I am running parse server in NodeJS environment with express.
Generally, Parse automatically figures out which data has changed so only “dirty” fields will be sent to the Parse Cloud. So, I don’t need to worry about squashing data that I didn’t intend to update.
But why this following code is saving new data every time instead of updating the existing document data with name "Some Name".
// Parse code
Parse.initialize(keys.parseAppID);
Parse.serverURL = keys.parseServerURL;
var GameScore = Parse.Object.extend("GameScore");
var gameScore = new GameScore();
let data = {
playerName: "Some Name",
score: 2918,
cheatMode: true
};
gameScore.save(data, {
success: (gameScore) => {
// let q = new Parse.Query("GameScore");
// q.get(gameScore.id)
console.log("ID: " + gameScore.id)
},
error: function (gameScore, error) {
// Execute any logic that should take place if the save fails.
// error is a Parse.Error with an error code and message.
alert('Failed to create new object, with error code: ' + error.message);
}
});
// End of Parse code
The problem is that you're executing the query to find which object you want to update, but then you're not using the results when you go to save data.
query.first({ // This will result in just one object returned
success: (result) => {
// Check to make sure a result exists
if (result) {
result.save(data, {
// Rest of code
Note: You're treating playerName as a unique key. If multiple users can have the same playerName attribute, then there will be bugs. You can use id instead which is guaranteed to be unique. If you use id instead, you can utilize Parse.Query.get
Edit:
Since you want to update an existing object, you must specify its id.
var GameScore = Parse.Object.extend("GameScore");
var gameScore = new GameScore();
gameScore.id = "ID"; // This id should be the id of the object you want to update
Related
I am not able to display records on my report.
Report Source: Group Approval(sysapproval_group) table
Condition:Sys Id - is one of - javascript: new GetMyGroupApprovals().getSysIds();
Script Include : MyGroupApproval
Note : Active is checked, Accesible is all application score & Client callable unchecked
var GetMyGroupApprovals = Class.create();
GetMyGroupApprovals.prototype = {
initialize: function() {
},
getSysIds : function getMyGroupMembers(){
var ga = new GlideRecord('sysapproval_group');
ga.addQuery('parent.sys_class_name', '=', 'change_request');
ga.query();
gs.log("TotalRecords1 Before:: " + ga.getRowCount());
var sysIdArray = [];
while(ga.next()){
sysIdArray.push(ga.sys_id);
}
return sysIdArray;
},
type: 'GetMyGroupApprovals'
};
Kindly note that I have to achieve with script approach. I am not able to get records on my report.
This line is probably causing unexpected behavior:
sysIdArray.push(ga.sys_id);
ga.sys_id returns a GlideElement object, which changes for each of the iterations in the GlideRecord, so the contents of sysIdArray will just be an instance of the same object for each row in the result set, but the value will just be the last row in the set.
You need to make sure you push a string to the array by using one of the following methods:
sysIdArray.push(ga.sys_id+''); // implicitly call toString
sysIdArray.push(ga.getValue('sys_id')); // return string value
Quick suggestion, you can use the following to get sys_ids as well:
sysIdArray.push(ga.getUniqueValue());
I have an online Parse.com database and I can create objects and query them but not update. In the Xamarin section of the Parse.com documentation it only tells you how to update an object directly after you've created it which I don't want to do. I tried adapting what the documentation says for other platforms but it hasn't worked, I have also tried querying the database and entering the new field values directly after that but it treats them as separate functions. Does anyone have any help?
Parse.com documentation:
// Create the object.
var gameScore = new ParseObject("GameScore")
{
{ "score", 1337 },
{ "playerName", "Sean Plott" },
{ "cheatMode", false },
{ "skills", new List<string> { "pwnage", "flying" } },
};
await gameScore.SaveAsync();
// Now let's update it with some new data. In this case, only cheatMode
// and score will get sent to the cloud. playerName hasn't changed.
gameScore["cheatMode"] = true;
gameScore["score"] = 1338;
await gameScore.SaveAsync();
What I tried most recently:
ParseQuery<ParseObject> query = ParseObject.GetQuery("cust_tbl");
IEnumerable<ParseObject> customers = await query.FindAsync();
customers["user"] = admin;
record["score"] = 1338;
await record;
In your example, you are getting an list (IEnumerable) of objects instead of single object. Instead, try something like this:
ParseQuery<ParseObject> query = ParseObject.GetQuery("cust_tbl");
// you need to keep track of the ObjectID assigned when you first saved,
// otherwise you will have to query by some unique field like email or username
ParseObject customer = await query.GetAsync(objectId);
customer["user"] = admin;
customer["score"] = 1338;
await customer.SaveAsync();
I am building a Chrome extension which should write new rows into a Google Spreadsheet. I manage to read the sheet content but am not able to write an additional row. Currently my error is "400 (Bad Request)". Any idea what I am doing wrong here?
I have gone through the Google Sheets API documentation and other posted questions here but was not able to find any solution.
Here is the code which I use to GET the sheet content (this works):
function loadSpreadsheet(token) {
var y = new XMLHttpRequest();
y.open('GET', 'https://spreadsheets.google.com/feeds/list/spreadsheet_id/default/private/values?access_token=' + token);
y.onload = function() {
console.log(y.response);
};
y.send();
}
And this is the code I try to POST a new row (gives me "400 - Bad Request"):
function appendRow(token){
function constructAtomXML(foo){
var atom = ["<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>",
'<entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:gsx="http://schemas.google.com/spreadsheets/2006/extended">',//'--END_OF_PART\r\n',
'<gsx:name>',foo,'</gsx:name>',//'--END_OF_PART\r\n',
'</entry>'].join('');
return atom;
};
var params = {
'body': constructAtomXML("foo")
};
url = 'https://spreadsheets.google.com/feeds/list/spreadsheet_id/default/private/full?alt=json&access_token=' + token;
var z = new XMLHttpRequest();
z.open("POST", url, true);
z.setRequestHeader("Content-type", "application/atom+xml");
z.setRequestHeader("GData-Version", "3.0");
z.setRequestHeader("Authorization", 'Bearer '+ token);
z.onreadystatechange = function() {//Call a function when the state changes.
if(z.readyState == 4 && z.status == 200) {
alert(z.responseText);
}
}
z.send(params);
}
Note: spreadsheet_id is a placeholder for my actual sheet ID.
Follow the protocol and to make it work.
Assume spreadsheet ID is '1TCLgzG-AFsERoibIUOUUE8aNftoE7476TWYKqXQ0xb8'
First use the spreadsheet ID to retrieve list of worksheets:
GET https://spreadsheets.google.com/feeds/worksheets/1TCLgzG-AFsERoibIUOUUE8aNftoE7476TWYKqXQ0xb8/private/full?alt=json
There you can read list of worksheets and their IDs. Let use the first worksheet from the example. You'll find its id in feed > entry[0] > link array. Look for "rel" equal 'http://schemas.google.com/spreadsheets/2006#listfeed'.
In my example the URL for this worksheet is (Worksheet URL): https://spreadsheets.google.com/feeds/list/1TCLgzG-AFsERoibIUOUUE8aNftoE7476TWYKqXQ0xb8/ofs6ake/private/full
Now, to read its content use:
GET [Worksheet URL]?alt=json
Besides list-row feed, you'll also find a "post" URL which should be used to alter spreadsheet using list-row feed. It's the one where "rel" equals "http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#post" under feed > link.
It happens that it is the same URL as for GET request. In my case: https://spreadsheets.google.com/feeds/list/1TCLgzG-AFsERoibIUOUUE8aNftoE7476TWYKqXQ0xb8/ofs6ake/private/full. Just be sure to not append alt=json.
Now, to insert a new row using list-row feed you need to send POST with payload which is specified in docs. You need to send a column name prefixed with "gsx:" as a tag name. However it may not be the same as the column name in the spreadsheet. You need to remove any white-spaces, make it all lowercase and without any national characters. So to make your example work you need to replace <gsx:Name> with <gsx:name>.
Before the change you probably had the following payload message:
Blank rows cannot be written; use delete instead.
It's because the API didn't understand what the "Name" is and it just dropped this part of entry from the request. Without it there were no more items and the row was blank.
Alternatively you can read column names from the GET response. Keys from objects in feed > entry array that begins with gsk$ are columns definitions (everything after $ sign is a column name).
=================================================================
EDIT
To answer a question from the comments.
I've changed two things from your example:
function appendRow(token){
function constructAtomXML(foo){
var atom = ["<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>",
'<entry xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:gsx="http://schemas.google.com/spreadsheets/2006/extended">',
'<gsx:name>',foo,'</gsx:name>',
'</entry>'].join('');
return atom;
};
/*
var params = {
'body': constructAtomXML("foo")
};
*/
var params = constructAtomXML("foo");
url = 'https://spreadsheets.google.com/feeds/list/'+spredsheetId+'/default/private/full?alt=json&access_token=' + token;
var z = new XMLHttpRequest();
z.open("POST", url, true);
z.setRequestHeader("Content-type", "application/atom+xml");
z.setRequestHeader("GData-Version", "3.0");
z.setRequestHeader("Authorization", 'Bearer '+ token);
z.onreadystatechange = function() {//Call a function when the state changes.
if(z.readyState == 4 && z.status == 200) {
alert(z.responseText);
}
}
z.send(params);
}
1) <gsx:Name> to <gsx:name>. Without it you'll receive an error.
2) params object should be a String! Not an object with some 'body' key. You just need to pass a value you want to send to the server.
I have a custom object Team in Parse with a relation field for the default User object. What I would like to do is retrieve all User objects which are not related to any Team object. Can anyone point me in the right direction on how to do this using the JavaScript SDK? I've been going over the documentation for the Query object but I can't find anything.
Perhaps another type of relation, or placing the relation at another place is a better solution. What I want to accomplish is the following: Each user is allowed to be in one team and one team only. In addition I need to be able to query the following information from Parse:
I want to retrieve the User objects of all the users assigned to a team
I want to retrieve the User objects of all the users who are not assigned to any team
I have tried using a join table with both the user and team object ids. Then I tried to following query to get all users not assigned to a team:
var teammember = Parse.Object.extend('TeamMember'),
query = new Parse.Query("User");
var innerQuery = new Parse.Query("TeamMember");
query.doesNotMatchQuery('user', innerQuery);
query.find({
success: function(results) {
response.success(results);
},
error : function(error) {
response.error(error);
}
})
But this just gets me the following response: error: "{"code":102,"message":"bad type for $notInQuery"}".
I like the Relation type as I can add or remove multiple members at once with a single call to the REST API. I also have no problems retrieving the information on team members when using the Relation type to connect the users to the teams. It is just getting the users which are not assigned to any team that is giving me problems.
It doesn't sound like you need a relation at all. Instead, add a Pointer column to User that points to Team. It ensures that a User can only belong to one team, and your other requirements can be captured as follows.
// All users assigned to a team
query = new Parse.Query('User');
query.exists('team');
// All users assigned to a specific team
query = new Parse.Query('User');
query.equalTo('team', specificTeam);
// All unassigned users
query = new Parse.Query('User');
query.doesNotExist('team');
Update: If you need to support multiple teams per User in the future, then I would suggest creating a Parse table called Membership with two columns: a Pointer to User and a Pointer to Team. This essentially gives you more control than relying on Parse relations, but it gets a little more complicated.
_ = require('underscore'); // Or lodash
// All users assigned to a team
query = new Parse.Query('Membership');
query.find().then(function (results) {
// http://underscorejs.org/#uniq
users = _.uniq(results, false, function (user) { return user.id; });
});
// All users assigned to a specific team
query = new Parse.Query('Membership');
query.equalTo('team', specificTeam);
// All unassigned users
var assignedUsers = []
var unassignedUsers = []
memberQuery = new Parse.Query('Membership');
userQuery = new Parse.Query('User');
memberQuery.find().then(function (memberResults) {
// http://underscorejs.org/#map
var ids = _.map(memberResults, function (user) { return user.id; });
// http://underscore.js.org/#uniq
assignedUsers = _.uniq(ids);
userQuery.find();
}).then(function (userResults) {
var users = _.map(userResults, function (user) { return user.id; });
// http://underscorejs.org/#difference
unassignedUsers = _.difference(users, assignedUsers);
});
To add and remove Users to/from Teams, you would create Membership objects and save API calls with Parse.Object.saveAll() and Parse.Object.destroyAll().
I ran into trouble with the answer provided by Seth. When retrieving the users not assigned to a team the difference between the two arrays would be incorrect. I am assuming this is due to the assignedUsers having object of type Membership and userResults being of type User. This would make it impossible for underscore to make a proper match.
I would up using this as my Cloud Code:
Parse.Cloud.define("getTeamlessUsers", function(request, response) {
var _ = require("underscore"),
assignedUsers = [],
companyUsers = [],
memberQuery = new Parse.Query("TeamMembers"),
userQuery = new Parse.Query("User"),
index,
ubound;
memberQuery.find().then(function(memberResults) {
// Make sure each User ID will appear just once
memberResults = _.unique(memberResults, false, function(item) { return item.get('user').id; });
// Loop over the unique team members and push the User ID into the array
for (index = 0, ubound = memberResults.length; index < ubound; index++) {
var user = memberResults[index].get("user");
assignedUsers.push(user.id);
}
// Get al the users
return userQuery.find();
}).then(function(userResults) {
// Loop over all the users and push the ID into the array
for (index = 0, ubound = userResults.length; index < ubound; index++) {
companyUsers.push(userResults[index].id);
}
// Create an array of user IDs which are not present in the assignedUsers array
var result = _.difference(companyUsers, assignedUsers);
// Return the IDs of user not assigned to any team
response.success(result);
}).fail(function(error) {
response.error(error);
});
});
When I use the code below to access a class row for the current user?
Parse reports that the function returns a data set thus:
{"user":{"__type":"Pointer""className":"_User""objectId":"NFYHCP6Ftw"}
"known_fieldname":"Value"
"known_fn2":"value2"
"known_fn3":"value3"
"objectId":"obFbHtMW4E"
"createdAt":"2014-09-16T15:47:55.047Z"
"updatedAt":"2014-09-16T16:10:55.318Z"
"__type":"Object"
"className":"Answers"}
Parse CloudCode:
Parse.Cloud.define("Answers", function(request, response) {
var query = new Parse.Query("Answers");
query.equalTo("user", Parse.User.current());
query.first({
success: function(obj) {
// kick out "value"...
console.log("A field I know="+obj.get("known_fieldname"));
// this for loop doesn't loop thru the field "keys" and "values"
// what do I replace it with?
for (var key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
console.log("Answer="+obj.get(key));
// add to a dictionary to return to caller
}
}
response.success(obj);
},
error: function() {
response.error("Failed to get any answers.");
}
});
});
To get a list of keys for an Object one needs to do this:
var keys = Object.keys(obj.toJSON());
One can then loop thru keys thus:
for (var key in keys) { ...
I think the Parse developers assumed one would know the names of fields within a Parse class and so didn't provide (yet) a clean API to access them.