Example:
modules/linslin/oxid6-example-module
However if I try to install my module
via composer
composer require compname/gg_oxid6-example-module:dev-master
(for local folder)
composer require v3ritas1989/gg_oxid6-example-module:dev-master
(for git)
I get ERROR:
[InvalidArgumentException] Could not find a matching version of
package compname/gg_oxid6-example-module. Check the package
spelling, your version constraint and that the package is available in
a stability which match es your minimum-stability (stable).
What I dont understand is why
composer require linslin/oxid6-example-module:dev-master
is working even so I deleted the local folder linslin
I guess it is pulling it from github?
but why then does this not work with my changed module and my github repo?
I made only search replace
modulename
compname
namespacename
Question:
I am assuming composer just does not find my repo or local.. so
How do I do composer require in a way that it only checks my local
folder?
Why does it also not find it in my github?
you need to register repository in your main composer.json file as described here:
https://getcomposer.org/doc/05-repositories.md#loading-a-package-from-a-vcs-repository
or register your package in https://packagist.org/ so it would be automatically detected.
There are also other ways of registering repositories, for example define it as local repository: https://getcomposer.org/doc/05-repositories.md#path

Host private PHP packages on packagist with gitlab

I have a gitlab installation for my organization. To standardize, the frameworks and development process we'd like to make the use of our own packagist installation on our server.
The thing that is confusing me, is when I have to submit a package which is on a repo of gitlab, it requires authentication. I know while including a package in composer.json I can put repo, username and password so that it can read package from there. or while I am creating a project:
composer create-project vendor/name path --repository-url=http://user:password#my.gitlab.com/myrepo/package.git
If that is true, do we really need packagist? if yes then what would be the best way to setup this.
I'd appreciate if you guys also tell me how the package submission on packagist(our own hosted) will work.

Lumen deployment error on Heroku / Scalingo

I created a fresh lumen project using composer and try to put it on heroku/scalingo.
However in both hosting solutions I get the following error:
Generating optimized autoload files
[RuntimeException]
Could not scan for classes inside "/build/4a8cf965dc0068e76480b81aa5321cff/vendor/laravel/lumen-framework/src/Foundation" which does not appear to be a file nor a folder
It is related to composer but I dont understand how.
Thank you
I added to exclude the /vendor/ folder on .gitignore and this solved the problem. But I dont understand what it was looking for that broke it.

Resources