I am looking for the way for generating unique identifiers for different business entities in project I am working on. Currently we are using GUIDs, but we want to move to number identifiers. I have worked with Facebook Graph API and figured out they have some kind of unique and self-contained (as I supposed) ids. But I could not find any information or assumptions in the Internet about how they generate this keys.
I formulated some minimum requirments for identifiers based on my suggestions and investigation of Facebook ids. Here they are:
It must be presented as long / Int64 value.
It must be unique in scope of whole system.
It must contains as minimum type of requesting entity (user, page, etc.). So that it gives possibility to create сonvenient API like GET {host}/{id}.
Does anybody have any experience or ideas how can this task can be solved? I guess there should be some existing solutions or specifications for it. If anybody has some suggestions it would be great to hear that.
Ok, the answer for me was Twitter Snowflake. Also you can find some interesting useful information here: Sharding & IDs at Instagram. Hope it helps somebody.
Related
I need to modify the body of an existing GitHub issue in a Project. All I'll be passed is the title of the issue, and a word (the word exists in the body, and I'll just need to fill the checkbox next it).
It looks like to do this I'll need to use the GET API to get the body of the issue, modify it, and then use the EDIT API to swap in the new body. However the GET API can only be called with the issue number. I need to do all this as quickly as possible. Is there some way to search via an API call?
Thoughts much appreciated!
Edit: All my issues are in the same project (and issue titles will be unique there). I've also recently discovered Github's GraphQL API, which may be applicable here.
You can use the issue search endpoint with the in and repo¹ keywords:
GET /search/issues?q=text+to+search+in:title+repo:some/repo
Of course, issue titles aren't guaranteed to be unique. You'll have to request each of the issues that comes back and see if its body contains the word you're looking for. Even in that case you could get multiple positive results.
It would be much better if you could search by issue number.
¹I've assumed that you really mean "repository" when you say "project". But if you're actually talking about GitHub Project Boards you can use the project keyword as well or instead.
I was wondering if it is possible to find a specific place using the google places api.
I know the name of the place, the address or website url, and the coordinates.
I need this to get the ratings this place has.
Is this possible? If not, is it going to be?
I think your best bet would be to do a nearbysearch with the location (lat,long), a small radius, and the name and types parameters to narrow it down. If you are targeting a specific place, then you can just manually find it in the results and use its reference for a Details request in your solution.
If the target place can be dynamic, for example based on user input, then you might want to show the user the list of results and let them choose the correct one. I don't think there's a way to guarantee that you will always get exactly the result you're looking for as, say, the first result in the list. Experiment with different types of requests and parameters and try to get a sense for the behaviour of the responses to find what will work best for your solution.
Hi I am building an Internet website with Java and Spring framework. I believe my question is not technology or framework related.
I need to have links in user interface so that visitors can click and to see records. These links have the format of
http://mysite.com?id=number-id-or-random-unique-string
Not all records are allowed to view. For the ID parameter in the URL, I could use the database-generated number as the ID value and so I do not need to have additional programming. Or I could use unique random string (for example: jcTDjhdDUls) as the ID value (I have to program this part). Numbers allow curious people (with good or bad intentions) to EASILY guess and try other IDs. Unique random strings seems better in this regard.
However, no matter numbers or strings as the value for the ID, I have security check in the backend code to see whether a visitor is allowed to see a record. From this perspective, I am not sure what is the real benefit of having random string as the ID.
I hope to have input from experienced people. What design decision do you choose? Or other better ideas?
Thanks and regards.
You certainly can if you want to, but I would not go through the trouble to randomize the ID. This is at its root, "security through obscurity (STO)." Sometimes STO is useful, but in this case I don't think it is worth complicating and bloating the code and memory footprint. It's surprisingly easy to enumerate the valid IDs whether they're randomized or not, using a tool like Burp Suite. All the security controls that really matter should be implemented in the backend.
I am new at the idea of programming algorithms. I can work with simplistic ideas, but my current project requires that I create something a bit more complicated.
I'm trying to create a categorization system based on keywords and subsets of 'general' categories that filter down into more detailed categories that requires as little work as possible from the user.
I.E.
Sports >> Baseball >> Pitching >> Nolan Ryan
So, if a user decides they want to talk about "Baseball" and they filter the search, I would like to also include 'Sports"
User enters: "baseball"
User is then taken to Sports >> Baseball
Now I understand that this would be impossible without a living - breathing dynamic program that connects those two categories in some way. It would also require 'some' user input initially, and many more inputs throughout the lifetime of the software in order to maintain it and keep it up to date.
But Alas, asking for such an algorithm would be frivolous without detailing very concrete specifics about what I'm trying to do. And i'm not trying to ask for a hand out.
Instead, I am curious if people are aware of similar systems that have already been implemented and if there is documentation out there describing how it has been done. Or even some real life examples of your own projects.
In short, I have a 'plan' but it requires more user input than I really want. I feel getting more info on the subject would be the best course of action before jumping head first into developing this program.
Thanks
IMHO It isn't as hard as you think. What you want is called Tagging and you can do it Automatically just by setting the correlation between tags (i.e. a Tag can have its meaningful information plus its reation with other ones. Then, if user select a Tag well, you related that with others via looking your ADT collection (can be as simple as an array).
Tag:
Sport
Related Tags
Football
Soccer
...
I'm hoping this helps!
It sounds like what you want to do is create a tree/menu structure, and then be able to rapidly retrieve the "breadcrumb" for any given key in the tree.
Here's what I would think:
Create the tree with all the branches. It's okay if you want branches to share keys - as long as you can give the user a "choice" of "Multiple found, please choose which one... ?"
For every key in the tree, generate the breadcrumb. This is time-consuming, and if the tree is very large and updating regularly then it may be something better done offline, in the cloud, or via hadoop, etc.
Store the key and the breadcrumb in a key/value store such as redis, or in memory/cached as desired. You'll want every value to have an array if you want to share keys across categories/branches.
When the user selects a key - the key is looked up in the store, and if the resulting value contains only one match, then you simply construct the breadcrumb to take the user where you want them to go. If it has multiple, you give them a choice.
I would even say, if you need something more organic, say a user can create "new topic" dynamically from anywhere else, then you might want to not use a tree at all after the initial import - instead just update your key/value store in real-time.
For example, when using entity.name in NSPredicate, I needed to change setFetchPredicate to setFilterPredicate, the 1st one was working just fine with XML store, SQLite required 2nd one.
I found: this message but couldn't find anything related in the list archive.
Is there any list with all valid NSPredicate statements?
When garbage collection can cause troubles?
See the section titled "Fetch Predicates and Sort Descriptors" of the Core Data Programming Guide for SQLite-specific limitations.
I'm not aware of any Core-Data-specific limitations in a Garbage-Collection-enabled environment - the reference in the e-mail you posted is news to me. A quick Google search revealed this thread and it's the first I'm hearing of this issue. I certainly never encountered it despite having a similar setup in a compute-intensive app that used Core Data + SQLite store type.
You'll need to be a lot more specific about your first question, however. I'm not sure what you mean.