I have two projects. One is just a client¹ that does http request to an external service. The other is a Rest API.
The client¹ reads an url configured in its own application.yml, but when I add a dependency (through pom.xml) to this client in the Rest API project, it no longer reads that property (it is null).
I want it to read from its own application.yml, so that I have a default value (that can be overridden later if necessary). How can I do that?
¹ The client is defined like this:
#Component
#ConfigurationProperties("app.client.notification")
public class NotificationClient {
private String url; // comes from application.yml.
// Works fine in the client project,
// and DOESN'T in the Rest project
}
You need to explicitly define the location of that .yml file somewhere in the code a'la #PropertySource("classpath:/application.yml"). I don't know about naming conflicts though, you need to experiment with it yourself.
Related
I have a spring boot project that depends on one of the 3rd party SDK libraries which contains a YAML file with some google cloud URLs.
I want to override those values within my YAML, this works for most of my project but for some reason no luck with this perticular dependency lib.
The Dependency Code
#ConfigurationProperties("google")
public class GoogleProperties {
String url;
..
..
}
Yaml file application-google-prod.yaml
google:
url: some url.
Say this is in a jar called google-client-sdk-1.0.0
My Code
Yaml file application-myapp-prod.yaml
spring:
profiles:
include: google-prod
google:
url: OVERRIDE url.
So I am expecting that the OVERRIDE url should be used when the code in the lib is invoked, but instead it continues to use some url from jar file's yaml.
any pointers?
EDIT
The SDK contains another class
class with the following annotations in the SDK
#Configuation
#PropertySource({"classpath:application-google-prod.yaml})
I think this is forcing SDK to pick the value from the specific YAML ignoring overridden value in the YAML from my app.
Disclaimer:
A is have no mean reproducing your issue, this is just a suggestion.
Notice the absence of #Configuration on GoogleProperties.
You have to either add #Configuration on the properties class:
(impossible in this case) or add #EnableConfigurationProperties(GoogleProperties.class) on top of the class where you want to use the properties.
E.g: Your main class if you want to use them in all the app.
As mentioned in the docs, you can also use:
#ConfigurationPropertiesScan({ "com.google.SDK", "org.acme.another" }) on top of your main class or any #Configuration class where you need those props.
Note: As explained here, the fact that as of spring-boot 2.2 we didn't need any more #Configuration or #EnableConfigurationProperties for the configuration properties feature is outdated.
I am building an app that mostly provide REST services, nothing fancy. since my data consumed by the app can have multiple languages I thought about using the bundle files.
I created 3 files, one with the default file name and another two with specific languages. The files created using intellij IDE I am using.
I followed this guide https://www.baeldung.com/java-resourcebundle however on each run I am getting:
MissingResourceException: Can't find bundle for base name tp_app_strings, locale en_US
I tried numerous articles but none of them seems to resolve the issue.
One fun fact is that if I am using the #Value("classpath:tp_app_strings.properties") on a 'Resource' field I am able to get a reference to that file, so it spring is able to find it.
Additional thing that I tried was to create a WEB-INF directory and place the files there (read it in some article) but still no positive affect
The project structure is quite straight forward:
Spring boot version 2.2 running tomcat.
Any suggeestions would be highly appriciated
You can load the .properties file to the application context using #PropertySource annotation instead using #Value to load the .properties file to a org.springframework.core.io.Resource instance.
The usage;
#Configuration
#PropertySource("classpath:tp_app_strings.properties")
public class DefaultProperties {
#Value("${property1.name}") // Access properties in the above file here using SpringEL.
private String prop1;
#Value("${property2.name}")
private String prop2;
}
You wouldn't need java.util.ResourceBundle access properties this way. Use different or same class to load other .properties files as well.
Update 1:
In order to have the functionality of java.util.ResourceBundle, you can't just use org.springframework.core.io.Resource class. This class or non of it sub-classes don't provide functions to access properties by its name java.util.ResourceBundle whatsoever.
However, if you want a functionality like java.util.ResourceBundle, you could implement something custom like this using org.springframework.core.io.Resource;
#Configuration
public class PropertyConfig {
#Value("classpath:tp_app_strings.properties")
private Resource defaultProperties;
#Bean("default-lang")
public java.util.Properties getDefaultProperties() throws IOException {
Properties props = new Properties();
props.load(defaultProperties.getInputStream());
return props;
}
}
Make sure to follow correct naming convention when define the property file as java.util.Properties#load(InputStream) expect that.
Now you can #Autowire and use this java.util.Properties bean wherever you want just like with java.util.ResourceBundle using java.util.Properties#getProperty(String) or its overloaded counterpart.
I think it's problem of you properties file naming convention. use underline "_" for specifying locale of file like
filename_[languageCode]_[regionCode]
[languageCode] and [regionCode] are two letters standard code that [regionCode] section is optional
about code abbrivation standard take a look on this question
in your case change file name to tp_app_strings_en_US.properties
I am new to Spring Boot and I am doing code cleanup for my old Spring Boot application.
Below code is using #Value annotation to inject filed value from properties file.
#Value("${abc.local.configs.filepath}")
private String LOCAL_ABC_CONFIGS_XML_FILEPATH;
My doubt is instead of getting value from properties file, can we not directly hardcode the value in same java class variable?
Example: private String LOCAL_ABC_CONFIGS_XML_FILEPATH="/abc/config/abc.txt"
It would be easier for me to modify the values in future as it will be in same class.
What is advantage of reading from properties file, does it make the code decoupled ?
This technique is called as externalising configurations. You are absolutely right that you can have your constants defined in the very same class files. But, sometimes, your configurations are volatile or may change with respect to the environment being deployed to.
For Example:
Scene 1:
I have a variables for DB connection details which will change with the environment. Remember, you will create a build out of your application and deploy it first to Dev, then take same build to stage and finally to the production.
Having your configurations defined externally, helps you to pre-define them at environment level and have same build being deployed everywhere.
Scene 2:
You have already generated a build and deployed and found something was incorrect with the constants. Having those configurations externalised gives you a liberty to just override it on environment level and change without rebuilding your application.
To understand more about externalising techniques read: https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/html/boot-features-external-config.html
Here #value is used for reading the values from properties file (it could be a any environment like dev, qa, prod) but we are writing #value on multiple fields it is not recomonded so thats instead of #value we can use #configurableProperties(prefix="somevalue>) and read the property values suppose `
#configurableProperties(prefix="somevalue")
class Foo{
string name;
string address;
}
application.properties:
somevalue.name="your name"
somevalue.address="your address"
`
I have develop a new Connector. This connector requires to be configured with two parameters, lets say:
default_trip_timeout_milis
default_trip_threshold
Challenge is, I want read ${myValue_a} and ${myValue_a} from an API, using an HTTP call, not from a file or inline values.
Since this is a connector, I need to make this API call somewhere before connectors are initialized.
FlowVars aren't an option, since they are initialized with the Flows, and this is happening before in the Mule app life Cycle.
My idea is to create an Spring Bean implementing Initialisable, so it will be called before Connectors are init, and here, using any java based libs (Spring RestTemplate?) , call API, get values, and store them somewhere (context? objectStore?) , so the connector can access them.
Make sense? Any other ideas?
Thanks!
mmm you could make a class that will create the properties in the startup and in this class obtain the API properties via http request. Example below:
public class PropertyInit implements InitializingBean,FactoryBean {
private Properties props = new Properties();
#Override
public Object getObject() throws Exception {
return props;
}
#Override
public Class getObjectType() {
return Properties.class;
}
}
Now you should be able to load this property class with:
<context:property-placeholder properties-ref="propertyInit"/>
Hope you like this idea. I used this approach in a previous project.
I want to give you first a strong warning on doing this. If you go down this path then you risk breaking your application in very strange ways because if any other components depend on this component you are having dynamic components on startup, you will break them, and you should think if there are other ways to achieve this behaviour instead of using properties.
That said the way to do this would be to use a proxy pattern, which is a proxy for the component you recreate whenever its properties are changed. So you will need to create a class which extends Circuit Breaker, which encapsulates and instance of Circuit Breaker which is recreated whenever its properties change. These properties must not be used outside of the proxy class as other components may read these properties at startup and then not refresh, you must keep this in mind that anything which might directly or indirectly access these properties cannot do so in their initialisation phase or your application will break.
It's worth taking a look at SpringCloudConfig which allows for you to have a properties server and then all your applications can hot-reload those properties at runtime when they change. Not sure if you can take that path in Mule if SpringCloud is supported yet but it's a nice thing to know exists.
I'm using spring-boot-starter-data-rest and spring-boot-starter-web.
I've made a simple project using a CrudRepository, letting spring boot generate the rest request mappings.
Now, I want to add a client -- making the rest calls -- live under ./.
Hence, I'm trying to prefix the paths for the rest calls (and only those!) with /api.
I've tried the answers from :
How to specify prefix for all controllers in Spring Boot?
using settings in the application.properties file
server.contextPath=/api/*
spring.data.rest.basePath=/api/*.
But still the static content (e.g. index.html, *.js, *.css) is not fetched using ./. There urls are also prefixed by "/api/".
The rest calls are properly served under /api/foos.
Is there a way to tell spring not to treat urls that lead to sources located in src/main/resources/public as 'rest-controllers'?
Update
Setting the property
spring.data.rest.basePath=/api/*
works perfectly. (I still had a programmatic bean configuration in my sandbox overriding this setting).
Spring controllers are made for serving both HTML and JSON/XML. The first one is done via Spring MVC Views and some template engine like Thymeleaf, the latter is handled entirely by Spring and #RestController.
There's no way to have a context path for only the controllers that returns JSON or XML data, and not for the other controllers as well, this also goes for static content. What you typically do is have some static variable containing the prefix you want for your APIs, and the use that in the controller's #RequestMapping. i.e.
#RestController
#RequestMapping(MyConstants.API_LATEST + "/bookings")
public class MyBookingsController {
...
}
You probably want to approach the prefix problem with something along these lines anyway. It is common to have to support older API versions when you have breaking changes, at least for some time.