I want to extend Enumerable methods to my class, so that I can call them directly on my class, and not on class's instance variable i.e. X.objects
class X
include Enumerable
extend Forwardable
#objects ||= []
# tried this, but it doesn't work
# def_delegator self, :count, #objects.count
#def_delegators self, #objects
class << self
attr_accessor :objects
end
def initialize(name)
#name = name
end
def save
self.class.objects << self
end
def self.show
objects
end
end
y = X.new('a')
y.save
z = X.new('b')
z.save
n = X.new('c')
n.save
q = X.new('d')
q.save
p X.show
#p X.count # I want this to work.
I assume you're trying to define delegator on the class level
You may try to define it like this:
class << self
extend Forwardable
attr_accessor :objects
def_delegator :objects, :count
end
I mean, the only difference between your code and this code is extending by Forwardable inside class << self
Related
I'm working to create a few Ruby builder objects, and thinking on how I could reuse some of Ruby's magic to reduce the logic of the builder to a single class/module. It's been ~10 years since my last dance with the language, so a bit rusty.
For example, I have this builder:
class Person
PROPERTIES = [:name, :age]
attr_accessor(*PROPERTIES)
def initialize(**kwargs)
kwargs.each do |k, v|
self.send("#{k}=", v) if self.respond_to?(k)
end
end
def build
output = {}
PROPERTIES.each do |prop|
if self.respond_to?(prop) and !self.send(prop).nil?
value = self.send(prop)
# if value itself is a builder, evalute it
output[prop] = value.respond_to?(:build) ? value.build : value
end
end
output
end
def method_missing(m, *args, &block)
if m.to_s.start_with?("set_")
mm = m.to_s.gsub("set_", "")
if PROPERTIES.include?(mm.to_sym)
self.send("#{mm}=", *args)
return self
end
end
end
end
Which can be used like so:
Person.new(name: "Joe").set_age(30).build
# => {name: "Joe", age: 30}
I would like to be able to refactor everything to a class and/or module so that I could create multiple such builders that'll only need to define attributes and inherit or include the rest (and possibly extend each other).
class BuilderBase
# define all/most relevant methods here for initialization,
# builder attributes and object construction
end
module BuilderHelper
# possibly throw some of the methods here for better scope access
end
class Person < BuilderBase
include BuilderHelper
PROPERTIES = [:name, :age, :email, :address]
attr_accessor(*PROPERTIES)
end
# Person.new(name: "Joe").set_age(30).set_email("joe#mail.com").set_address("NYC").build
class Server < BuilderBase
include BuilderHelper
PROPERTIES = [:cpu, :memory, :disk_space]
attr_accessor(*PROPERTIES)
end
# Server.new.set_cpu("i9").set_memory("32GB").set_disk_space("1TB").build
I've been able to get this far:
class BuilderBase
def initialize(**kwargs)
kwargs.each do |k, v|
self.send("#{k}=", v) if self.respond_to?(k)
end
end
end
class Person < BuilderBase
PROPERTIES = [:name, :age]
attr_accessor(*PROPERTIES)
def build
...
end
def method_missing(m, *args, &block)
...
end
end
Trying to extract method_missing and build into the base class or a module keeps throwing an error at me saying something like:
NameError: uninitialized constant BuilderHelper::PROPERTIES
OR
NameError: uninitialized constant BuilderBase::PROPERTIES
Essentially the neither the parent class nor the mixin are able to access the child class' attributes. For the parent this makes sense, but not sure why the mixin can't read the values inside the class it was included into. This being Ruby I'm sure there's some magical way to do this that I have missed.
Help appreciated - thanks!
I reduced your sample to the required parts and came up with:
module Mixin
def say_mixin
puts "Mixin: Value defined in #{self.class::VALUE}"
end
end
class Parent
def say_parent
puts "Parent: Value defined in #{self.class::VALUE}"
end
end
class Child < Parent
include Mixin
VALUE = "CHILD"
end
child = Child.new
child.say_mixin
child.say_parent
This is how you could access a CONSTANT that lives in the child/including class from the parent/included class.
But I don't see why you want to have this whole Builder thing in the first place. Would an OpenStruct not work for your case?
Interesting question. As mentioned by #Pascal, an OpenStruct might already do what you're looking for.
Still, it might be more concise to explicitly define the setter methods. It might also be clearer to replace the PROPERTIES constants by methods calls. And since I'd expect a build method to return a complete object and not just a Hash, I renamed it to to_h:
class BuilderBase
def self.properties(*ps)
ps.each do |property|
attr_reader property
define_method :"set_#{property}" do |value|
instance_variable_set(:"##{property}", value)
#hash[property] = value
self
end
end
end
def initialize(**kwargs)
#hash = {}
kwargs.each do |k, v|
self.send("set_#{k}", v) if self.respond_to?(k)
end
end
def to_h
#hash
end
end
class Person < BuilderBase
properties :name, :age, :email, :address
end
p Person.new(name: "Joe").set_age(30).set_email("joe#mail.com").set_address("NYC").to_h
# {:name=>"Joe", :age=>30, :email=>"joe#mail.com", :address=>"NYC"}
class Server < BuilderBase
properties :cpu, :memory, :disk_space
end
p Server.new.set_cpu("i9").set_memory("32GB").set_disk_space("1TB").to_h
# {:cpu=>"i9", :memory=>"32GB", :disk_space=>"1TB"}
I think no need to declare PROPERTIES, we can create a general builder like this:
class Builder
attr_reader :build
def initialize(clazz)
#build = clazz.new
end
def self.build(clazz, &block)
builder = Builder.new(clazz)
builder.instance_eval(&block)
builder.build
end
def set(attr, val)
#build.send("#{attr}=", val)
self
end
def method_missing(m, *args, &block)
if #build.respond_to?("#{m}=")
set(m, *args)
else
#build.send("#{m}", *args, &block)
end
self
end
def respond_to_missing?(method_name, include_private = false)
#build.respond_to?(method_name) || super
end
end
Using
class Test
attr_accessor :x, :y, :z
attr_reader :w, :u, :v
def set_w(val)
#w = val&.even? ? val : 0
end
def add_u(val)
#u = val if val&.odd?
end
end
test1 = Builder.build(Test) {
x 1
y 2
z 3
} # <Test:0x000055b6b0fb2888 #x=1, #y=2, #z=3>
test2 = Builder.new(Test).set(:x, 1988).set_w(6).add_u(2).build
# <Test:0x000055b6b0fb23b0 #x=1988, #w=6>
I am building an in-memory instance model in Ruby. There are a bunch of classes that each get instantiated and managed by class methods on that class. There are a bunch of those class methods, e.g. list all instances, retrieve all instances, etc.
The code for these methods is common across all classes and does not need to take any account of any particularities of those classes. Hence, I would like that code to live in a common place. See the list method below. My question: How to best achieve this.
class A
attr_reader :value
##instances = []
def initialize(value:)
#value = value; ##instances << self
end
def self.list
##instances.each { |i| puts "#{i.value}"}
end
end
class B
attr_reader :value
##instances = []
def initialize(value:)
#value = value; ##instances << self
end
def self.list
##instances.each { |i| puts "#{i.value}"}
end
end
A.new(value: '100')
A.new(value: '101')
B.new(value: '200')
B.new(value: '201')
A.list
B.list
Ideally, I define the list method only once. I have also tried moving that to a super-class:
class Entity
def self.list
##instances.each { |i| puts "AB: #{i.value}"}
end
end
class A < Entity
attr_reader :value
##instances = []
def initialize(value:)
#value = value; ##instances << self
end
end
class B < Entity
attr_reader :value
##instances = []
def initialize(value:)
#value = value; ##instances << self
end
end
...but as one would expect the super-class cannot access the ##instances array of its sub-classes. Moving the ##instances array to the super-class results in the array being common to all classes, which is not what I need.
The main change you need to make is to use class instance variables rather than class variables. For reasons explained here class variables should be used sparingly; class instance variables are generally a better choice, as is illustrated nicely by this question.
class Entity
attr_reader :value
class << self
attr_reader :ins
end
def self.inherited(klass)
klass.instance_variable_set(:#ins, [])
end
def initialize(value:)
#value = value
self.class.ins << self
end
def self.list
#ins.each { |i| puts "#{i.value}"}
end
end
class A < Entity; end
class B < Entity; end
A.new(value: '100')
#=> #<A:0x00005754a59dc640 #value="100">
A.new(value: '101')
#=> #<A:0x00005754a59e4818 #value="101">
A.list
# 100
# 101
B.new(value: '200')
#=> #<B:0x00005754a59f0910 #value="200">
B.new(value: '201')
#=> #<B:0x00005754a59f8b88 #value="201">
B.list
# 200
# 201
I defined a getter for the class instance variable #ins in Entity's singleton class1:
class << self
attr_reader :ins
end
When subclasses of Entity are created the callback method Class::inherited is executed on Entity, passing as an argument the class that has been created. inherited creates and initializes (to an empty array) the class instance variable #ins for the class created.
Another way of doing that, without using a callback method, is as follows.
class Entity
attr_reader :value
class << self
attr_accessor :ins
end
def initialize(value:)
#value = value
(self.class.ins ||= []) << self
end
def self.list
#ins.each { |i| puts "#{i.value}"}
end
end
The fragment:
(self.class.ins ||= [])
sets #ins to an empty array if #ins equals nil. If #ins is referenced before it is created, nil is returned, so either way, #ins is set equal to []. In order to execute this statement I needed to change attr_reader :ins to attr_accessor :ins in order to perform the assignment #ins = [] (though I could have used instance_variable_set instead).
Note that if I were to add the line #ins = [] to Entity (as th first line, say), the instance variable #ins would be created for every subclass when the subclass is created, but that instance variable would not be initialized to an empty array, so that line would serve no purpose.
1. Alternatively, one could write, singleton_class.public_send(:attr_reader, :ins).
I have a ruby class, and in one of the methods, it calls an external function, and pass in all instance variables, and continue with the return value. Here is the code:
class MyClass
attr_accessor :name1
attr_accessor :name2
...
attr_accessor :namen
def inner_func():
all_vars = ???? # how to collect all my instance variables into a dict/Hash?
res = out_func(all_vars)
do_more_stuff(res)
end
end
The problem is the instance variables might vary in subclasses. I can't refer them as their names. So, is there a way to do this? Or Am I thinking in a wrong way?
You can use instance_variables to collect them in an Array. You will get all initialized instance variables.
class MyClass
attr_accessor :name1
attr_accessor :name2
...
attr_accessor :namen
def inner_func():
all_vars = instance_variables
res = out_func(all_vars)
do_more_stuff(res)
end
end
You could keep track of all accessors as you create them:
class Receiver
def work(arguments)
puts "Working with #{arguments.inspect}"
end
end
class MyClass
def self.attr_accessor(*arguments)
super
#__attribute_names__ ||= []
#__attribute_names__ += arguments
end
def self.attribute_names
#__attribute_names__
end
def self.inherited(base)
parent = self
base.class_eval do
#__attribute_names__ = parent.attribute_names
end
end
def attributes
self.class.attribute_names.each_with_object({}) do |attribute_name, result|
result[attribute_name] = public_send(attribute_name)
end
end
def work
Receiver.new.work(attributes)
end
attr_accessor :foo
attr_accessor :bar
end
class MySubclass < MyClass
attr_accessor :baz
end
Usage
my_class = MyClass.new
my_class.foo = 123
my_class.bar = 234
my_class.work
# Working with {:foo=>123, :bar=>234}
my_subclass = MySubclass.new
my_subclass.foo = 123
my_subclass.bar = 234
my_subclass.baz = 345
my_subclass.work
# Working with {:foo=>123, :bar=>234, :baz=>345}
attr_accessor does not work on the following code. The error says "undefined method 'things' for Parent:Class (NoMethodError)":
class Parent
##things = []
attr_accessor :things
end
Parent.things << :car
p Parent.things
However the following code works
class Parent
##things = []
def self.things
##things
end
def things
##things
end
end
Parent.things << :car
p Parent.things
attr_accessor defines accessor methods for an instance. If you want class level auto-generated accessors you could use it on the metaclass
class Parent
#things = []
class << self
attr_accessor :things
end
end
Parent.things #=> []
Parent.things << :car
Parent.things #=> [:car]
but note that this creates a class level instance variable not a class variable. This is likely what you want anyway, as class variables behave differently than you might expect when dealing w/ inheritance. See "Class and Instance Variables In Ruby".
attr_accessor generates accessors for instance variables. Class variables in Ruby are a very different thing, and they are usually not what you want. What you probably want here is a class instance variable. You can use attr_accessor with class instance variables like so:
class Something
class << self
attr_accessor :things
end
end
Then you can write Something.things = 12 and it will work.
Just some clarification: class variables won't be accessible using attr_accessor. It's all about instance variables:
class SomeClass
class << self
attr_accessor :things
end
#things = []
end
because in Ruby, class is an instance of the class "Class" (God, I love to say that) and attr_accessor sets accessor methods for instance variables.
This is probably the simplest way.
class Parent
def self.things
##things ||= []
end
end
Parent.things << :car
p Parent.things
Аlso note that a singleton method is a method only for a single object. In Ruby, a Class is also an object, so it too can have singleton methods! So be aware of when you might be calling them.
Example:
class SomeClass
class << self
def test
end
end
end
test_obj = SomeClass.new
def test_obj.test_2
end
class << test_obj
def test_3
end
end
puts "Singleton methods of SomeClass"
puts SomeClass.singleton_methods
puts '------------------------------------------'
puts "Singleton methods of test_obj"
puts test_obj.singleton_methods
Singleton methods of SomeClass
test
Singleton methods of test_obj
test_2
test_3
Parent.class_variable_get(:##things)
That would be the built-in way. In most cases this should be sufficient I think. No need to have a class variable accessor in the instance.
class Parent
#things = []
singleton_class.send(:attr_accessor, :things)
end
This pattern is most useful when you are defining accessors dynamically or creating them inside a method:
class Foo
def self.add_accessor(name)
singleton_class.send(:attr_accessor, name)
end
end
Foo.add_accessor :things
Foo.things = [:car]
Foo.things # => [:car]
I'm trying to make a method similar to attr_reader but I can't seem to get the instance of the class that the method gets called in.
class Module
def modifiable_reader(*symbols)
# Right here is where it returns Klass instead of #<Klass:0x1df25e0 #readable="this">
mod = self
variables = symbols.collect { |sym| ("#" << sym.to_s).to_sym }
attr_reader *symbols
(class << ModifyMethods; self; end).instance_eval do
define_method(*symbols) do
mod.instance_variable_get(*variables)
end
end
end
end
class Object
module ModifyMethods; end
def modify(&block)
ModifyMethods.instance_eval(&block)
end
end
class Klass
modifiable_reader :readable
def initialize
#readable = "this"
end
end
my_klass = Klass.new
my_klass.modify do
puts "Readable: " << readable.to_s
end
I'm not sure what it is you're trying to do.
If it helps, the spell for attr_reader is something like this:
#!/usr/bin/ruby1.8
module Kernel
def my_attr_reader(symbol)
eval <<-EOS
def #{symbol}
##{symbol}
end
EOS
end
end
class Foo
my_attr_reader :foo
def initialize
#foo = 'foo'
end
end
p Foo.new.foo # => "foo"
What I can understand from your code is that you want to have the modify block to respond to the instance methods of Klass, that's as simple as:
class Klass
attr_reader :modifiable
alias_method :modify, :instance_eval
def initialize(m)
#modifiable = m
end
end
Klass.new('john').modify do
puts 'Readable %s' % modifiable
end
About this tidbit of code:
def modifiable_reader(*symbols)
# Right here is where it returns Klass instead of #<Klass:0x1df25e0 #readable="this">
mod = self
...
Probably this can give you a hint of what is going on:
Class.superclass # => Module
Klass.instance_of?(Class) # => true
Klass = Class.new do
def hello
'hello'
end
end
Klass.new.hello # => 'hello'
When you are adding methods to the Module class, you are also adding methods to the Class class, which will add an instance method to instances of Class (in this case your class Klass), at the end this means you are adding class methods on your Klass class