Is there support for embedded arrays in form? Like list of emails or phone numbers (these entities do not exist as standalone resource so it is impossible to use Reference* fields/inputs). SelectArrayInput looks promising, but it needs to know in advance possible options which is not the case (maybe there is an easy way to modify it to accept any option after hiting an enter button?).
Not currently, you'll have to make a custom input. If you do, please make it an addon and we'll reference it in the documentation.
Also note that someone started an addon about this: https://github.com/marmelab/admin-on-rest/pull/697
Related
since google did not create extensive documentation for their API Linter and I cannot find anything from other sources, i wanted to ask here.
From what exactly am i supposed to create protofiles and what do they represent?
As I understood, these protofiles get checked for compliance to their AIPs.
I'm interested in creating a automatic prototype (Java) to check for customized API Rules and am thinking about using Protobufer for this goal. Would this be a pragmatic solution?
Thank you!
As I now understand, Googles API Linter isn't supposed to check a API or a different API specification for compliance.
It checks proto files because they are themself the API specification and can be converted to Code. But before converting them they can be checked against rules they have to comply with.
These rules are not in the protofiles (as I initially thought) but in the many GO-files under rules/ .
Please correct me if you read this and find mistakes! Thanks!
Can aws-lex be used to build a conversation flow bot?
For example:
Thank you very much!
Reason for all this: So we have our own "dialogue builder" and "bot-service".
Our own "Dialogue Builder": is maybe similar to Amazon Connect dialogue builder, and our own "Bot-service" is similar to Microsoft bot framework. Before we were using microsoft-luis to get "intention" of a sentence while using our own dialogue builder and our own bot-service to build a conversation/dialogues flow like if a user says "yes" then go to another flow and if a user says "no" then go to different flow (can this be done in slots?) === Binary tree :)
So now we are switching from luis to aws-lex and trying to think if it is possible to just use aws-lex UI and not our (dialogue builder/bot-service) anymore. But what I am understanding is that to use aws-lex without some kind of dialogue builder we would need to write alot of if/case statements if it contains large data, right? what is your suggestion? One way would be to just use "Amazon Connect" to utilize their dialogue builder so we don't have to write alot of if statements but then if we are using dialogue builder we can just use our own (old one) dialogue builder? what do you think?
Questions:
1)Is there a way to do something like this in aws-lex or not? I tried using slots/prompts/lambda but I am not able to go to 2nd or 3rd level depth in diagram. can be done somehow?
2) Do I have to use lambda and use "switch/if conditions each time it has to change the flow (ex: if answer is yes then reply this, and if no then reply this)?
3) If #2 is true, then is it possible for it to be used by non-developer. Even if I write if/conditions ~1k - 2k if conditions, then if a person (non-developer) tries to edit a dialogue/or-something through UI won't able to do it, right? (So does this mean that we are't really using UI of aws-lex, we are just writing "if conditions" in programming + using aws-lex "intention" to get intention, right?
4) Would it be possible to give example and show how making a flow is possible? So far using slots replies/responses don't change based on user's input. It doesn't matter if users says "no" or says "yes" it is going to reply with same path/answer. Is there a way to change reply based on user's input.
5) If #3 is not possible (non-developer) can't use aws-lex UI to make something like this, should we use custom dialogue builder which does this?
Thank you very very much!
It sounds like you're switching from the Microsoft Bot Framework to find a simpler solution to structured flows without entity recognition.
You may want research Microsoft's QnAMaker multi-turn ability. It's supported in the QnA Maker online editor, but not in the bot framework SDK (yet). They do have an example bot that uses it through the Web API.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/qnamaker/how-to/multiturn-conversation
I realize this doesn't answer you Lex question, but might address your concern.
we have just added Application Insights to our WebAPI 2.2 application and it looks like a winner.
However, we have some controllers that receive sensitive information that we cannot store due to compliance regulations, even in Application Insights. We want to capture information level trace events on some of our controllers, but we need to not capture or obscure the information when sent through other controllers. Can anyone suggest a way that we can achieve that?
Since you're using the Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.TraceListener package, I don't think there's any way to directly filter the data. If you can add something special to the Trace.WriteXxx() call, then one option might be to implement a TraceFilter and register it through your configuration for the ApplicationInsights Trace Writer.
Then in your TraceFilter.ShouldTrace(), you could check for that special value (maybe it's the event ID, maybe some prefix in the trace message, or something like that) and simply return false to cause it to be skipped.
I asked the same question on the Azure MS website and got a reply that works well.
Anyone looking here for an answer should look there.
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/app-insights-get-started/#comment-2309233065
I'm using Spring shell to develop command shell for my project.
the problem is as i described below:
i need to have some functionality like method overloading in shell. in other words i need to have two commands with same name but different options.
I googled it and found some ideas like overriding parser interface, but i did not find any samples over internet.
any suggestions will be helpful.
Thank for your help.
You need to implement org.springframework.shell.core.Converter and add #Component to it.
I've searched around online but can't find what I'm after. Basically, during an install, we fire off a separate executable that basically brute forces a few folders to be read/write enabled for the user group "EVERYONE".
Now, the person that wrote this never took into consideration system language. I had a call with a customer in France that kept failing installation because "EVERYONE" isn't what we would expect.
I'm after an API call to Windows that would return a security group name which would be "safe" to use in a localized environment. Essentially I'm looking to safely edit this code so instead of hardcoding in "EVERYONE", we call a function instead.
The fundamental mistake here is not so much the use of EVERYONE, but rather that the code is using names at all. Instead of using names you should use the well-known SIDs. In your case you need S-1-1-0.